Efficiency of eSource Direct Data Capture in Investigator-Initiated Clinical Trials in Oncology.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials have become larger and more complex. Thus, eSource should be used to enhance efficiency. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the multisite implementation of eSource direct data capture (DDC), which we define as eCRFs for direct data entry in this study, on efficiency by analyzing data from a single investigator-initiated clinical trial in oncology. METHODS: Operational data associated with the targeted study conducted in Japan was used to analyze time from data occurrence to data entry and data finalization, and number of visits to the site and time spent at the site by clinical research associates (CRAs). Additionally, simulations were performed on the change in hours at the clinical sites during the implementation of eSource DDC. RESULTS: No difference in time from data occurrence to data entry was observed between the DDC and the transcribed data fields. However, the DDC fields could be finalized 4 days earlier than the non-DDC fields. Additionally, although no difference was observed in the number of visits for source data verification (SDV) by CRAs, a comparison among sites that introduced eSource DDC and those that did not showed that the time spent at the site for SDV was reduced. Furthermore, the simulation results indicated that even a small amount of data to be collected or a small percentage of DDC-capable items may lead to greater efficiency when the number of subjects per site is significant. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of eSource DDC may enhance efficiency depending on the study framework and type and number of items to be collected.

Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Treatments for Early Stage Resectable NSCLC: Consensus Recommendations From the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

Advances in the multidisciplinary care of early stage resectable NSCLC (rNSCLC) are emerging at an unprecedented pace. Numerous phase 3 trials produced results that have transformed patient outcomes for the better, yet these findings also require important modifications to the patient treatment journey trajectory and reorganization of care pathways. Perhaps, most notably, the need for multispecialty collaboration for this patient population has never been greater. These rapid advances have inevitably left us with important gaps in knowledge for which definitive answers will only become available in several years. To this end, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer commissioned a diverse multidisciplinary international expert panel to evaluate the current landscape and provide diagnostic, staging, and therapeutic recommendations for patients with rNSCLC, with particular emphasis on patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer-Union for International Cancer Control TNM eighth edition stages II and III disease. Using a team-based approach, we generated 19 recommendations, of which all but one achieved greater than 85% consensus among panel members. A public voting process was initiated, which successfully validated and provided qualitative nuance to our recommendations. Highlights include the following: (1) the critical importance of a multidisciplinary approach to the evaluation of patients with rNSCLC driven by shared clinical decision-making of a multispecialty team of expert providers; (2) biomarker testing for rNSCLC; (3) a preference for neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for stage III rNSCLC; (4) equipoise regarding the optimal management of patients with stage II between upfront surgery followed by adjuvant therapy and neoadjuvant or perioperative strategies; and (5) the robust preference for adjuvant targeted therapy for patients with rNSCLC and sensitizing EGFR and ALK tumor alterations. Our primary goals were to provide practical recommendations sensitive to the global differences in biology and resources for patients with rNSCLC and to provide expert consensus guidance tailored to the individualized patient needs, goals, and preferences in their cancer care journey as these are areas where physicians must make daily clinical decisions in the absence of definitive data. These recommendations will continue to evolve as the treatment landscape for rNSCLC expands and more knowledge is acquired on the best therapeutic approach in specific patient and disease subgroups.

Prognostic significance of micronest in cancer stroma in resected lung squamous cell carcinoma.

Tumor budding in the cancer stroma has been reported to be a prognostic factor in non-small cell lung cancer. Micronest in cancer stroma (MICS) is often observed as a formation that is larger and more conspicuous than budding, but its clinicopathologic significance is unclear. In this study, we aimed to examine the clinicopathological significance of MICS in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSqCC). A total of 198 consecutive patients with pathologically diagnosed LSqCC (anyT N0-1M0) were enrolled in this study. MICS were defined as those that met the following criteria: (1) consisting of 5-200 tumor cells or less than 200 µm in diameter and (2) more than 200 µm away from the adjacent main lesion. The prognostic impact of the presence or absence of MICS and the characteristics of MICS-forming cancer cells were evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC). MICS was observed in 57 patients (28.8%), and overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were significantly shorter in the MICS-positive group (OS: 44.4% vs. 84.4%, p < 0.001; RFS: 30.0% vs. 82.6%, p < 0.001). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that the presence of MICS was an independent poor prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR] 3.54, p < 0.001) and RFS (HR 4.99, p < 0.001). Immunohistochemistry showed that the expression levels of the cell-cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin and hypoxia-induced protein GLUT-1 were significantly decreased in cancer cells forming MICS lesions compared to the tumor component excluding MICS within the same tumor (non-MICS lesions). Our data show that MICS is a distinct morphological feature with important biological and prognostic significance.

