Pediatric Procedural Sedation.

Pediatric procedural sedation (PPS), formerly known as conscious sedation, is often used outside the operating room for various procedures. Twenty years ago, nearly all cases of PPS were performed by pediatric intensivists, dentists, emergency medicine physicians, and anesthesiologists, due to the urgent nature of procedures in their settings. However, with the emergence of pediatric hospital medicine as a board-certified subspecialty, many children's hospitals have created dedicated PPS teams. These teams, composed of highly trained physicians and ancillary staff, are well-suited for procedures, quality measures, and multidisciplinary care. The wider availability of sedation outside the operating room allows other pediatric subspecialties, such as surgery and oncology, to use PPS in ensuring safe and timely interventions for their patients. This article will cover PPS as an alternative to anesthesia for otherwise healthy children and aim to answer frequent questions that arise regarding medications, risks, and candidacy for PPS. [Pediatr Ann. 2024;53(9):e324-e329.].

Parent Preferences for Shared Decision-making in Acute Versus Chronic Illness.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to examine preferences for shared decision-making (SDM) in parents of acutely ill versus chronically ill children in the inpatient setting. Additionally, we explored the effect of parental perception of illness severity and uncertainty in illness on decision-making preference. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we surveyed parents of children admitted to pediatric inpatient units at an academic, tertiary-care hospital. Surveys were administered in person and used validated tools to assess SDM preferences and uncertainty in illness. Descriptive statistics evaluated associations stratified by acute versus chronic illness, and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of the 200 parents who participated, the majority were women (78%), Hispanic (81.5%), English speaking (73%), between 30 and 39 years old (37.5%), and had an education achievement of less than a college degree (77%). The mean age of hospitalized children was 8.1 years, and half reported a chronic illness. Most parents preferred an active (43%) or collaborative (40%) role in SDM. There was no association with SDM preference by demographics, number of previous hospitalizations, perception of illness severity, or uncertainty. However, parents of chronically ill children significantly preferred a passive role in SDM when they perceived a high level of uncertainty in illness. CONCLUSIONS: Most parents of hospitalized children prefer to take an active or collaborative role in SDM. However, parents of chronically ill children who perceive high levels of uncertainty surrounding their children's illness prefer a passive role, thus illustrating the complexity in decision-making among this parent population.

Hypotonic versus isotonic fluids in hospitalized children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the use of hypotonic vs isotonic maintenance fluids confers an increased risk of hyponatremia in hospitalized children. STUDY DESIGN: A search of MEDLINE (1946 to January 2013), the Cochrane Central Registry (1991 to December 2012), Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Literature (1990 to December 2012), and Pediatric Academic Societies (2000-2012) abstracts was conducted using the terms "hypotonic fluids/saline/solutions" and "isotonic fluids/saline/solutions," and citations were reviewed using a predefined protocol. Data on the primary and secondary outcomes were extracted from original articles by 2 authors independently. Meta-analyses of the primary and secondary outcomes were performed when possible. RESULTS: A total of 1634 citations were screened. Ten studies (n = 893) identified as independent randomized controlled trials were included. Five studies examined subjects in the intensive care unit setting, including 4 on regular wards and 1 in a mixed setting. In hospitalized children receiving maintenance intravenous fluids, hyponatremia was seen more often in those receiving hypotonic fluids than in those receiving isotonic fluids, with an overall relative risk of 2.37 (95% CI, 1.72-3.26). Receipt of hypotonic fluids was associated with a relative risk of moderate hyponatremia (<130 mmol/L) of 6.1 (95% CI, 2.2-17.3). A subgroup analysis of hypotonic fluids with half-normal saline found a relative risk of hyponatremia of 2.42 (95% CI, 1.32-4.45). CONCLUSION: In hospitalized children in intensive care and postoperative settings, the administration of hypotonic maintenance fluids increases the risk of hyponatremia when compared with administration of isotonic fluids. For patients on general wards, insufficient data are available based on the reviewed studies, and individual risk factors must be assessed.