The impact of antibiotic stewardship interventions and patient related factors on antibiotic prescribing in a vascular surgical department.

PURPOSE: The development of guidelines tailored to the departments' needs and counselling during ward rounds are important antibiotic stewardship (AS) strategies. The aim was to analyse the impact of AS ward rounds and institutional guidelines as well as patient-related factors on antibiotic use in vascular surgical patients. METHODS: A retrospective prescribing-analysis of 3 months (P1, P2) before and after implementing weekly AS ward rounds and antimicrobial treatment guidelines was performed. Choice of systemic antibiotics, days of antibiotic therapy and clinical data were obtained from electronic patient records. RESULTS: During P2, the overall antibiotic consumption as well as the use of last-resort compounds like linezolid and fluoroquinolones decreased distinctly (overall: 47.0 days of therapy (DOT)/100 patient days (PD) vs. 35.3 DOT/100PD, linezolid: 3.7 DOT/100PD vs. 1.0 DOT/100PD, fluoroquinolones: 7.0 DOT/100PD vs. 3.2 DOT/100PD) while narrow-spectrum beta-lactams increased by 48.4%. Courses of antibiotics were de-escalated more often during P2 (30.5% vs. 12.1%, p = 0.011). Only in P2, an antibiotic therapy was initiated in patients suffering from more comorbidities (i.e. higher Charlson Comorbidity Index) more frequently. Other patient factors had no distinct impact on antibiotic prescribing. CONCLUSION: Weekly AS ward rounds improved adherence to institutional antibiotic treatment guidelines and antibiotic prescribing in vascular surgical patients. Clear patient-related determinants affecting choice of antibiotic therapies could not be identified.

Physician Modification of a Custom-Made Fenestrated Endograft By Closure of a Fenestration With Bovine Patch.

PURPOSE: Ruptured mycotic pararenal aortic aneurysms are rare and serious condition that requires prompt treatment. Open surgery with aortic resection and in-situ or extra-anatomic reconstruction is the standard treatment. The aim of this technical note is to report urgent endovascular treatment using a readily available custom-made device (created for another patient), with a back-table modification using pericardium patch and a new fenestration. TECHNIQUE: In preoperative measurements on centerline-based workstation, aortic diameter in proximal and distal landing zone and target vessel position matched the measurements of graft plan of custom-made device (CMD) besides left renal artery. To address current patient`s anatomy, closure of the nonsuitable fenestration with pericardial patch and creation of new fenestration (1 cm above and 1:15 hours posterior to original fenestration) for the respective target vessel have been performed. Postoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) scan showed complete exclusion of aneurysm, perfused target vessels, and no endoleak. Under resistance-based antibiotic therapy, the patient was asymptomatic and showed normal infection parameters in blood samples postoperatively. CONCLUSION: In the hands of an experienced endovascular aortic surgeon modification of a custom-made device is a quick and feasible technique in this emergency situation. Long-term follow-up must confirm the durability and reliability of this new technique. CLINICAL IMPACT: The described technique of modification of a custom-made endograft can provide an alternative endovascular treatment option for urgent complex abdominal aortic pathologies. Compared to the current available treatment modalities, like physician modified endografts, off-the-shelf branched devices, parallel grafts and in-situ fenestration, it can save considerable time and provides reasonable sealing in ruptured cases. The technique offers a valuable add-on to the armamentarium of experienced endovascular physicians.