Effect of Resected Lung Volume on Pulmonary Function and Residual Lung Volume in Patients Undergoing Segmentectomy: A Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: We elucidated the effects of planned resection volume on postoperative pulmonary function and changes in residual lung volume during segmentectomy. METHODS: This study included patients who underwent thoracoscopic segmentectomy between January 2017 and December 2022 and met eligibility criteria. Pre- and post-resection spirometry and computed tomography were performed. Three-dimensional reconstructions were performed by using computed tomography images to calculate the volumes of the resected, remaining, and nonoperative side regions. Based on the resected region volume, patients were divided into the higher and lower volume segmentectomy groups. Changes in lung volume and pulmonary function before and after the surgery were comparatively analyzed. RESULTS: The median percentage of resected lung volume was 10.9%, forming the basis for categorizing patients into the two groups. Postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) ratios to preoperative measurements in both groups did not differ significantly (FEV1, p = 0.254; FVC, p = 0.777). Postoperative FEV1 and FVC ratios to their predicted postoperative values were significantly higher in the higher volume segmentectomy group than in the lower volume segmentectomy group (FEV1, p = 0003; FVC, p < 0.001). The higher volume segmentectomy group showed significantly greater post-to-preoperative lung volume ratio in overall, contralateral, ipsilateral, residual lobe and residual segment than the lower volume segmentectomy group. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative respiratory function did not differ significantly between the higher- and lower-volume segmentectomy groups, indicating improved respiratory function because of substantial postoperative residual lung expansion. Our findings would aid in determining the extent of resection during segmentectomy.

Risk Factors of Severe Postoperative Complication in Lung Cancer Patients with Diabetes Mellitus.

PURPOSE: Clinically, postoperative complications are occasionally observed in lung cancer patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). The increased risk of postoperative complications in DM patients has been reported in other fields. This study aims to identify risk factors for severe postoperative complications in lung cancer patients with DM. METHODS: Of 2756 consecutive patients who underwent complete resection for lung cancer between 2008 and 2018 in our hospital, 475 patients (20%) were complicated by DM. Clinical factors and diabetic factors (HbA1c, preoperative fasting blood glucose [FBG], postoperative mean FBG on 1, 3 postoperative days [PODs], and use of insulin) were evaluated by univariable and multivariable analyses to identify independent risk factors of severe complication. RESULTS: The 349 (73%) patients were male. Their median age was 71 years. Severe perioperative complications occurred in 128 (27%) patients. In the multivariable analysis, male (p <0.01), age (≥75 years) (p = 0.04), preoperative FBG (≥140 mg/dL) (p = 0.03), and increased mean FBG on 1, 3 PODs (≥180 mg/dL) (p <0.01) were significantly associated with severe perioperative complications. CONCLUSION: Increased FBG on 1, 3 PODs (≥180 mg/dL) was an independent risk factor for severe perioperative complications in lung cancer with DM. Postoperative hyperglycemia may be correlated to severe perioperative complications.

A case of lung metastasis from gastric cancer presenting as ground-glass opacity dominant nodules.

