Development of A Minimum Dataset for the Monitoring of Recombinant Human Growth Hormone (rhGH) Therapy Use in Children with Growth Hormone Deficiency (GHD) - A GloBE-Reg Initiative.

Introduction Although there are some recommendations in the literature on the assessments that should be performed in children on recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) therapy, the level of consensus on these measurements is not clear. The objective of the current study was to identify the minimum dataset (MDS) that could be measured in a routine clinical setting across the world, aiming to minimise burden on clinicians and improve quality of data collection. Methods This study was undertaken by the GH Scientific Study Group (SSG) in GloBE-Reg, a new project that has developed a common registry platform that can support long-term safety and effectiveness studies of drugs. Twelve clinical experts from 7 international endocrine organisations identified by the GloBE-Reg Steering Committee, 2 patient representatives and representatives from 2 pharmaceutical companies with previous GH registry expertise collaborated to develop this recommendation. A comprehensive list of data fields routinely collected by each of the clinical and industry experts for children with GHD was compiled. Each member was asked to determine the: (1) Importance of the data field and (2) Ease of data collection. Data fields that achieved 70% consensus in terms of importance qualified for the MDS, provided <50% deemed the item difficult to collect. Results A total of 246 items were compiled and 27 removed due to redundancies, with 219 items subjected to the grading system. Of the 219 items, 111 achieved at least 70% consensus as important data to collect when monitoring children with GH deficiency (GHD) on rhGH treatment. Sixty-nine of the 219 items were deemed easy to collect. Combining the criteria of importance and ease of data collection, 63 met the criteria for the MDS. Several anomalies to the MDS rule were identified and highlighted for discussion, including whether the patients were involved in current or previous clinical trials, need for HbA1c monitoring, other past medical history, and adherence, enabling formulation of the final MDS recommendation of 43 items; 20 to be completed once, 14 every 6 months and 9 every 12 months. Conclusion In summary, this exercise performed through the GloBE-Reg initiative provides a recommendation of the minimum dataset requirement, collected through real-world data, for the monitoring of safety and effectiveness of rhGH in children with GHD, both for the current daily preparations and the newer long-acting growth hormone.

The I-CAH Registry: A platform for international collaboration for improving knowledge and clinical care in congenital adrenal hyperplasia.

To provide an overview of the I-CAH Registry. Following the successful roll-out of the I-DSD Registry in the 2000s, it was felt that there was a need for a registry for congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) and this was launched in 2014 as a dedicated module within the original registry. In addition to supporting and promoting research, the I-CAH Registry acts as an international tool for benchmarking of clinical care and it does this through the collection of standardised data for specific projects. Surveillance of novel therapies in the field of CAH can also be achieved via global collaborations. Its robust governance ensures adherence to the international standards for rare disease registries. Rare disease registries such as the I-CAH Registry are important tools for all stakeholders involved in the care of people with CAH.

Nutritional Status at Diagnosis as Predictor of Survival from Childhood Cancer: A Review of the Literature.

Few studies so far have examined the impact of nutritional status on the survival of children with cancer, with the majority of them focusing on hematological malignancies. We summarized published evidence reporting the association of nutritional status at diagnosis with overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), relapse, and treatment-related toxicity (TRT) in children with cancer. Published studies on children with leukemia, lymphoma, and other solid tumors have shown that both under-nourished and over-nourished children at cancer diagnosis had worse OS and EFS. Particularly, the risk of death and relapse increased by 30-50% among children with leukemia with increased body mass index at diagnosis. Likewise, the risk of TRT was higher among malnourished children with osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma. Nutritional status seems to play a crucial role in clinical outcomes of children with cancer, thus providing a significant modifiable prognostic tool in childhood cancer management. Future studies with adequate power and longitudinal design are needed to further evaluate the association of nutritional status with childhood cancer outcomes using a more standardized definition to measure nutritional status in this population. The use of new technologies is expected to shed further light on this understudied area and give room to person-targeted intervention strategies.

Early Postnatal Use of Glibenclamide in Permanent Neonatal Diabetes Secondary to Antenatally Diagnosed KJCN11 Mutation.

