Left Atrial Remodeling Related to Disproportionately Low B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Acute Heart Failure Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

The diagnostic performance of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) for acute heart failure (HF) is impaired in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Increased AF burden in HF is associated with left atrial (LA) remodeling. Recent studies have revealed that LA remodeling may affect LV filling. We hypothesized that LA remodeling affects BNP secretion in acute HF conditions. The study investigated the clinical impact of LA remodeling on admission BNP levels in acute HF patients with and without AF. Consecutive acute HF hospitalized patients (n = 899) were divided into groups with (n = 382) or without AF (n = 507) and subdivided into disproportionately low BNP (LB) (≤200 pg/ml), medium BNP (200 to 600 pg/ml) and high BNP (≥600 pg/ml) subgroups. The AF group had a higher proportion of patients with LB than the non-AF group (23.6% vs 16.6%, p = 0.009). BNP levels in both groups were positively correlated with LV end-diastolic volume and negatively correlated with LV ejection fraction in both groups. In contrast, BNP was positively correlated with LA volume index in the non-AF group, but negatively correlated in the AF group. The survival rates were significantly higher in the LB group than in the other groups in non-AF. Conversely, there were no significant differences across all groups in AF patients. In conclusion, in patients with acute HF and AF, disproportionately low BNP levels are associated with LA structural remodeling and poor prognosis.

Prognostic impact of a reduction in the fibrosis-4 index among patients hospitalized with acute heart failure.

Although the fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) is associated with right atrial pressure or prognosis in acute heart failure (AHF), the prognostic impact of its reduction during hospitalization remains uncertain. We included 877 patients (age, 74.9 ± 12.0 years; 58% male) hospitalized with AHF. The reduction in FIB-4 was defined as: (FIB-4 on admission-FIB-4 at discharge)/FIB-4 on admission × 100. Patients were divided into low (< 1.0%, n = 293), middle (1.0-27.4%, n = 292), and high (> 27.4%, n = 292) FIB-4 reduction groups. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death or heart failure rehospitalization within 180 days. The median FIB-4 reduction was 14.7% (interquartile range - 7.8-34.9%). The primary outcome was observed in 79 (27.0%), 63 (21.6%), and 41 (14.0%) patients in the low, middle, and high FIB-4 reduction groups, respectively (P = 0.001). Adjusted Cox proportional-hazards analysis revealed that the middle and low FIB-4 reduction groups were associated with the primary outcome, independent of the pre-existing risk model including baseline FIB-4 ([high vs. middle] hazard ratio [HR]: 1.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10-2,63, P = 0.017; [high vs. low] HR: 2.16, 95% CI 1.41-3.32, P < 0.001). FIB-4 reduction provided additional prognostic value to the baseline model, including well-known prognostic factors ([continuous net reclassification improvement] 0.304; 95% CI 0.139-0.464; P < 0.001; [integrated discrimination improvement] 0.011; 95% CI 0.004-0.017; P = 0.001). Additionally, the combination of the reduction in FIB-4 and brain natriuretic peptide was useful for risk stratification. In conclusion, among patients hospitalized with AHF, a greater FIB-4 reduction during hospitalization was associated with better prognoses.

Prognostic Impact of Multiple Drug Use at Discharge in Patients Hospitalized with Heart Failure.

The association between polypharmacy/multiple drug use (MDU) and prognosis in patients hospitalized with heart failure (HF) is unclear. It is also unknown whether the prognostic values of MDU vary depending on the presence/absence of a previous history of HF and preserved/reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We analyzed consecutive 1,034 patients hospitalized with HF (age, 74.9 ± 11.5 years; 58.7% male). MDU was defined as ≥5 drugs at discharge. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death and HF readmission. MDU was observed in 695 patients (67.2%). Patients with MDU use had higher prevalences of a previous history of HF, reduced LVEF, and comorbidities than those without MDU. Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that MDU was significantly associated with the primary endpoint after adjustment for possible confounders (hazard ratio [HR], 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.79; P = 0.030). There was significant interaction between the presence/absence of a history of HF and the prognostic impact of MDU (HF history [-]: HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.54-1.40; P = 0.553; HF history [+]: HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.16-2.55; P = 0.007; P for interaction = 0.005). However, there was no significant interaction between preserved/reduced LVEF and the prognostic impact of MDU (P for interaction = 0.274). In conclusion, MDU at discharge is an independent risk factor for the composite of death or HF readmission in patients hospitalized with HF. We observed a significant interaction between the presence of de novo versus recurrent HF and the prognostic value of MDU.

Fibrosis-4 index identifies worsening renal function associated with adverse outcomes in acute heart failure.