BACKGROUND: Most metastatic lung tumors present as solid nodules on chest computed tomography (CT). In contrast, ground-glass opacity on chest computed tomography usually suggests low-grade malignant lesions such as adenocarcinoma in situ or atypical adenomatous hyperplasia of the lung. CASE PRESENTATION: A 75-year-old woman with a history of gastric cancer surgery approximately 5 years prior was referred to the Department of Thoracic Surgery at our hospital because of two newly appearing pulmonary ground-glass opacity-dominant nodules on chest computed tomography. She had two ground-glass opacities in the right lower lobe, one in the S6 segment was 12 mm and the other in the S10 segment was 8 mm. On chest computed tomography 15 months prior to referral, the lesion in the S6 segment was 8 mm, and the lesion in the S10 segment was 2 mm. She was suspected to have primary lung cancer and underwent wide-wedge resection of the nodule in the S6 segment. In the resected specimen, polygonal tumor cells infiltrated the alveolar septa, with some tumor cells exhibiting signet ring cell morphology. Based on morphological similarities to the tumor cells of previous gastric cancers and the results of immunostaining, the patient was diagnosed with lung metastases of gastric cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary nodules in patients with a history of cancer in other organs, even if ground-glass opacity is predominant, should also be considered for the possibility of metastatic pulmonary tumors if they are growing rapidly.

Prognostic value of the international association for the study of lung cancer grading system and its association with the tumor microenvironment in stage I EGFR-muted lung adenocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) grading system predicts early lung adenocarcinoma outcomes. METHODS: The purpose of this study is to examine prognostic value of the IASLC grading system and its association with the tumor microenvironment (TME) in Stage I EGFR-muted lung adenocarcinoma. Based on the IASLC grading system, we compared the clinicopathological characteristics of EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma (n = 296). In addition, we examined the expression level of E-cadherin in tumor cells and counted the number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs; CD8, CD20, CD138, and Foxp3), tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs; CD204), and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs; podoplanin) using semi-automatic digital pathology image analysis. RESULTS: Recurrence-free survival (RFS) curve showed that survival of grade 3 was significantly shorter than that of grade 1 (P < 0.01) and grade 2 (P = 0.03). Multivariate analysis of RFS revealed the invasive size, lymphatic permeation, and grade 3 (P < 0.01) as independent poor prognostic factors. The number of CD204 +TAMs and PDPN+CAFs was significantly higher in grade 3 than in grade 1 or 2 (all P < 0.01). Among the intermediate grade by the predominant subtype based classification, cases classified as grade 3 by the new classification had higher number of CD204 +TAMs (P < 0.01) and PDPN+CAFs (P = 0.02) than those classified as grade 2. CONCLUSION: The IASLC grading system correlated with the outcomes of EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma. Grade 3 was found to have the TME that most contributes to tumor progression, which probably explained their poor prognosis.

Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of resectable clinical stage III non-small cell lung cancer in a Japanese real-world setting: Surgery cohort analysis of the SOLUTION study.

BACKGROUND: To elucidate the treatment and surgery outcomes with or without perioperative therapies in Japanese patients with clinical stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in real-world settings. METHODS: We performed subset analyses of the SOLUTION study, a multicenter, noninterventional, observational study of Japanese patients diagnosed with clinical stage III NSCLC, for those who started first-line treatment (surgery±perioperative therapy) between January 2013 and December 2014 (study registration: UMIN000031385). Follow-up data were obtained using medical records from diagnosis to March 1, 2018. RESULTS: Of 149 eligible patients, 67 underwent surgery alone (median age 71 years) and 82 underwent surgery+perioperative therapy (median age 63 years). Lung resection was performed in 137 patients and the others underwent exploratory thoracotomy or other procedures. Perioperative therapies included adjuvant therapy only (n = 41), neoadjuvant therapy only (n = 24), and neoadjuvant+adjuvant therapy (n = 17). The median overall survival (OS) and 3-year OS rate were 29.3 months and 44.0%, respectively, in patients who underwent surgery alone, and not reached and 61.1%, respectively, in patients who underwent surgery+perioperative therapy. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 42.4% and 47.1%, respectively, in patients who underwent surgery+perioperative therapy and 28.5% and 28.9%, respectively, in patients who underwent surgery alone. In multivariable Cox regression, perioperative therapy was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.49 [0.29-0.81]), PFS (0.62 [0.39-0.96]), and DFS (0.62 [0.39-0.97]) versus surgery alone. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggested that perioperative therapy may be associated with better survival among patients undergoing surgical treatment of clinical stage III NSCLC.