3D printing in the planning and teaching of endovascular procedures.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of 3D printing in the medical field led to new possibilities in the planning of complex procedures, as well as new ways of training junior physicians. Especially in the field of vascular interventions, 3D printing has a wide range of applications. METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS: 3D-printed models of aortic aneurysms can be used for procedural training of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), which can help boost the physician's confidence in the procedure, leading to a better outcome for the patient. Furthermore, it allows for a better understanding of complex anatomies and pathologies. In addition to teaching applications, the field of pre-interventional planning benefits greatly from the addition of 3D printing. Especially in the preparation for a complex endovascular aortic repair, prior orientation and test implantation of the stent grafts can further improve outcomes and reduce complications. For both teaching and planning applications, high-quality imaging datasets are required that can be transferred into a digital 3D model and subsequently printed in 3D. Thick slice thickness or suboptimal contrast agent phase can reduce the overall detail of the digital model, possibly concealing crucial anatomical details. CONCLUSION: Based on the digital 3D model created for 3D printing, another new visualization technique might see future applications in the field of vascular interventions: virtual reality (VR). It enables the physician to quickly visualize a digital 3D model of the patient's anatomy in order to assess possible complications during endovascular repair. Due to the short transfer time from the radiological dataset into the VR, this technique might see use in emergency situations, where there is no time to wait for a printed model.

[The spinal catheter in aortic surgery : Implications for anesthesia]. / Der Spinalkatheter in der Aortenchirurgie : Implikationen für die Anästhesie.

During surgical repair of aortic pathologies (e.g. dissection, aneurysms), cross-clamping of the aorta or overstenting of critical segmental arteries can lead to ischemia- and edema-related spinal cord damage with subsequent paraplegia. By regulating cerebrospinal fluid pressure, the spinal catheter is an effective method for prophylaxis and treatment of spinal cord ischemia. Due to the high complication rate of the spinal catheter a detailed risk-benefit assessment is obligatory: besides cerebrospinal fluid leakage, postpuncture headaches and local infections, feared complications, such as intracranial bleeding, meningitis and neuraxial hematomas can also occur, sometimes with a significant latent period after termination of the procedure. Adequate training of personnel in the perioperative handling of spinal catheters and meticulous adherence to drainage parameters are important components for increasing procedural safety. This is particularly true since the clinical aspects of catheter-associated complications only slightly differ from that of ischemic spinal cord injury.

Erratum to: Complex endovascular treatment of intact aortic aneurysms. An analysis of health insurance claims data.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1007/s00772-018-0387-7.].

Staged procedures for prevention of spinal cord ischemia in endovascular aortic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord ischemia with development of paraplegia is the most relevant complication of thoracoabdominal aortic surgery caused by compromising the segmental arteries. To prevent this devastating complication in endovascular aortic surgery, staging procedures have been developed to reinforce collateral blood flood to the spinal cord. RESULTS: In patients with a medium to high risk for spinal cord ischemia, staged aortic repair is recommended. The classical staged repair is the two-step repair with delayed implantation of the aortic stent grafts. Additionally, more recent methods for short-term salvage of segmental artery perfusion by leaving an endoleak have been developed. Perfusion branches, delayed bridging stents as well as the open branch technique are among these methods. The latest option of staged repair is minimally invasive segmental artery embolization. CONCLUSION: Besides the nonsurgical options for monitoring and therapy of spinal cord ischemia, various staging procedures are available, which can be implemented depending on the patient and the aortic anatomy. Evidence that underlines staged repair for endovascular treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic pathologies is mostly based on retrospective studies.

Complex endovascular treatment of intact aortic aneurysms: An analysis of health insurance claims data.

BACKGROUND: The complex endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms and dissections with fenestrated or branched stent grafts (FB-EVAR) remains challenging for interventional vascular surgery. To date, the evidence regarding treatment patterns and outcome measures consists of single center studies; however, it might be reasonable to validate results with multicenter real-world evidence. METHODS: Health insurance claims data from Germany's third largest insurance provider, DAK-Gesundheit, were used to determine outcomes following FB-EVAR of non-ruptured thoracic aorta (TA) or thoracoabdominal including pararenal abdominal (TAA) aorta. The study included patients operated between January 2008 and April 2017. RESULTS: Included were 984 patients (18.1% female) who underwent FB-EVAR. Patients with treatment of the TA were younger (71.7 vs. 73.2 years, p < 0.001) and more often female (38.5% vs. 17.0%, p < 0.001) as compared to patients with treatment of TAA. In the TA group peripheral arterial disease was less frequent compared to the TAA group (67.3% vs. 80.4%, p = 0.036). Mortality was significantly (p < 0.001) higher following repair of the TAA compared to the TA at discharge (17.3% vs. 4.6%), at 30 days (26.9% vs. 8.2%) and at 90 days (34.6% vs. 10.1%). Patients with treatment of the TAA suffered more often from stroke as compared to the TA group (7.7% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: In this large-scale German analysis of claims data, multicenter real-world evidence was different from single center studies regarding patient risk-factors and outcome measures. Validated multicenter registry studies could help to further investigate this topic in times of increasing procedures.

