High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity: Aspirin versus Clopidogrel.

BACKGROUND: Antithrombotic regimen in patients on oral anticoagulation (OAC) post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is challenging. At least, one antiplatelet agent in combination with OAC is recommended after PCI for 6-12 months. Clopidogrel is used most frequently in this setting. However, data comparing P2Y12 inhibition with clopidogrel versus cyclooxygenase inhibition by acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, aspirin) is missing. It is well known that the antiplatelet effects of ASA and clopidogrel are frequently impaired (high on-treatment platelet reactivity [HTPR]). In this pilot investigation, we compared the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel versus ASA. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center database analysis, we investigated platelet reactivity by light transmission aggregometry in patients under different antiplatelet regimes. Results were presented as maximum of aggregation (MoA). HTPR to ASA and to clopidogrel were assessed. RESULTS: 755 patients were enrolled. 677 were on ASA, 521 were on clopidogrel, and 198 had OAC. Overall mean age was 73 ± 13.4 years, and 458 (60.7%) were male. HTPR to ASA occurred in 94/677 patients (13.9%), and mean arachidonic acid-induced MoA was 14.15 ± 19.04%. HTPR to clopidogrel occurred in 241/521 patients (46.3%), and mean adenosine diphosphate-induced MoA was 50.06 ± 20.42%. HTPR to clopidogrel was significantly more frequent than HTPR to ASA; single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT)-mono ASA: 27/199 (13.6%) versus mono clopidogrel: 6/18 (33.3%); p = 0.037; SAPT with OAC-OAC with ASA: 8/35 (22.9%) versus OAC with clopidogrel: 27/60 (45%); p = 0.046. Same difference in HTPR contingency could be shown in subgroups of dual antiplatelet therapy and ASA + clopidogrel + OAC therapy. CONCLUSION: Impaired pharmacodynamic response to clopidogrel was more frequent as HTPR to ASA. Hence, ASA should be tested in combination with OAC post-PCI.

Sphingosine-1-phosphate improves outcome of no-reflow acute myocardial infarction via sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1.

AIMS: Therapeutic options targeting post-ischaemic cardiac remodelling are sparse. The bioactive sphingolipid sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) reduces ischaemia/reperfusion injury. However, its impact on post-ischaemic remodelling independently of its infarct size (IS)-reducing effect is yet unknown and was addressed in this study. METHODS AND RESULTS: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in mice was induced by permanent ligation of the left anterior descending artery (LAD). C57Bl6 were treated with the S1P lyase inhibitor 4-deoxypyridoxine (DOP) starting 7 days prior to AMI to increase endogenous S1P concentrations. Cardiac function and myocardial healing were assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI), murine echocardiography, histomorphology, and gene expression analysis. DOP effects were investigated in cardiomyocyte-specific S1P receptor 1 deficient (S1PR1 Cardio Cre+) and Cre- control mice and S1P concentrations measured by LC-MS/MS. IS and cardiac function did not differ between control and DOP-treated groups on day one after LAD-ligation despite fourfold increase in plasma S1P. In contrast, cardiac function was clearly improved and myocardial scar size reduced, respectively, on Day 21 in DOP-treated mice. The latter also exhibited smaller cardiomyocyte size and reduced embryonic gene expression. The benefit of DOP treatment was abolished in S1PR1 Cardio Cre+. CONCLUSIONS: S1P improves cardiac function and myocardial healing post AMI independently of initial infarct size and accomplishes this via the cardiomyocyte S1PR1. Hence, in addition to its beneficial effects on I/R injury, S1PR1 may be a promising target in post-infarction myocardial remodelling as adjunctive therapy to revascularization as well as in patients not eligible for standard interventional procedures.

Excess Mortality in Aspirin and Dipyrone (Metamizole) Co-Medicated in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: A Nationwide Study.

Background Pain is a major issue in our aging society. Dipyrone (metamizole) is one of the most frequently used analgesics. Additionally, it has been shown to impair pharmacodynamic response to aspirin as measured by platelet function tests. However, it is not known how this laboratory effect translates to clinical outcome. Methods and Results We conducted a nationwide analysis of a health insurance database in Germany comprising 9.2 million patients. All patients with a cardiovascular event in 2014 and subsequent secondary prevention with aspirin were followed up for 36 months. Inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis was conducted to investigate the rate of mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke/transient ischemic attack between patients on aspirin-dipyrone co-medication compared with aspirin-alone medication. Permanent aspirin-alone medication was given to 26,200 patients, and 5946 patients received aspirin-dipyrone co-medication. In the inverse probability of treatment weighted sample, excess mortality in aspirin-dipyrone co-medicated patients was observed (15.6% in aspirin-only group versus 24.4% in the co-medicated group, hazard ratio [HR], 1.66 [95% CI, 1.56-1.76], P<0.0001). Myocardial infarction and stroke/transient ischemic attack were increased as well (myocardial infarction: 1370 [5.2%] versus 355 [5.9%] in aspirin-only and co-medicated groups, respectively; HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.05-1.32]; P=0.0066, relative risk [RR], 1.14; number needed to harm, 140. Stroke/transient ischemic attack, 1901 [7.3%] versus 506 [8.5%] in aspirin-only and co-medicated groups, respectively; HR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.11-1.35]; P<0.0001, RR, 1.17, number needed to harm, 82). Conclusions In this observational, nationwide analysis, aspirin and dipyrone co-medication was associated with excess mortality. This was in part driven by ischemic events (myocardial infarction and stroke), which occurred more frequently in co-medicated patients as well. Hence, dipyrone should be used with caution in aspirin-treated patients for secondary prevention.