Clinicopathological differences between EGFR mutated and EGFR wild-type lung adenocarcinoma with papillary predominant pattern.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to reveal the clinicopathological differences between epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated and wild-type (WT) lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) focusing on the predominant subtype. METHODS: This study included 352 with EGFR mutation and 370 with WT patients in consecutive stage I LUAD classified by the predominant subtype, and their clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis were analyzed. Using the Cancer Genome Atlas Program (TCGA) cohort, we analyzed differences in gene expression between EGFR mutation and WT groups. Furthermore, we performed immunohistochemical evaluations for 46 with EGFR mutation and 47 with WT patients in consecutive stage I papillary predominant adenocarcinoma (PPA). RESULTS: Compared to the PPA with WT [n = 115], those with EGFR mutation [n = 99] exhibited smaller invasive size (p = 0.03) and less frequent vessel invasion (p < 0.01). However, PPA with EGFR mutation showed significantly worse 5-ys recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates compared to those with WT (70.6 % versus 83.3 %, p = 0.03). Contrarily, no significant differences were observed in other predominant subtypes. In the TCGA cohort, PPA with EGFR mutation tended to show higher expression of galectin-3, which is associated with tumor metastasis and resistance to anoikis, compared to those with WT (p = 0.06). Immunohistochemical evaluation revealed that galectin-3 expression was significantly higher in PPA with EGFR mutation than in those with WT (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of PPA with EGFR mutation proved to be less favorable compared to that with WT, and galectin-3 is highly expressed in EGFR-mutated PPA.

Prognostic significance of ground-glass areas within tumours in non-small-cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To validate or refute the hypothesis that non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC) with ground-glass areas (GGA+) within the tumour on high-resolution computed tomography are associated with a more favourable prognosis than those without GGA (GGA-). METHODS: We analysed data from a multicentre observational cohort study in Japan including 5005 patients with completely resected pathological stage I NSCLC, who were excluded from the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) 0707 trial on oral adjuvant treatment during the enrolment period. The patients' medical and pathological records were assessed retrospectively by physicians and re-staged according to the 8th tumour, node, metastasis edition. RESULTS: Of the 5005 patients, 2388 (48%) were ineligible for the JCOG0707 trial and 2617 (52%) were eligible but were not enrolled. A total of 958 patients (19.1%) died. Patients with GGA+ NSCLC and pathological invasion ≤3 cm showed significantly better overall survival than others. In patients with tumours with an invasive portion ≤4 cm, GGA+ was associated with better survival. The prognoses of patients with GGA+ T2a and GGA- T1c tumours were similar (5-year overall survival: 84.6% vs 83.1%, respectively). The survival with T2b or more tumours appeared unaffected by GGA, and GGA was not prognostic in these larger tumours. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with GGA+ NSCLC on high-resolution computed tomography and ≤4 cm invasion size may have a better prognosis than patients with solid GGA- tumours of the same T-stage. However, the presence or absence of radiological GGA has little impact on the prognosis of patients with NSCLC with greater (>4 cm) pathological invasion.

Long-term outcomes of 5-year survivors without recurrence after the complete resection of non-small cell lung cancer after lobectomy: a landmark analysis in consideration of competing risks.

PURPOSE: Among non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), 5 years is a benchmark in cancer control and treatment, but a certain percentage of cases recur after 5 years. The long-term post-recurrence outcomes remain controversial. To examine the accurate prognostic factors associated with survival and cancer recurrence among 5-year survivors, a landmark analysis that considered competing risks was performed. METHODS: Complete resection of NSCLC was performed in 2482 patients between January 2003 and December 2015. A total of 1431 patients were 5-year survivors without recurrence. A landmark time analysis was applied to the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) from 5 years after surgery, and the findings were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The cumulative incidence of cause-specific death and recurrence was estimated using the cumulative incidence function, while carefully considering the competing risks. RESULTS: Postoperative recurrence was detected in 732 patients, of whom 68 (9.3%) had recurrence after 5 years. The median follow-up period was 8.2 years. In the competing risk analysis, the independent poor prognostic factors associated with cause-specific death were age ≥ 75 years, lymph node metastasis and pleural invasion. CONCLUSIONS: Patients requiring a follow-up for > 5 years were aged ≥ 75 years and had either lymph node metastasis or pleural invasion.

Summary of Research: Overall Survival with Osimertinib in Resected EGFR-Mutated NSCLC.