AIMS: Worsening renal function (WRF) often develops during heart failure (HF) treatment. However, prognostic implications of WRF in acute HF remain controversial, and risk stratification of WRF is challenging. Although the fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) was initially established as a liver fibrosis marker, recent studies show that high FIB-4 is associated with venous congestion and poor prognosis in acute HF. This study aimed to evaluate whether FIB-4 could identify prognostically relevant and non-relevant WRF in patients with acute HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analysed data from a single-centre registry on acute HF at our university hospital between January 2015 and June 2021. This study included patients with acute HF aged ≥20 years who were immediately hospitalized and had brain natriuretic peptide levels ≥100 pg/mL at admission. WRF was defined as increases of ≥0.3 mg/dL and >25% in serum creatinine level from admission to discharge. FIB-4 scores were calculated before discharge. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality within 1 year of discharge. Based on the presence of WRF and whether FIB-4 scores were above the median, patients were stratified into four groups: no WRF and lower FIB-4 scores, no WRF and higher FIB-4 scores, WRF and lower FIB-4 scores, and WRF and higher FIB-4 scores. The patients were followed up via clinical visits or telephone interviews. Clinical outcomes were collected from the electronic medical records. RESULTS: Of the 969 patients hospitalized for acute HF (76 ± 11 years, 59% men), 118 patients (12%) had WRF at discharge. The median (interquartile range) FIB-4 score at discharge was 2.36 (1.55-3.25). The primary endpoint occurred in 136 patients (14.0%). The 1 year mortality rates were 10.5% in the no WRF and lower FIB-4 scores (≤2.36) group (n = 428), 16.1% in the no WRF and higher FIB-4 scores (>2.36) group (n = 423), 12.5% in the WRF and lower FIB-4 scores group (n = 56), and 25.8% in the WRF and higher FIB-4 scores group (n = 62) (P = 0.005). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated higher all-cause mortality in the WRF and higher FIB-4 group (log-rank P = 0.003). In the Cox regression analysis, only the WRF and higher FIB-4 scores group was associated with an increased risk of mortality compared with the no WRF and lower FIB-4 scores group (hazard ratio = 2.11, 95% confidence interval: 1.07-4.18, P = 0.032), despite adjusting for other confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: FIB-4 is a valuable risk stratification marker for WRF in patients with acute HF. The underlying mechanism and potential clinical importance of these observations require further investigation.

Prognostic Value of the FAN Score, a Combination of the Fibrosis-4 Index, Albumin-Bilirubin Score and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio, in Patients Hospitalized with Heart Failure.

The fibrosis-4 index, albumin-bilirubin score and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio are all prognostic markers in patients with heart failure. Recently, the FAN score, which includes all 3 of these markers, was developed as a useful risk stratification tool in patients with cancer. However, its cut-off values have not been validated for heart failure. We aimed to investigate the optimal cut-off and prognostic values of the FAN score in patients with heart failure. We analyzed 669 consecutive patients hospitalized with heart failure (age, 75.8 ± 11.3 years). Their median values of the fibrosis-4 index, albumin-bilirubin score, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio at discharge were 2.12, -2.25, and 2.41, respectively. The FAN score for heart failure (HF-FAN score) was calculated using these median values. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death and heart failure rehospitalization. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to HF-FAN scores of 0 (n = 112), 1 (n = 231), 2 (n = 242) and 3 (n = 84). Patients with HF-FAN scores of 3 were older, had higher brain natriuretic peptide levels, and larger inferior vena cava diameters. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a direct correlation between higher HF-FAN scores and occurrence of the primary endpoint (log-rank P < 0.001). Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed a higher HF-FAN score was significantly associated with a worse prognosis even after adjustment for possible prognostic factors. Changing from the FAN score to HF-FAN score provided significant continuous net reclassification improvement. In conclusion, the HF-FAN score at discharge was useful for risk stratification in patients hospitalized with heart failure. The HF-FAN score might be more suitable for patients with heart failure than the FAN score.

Prognostic value of the liver fibrosis marker fibrosis-5 index in patients with acute heart failure.

AIMS: Recently, liver fibrosis markers, such as the fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4), have been shown to be associated with prognosis in patients with heart failure. The fibrosis-5 (FIB-5) index, which assesses albumin, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate transaminase, alanine aminotransferase and platelet count, is a simple liver fibrosis marker that was reported to be superior to FIB-4 for differentiation of liver fibrosis. This study aimed to compare the prognostic value of FIB-4 and FIB-5 in patients with heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: The FIB-4 and FIB-5 scores were calculated at discharge in 906 patients hospitalized with heart failure. The patients were stratified into three groups based on their FIB-5 scores: low (n = 303), middle (n = 301), and high (n = 302) FIB-5 groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death or rehospitalization for heart failure. The low FIB-5 group was older and had larger inferior vena cava diameters and higher brain natriuretic peptide levels than the other two groups. The primary endpoint occurred in 156 (51.5%), 110 (36.5%), and 54 patients (17.9%) in the low, middle, and high FIB-5 groups, respectively (P < 0.001). On Cox proportional hazard analysis, the low FIB-5 was independently associated with the primary endpoint after adjustment for confounding factors. The association was consistent in both patients with preserved and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and there was no significant interaction between LVEF phenotypes in terms of the prognostic impact of FIB-5 (P for interaction = 0.311). FIB-5 was superior to FIB-4 as a prognostic indicator of the primary endpoint (continuous net reclassification improvement, 0.530; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.399-0.662; P < 0.001; integrated discrimination improvement, 0.072; 95% CI, 0.057-0.088; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The FIB-5 is a useful risk stratification marker with better prognostic value than FIB-4 in patients hospitalized with heart failure.