INTRODUCTION: Heterozygous activating mutations in KCNJ11 cause both permanent and transient neonatal diabetes. A minority of patients also have neurological features. Early genetic diagnosis has important therapeutic implications as treatment with sulfonylurea provides good metabolic control and exerts a protective effect on neuromuscular function. CASE PRESENTATION: A term female infant with normal birth weight (2.73 kg, z-score: -1.69) was admitted to the Neonatal Unit at Addenbrookes Hospital. She had been antenatally diagnosed with KCNJ11 mutation-R201C inherited from her glibenclamide-treated mother who continued sulfonylurea treatment throughout pregnancy. A continuous glucose-monitoring system inserted at 20 h of age showed progressive rise of blood glucose concentrations, prompting treatment with glibenclamide on day 2 of life. Initial attempts to treat with an extemporaneous solution of glibenclamide (starting dose 0.2 mg/kg/day) resulted in inconsistent response and significant hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia. A licenced liquid formulation of glibenclamide (AMGLIDIA) at a starting dose of 0.05 mg/kg/day was used with stabilization of blood glucose profile within 24 h. Other than a mild transient elevation in transaminase, treatment was well tolerated. At most recent review (age 12 months), the patient remains well with age-appropriate neurodevelopment. Overall glucose control is reasonable with estimated HbA1c of 7.6% (59.9 mmol/mol). CONCLUSION: Early postnatal glibenclamide treatment of insulin-naive patients with KATP-dependent neonatal diabetes is safe, provides good metabolic control, and has a potential protective effect on neurological function. The formulation of the medicine needs to be carefully considered in the context of the very small doses required in this age group.

Gonadotrophin-independent Precocious Puberty Secondary to an Estrogen Secreting Adrenal Tumor.

BACKGROUND: Adrenal masses are rare in children and most commonly present with clinical features of virilization in the absence of activation of the pituitary axis-gonadotrophin-independent precocious puberty. OBSERVATIONS: We report an unusual case of a 7-year-old girl who presented with clinical signs suggestive of exposure to both androgens and estrogens. Imaging revealed a left-sided adrenal mass with no evidence of metastasis. She underwent successful laparoscopic unilateral adrenalectomy. Histology confirmed an adrenal adenoma. CONCLUSION: We conclude that adrenocortical tumors should be considered in children presenting with gonadotrophin-independent precocious puberty and raised estrogens.

Safe and effective use of a hybrid closed-loop system from diagnosis in children under 18 months with type 1 diabetes.

The management of type 1 diabetes in infancy presents significant challenges. Hybrid closed loop systems have been shown to be effective in a research setting and are now available for clinical use. There are relatively little reported data regarding their safety and efficacy in a real world clinical setting. We report two cases of very young children diagnosed with type 1 diabetes at ages 18 (Case 1) and 7 months (Case 2), who were commenced on hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery using the CamAPS FX™ system from diagnosis. At diagnosis, total daily dose (TDD) was 6 and 3.3 units for Case 1 and 2, respectively. Closed loop was started during the inpatient stay and weekly follow up was provided via video call on discharge. Seven months from diagnosis, Case 1 has an HbA1C of 49 mmol/mol, 61% time in range (TIR, 3.9-10 mmol/L) with 2% time in hypoglycemia (<3.9 mmol/L) with no incidents of very low blood glucose (BG; <3 mmol/L, 54 mg/dL) over 6 months. Given the extremely small TDD of insulin in Case 2, we elected to use diluted insulin (insulin aspart injection, NovoLog, Novo Nordisk Inc., Plainsboro, NJ, Diluting Medium for NovoLog®). Six months from diagnosis, the estimated HbA1c is 50 mmol/mol, TIR 76% with 1% hypoglycemia and no incidents of very low BG (<3 mmol/L, 54 mg/dL) over 6 months. We conclude that the use hybrid closed-loop can be safe and effective from diagnosis in children under 2 years of age with type 1 diabetes.

Exposure to pesticides and childhood leukemia risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Despite the abundance of epidemiological evidence concerning the association between pesticide exposure and adverse health outcomes including acute childhood leukemia (AL), evidence remains inconclusive, and is inherently limited by heterogeneous exposure assessment and multiple statistical testing. We performed a literature search of peer-reviewed studies, published until January 2021, without language restrictions. Summary odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were derived from stratified random-effects meta-analyses by type of exposure and outcome, exposed populations and window of exposure to address the large heterogeneity of existing literature. Heterogeneity and small-study effects were also assessed. We identified 55 eligible studies (n = 48 case-control and n = 7 cohorts) from over 30 countries assessing >200 different exposures of pesticides (n = 160,924 participants). The summary OR for maternal environmental exposure to pesticides (broad term) during pregnancy and AL was 1.88 (95%CI: 1.15-3.08), reaching 2.51 for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL; 95%CI: 1.39-4.55). Analysis by pesticide subtype yielded an increased risk for maternal herbicide (OR: 1.41, 95%CI: 1.00-1.99) and insecticide (OR: 1.60, 95%CI: 1.11-2.29) exposure during pregnancy and AL without heterogeneity (p = 0.12-0.34). Meta-analyses of infant leukemia were only feasible for maternal exposure to pesticides during pregnancy. Higher magnitude risks were observed for maternal pesticide exposure and infant ALL (OR: 2.18, 95%CI: 1.44-3.29), and the highest for infant acute myeloid leukemia (OR: 3.42, 95%CI: 1.98-5.91). Overall, the associations were stronger for maternal exposure during pregnancy compared to childhood exposure. For occupational or mixed exposures, parental, and specifically paternal, pesticide exposure was significantly associated with increased risk of AL (ORparental: 1.75, 95%CI: 1.08-2.85; ORpaternal: 1.20, 95%CI: 1.07-1.35). The epidemiological evidence, supported by mechanistic studies, suggests that pesticide exposure, mainly during pregnancy, increases the risk of childhood leukemia, particularly among infants. Sufficiently powered studies using repeated biomarker analyses are needed to confirm whether there is public health merit in reducing prenatal pesticide exposure.