[Vascular surgery in the elderly : What is possible? What is reasonable?] / Gefäßchirurgie bei alten Menschen : Was ist möglich? Was ist sinnvoll?

Nowadays vascular treatment of the elderly is a great challenge. Following the demographic change patients in the field of vascular surgery are becoming older and sicker. In addition to the actual main vascular pathology, the average patient arrives with a series of additional diagnoses that have an impact on the perioperative strategy, surgery and outcome of patients. This strategy becomes more and more challenging because on one hand there will be soon be no limits to treatment, which is attributable to the progress in endovascular surgery and on the other hand the question arises whether the feasible is reasonable? Within the scope of this article the problems of treatment of the elderly are presented and strategies and decisions for an individualized optimal therapy are proposed.

Editor's Choice - Subsequent Results for Arch Aneurysm Repair with Inner Branched Endografts.

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to evaluate the current results of aortic arch aneurysm repair using inner branched endografts performed in three high volume aortic endovascular centers and to compare them to the pioneering global experience with this technology. METHODS: Included patients underwent repair of aortic arch aneurysms >55 mm in diameter using inner branched endograft technology between April 2013 and November 2014. All patients were deemed unfit for open surgery. Inner branches were designed to perfuse the brachiocephalic trunk and the left common carotid artery in all cases. A left subclavian artery (LSA) revascularization was performed prior to the arch endovascular repair. Data were collected retrospectively in an electronic database. Parameters included length of procedure, fluoroscopy time, contrast volume, technical success, presence of endoleaks, early and late complications, and mortality. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were included in the study. Technical success was achieved in all cases. No patients died during the 30 day post-operative period. Early neurologic events included two major strokes (7.4%) and one minor stroke (3.7%). Transient spinal cord ischemia with full recovery was observed in two patients (7.4%). Four patients (14.8%) underwent early (<30 day) re-interventions; these were for an access complication, an ischemic limb and exploration of the left ventricle through a sternotomy in two patients. During follow up (median 12 months), one patient (3.7%) died from a remote thoraco-abdominal aneurysm rupture. There were three Type 2 endoleaks (11.1%). Two re-interventions (7.4%) were performed, one to treat a Type 2 endoleak and one to treat a septic false aneurysm. A significant decrease in overall mortality was observed when comparing patients from the early experience with patients from the current report. CONCLUSIONS: The early outcomes associated with this technology are favorable. Branched endografting of aortic arch aneurysms should be considered in patients unfit for open surgery.

Chronic type B aortic dissection: indications and strategies for treatment.

Chronic type B aortic dissection is a distinctive condition that needs individual treatment strategies and different considerations than in therapy of acute or subacute type B aortic dissection. The most common indication for treatment of this complex disease is aneurysmal dilatation of the dissected aortic segment. While open repair of the enlarged dissected aorta remains the best option for good-risk patients and patients with connective tissue disorders in high-volume centers with respective expertise, endovascular management of chronic type B aortic dissection with postdissection aneurysms has significantly gained ground in the past years. But the concept of TEVAR with implantation of a tubular stent-graft into the thoracic aorta to seal the proximal entry tear and reroute the blood flow into the true lumen alone, is not associated with satisfactory results. This is mainly due to the sparse remodeling capacity of the aortic tissue compared to earlier stages of the disease as the aortic wall and the dissection membrane are thickened and more rigid. On the other hand, it is restricted by the most limiting factor for endovascular success in chronic type B aortic dissection: persistent false lumen perfusion. This problem also affects patients with residual dissection after surgical repair of a DeBakey type I aortic dissection or dissection after ascending aortic repair for other pathologies. Hence, it is evident that strategies to achieve endovascular false lumen occlusion are of increasing importance and novel techniques have been introduced to solve the problem of persisting false lumen flow. Thus, the evolution of a large variety of techniques to address the false lumen perfusion issue indicates that complicated chronic type B dissection involves a high diversity in clinical presentation and morphology. A large armamentarium of catheter skills as well as critical individualized treatment strategies are required to address the heterogenous morphological disease pattern for each individual patient. The rapid development in endovascular techniques gives new directions for treatment indications and strategies in chronic aortic dissection and enables new insights into this old disease.

