Ambulatory Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Use in Patients Listed for Lung Transplant.

There has been an increase in the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) to bridge critically ill patients to lung transplant (LTX). This study evaluates how ambulatory status on ECMO affected waitlist and post-LTX outcomes. The United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was queried for patients aged of greater than or equal to 18 years and between 2016 and 2021 to identify pre-LTX patients supported by ECMO. The patients were classified in venous-arterial (VA) ECMO and veno-venous (VV) ECMO cohorts and further classified as ambulatory (AMB) and non-AMB (nAMB). Each cohort was controlled against the non-ECMO patients. Univariate statistical tests, as well as Kaplan-Meier survival curves, were used for analysis. The 90 day waitlist survival was the highest among the non-ECMO group (96%), but both AMB VV and VA groups had superior survival compared to the nAMB group (85% vs. 75%, 78% vs. 65%, p < 0.01). After adjusting for the median lung allocation score (LAS) (88) in the VV ECMO group, the waitlist survival was superior in the AMB VV ECMO compared to those not on ECMO (86% vs. 78%, p > 0.01). The 1 year post-LTX survival between non-ECMO and AMB VV ECMO was comparable (88% vs. 88%, p = 0.66). Ambulating patients or use of physical therapy while on ECMO can help improve lung transplant outcomes.

Cannula Placement for Cerebral Protection Without Circulatory Arrest in Patients Undergoing Hemiarch Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

BACKGROUND: Aortic aneurysms involving the proximal aortic arch, which require hemiarch-type repair, typically require circulatory arrest with antegrade cerebral perfusion. Left carotid antegrade cerebral perfusion (LCP) via distal arch cannulation without circulatory arrest was used in this study's patient population. The goal was to assess the operative efficiency and clinical outcomes of using a distal arch cannulation technique that would not require any hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) time compared with more traditional brachiocephalic artery cannulation with right-sided unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (RCP) and HCA. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review of patients with replacement of the distal ascending aorta involving the proximal arch was performed. Patients with an intramural hematoma or dissection were excluded. Between January 2015 and December 2019, 68 adult patients had undergone a hemiarch repair because of aneurysmal disease. Analysis of baseline demographics, operative data, and clinical outcomes was performed. RESULTS: Comparing the 68 patients: 21 patients were treated with RCP (via brachiocephalic artery graft with HCA), and 47 patients were treated with LCP (via distal aortic arch cannulation with cross-clamp between the brachiocephalic and left common carotid arteries without HCA). Baseline characteristics and outcomes were evaluated for both groups. The LCP group was younger (LCP median [IQR] age, 60 [53-65] years vs RCP median [IQR] age, 67 [59-71] years]. Sex, race, body mass index, comorbidities, and ejection fraction were similar between the groups. Cardiopulmonary bypass time (LCP, 123 minutes vs RCP, 149 minutes) and unilateral cerebral perfusion time (LCP, 17 minutes vs RCP, 22 minutes) were longer in the RCP group. Bleeding, prolonged ventilatory support, kidney failure, and length of stay were similar. In-hospital mortality was 2% in the LCP group vs 0% in the RCP group. Stroke occurred in 2 patients (4.2%) in the LCP group and in 0% of the RCP group. Mortality at 6 months in the LCP and RCP groups was 3% and 10%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Distal arch cannulation with LCP without HCA is a reasonable and safe alternative strategy for patients requiring hemiarch replacement for aneurysmal disease. This technique may provide additional benefits by avoiding circulatory arrest in these complex cases.

Perioperative Morbidity and Outcomes in Pediatric Patients Transitioned From Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation to Ventricular Assist Device Support: A Study of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database.