This is a summary of the original article ?Overall survival with osimertinib in resected EGFR-mutated NSCLC.Ë® Osimertinib blocks the activity of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) on cancer cells, causing cancer cell death and tumor shrinkage, and is an effective treatment for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The ADAURA study assessed the effects of osimertinib versus placebo in patients with EGFR-mutated (exon 19 deletion or L858R) early stage (IB-IIIA) NSCLC removed by surgery (resected). Previous results from ADAURA demonstrated that patients treated with osimertinib stayed alive and cancer-free (disease-free survival) significantly longer than patients who received placebo. Recent data showed the overall length of time patients were alive after starting treatment (overall survival). In both the primary stage II-IIIA and overall stage IB-IIIA populations, patients in the osimertinib group had a significant 51% reduction in the risk of death compared with the placebo group. The data demonstrated that osimertinib after surgery significantly improved overall survival in patients with resected, EGFR-mutated, stage IB-IIIA NSCLC.

Spatial intratumor heterogeneity of programmed death-ligand 1 expression predicts poor prognosis in resected non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: We quantified the pathological spatial intratumor heterogeneity of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and investigated its relevance to patient outcomes in surgically resected non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). METHODS: This study enrolled 239 consecutive surgically resected NSCLC specimens of pathological stage IIA-IIIB. To characterize the spatial intratumor heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression in NSCLC tissues, we developed a mathematical model based on texture image analysis and determined the spatial heterogeneity index of PD-L1 for each tumor. The correlation between the spatial heterogeneity index of PD-L1 values and clinicopathological characteristics, including prognosis, was analyzed. Furthermore, an independent cohort of 70 cases was analyzed for model validation. RESULTS: Clinicopathological analysis showed correlations between high spatial heterogeneity index of PD-L1 values and histological subtype (squamous cell carcinoma; P < .001) and vascular invasion (P = .004). Survival analysis revealed that patients with high spatial heterogeneity index of PD-L1 values presented a significantly worse recurrence-free rate than those with low spatial heterogeneity index of PD-L1 values (5-year recurrence-free survival [RFS] = 26.3% vs 47.1%, P < .005). The impact of spatial heterogeneity index of PD-L1 on cancer survival rates was verified through validation in an independent cohort. Additionally, high spatial heterogeneity index of PD-L1 values were associated with tumor recurrence in squamous cell carcinoma (5-year RFS = 29.2% vs 52.8%, P < .05) and adenocarcinoma (5-year RFS = 19.6% vs 43.0%, P < .01). Moreover, we demonstrated that a high spatial heterogeneity index of PD-L1 value was an independent risk factor for tumor recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: We presented an image analysis model to quantify the spatial intratumor heterogeneity of protein expression in tumor tissues. This model demonstrated that the spatial intratumor heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression in surgically resected NSCLC predicts poor patient outcomes.

EGFR mutation impacts recurrence in high-risk early-stage lung adenocarcinoma in the IASLC grading system.

INTRODUCTION: The developments of perioperative treatments for patients with high-risk early-stage lung cancer are ongoing, however, real-world data and evidence of clinical significance of genetic aberration are lacking in this population. This study aimed to identify patients with early-stage lung adenocarcinoma at high risk for recurrence based on pathological indicators of poor prognosis, including the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) grade, and elucidate the prognostic impact of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation (EGFRm) status. METHODS: This retrospective study included 494 consecutive patients who underwent complete resection for pathological stage I lung adenocarcinoma between 2011 and 2016. The patients were evaluated for EGFRm and IASLC grade. Multivariable analysis was used to identify pathological factors for poor prognosis associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients with any one of these factors were classified into the high-risk group. The prognostic impact of EGFRm was evaluated using RFS, OS, and cumulative recurrence proportion. RESULTS: Multivariable analysis for RFS and OS revealed that IASLC grade 3, pathological invasion size>2 cm, and presence of lymphovascular invasion were indicators of poor prognosis. EGFRm-positive patients had a higher incidence of all types of recurrence, including central nervous system (CNS) metastasis and distant metastasis in high-risk group, but not in low-risk group. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that patients with EGFRm-positive stage I lung adenocarcinoma in the high-risk group have an increased risk of recurrence, including CNS metastasis. These findings highlight the need for development of adjuvant treatment in this population.

