A Phase 1a Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of RO7303509, an Anti-TGFß3 Antibody, in Healthy Volunteers.

INTRODUCTION: Transforming growth factor beta (TGFß) cytokines (TGFß1, TGFß2, and TGFß3) play critical roles in tissue fibrosis. However, treatment with systemic pan-TGFß inhibitors have demonstrated unacceptable toxicities. In this study, we evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of RO7303509, a high-affinity, TGFß3-specific, humanized immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody, in healthy adult volunteers (HVs). METHODS: This phase 1a, randomized, double-blind trial included six cohorts for evaluation, with each cohort receiving single doses of placebo or RO7303509, administered intravenously (IV; 50 mg, 150 mg, 240 mg) or subcutaneously (SC; 240 mg, 675 mg, 1200 mg). The frequency and severity of adverse events (AEs) and RO7303509 serum concentrations were monitored throughout the study. We also measured serum periostin and cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) by immunoassay and developed a population pharmacokinetics model to characterize RO7303509 serum concentrations. RESULTS: The study enrolled 49 HVs, with a median age of 39 (range 18-73) years. Ten (27.8%) RO7303509-treated subjects reported 24 AEs, and six (30.8%) placebo-treated subjects reported six AEs. The most frequent AEs related to the study drug were injection site reactions and infusion-related reactions. Maximum serum concentrations (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-inf) values for RO7303509 appeared to increase dose-proportionally across all doses tested. Serum concentrations across cohorts were best characterized by a two-compartment model plus a depot compartment with first-order SC absorption kinetics. No subjects tested positive for anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) at baseline; one subject (2.8%; 50 mg IV) tested positive for ADAs at a single time point (day 15). No clear pharmacodynamic effects were observed for periostin or COMP upon TGFß3 inhibition. CONCLUSION: RO7303509 was well tolerated at single SC doses up to 1200 mg in HVs with favorable pharmacokinetic data that appeared to increase dose-proportionally. TGFß3-specific inhibition may be suitable for development as a chronic antifibrotic therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN13175485.

Serious Infection Rates Among Patients with Select Autoimmune Conditions: A Claims-Based Retrospective Cohort Study from Taiwan and the USA.

INTRODUCTION: Serious infections are an important concern for patients with autoimmune conditions. We sought to estimate serious infection rates among patients with select autoimmune conditions relative to the general population in Taiwan and the USA. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study estimated setting-specific standardized serious infection incidence rates and ratios among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, including extra-renal lupus and lupus nephritis, rheumatoid arthritis and primary membranous nephropathy, compared with the general population using insurance claims for hospitalizations between 2000 and 2013. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios for serious infections, adjusting for age, sex, index year, prior serious infection, comorbidities and medications. RESULTS: In Taiwan, serious infection rates were 22.7, 28.7, 70.6, 43.4 and 215.3 per 1000 person-years among the general population and among cohorts of patients with primary membranous nephropathy, rheumatoid arthritis, extra-renal lupus and lupus nephritis, respectively. In the USA, serious infection rates were 2.6, 9.0, 15.6, 21.0 and 63.3 per 1000 person-years among the general population and among cohorts of patients with primary membranous nephropathy, rheumatoid arthritis, extra-renal lupus and lupus nephritis, respectively. Patients had significantly higher serious infection rates than the general population in both settings, largely driven by bacterial, respiratory, urinary tract and opportunistic infections. Patients with lupus nephritis had the highest burden of serious infections relative to the general population, with 7- to 25-fold higher adjusted hazard ratios in Taiwan and the USA, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study identified a significant excess serious infection burden among patients with targeted autoimmune conditions compared with the general populations in Taiwan and the USA.