As a bridge to transplant strategy, children transitioned from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) to ventricular assist device (VAD) have higher waitlist mortality compared with those who receive de novo VAD. However, the contribution of the immediate perioperative period and differences in the two groups are not well studied. We performed a nested case-control study between children receiving de novo VAD (group 1) and those transitioned from ECMO to VAD (group 2) between 2014 and 2019 using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database. A total of 735 children underwent VAD placement with 498 in group 1 and 237 in group 2. Patients in group 2 were significantly younger, smaller, and significantly sicker, were twice as likely to transition to biventricular VAD and need unplanned reoperations. Overall mortality was 16% for group 1 and 34% for group 2 ( p < 0.01). Regression analysis showed that ECMO use (odds ratio [OR], 2.17 [1.3-3.4]), ventilator need (OR, 2.2 [1.3-3.9]), and cardiogenic shock (OR, 1.8 [1.2-2.8]) were all independent preoperative predictors of VAD mortality while dialysis need (OR, 25.5 [8.6-75.3]), stroke (OR, 6.2 [3.1-12.6]), and bleeding (OR, 1.9 [1.1-3.4]) were independent postoperative predictors of VAD mortality within 30 days (all p < 0.05). The study demonstrated significant baseline differences between the two cohorts, warranting avoidance of comparison. Early elective VAD placement in this cohort of patients should be sought to avoid interim ECMO and high post-VAD mortality.

Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Is Associated with Superior Survival Compared to Open Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has not been associated with a long-term survival advantage compared to open esophagectomy (OE). We investigated survival differences between MIE, including laparoscopic and robotic, and OE. METHODS: Patients undergoing esophagectomy from 2010 to 2014 with T1-4N0-3M0, adenocarcinoma or squamous cell histology, in middle or lower esophagus were queried from the National Cancer Database and stratified into groups based on their surgical procedure: robotic, laparoscopic, or OE. Propensity matching (1:1) was done between robotic and laparoscopic to produce an MIE group. The MIE group was matched to OE yielding a 1:1:2 matching of robotic:laparoscopic:OE. Postoperative outcomes and survival (Kaplan-Meier) were compared between groups. RESULTS: Prior to matching, 7,163 patients met inclusion criteria and a greater portion underwent OE (67.7%) than MIE (laparoscopic 24.9% and robotic 7.4%). Matching yielded similar groups (robotic = 527, laparoscopic = 527, and OE =1054). Compared to OE, MIE patients had a significantly greater number of nodes sampled and trended toward increased R0 resections (96.1% vs 94.3%, P = .053). OE was associated with a longer median postoperative stay (10 vs 9 days, P = .001). Mortality at 30 and 90 days was similar. However, postoperative survival for MIE was significantly greater than OE (P < .001). No survival difference existed between robotic and laparoscopic (P = .723). CONCLUSIONS: MIE is associated with increased number of nodes examined and a shorter postoperative length of stay. After propensity matching, patients undergoing MIE had better long but not short-term survival than OE. This benefit seems to be independent of the use of robotic technology.

Amiodarone Use and All-Cause Mortality in Patients With a Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device.

Background Atrial and ventricular arrhythmias are commonly encountered in patients with advanced heart failure, with amiodarone being the most commonly used antiarrhythmic drug in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) recipients. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of amiodarone use on long-term all-cause mortality in ptients with a CF-LVAD. Methods and Results A retrospective multicenter study of CF-LVAD was conducted at 5 centers including all CF-LVAD implants from 2007 to 2015. Patients were stratified based on pre-CF-LVAD implant amiodarone use. Additional use of amiodarone after CF-LVAD implantation was also evaluated. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality during long-term follow-up. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess survival outcomes. Multivariable Cox regression was used to identify predictors of outcomes. Propensity matching was done to address baseline differences. A total of 480 patients with a CF-LVAD (aged 58±13 years, 81% men) were included. Of these, 170 (35.4%) were on chronic amiodarone therapy at the time of CF-LVAD implant, and 310 (64.6%) were not on amiodarone. Rate of all-cause mortality over the follow-up period was 32.9% in the amiodarone group compared with 29.6% in those not on amiodarone (P=0.008). Similar results were noted in the propensity-matched group (log-rank, P=0.04). On multivariable Cox regression analysis, amiodarone use at baseline was independently associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.1-2.5]; P=0.01). Conclusions Amiodarone use was associated with significantly increased rates of all-cause mortality in CF-LVAD recipients. Earlier interventions for arrhythmias to avoid long-term amiodarone exposure may improve long-term outcomes in CF-LVAD recipients and needs further study.

Use of Impella in Patients Listed for Heart Transplantation.

