One-stage focal cartilage defect treatment with bone marrow mononuclear cells and chondrocytes leads to better macroscopic cartilage regeneration compared to microfracture in goats.

OBJECTIVE: The combination of chondrocytes and mononuclear fraction (MNF) cells might solve the expansion induced dedifferentiation problem of reimplanted cells in autologous chondrocytes implantation as sufficient cells would be available for direct, one-stage, implantation. Earlier in vitro work already showed a positive stimulation of cartilage specific matrix production when chondrocytes and MNF cells were combined. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate cartilage regeneration using a one-stage procedure combining MNF cells and primary chondrocytes for the treatment of focal cartilage lesions in goats compared to microfracture treatment. DESIGN: Freshly created focal cartilage defects were treated with either a combination of chondrocytes and MNF cells embedded in fibrin glue or microfracture treatment. After 6 months follow-up local regeneration as well as the general joint cartilage health were evaluated using validated scores and biochemical assays. RESULTS: Macroscopic (P = 0.015) scores for the cartilage surface at the treated defect were, after 6 months, significantly higher for the chondrocyteMNF treatment compared to microfracture-treated defects, but microscopic scores were not (P = 0.067). The articulating cartilage showed more (P = 0.005) degeneration following microfracture treatment compared to chondrocyteMNF treatment. Biochemical glycosaminoglycans (GAG) evaluation did not reveal differences between the treatments. Both treatments had resulted in a slight to moderate cartilage degeneration at other locations in the joint. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, treatment of focal articular cartilage lesions in goats using a combination of MNF cells from bone marrow and unexpanded chondrocytes leads to better macroscopic regeneration compared to microfracture, however needs further fine-tuning to decrease the negative influence on other joint compartments.

Delayed gadolinium enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) can be effectively applied for longitudinal cohort evaluation of articular cartilage regeneration.

OBJECTIVE: Delayed gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of cartilage (dGEMRIC) facilitates non-invasive evaluation of the glycosaminoglycan content in articular cartilage. The primary aim of this study was to show that the dGEMRIC technique is able to monitor cartilage repair following regenerative cartilage treatment. DESIGN: Thirty-one patients with a focal cartilage lesion underwent a dGEMRIC scan prior to cartilage repair surgery and at 3 and 12 months follow-up. At similar time points clinical improvement was monitored using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Lysholm questionnaires. Per MRI scan several regions-of-interest (ROIs) were defined for different locations in the joint. The dGEMRIC index (T1gd) was calculated for each ROI. Repeated-measures analysis of variance (RMANOVA) analysis was used to evaluate improvement in clinical scores and MRI T1gd over time. Also regression analysis was performed to show the influence of local repair on cartilage quality at distant locations in the knee. RESULTS: Clinical scores and the dGEMRIC T1gd per ROI showed a statistically significant improvement (P < 0.01), from baseline, at 12 months follow-up. Also, improvement from baseline in T1gd of the ROI defining the treated cartilage defect showed a direct relationship (P < 0.007) to the improvement of the T1gd of ROI at other locations in the joint. CONCLUSIONS: The dGEMRIC MRI protocol is a useful method to evaluate cartilage repair. In addition, local cartilage repair influenced the cartilage quality at other location in the joint. These findings validate the use of dGEMRIC for non-invasive evaluation of the effects of cartilage regeneration.

dGEMRIC as a tool for measuring changes in cartilage quality following high tibial osteotomy: a feasibility study.

OBJECTIVE: The high tibial osteotomy (HTO) is an effective strategy for treatment of painful medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. Effects on cartilage quality are largely unknown. Delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) enables non-invasive assessment of cartilage glycosaminoglycan content. This study aimed to evaluate if dGEMRIC could detect relevant changes in cartilage glycosaminoglycan content following HTO. DESIGN: Ten patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis underwent a dGEMRIC scan prior to HTO, and after bone healing and subsequent hardware removal. A dGEMRIC index (T1Gd) was used for changes in cartilage glycosaminoglycan content, a high T1Gd indicating a high glycosaminoglycan content and vice versa. Radiographic analysis included mechanical axis and tibial slope measurement. clinical scores [knee osteoarthritis outcome scale (KOOS), visual analogue score (VAS) for pain, Knee Society clinical rating system (KSCRS)] before, 3 and 6 months after HTO and after hardware removal were correlated to T1Gd changes. RESULTS: Overall a trend towards a decreased T1Gd, despite HTO, was observed. Before and after HTO, lateral femoral condyle T1Gd was higher than medial femoral condyle (MFC) T1Gd and tibial cartilage T1Gd was higher than that of femoral cartilage (P < 0.001). The MFC had the lowest T1Gd before and after HTO. Clinical scores all improved significantly (P < 0.01), KOOS Symptoms and QOL were moderately related to changes in MFC T1Gd. CONCLUSIONS: dGEMRIC effectively detected differences in cartilage quality within knee compartments before and after HTO, but no changes due to HTO were detected. Hardware removal post-HTO seems essential for adequate T(1)Gd interpretation. T(1)Gd was correlated to improved clinical scores on a subscore level only. Longer follow-up after HTO may reveal lasting changes. ClinicalTrials.gov registration ID: NCT01269944.

Quality of scaffold fixation in a human cadaver knee model.

OBJECTIVE: Newly developed regenerative cartilage interventions based on the application of 3D-scaffolds require a further evaluation of the surgical techniques involved. The present study compared four different scaffold fixation techniques [fibrin glue (FG), transosseous (TS) fixation, biodegradable pin (BP) fixation and continuous cartilage sutures (CS)] to implant a custom-printed porous PEOT/PBT1000/70/30 scaffold in a human cadaver knee model. METHODS: After implantation, the knees were subjected to a vertically oriented loaded continuous passive motion (CPM) protocol. The fixation techniques were evaluated after 60 and a subsequent 150 motion cycles, focusing on area coverage, outline attachment and scaffold integrity. After the total of 210 cycles, also an endpoint fixation test was performed. RESULTS: The fixation techniques revealed marginal differences for area coverage and outline attachment after 60 and 150 cycles. The FG scored higher on scaffold integrity compared to TS (P<0.05) and CS (P=0.01). Endpoint fixation was highest for the CS, whereas FG showed a weak final fixation strength (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that optimal fixation cannot be combined always with high scaffold integrity. Special attention devoted to scaffold properties in relation to the fixation technique may result in an improvement of scaffold fixation, and thus clinical cartilage regenerative approaches involving these scaffolds.