[Transcardiac Access Routes for Endovascular Treatment of Ascending Aortic Pathologies]. / Transkardiale Zugangswege zur endovaskulären Versorgung der Aorta ascendens.

Gold standard for treatment of pathologies of the ascending aorta is still open surgery with extracorporal circulation in moderate to deep hypothermia. These procedures are associated with high morbidity and mortality, especially if performed in older patients or after previous cardiac surgery. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has become the preferred treatment option for thoracic aortic pathologies of the descending aorta even in high-risk patients with severe comorbidities resulting in reduced morbidity and mortality compared to open repair. Despite the continuous development of endograft technology an adequate arterial access still poses a relevant limitation of this treatment option accentuated in the proximal segments of the aorta. The transfemoral access may be limited due to severe kinking or arteriosclerotic plaque stenosis of femoral or iliac vessels. Furthermore, the long distance between femoral access vessels and the aortic lesion impairs device torsibility and exact deployment of the stent graft. To provide a practical alternative endovascular access to the ascending aorta, antegrade transcardiac access routes including transapical or transseptal techniques have recently gained increasing interest.

TEVAR for chronic aortic dissection - is covering the primary entry tear enough?

Treatment-strategies for type B aortic dissection (TBAD) are rapidly developing towards endovascular treatment strategies. While TEVAR for acute TBAD shows favourable results, TEVAR in chronic TBAD following the same interventional strategies as in acute TBAD by covering the proximal entry-tear alone has shown unsatisfactory results with one third of the patients developing further false-lumen growth and mortality of 36% at 3 years. This review article describes endovascular strategies and adjunctive techniques to prevent distal false-lumen back-flow in patients with chronic TBAD, as covering the proximal entry tear has proven insufficient.

Acute aortic syndromes: definition, prognosis and treatment options.

Acute aortic syndromes (AAS) are life-threatening vascular conditions of the thoracic aorta presenting with acute pain as the leading symptom in most cases. The incidence is approximately 3-5/100,000 in western countries with increase during the past decades. Clinical suspicion for AAS requires immediate confirmation with advanced imaging modalities. Initial management of AAS addresses avoidance of progression by immediate medical therapy to reduce aortic shear stress. Proximal symptomatic lesions with involvement of the ascending aorta are surgically treated in the acute setting, whereas acute uncomplicated distal dissection should be treated by medical therapy in the acute period, followed by surveillance and repeated imaging studies. Acute complicated distal dissection requires urgent invasive treatment and thoracic endovascular aortic repair has become the treatment modality of choice because of favorable outcomes compared to open surgical repair. Intramural hematoma, penetrating aortic ulcers, and traumatic aortic injuries of the descending aorta harbor specific challenges compared to aortic dissection and treatment strategies are not as uniformly defined as in aortic dissection. Moreover these lesions have a different prognosis. Once the acute period of aortic syndrome has been survived, a lifelong medical treatment and close surveillance with repeated imaging studies is essential to detect impending complications which might need invasive treatment within the short-, mid- or long-term.

[Treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms]. / Therapie des abdominalen Aortenaneurysmas.

The treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) has changed significantly since the introduction of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). In terms of perioperative morbidity and mortality, randomized multicenter trials revealed results in favour of EVAR compared to open reconstruction. However, EVAR is associated with possible late complications caused by endoleaks, stent migration, kinking and/or overstenting of side branches, making life-long follow-up necessary. Since the majority of patients requiring therapy are elderly and exhibit attendant comorbidities, EVAR has become the procedure of choice in those patients with favourable anatomy. Medicamentous and conservative treatment may be relevant in patients with small to medium-sized aneurysms. Since smoking is one of the major risk factors for the development of AAA, all patients should be advised to stop smoking. Studies on long-term statin therapy in patients following surgical AAA repair showed a reduction in both overall and cardiovascular mortality; AAA patients should therefore receive statins for secondary prevention.

Iliac conduits for endovascular repair of aortic pathologies.

OBJECTIVES: Challenging iliac access during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is associated with a higher risk of access site complications such as injury or rupture of the iliac vessels. As a result, the use of iliac conduits is frequently used to facilitate access during TEVAR. This report evaluates the effect of iliac conduits on TEVAR outcomes. METHODS: The 2005-2010 American College of Surgeons Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried to identify vascular patients undergoing elective TEVAR. Patients without conduit (Group A) were compared to patients who underwent TEVAR with conduit (Group B). RESULTS: We identified 1037 patients (90%) in Group A (69 ± 12.7 years, 42% female) and 117 patients (10%) in Group B (70 ± 12.6 years, 68% female). Women received conduits more often than men (Male:5.8%, Female:15.7%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the rate of non-surgical (A:19%,B:25%,p = 0.121), pulmonary (A:11%,B:16%, p = 0.115), renal (A:3.1%, B:1.7%, p = 0.4) and cardiovascular complications (A:8%, B:12%, p = 0.143) between groups. However, any complication (A:24%, B:33%. p = 0.025), surgical complications (A:10%, B:16%, p = 0.035) and mortality (A:4.5%, B:12%. p = 0.001) were significantly higher in Group B. In multivariate analysis, use of conduit was associated with a 3.8 times higher risk of death compared with no conduit after controlling for confounders. Length of in-hospital stay was similar for both groups (A:6.6 ± 8.8, B:7.6 ± 8 days, p = 0.247). The use of conduits had a declining rate over time from 17.9% in 2006 down to 6.5% in 2010. CONCLUSIONS: Female patients more frequently require iliac conduits during TEVAR compared to men. Conduits were associated with a higher rate of surgical complications and mortality. The incidence of conduit use has decreased threefold in the last five years. Safer access for TEVAR by use of a conduit should not be abandoned based on these results, but there should be a heightened awareness for the higher rate of mortality in these patients.

[Aneurysms of the deep femoral artery: a systematic review of literature]. / Aneurysma der A. profunda femoris - Eine systematische Literaturanalyse.

INTRODUCTION: True aneurysms of the deep femoral artery (APFA) are rare and are usually presented as case reports. Recommendations for diagnostics and therapy of APFAs are based on low-level evidence only. The purpose of this paper was to summarise the existing world experience with APFA. MATERIAL/METHODS: On the occasion of our own case a systematic review of the literature was performed for diagnostics and therapy for true APFA. Publications retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Collaboration as well as by hand search from their references were reviewed. RESULTS: From 2002 onwards 25 papers on true APFAs were published in the English and German literature. Apart from two retrospective studies over a longer period of time these were exclusively case reports. A total of 55 true APFAs were reported in 47 patients with a mean age of 63 years. Therapeutic intervention was due to a rupture in 10 cases (18 %). The mean maximal diameter of APFA at presentation was 5.4 cm (2-18 cm). APFAs that were not ruptured presented frequently as a painful pulsatile mass in the groin and thigh. Therapeutic options for APFA included, apart from surgical resection with or without reconstruction of the deep femoral artery, the endovascular repair. DISCUSSION: Symptoms of swelling and pain in the presence of a mass at the proximal thigh should raise the suspicion of an APFA. Surgical therapy should be performed electively in APFAs with a diameter of more than 2 cm or in cases of rapid progression as well as in all symptomatic or ruptured cases. The endovascular approach should be considered as an alternative option in all cases.