The new United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) policy has resulted in a significantly higher number of temporary mechanical circulatory support device usage such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, Impella, and intra-aortic balloon pump due to provision of higher priority with their use while on the waiting list. We aimed to identify Impella use in patients awaiting heart transplantation and temporal changes in its usage. The UNOS database was queried between years 2015 and 2019 for patients aged greater than or equal to 18 years, listed to undergo heart transplantation. A total of 378 patients had Impella support while listed for heart transplantation. Impella use skyrocketed from 2015 (1%) to 2019 (4%, p < 0.01). The most substantial increase in Impella use occurred after the UNOS policy change. The patients listed on Impella support after the policy change had significantly lower waiting time (median 12 days vs. 45 days, p < 0.01). More patients with Impella were directly transplanted (80% vs. 56%, p < 0.01) after the policy change, had significantly lower waitlist mortality (25% vs. 13%, p < 0.01) and fewer converted to a durable support (13% vs. 3%). The translatability (likelihood for receiving organs faster) was significantly improved after the policy change. A multivariable Cox regression model showed that post-transplant survival of Impella patients was not adversely affected after the policy change (hazard ratio = 0.9; p = 0.8). This increase in Impella use represents a substantial change in practice patterns of listing and managing patients on the heart transplant waiting list.

Apixaban: Alternative Anticoagulation for HeartMate 3 Ventricular Assist Device.

Patients with left ventricular assist devices currently require long-term anticoagulation with warfarin. Warfarin requires frequent blood tests and is associated with adverse events when not in the therapeutic range. Apixaban is a possible alternative that is potentially better for compliance and requires no additional testing. The purpose of this study was to compare adverse events in patients with a HeartMate 3 LVAD receiving apixaban versus warfarin. Thirty-five patients underwent HM3 implantation between January 01, 2016 to January 31, 2021. The groups compared were apixaban (n = 15, 43%) and warfarin (n = 20, 57%). All patients received 325 mg aspirin daily. Stroke, bleeding, and death were identified as primary outcomes after LVAD implant. Univariate nonparametric statistical analysis was performed. The median duration of treatment with apixaban was 148 days (37-606 days). The groups were comparable in terms of age (56 vs. 54 years), gender (male, 85% vs. 75%), and renal function (Cr 1.5 vs. 1.4). The apixaban group had significantly higher mean pulmonary artery pressure (41 vs. 34, p = 0.03) and there were more (p < 0.05) ischemic cardiomyopathy and INTERMACS profile >3 in the warfarin group. At 6 months, thrombotic complications and death were not different between the groups. The two deaths in the apixaban group were from right heart failure. The apixaban group had clinically lower rates of bleeding complications (5% vs. 30%). The adverse events of bleeding, stroke, and death were similar in HM3 patients receiving warfarin or apixaban. Apixaban may be a safe alternative anticoagulant therapy in HM 3 LVAD patients.

Racial disparities in cardiac transplantation: Chronological perspective and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate annual heart transplant volumes and 3-year post-transplant outcomes since establishment of United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database stratified by race. METHODS: The UNOS thoracic transplant database was evaluated for adult patients since 1987. The available database was then stratified by Race: Black, White and Other and era of transplant: group 1(1987-1991), group 2(1992-1996), group 3(1997-2001), group 4(2002-2006), group 5(2007-2011), group 6(2012-2016) and group 7(2017 and later). Demographic and clinical factors were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 105,266 adults have been listed since 1987 and 67,824 have been transplanted. Of the transplanted patients 11,235 were Black, 48,786 White and 6803 were of Other race. The proportion of Black patients listed increased from 7% in 1987 to 13.4% in 1999 and 25% in 2019 and those transplanted increased from 5% in 1987 to 13.4% in 2001 and 26% in 2019. The survival of Black patients gradually improved. CONCLUSION: Historically, fewer Black patients received cardiac transplantation however, their access gradually improved over the years and account for over 25% of cardiac transplantations performed in recent years. The historically poor survival of Black patients has recently improved and became comparable to the rest.

A Tale of Two Centrifugal-Flow Ventricular Assist Devices As Bridge to Heart Transplant.