Tocilizumab and remdesivir in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia: a randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: Trials of tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia have demonstrated mixed results, and the role of tocilizumab in combination with other treatments is uncertain. Here we evaluated whether tocilizumab plus remdesivir provides greater benefit than remdesivir alone in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial included patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19 pneumonia requiring > 6 L/min supplemental oxygen. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1 ratio) to receive tocilizumab 8 mg/kg or placebo intravenously plus ≤ 10 days of remdesivir. The primary outcome was time from randomization to hospital discharge or "ready for discharge" (defined as category 1, assessed by the investigator on a 7-category ordinal scale of clinical status) to day 28. Patients were followed for 60 days. RESULTS: Among 649 enrolled patients, 434 were randomly assigned to tocilizumab plus remdesivir and 215 to placebo plus remdesivir. 566 patients (88.2%) received corticosteroids during the trial to day 28. Median time from randomization to hospital discharge or "ready for discharge" was 14 (95% CI 12-15) days with tocilizumab plus remdesivir and 14 (95% CI 11-16) days with placebo plus remdesivir [log-rank P = 0.74; Cox proportional hazards ratio 0.97 (95% CI 0.78-1.19)]. Serious adverse events occurred in 128 (29.8%) tocilizumab plus remdesivir and 72 (33.8%) placebo plus remdesivir patients; 78 (18.2%) and 42 (19.7%) patients, respectively, died by day 28. CONCLUSIONS: Tocilizumab plus remdesivir did not shorten time to hospital discharge or "ready for discharge" to day 28 compared with placebo plus remdesivir in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia.

Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacodynamic Effects of the Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Fenebrutinib (GDC-0853) in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Results of a Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Fenebrutinib (GDC-0853) is a noncovalent, oral, and highly selective inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK). The efficacy, safety, and pharmacodynamics of fenebrutinib in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) were assessed in this phase II, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled study. METHODS: Patients who had moderately to severely active SLE while receiving background standard therapy were randomized to receive placebo, fenebrutinib 150 mg once daily, or fenebrutinib 200 mg twice daily. Glucocorticoid taper was recommended from weeks 0 to 12 and from weeks 24 to 36. The primary end point was the SLE Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) response at week 48. RESULTS: Patients (n = 260) were enrolled from 44 sites in 12 countries, with the majority from Latin America, the US, and Western Europe. The SRI-4 response rates at week 48 were 51% for fenebrutinib 150 mg once daily (P = 0.37 versus placebo), 52% for fenebrutinib 200 mg twice daily (P = 0.34 versus placebo), and 44% for placebo. British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Combined Lupus Assessment response rates at week 48 were 53% for fenebrutinib 150 mg once daily (P = 0.086 versus placebo), 42% for fenebrutinib 200 mg twice daily (P = 0.879 versus placebo), and 41% for placebo. Safety results were similar across all arms, although serious adverse events were more frequent with fenebrutinib 200 mg twice daily. By week 48, patients treated with fenebrutinib had reduced levels of a BTK-dependent plasmablast RNA signature, anti-double-stranded DNA autoantibodies, total IgG, and IgM, as well as increased complement C4 levels, all relative to placebo. CONCLUSION: While fenebrutinib had an acceptable safety profile, the primary end point, SRI-4 response, was not met despite evidence of strong pathway inhibition.

Fenebrutinib versus Placebo or Adalimumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase II Trial (ANDES Study).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate fenebrutinib, an oral and highly selective non-covalent inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Patients with RA and inadequate response to methotrexate (cohort 1, n=480) were randomized to fenebrutinib (50 mg once daily, 150 mg once daily, 200 mg twice daily), 40 mg adalimumab every other week, or placebo. Patients with RA and inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (cohort 2, n=98) received fenebrutinib (200 mg twice daily) or placebo. Both cohorts continued methotrexate therapy. RESULTS: In cohort 1, American College of Rheumatology scores (ACR50) at week 12 were similar for fenebrutinib 50 mg once daily and placebo, and higher for fenebrutinib 150 mg once daily (28%) and 200 mg twice daily (35%) than placebo (15%) (p=0.017; p=0.0003). Fenebrutinib 200 mg twice daily and adalimumab (36%) were comparable (p=0.81). In cohort 2, more patients achieved ACR50 with fenebrutinib 200 mg twice daily (25%) than placebo (12%) (p=0.072). The most common adverse events for fenebrutinib included nausea, headache, anemia, and upper respiratory tract infections. Fenebrutinib had significant effects on myeloid and B cell biomarkers (CCL4 and rheumatoid factor). Fenebrutinib and adalimumab caused overlapping as well as distinct changes in B cell and myeloid biomarkers. CONCLUSION: Fenebrutinib demonstrated efficacy comparable to adalimumab in patients with an inadequate response to methotrexate, and safety consistent with existing immunomodulatory therapies for RA. These data support targeting both B and myeloid cells via this novel mechanism for potential efficacy in the treatment of RA.