Aspirin I.V. Loading during Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Additional loading dose of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) despite permanent oral ASA medication is frequently applicated. The impact on platelet reactivity and clinical events is not known. In this pilot study, we aimed to analyze high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) to aspirin in patients undergoing elective PCI. Platelet reactivity was measured using light-transmission aggregometry in 100 patients on permanent low-dose ASA medication undergoing elective PCI. Platelet reactivity measured by arachidonic acid-induced maximum of aggregation (MoA) in patients with versus without additional peri-procedural ASA loading (500 mg i.v.) was compared. HTPR was defined as MoA >20% for ASA. Major adverse cerebro- and cardiovascular events (MACCEs) and bleeding events were evaluated during hospital course. HTPR rate was similar in both groups (HTPR to ASA: loading vs. control 6% vs. 16%, odds ratio [OR] = 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08-1.35, p = 0.12). In-hospital MACCEs were not different between groups (MACCE: loading vs. control: 0 vs. 0 patient, OR = 1.32, 95% CI 0.03-67.95, p = 0.89). Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction minimal bleedings were numerically higher in patients without ASA loading dose. In this pharmacodynamic pilot study, additional ASA loading did not reduce HTPR to ASA. Furthermore, ASA loading did not increase in-hospital MACCE and bleeding complications.

Risk prediction of bleeding and MACCE by PRECISE-DAPT score post-PCI.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend the PRECISE-DAPT (PD) score to adapt duration of dual antiplatelet therapy due to bleeding risk. However, there is first evidence that PD predicts mortality and ischemic events as well. METHODS: We investigated PD Score in 994 patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). PD was correlated with clinically frequently used scores. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) bleeding were assessed during one-year follow-up. RESULTS: 524 patients had PD < 25 and 470 patients PD ≥ 25 (47%). Rate of major and minor bleeding was higher in the PD ≥ 25 group (major bleeding: Hazard ratio [HR] 2.9, 95% confidence interval [Cl] 1.01-8.16, p = 0.049; minor bleeding: HR 3.94, 95% Cl 1.36-9.19, p = 0.0096). Rate of MACCE, death and myocardial infarction were higher as well (MACCE: HR 2.0, 95% Cl 1.52-2.71, p < 0.0001; death: HR 3.9, 95% Cl 2.12-5.68, p < 0.0001; MI: HR 2.1, 95% Cl 1.26-3.43, p = 0.0041). Rate of stroke/transient ischemic attack did not differ between groups. Discriminative potency to predict major and minor bleeding, MACCE, death and MI were high with nearly equal cut-off values calculated by Youden's index (YI) (major bleeding: Area under the curve [AUC] 0.66; p = 0.026; YI 32; minor bleeding: AUC 0.72; p = 0.001; YI 28; MACCE: AUC 0.62; p < 0.0001; YI 24). CONCLUSION: In our cohort, PD score predicted bleeding moderately in post-PCI patients. In this study, ischemic events were predicted as well. Adaption of antiplatelet therapy duration by PD score is accurate. Nevertheless, it should be well-balanced with patient-related risk for ischemic events.

MTX Treatment Does Not Improve Outcome in Mice with AMI.

BACKGROUND: Targeting inflammation in patients with coronary artery disease and/or acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a matter of debate. Methotrexate (MTX) is one of the most widely used immunosuppressants. Cardiovascular Inflammation Reduction Trial (CIRT) recently failed to demonstrate reduced cardiovascular events in MTX-treated patients. However, it is not known if long-term MTX treatment improves cardiac outcome in AMI. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the postischemic phase in MTX-treated mice undergoing AMI. METHODS: Wild-type mice received MTX medication intraperitoneally for 2 weeks. Afterward, AMI was induced by transient left anterior ascending artery ligation. Postischemic cardiac damage after 24 h was assessed. RESULTS: MTX treatment did not affect infarct size as compared to control (IS/AAR: Con 76.20% ± 12.37%/AAR vs. MTX 73.51 ± 11.72%/AAR, p = 0.64). Moreover, systolic function and structural parameters did not differ between groups (24hejection fraction: Con 36.49 ± 3.23% vs. MTX 32.77 ± 2.29%, p = 0.41; 24hLVID; d: Con 3.57 ± 0.17 mm vs. MTX 3.19 ± 0.13 mm, p = 0.14). Platelets were increased by MTX (Con 1,442 ± 69.20 × 103/mm3 vs. MTX 1,920 ± 68.68 × 103/mm3, p < 0.0001). White blood cell and RBC as well as rate of monocytes, granulocytes, lymphocytes, and serum amyloid P levels were equal. CONCLUSION: MTX medication did not improve postischemic cardiac damage in a murine model of AMI. Future trials are needed to identify and investigate other anti-inflammatory targets to improve cardiovascular outcome.