BACKGROUND: Use of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) has increased over the years as a bridge to transplant. The HeartWare HVAD (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) and HeartMate III (HM3, Abbott, Abbott Park, IL) are currently approved centrifugal-flow devices used for bridge to transplant. We sought to evaluate outcomes of the patients listed and who received a transplant after receiving these 2 devices. METHODS: The United Network of Organ Sharing thoracic transplant database was queried after August 23, 2017, until December 2018 to identify patients aged older than 18 years listed for heart transplant and supported by the HVAD or HM3. Patient characteristics were evaluated at the time of listing and transplant. The primary study end point was 1-year mortality after LVAD implantation. Nonparametric tests were used to evaluate the device groups. RESULTS: Of 569 patients listed for heart transplant during the study period, 226 had HM3 and 343 had HVAD. The HM3 group had more men (82% vs 74%, P = .02), patients with diabetes (38% vs 29%, P = .02), and the body mass index was higher (28 vs 27 kg/m2, P = .04) at listing. Between the HM3 and HVAD groups, the 1-year mortality was 20% vs 17%, respectively (log-rank P = .28; Figure 1), and the posttransplant survival at 1 year was 97% and 94%, respectively (P = .1). CONCLUSIONS: In a relatively well-matched group of patients listed for heart transplant with a centrifugal-flow LVAD, the 6-month and 1-year mortality on the waiting list as well as after transplant were not statistically different. Additional real-world experience or a randomized trial would be needed to determine whether one LVAD is superior.

Contemporary outcomes of durable ventricular assist devices in adults with congenital heart disease as a bridge to heart transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics, risk factors, and overall survival outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) bridged to transplantation with a ventricular assist device (VAD) versus no-VAD. METHODS: The study included 894 ACHD patients aged ≥18 years listed for primary heart transplantation between 2010 and 2019 from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Primary outcomes were waitlist and 1-year post-transplant mortality between VAD and no-VAD ACHD patients. RESULTS: Of 894 ACHD patients included in the study, 91(10.1%) had VAD support at the time of listing. Patients who needed VAD support were mostly males, heavier, and had higher pulmonary artery pressure than the no-VAD group at the listing. The overall waitlist mortality was 38% in the VAD group than 17% in the no-VAD group (p < 0.01). ECMO use was associated with significantly higher mortality than either group. There was no significant difference in 1-year post-transplant mortality between VAD versus no-VAD at the time of transplant (15% vs. 17%; p = 0.66). Multivariate regression analysis found that BMI <20 kg/m2 (hazard ratio (HR) 1.1; p = 0.01), bilirubin >2 mg/dl (HR 1.1; p = 0.03), creatinine >2 mg/dl (HR 1.3; p = 0.04) and ECMO at transplant (HR 1.4; p = 0.03) increased early post-transplant mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The one-year post-transplant mortality rate was no different for ACHD patients that received VAD versus no-VAD. These findings suggest that a VAD should be considered an option to support ACHD patients as a bridge to heart transplantation.

Aortic root replacement with Medtronic Freestyle bioprosthesis: 25-year experience.

BACKGROUND: Stentless porcine bioprothesis is a surgical strategy to treat aortic root disease. Use has been limited due to the concern for long-term valve degeneration. This study evaluated the perioperative and late outcomes of patients with aortic root disease requiring root replacement. METHODS: A total of 409 patients underwent aortic root replacement by a single surgeon using a stentless porcine bioroot between February 1996 and May 2020. The cohort was divided into two groups (age ≤65 and >65 years). Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data and Kaplan-Meier curves used to evaluate long-term outcomes. RESULTS: Patients age >65 years were more likely to be female (p = .01), have hypertension (p = .01), require circulatory arrest (p = .01), and have concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (p = .04). Baseline creatinine >1.8 (p = .20), diabetes (p = .06), and ejection fraction (p = .20) were similar between groups. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival for patients age ≤65 years were 92%, 87%, and 69%, respectively, significantly better than patients age >65 (88%, 73%, and 43%, respectively) (p < .01, Figure 1). The 1-, 5-, and 10-year freedom from reoperation for patients ≤65 years were 99%, 97%, and 93% versus 99%, 98%, and 96% in patients age >65 years, respectively (p = .24). CONCLUSION: Patients with aortic root disease can be treated with acceptable perioperative outcomes, long-term survival, and low reoperation rates using a stentless porcine bioprothesis. It should be considered irrespective of age due to its excellent durability and freedom from anti-coagulation requirement.

Role of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in patients awaiting heart transplant in the continuous-flow left ventricular assist device era.