A Multi-Institutional, Randomized, Phase III Trial Comparing Anatomical Segmentectomy and Lobectomy for Clinical Stage IA3 Pure-Solid Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: West Japan Oncology Group Study WJOG16923L (STEP UP Trial).

INTRODUCTION: Although the standard treatment for patients with resectable early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is pulmonary lobectomy, recent clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of anatomical segmentectomy for small-sized early-stage NSCLC measuring ≤2 cm. Segmentectomy is gaining attention as an alternative procedure to lobectomy for early-stage NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In January 2024, we have initiated a randomized phase III trial in Japan to confirm the noninferiority of anatomical segmentectomy to lobectomy in patients with peripheral clinical stage IA3 pure-solid NSCLC (tumor measuring >2 cm and ≤3 cm; consolidation-to-tumor ratio = 1.0). We plan to enroll 520 patients from 61 institutions over a period of 5 years. The primary endpoint is overall survival, and the secondary endpoints include relapse-free survival, postoperative respiratory function, proportion of patients with respiratory failure and cerebrovascular disease, cumulative incidence of death from other diseases, cumulative incidence of local recurrence, proportion of patients who undergo segmentectomy, number of resected segments, operative time, blood loss, and adverse events. This trial has been registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry under the code UMIN000052064. CONCLUSIONS: This trial will help establish a novel treatment strategy for patients with peripheral clinical stage IA3 pure-solid NSCLC.

Early chest tube removal regardless of drainage volume after anatomic pulmonary resection: A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of early chest tube removal after anatomic pulmonary resection, regardless of the drainage volume. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial. Patients with greater than 300 mL drainage volume during postoperative day 1 were randomly assigned to group A (tube removed on postoperative day 2) and group B (tube retained until drainage volume ≤300 mL/24 hours). The primary end point was the frequency of respiratory-related adverse events (grade 2 or higher based on the Clavien-Dindo classification) within 30 days postoperatively. RESULTS: Between April 2019 and October 2021, 175 patients were assigned to group A (N = 88) or group B (N = 87). One patient in group B who experienced chylothorax was excluded from the study. Respiratory-related adverse events were observed in 10 patients (11.4%) in group A and 12 patients (14.0%) in group B (P = .008). The frequencies of thoracentesis or chest tube reinsertion were not significantly different (8.0% and 9.3% in groups A and B, respectively, P = .752). Additionally, the duration of chest tube placement was significantly shorter in group A than in group B (median, 2 vs 3 days; P < .001). No significant difference between groups A and B was found in postoperative hospital stay (median, 6 vs 7 days, P = .231). CONCLUSIONS: Early chest tube removal, regardless of drainage volume, was safe and feasible in patients who underwent anatomic pulmonary resection.

Ten-year follow-up outcomes of limited resection trial for radiologically less-invasive lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The JCOG0804/WJOG4507L single-arm confirmatory trial indicated a satisfactory 10-year prognosis for patients who underwent limited resection for radiologically less-invasive lung cancer. However, only one prospective trial has reported a 10-year prognosis. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter prospective study coordinated by the National Cancer Center Hospital East and Kanagawa Cancer Center. We analyzed the long-term prognosis of 100 patients who underwent limited resection of a radiologically less-invasive lung cancer in the peripheral lung field. We defined radiologically less-invasive lung cancer as lung adenocarcinoma with a maximum tumor diameter of ≤2 cm, tumor disappearance ratio of ≥0.5 and cN0. The primary endpoint was the 10-year local recurrence-free survival. RESULTS: Our patients, with a median age of 62 years, included 39 males. A total of 58 patients were non-smokers; 87 had undergone wide wedge resection and 9 underwent segmentectomy. A total of four cases were converted to lobectomy because of the presence of poorly differentiated components in the frozen specimen or insufficient margin with segmentectomy. The median follow-up duration was 120.9 months. The 10-year recurrence-free survival and overall survival rates of patients with lung cancer were both 96.0%. Following the 10-year long-term follow-up, two patients experienced recurrences at resection ends after wedge resection. CONCLUSIONS: Limited resection imparted a satisfactory prognosis for patients with radiologically less-invasive lung cancer, except two cases of local recurrence >5 years after surgery. These findings suggest that patients with this condition who underwent limited resection may require continued follow-up >5 years after surgery.