A novel mechanism of ACE inhibition-associated enhanced platelet reactivity: disproof of the ARB-MI paradox?

PURPOSE: ACE inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) are important drugs in cardiovascular disease. However, little is known about which of these drug class is to be preferred. First analyses show that the blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) influences platelet reactivity. Therefore, we evaluated the effects of ACEI and ARB on platelet reactivity and thrombin generation. METHODS: We conducted a time series analysis in 34 patients. We performed light transmission aggregometry (LTA) to evaluate platelet reactivity. Results are given as maximum of aggregation (MoA). Thrombin generation was measured as endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) via calibrated automated thrombogram. Flow cytometry was used to analyze protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1 expression. RESULTS: ACEI treatment significantly increased platelet reactivity already 4 h after initiation of treatment (prior vs. 4 h post ACEI: MoA 41.9 ± 16.2% vs. 55.2 ± 16.7%; p = 0.003). After switching from ACEI to ARB treatment, platelet reactivity decreased significantly (3 months after switching: MoA 34.7 ± 20.9%; p = 0.03). ACEI reduced endogenous thrombin potential significantly from before to 3 months after ACEI (ETP 1527 ± 437 nM × min vs. 1088 ± 631 nM × min; p = 0.025). Platelet thrombin receptor (PAR1) expression increased from 37.38 ± 10.97% before to 49.53 ± 6.04% after ACEI treatment (p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: ACEI enhanced platelet reactivity. This can be reversed by changing to ARB. The mechanism behind RAAS influencing platelet function seems to be associated with PAR-1 expression.

Enhanced Platelet Reactivity under Aspirin Medication and Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.

Aspirin is indispensable in secondary prevention of ischemic events in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). However, insufficient platelet inhibition despite aspirin medication is frequent. This is referred to as high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR). Nevertheless, if this is associated with clinical outcome instead of only laboratory phenomenon remains unclear so far. In this study, we test whether patients with ischemic events have higher platelet reactivity despite aspirin medication than patients without ischemic events. In this prospective study of 72 CAD patients, we determined pharmacodynamic response to aspirin by arachidonic acid induced aggregation via light-transmission aggregometry and expressed as maximum of aggregation (MoA). During a mean follow-up duration of 3.2 years, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), mortality, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and stroke were assessed as endpoints via yearly telephone interviews with the treating physician of the patients. Patients who suffered from MACCE, death, and NSTEMI had a significantly higher MoA than those without (MACCE: 5.4 vs. 16.4%, p < 0.05; death: 5.6 vs. 16.8%, p < 0.05; NSTEMI: 1.8 vs. 21%, p < 0.001). MoA did not differ with regard to the occurrence of stroke (10.1 vs. 14.9%, p = 0.59). Patients with MACCE, death, and NSTEMI show enhanced platelet reactivity despite aspirin medication as compared to patients without ischemic events. Hence, insufficient response to aspirin medication should be regarded as risk factor for ischemic events in CAD patients. Further trials are needed to assess options to overcome HTPR to aspirin.

Antiplatelet effects of aspirin and clopidogrel after left atrial appendage (LAA) occluder implantation.

BACKGROUND: The optimal antithrombotic strategy after interventional left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is controversial. Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel is the most frequently used regiment. However, pharmacodynamic response to antiplatelet medication differs significantly between individuals. Therefore, we aimed to analyse pharmacodynamic response to aspirin and clopidogrel after LAAC. METHODS: In this study, we included 129 patients undergoing interventional LAAC. Primary end point was pharmacodynamic response to antiplatelet medication. Platelet reactivity was measured by light transmittance aggregometry and vasodilator stimulated protein phosphorylation assay. Secondary endpoints were TIMI bleeding events and MACCE during hospital course and one-year follow-up. RESULTS: Insufficient pharmacodynamic response (high on-treatment platelet reactivity - HTPR) to clopidogrel occurred in 67 patients (52%); HTPR to aspirin in 15 patients (12%); low on-treatment platelet reactivity - LTPR - to clopidogrel in 13 patients (10%). No occluder thrombosis or stroke occurred during one year follow-up. Pharmacodynamic response to antiplatelet medication was not associated with MACCE. However, the incidence of TIMI minor bleeding was increased in patients with LTPR to clopidogrel. CONCLUSIONS: Impaired clopidogrel antiplatelet effects were very frequent in patients after LAAC. No stroke or occluder thrombosis occurred. Patients with LTPR to clopidogrel showed more minor bleeding events. Therefore, this hypothesis generating pilot study raises the question if clopidogrel early after LAAC is needed. This question should be addressed in large scale trials.