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have been shown to have survival advantage in advanced heart failure patients. Few studies have evaluated the role of ICDs in patients supported with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CFVADs). We aimed to evaluate the impact of ICD and CFVAD on heart transplant (HTx) waiting list survival. We queried the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) thoracic transplant database between years 2007 and 2016 for patients aged ≥ 18 years listed for HTx. Patients receiving devices other than CFVAD were excluded. Patients were divided into groups-with and without CFVAD and further subdivided into groups-with and without ICD use. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to evaluate the survival outcomes. There were 34 860 patients listed for HTx during study period of which 11 481 (32%) had a CFVAD and 26 139 (75%) had an ICD. Within CFVAD group, patients with ICD were older, more likely male, with higher creatinine and listed as UNOS status 1A. In the No-CFVAD group, 1-year waitlist survival was significantly better with ICD use (81% vs. 73%, P < .0001); however, in CFVAD patients, 1-year survival with ICD use was comparable to No-ICD use (95% vs. 94%, P = .1). Use of ICD is associated with significantly better heart transplant waitlist survival in patients not supported by CFVAD. In patients supported with CFVAD, the ICD does not offer additional survival benefit.

Association of temporal trends in neutrophil lymphocyte ratio on left ventricular assist device patient outcomes.

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) can predict mortality/complications in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients; however, the prognostic value of longitudinal NLR measurements has not been well studied. Here, we examine the mortality/complication incidence in patients with chronically increased NLR verses patients with acutely elevated NLR as a predictor of patient outcomes. This retrospective analysis included 102 patients who underwent LVAD implantation from 2016 to 2018 at a single center. The NLR was calculated at the time of surgery, and at 30 and 90 days after surgery. The NLR values were grouped into categorical data: low, normal (put in range), and high. Patients were classified in 2 groups based on change in their NLR values from surgery to 90 days; the H90 group had sustained increase of NLR over 90-days and the N90 group had normalization of NLR at 90-days. Actuarial survival the between study groups was measured using Kaplan-Meier curves. The N90 group had 50 patients (median age 58 (48-66) years, 21% female) at the time of LVAD placement. Group H90 had 52 patients (median age 64 (52-68) years, 16% female). Median age, body mass index (BMI), bilirubin, creatinine, and BNP at time of implant as well as type of device and implant strategy were comparable between the study groups. The post implant survival for N90 group was significantly better than the H90 group at 1 year (93% vs. 80%) and 2 years (90% vs. 67%) (log-rank P = .001). Early post LVAD survival in patients with elevated NLR over 90 days postoperatively was significantly worse compared to patients who normalized the NLR at 90 days.

Optimum surgical treatment for tricuspid valve infective endocarditis: An analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons national database.

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of intravenous drug-associated tricuspid valve endocarditis in the United States is rapidly increasing. Our goal was to evaluate the outcomes of isolated tricuspid valve operations using the Society of Thoracic Surgeon Adult Cardiac Surgical Database. METHODS: From July 2011 to December 2016, 1613 patients with intravenous drug-associated tricuspid valve endocarditis underwent isolated tricuspid valve operations for endocarditis. Patients were stratified on the basis of type of tricuspid valve operation: valvectomy in 119 (7%), repair in 532 (33%), and replacement in 962 (60%). Risk factors and 30-day outcomes were compared among groups using Kruskal-Wallis and Pearson's chi-square tests. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated risk-adjusted operative mortality and morbidity by operative technique. RESULTS: Age, gender, race, and renal function were comparable among groups. Compared with the repair and replacement groups, the valvectomy group had a higher rate of acute infection (90% vs 79%, 84%; P < .01), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score (10.17 vs 8.44, 9.74, P < .01), and urgent/emergency surgery (91% vs 75%, 83%; P < .01), respectively. Operative mortality was higher in those undergoing valvectomy (16%) (P < .01) compared with repair (2%) or replacement (3%). After risk adjustment, valvectomy was associated with a higher risk of operative mortality compared with repair (odds ratio, 3.82; P < .01), whereas there was no difference in operative mortality between repair and replacement (odds ratio, 0.95; P = .89). CONCLUSIONS: This contemporary series of intravenous drug-associated tricuspid valve endocarditis reveals that valvectomy is an independent predictor of operative mortality. When anatomically possible, repair should be the preferred management for tricuspid valve endocarditis to avoid recurrent valve infection and prosthetic valve degeneration.