Segmentectomy versus lobectomy in small-sized peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer with radiologically pure-solid appearance in Japan (JCOG0802/WJOG4607L): a post-hoc supplemental analysis of a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Although segmentectomy was better than lobectomy in terms of overall survival for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a pure-solid tumour appearance on thin-section CT in the open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 JCOG0802/WJOG4607L trial, the reasons why segmentectomy was associated with better overall survival were unclear. We aimed to compare the survival, cause of death, and recurrence patterns after segmentectomy versus lobectomy in trial participants with NSCLC with a pure-solid appearance METHODS: We conducted a post-hoc supplemental analysis of the JCO0802/WJOG4607L randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial for the patients (aged 20-85 years) with small-sized NSCLC with radiologically pure-solid appearance on thin-section CT (≤2 cm, consolidation tumour ratio 1·0). The primary aim was to compare the overall and relapse-free survival, cause of death, and recurrence patterns associated with segmentectomy and lobectomy for patients with radiologically pure-solid NSCLC to determine why the overall survival of segmentectomy was superior to that of lobectomy, even for oncologically invasive lung cancers. JCO0802/WJOG4607L is registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000002317, and is complete. FINDINGS: Between Aug 10, 2009, and Oct 21, 2014, 1106 patients were randomly assigned to undergo either lobectomy or segmentectomy. Of these participants, 553 (50%) had radiologically pure-solid NSCLC and were eligible for this post-hoc supplemental analysis. Of these 553 participants, 274 (50%) patients underwent lobectomy and 279 (50%) underwent segmentectomy. Median patient age was 67 years (IQR 61-73), 347 (63%) of 553 patients were male and 206 (37%) were female, and data on race and ethnicity were not collected. As of data cutoff (June 13, 2020), after a median follow-up of 7·3 years (IQR 6·0-8·5), the 5-year overall survival rate was significantly higher after segmentectomy than after lobectomy (86·1% [95% CI 81·4-89·7] in the lobectomy group, with 55 deaths vs 92·4% [88·6-95·0] in the segmentectomy group, with 38 deaths; hazard ratio (HR) 0·64 [95% CI 0·41-0·97]; log-rank test p=0·033), whereas the 5-year relapse-free survival was similar between the groups (81·7% [95% CI 76·5-85·8], with 34 events vs 82·0% [76·9-86·0], with 52 events; HR 1·01 [95% CI 0·72-1·42]; p=0·94). Deaths after a median follow-up of 7·3 years due to lung cancer occurred in 20 (7%) of 274 patients after lobectomy and 19 (7%) of 279 after segmentectomy, and deaths due to other causes occurred in 35 (13%) patients after lobectomy compared with 19 (7%) after segmentectomy (lung cancer death vs other cause of death, p=0·19). The locoregional recurrence was higher after segmentectomy (21 [8%] vs 45 [16%]; p=0·0021). In subgroup analyses, better 5-year overall survival after segmentectomy than after lobectomy was observed in the subgroup of patients aged 70 years or older (77·1% [95% CI 68·2-83·8] with lobectomy vs 85·6% [77·5-90·9] with segmentectomy; p=0·013) and in male patients (80·5% [73·7-85·7] vs 92·1% [87·0-95·2]; p=0·0085). By contrast, better 5-year relapse-free survival after lobectomy than after segmentectomy was observed in the subgroup younger than 70 years (87·4% [95% CI 81·2-91·7] with lobectomy vs 84·4% [77·9-89·1] with segmentectomy; p=0·049) and in female patients (94·2% [87·6-97·4] vs 82·2% [73·2-88·4]; p=0·047). INTERPRETATION: This post-hoc analysis showed improved overall survival after segmentectomy in patients with pure-solid NSCLC compared with lobectomy. However, survival outcomes of segmentectomy depend on the patient's age and sex. Given the results of this exploratory analysis, further research is necessary to determine clinically relevant indications for segmentectomy in radiologically pure-solid NSCLC. FUNDING: Japanese National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund and Practical Research for Innovative Cancer Control Fund, and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare of Japan.