RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To study the density, spacing, and regularity of retinal cone photoreceptors using an Adaptive Optics (AO) retinal camera (Rtx1TM, Imagine Eyes, Orsay, France) in patients with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG) and to compare the outcomes with those of healthy age-matched control subjects. METHODS: The study included 43 eyes with POAG and 31 eyes of normal subjects. POAG patients were divided into three groups according to the severity of the visual field defect. The AO Rtx1TM was used to obtain images of the parafoveal cone mosaic to calculate cone values. Analysis was performed at two and four degrees of eccentricity from the fovea along the four meridians (nasal, temporal, superior, inferior). RESULTS: In POAG eyes, the mean ± standard deviation (SD) cone density at 2° considering all meridians was significantly lower than in normal controls (23,058.6 ± 3532.0 cones/mm2, and 25,511.7 ± 3157.5 cones/mm2, respectively; p = 0.003). Cone spacing was 7.3 ± 0.5 µm in POAG and 7.0 ± 0.4 µm in normal controls (p = 0.005), and cone regularity was 90.5 ± 4.9% and 93.5 ± 1.9% in POAG and normal controls, respectively (p < 0.001). At 4° similar trends were observed. However, no significant differences were found among patients with different severity of POAG (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Using AO Rtx1TM, significant differences in retinal photoreceptors mosaic pattern were found between POAG eyes and age-matched controls, indicating a reduction in photoreceptors in POAG. No significant differences in retinal photoreceptor values were found among the three POAG groups.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is associated with an increased prevalence of open-angle glaucoma, attributed to variations of the pressure gradient between intraocular and intracranial compartments at the level of the lamina cribrosa (LC). As ocular biomechanics influence the behavior of the LC, and a lower corneal hysteresis (CH) has been associated to a higher risk of glaucomatous optic nerve damage, in this study we compared ocular biomechanics of iNPH patients with healthy subjects. METHODS: Twenty-four eyes of 24 non-shunted iNPH patients were prospectively recruited. Ocular biomechanical properties were investigated using the ocular response analyzer (Reichert Instruments) for the calculation of the CH, corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), and corneal-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc). Results were compared with those of 25 eyes of 25 healthy subjects. RESULTS: In iNPH eyes, the median CH value and interquartile range (IQR) were 9.7 mmHg (7.8-10) and 10.6 mmHg (9.3-11.3) in healthy controls (p = 0.015). No significant differences were found in IOPcc [18.1 mmHg (14.72-19.92) vs. 16.4 mmHg (13.05-19.6)], IOPg [15.4 mmHg (12.82-19.7) vs. 15.3 mmHg (12.55-17.35)], and CRF [9.65 mmHg (8.07-11.65) vs. 10.3 mmHg (9.3-11.5)] between iNPH patients and controls. CONCLUSIONS: In iNPH patients, the CH was significantly lower compared to healthy subjects. This result suggests that ocular biomechanical properties may potentially contribute to the risk of development of glaucomatous optic nerve damage in iNPH patients.