How to interpret IGF-1 and growth hormone stimulation tests.

You are seeing an 11-year-old boy in a general paediatric clinic referred with short stature. His height is below the 0.4th centile. The mid-parental height is on 50th centile. Baseline investigations, including renal and liver function, coeliac screen and thyroid function tests are normal. You have a suspicion of growth hormone deficiency. Should you check an insulin-like growth factor-1 level or proceed with a growth hormone provocation test? The current paper will aim to give an overview of these tests and factors to consider when interpreting the results.

Association between blood pressure and risk of cancer development: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

With the exception of renal cell carcinoma, studies assessing the association between hypertension and other cancers are inconsistent. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess this evidence. We included observational studies investigating the association between any definition of hypertension or systolic and diastolic blood pressure and risk of any cancer, after searching PubMed until November 2017. We calculated summary relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using inverse-variance weighted random effects methods. A total of 148 eligible publications were identified out of 39,891 initially screened citations. Considering only evidence from 85 prospective studies, positive associations were observed between hypertension and kidney, colorectal and breast cancer. Positive associations between hypertension and risk of oesophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, liver and endometrial cancer were also observed, but the majority of studies did not perform comprehensive multivariable adjustments. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were positively associated with risk of kidney cancer but not with other cancers. In addition to the previously well-described association between hypertension and risk of kidney cancer, the current meta-analysis suggested that hypertensive individuals may also be at higher risk of colorectal and breast cancer. However, careful interpretation is required as most meta-analyses included relatively small number of studies, several relative risks had weak or moderate magnitude and maybe affected by residual confounding.

Comparative rates of harms in randomized trials from more developed versus less developed countries may be different.

OBJECTIVES: We set up to evaluate the relative risk of harms in trials performed in less developed vs. more developed countries. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Meta-epidemiologic evaluation using the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. We considered meta-analyses with at least one randomized clinical trial (RCT) in a less developed country and one RCT in a more developed country. We targeted severe adverse events (AEs), discontinuations due to AEs, any AE, organ system-specific AEs, individual AEs, and all discontinuations due to any reason. We estimated the relative odds ratio (ROR) of harms between more and less developed countries for each topic and the summary ROR (sROR) across topics under each category of harms. RESULTS: We identified 42 systematic reviews (128 meta-analyses, 521 independent RCTs). Summary sRORs did not differ significantly from 1.00 for any harm category. Nominally significant RORs were found in only 6/128 meta-analyses. However, in 27% (35/128) of meta-analyses the ROR point estimates indicated relative differences between country settings >2-fold. Considering also ROR 95% confidence intervals, in 92% (118/128) of meta-analyses one could not exclude a 2-fold difference in both directions. CONCLUSIONS: We identified limited comparative evidence on harms in trials from these two country settings. Substantial differences in the risk point estimates were common; the potential for modest differences could rarely be excluded with confidence.

Omalizumab for the treatment of inadequately controlled allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Patients with moderate-to-severe allergic rhinitis who are inadequately controlled despite treatment according to current rhinitis management guidelines have a significant unmet medical need. Such patients have a negative impact on daily functioning and are at risk of developing serious comorbidities, such as asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of omalizumab in poorly controlled allergic rhinitis under a meta-analysis framework. METHODS: MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched through September 2013. Studies on the efficacy of omalizumab in allergic rhinitis that assessed clinical outcomes were selected. Descriptive and quantitative information was extracted; mean differences and relative risk estimates were synthesized under a fixed or random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by using the Q statistic and the I(2) metric. Subgroup analyses were performed for the presence of specific immunotherapy treatment. RESULTS: Of the 352 citations retrieved, 11 studies of 2870 patients were finally included. A statistically significant reduction in the daily nasal symptom severity score (standardized mean difference -0.67 [95% CI, -1.3 to -0.31]; P < .0001; I(2), 92%) and a statistically significant reduction in daily nasal rescue medication score (-0.22 [95% CI, -0.39 to -0.05; P = .01; I(2), 58%) were observed. There was not a statistically significant difference in the occurrence of any adverse event (relative risk 1.06 [95% CI, 0.94-1.19; I(2), 55%). CONCLUSIONS: Omalizumab is statistically significantly associated with symptom relief, decreased rescue medication use, and improvement of quality of life in patients with inadequately controlled allergic rhinosinusitis.