Regional variations in adverse event reporting rates and ACR responses in placebo/standard-of-care arms of rheumatoid arthritis trials.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical trials are increasingly globalized, and adverse event (AE) rates and treatment responses may differ by geographical region. This study assessed regional differences in AE reporting rates and ACR response rates (ACR20/50) in patients with RA who received placebo/standard-of-care treatment in clinical trials. METHODS: Patients from the placebo arms of 7 RA trials in the TransCelerate Biopharma Inc database were grouped into 5 geographical regions (Asia, Latin America, Russian Federation and Eastern Europe [RFEE], USA, and Western Europe). Differences in demographics, AE reporting rates and ACR response were evaluated using descriptive statistics and omnibus tests for significance; pairwise comparisons were made between regions, with false discovery rate correction for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: Among 970 patients included, week 12 AE rates were significantly lower in the RFEE than in Asia, Latin America and the USA (22% vs 51%, 49% and 53%, respectively; P < 0.05 after false discovery rate correction). Similar differences in AE rates across geographical regions were seen at week 52. Among 747 patients with ACR data, the lowest response rates were observed in the USA (ACR20, 22%) and RFEE (ACR50, 3%); the highest response rates were seen in Western Europe (ACR20, 43%) and Latin America (ACR50, 15%). Only the differences in ACR50 response between the RFEE and Latin America remained significant after false discovery rate correction. CONCLUSION: These placebo/standard-of-care arm data revealed significant regional differences in AE reporting rates and ACR50 response rates. Regional distribution of patients should be considered when conducting RA clinical trials, particularly during recruitment.

Correction to: Population Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy Exposure-response Analysis, and Model-based Meta-analysis of Fenebrutinib in Subjects with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

The article was published with an incomplete title. The complete title is "Population Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy Exposure-response Analysis, and Model-based Meta-analysis of Fenebrutinib in Subjects with Rheumatoid Arthritis" The original article has been corrected.

Population Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy Exposure-response Analysis, and Model-based Meta-analysis of Fenebrutinib in Subjects with Rheumatoid Arthritis [corrected].

PURPOSE: Fenebrutinib (GDC-0853), a Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor was investigated in a Phase 2 clinical trial in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Our aim was to apply a model-informed drug development (MIDD) approach to examine the totality of available clinical efficacy data. METHODS: Population pharmacokinetics (popPK) modeling, exposure-response (E-R) analysis, and model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) of fenebrutinib were performed based on the Phase 2 data. RESULTS: PopPK of fenebrutinib after oral administration was described using a 3-compartment model with linear elimination and a flexible absorption transit compartment model. Healthy subjects had a 52% higher apparent clearance than patients. E-R analyses based on longitudinal ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 and DAS28 (CRP) data modeled fenebrutinib effect with an Emax function, and an efficacy plateau was achieved within the exposure range obtained in the Phase 2 clinical trial. Based on literature data, a summary-level clinical efficacy database was constructed, and MBMA determined ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 responder rates in the placebo and adalimumab arms of the Phase 2 clinical trial were found to be consistent with historical data for these treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Our multi-pronged approach applied MIDD to maximize knowledge extraction of efficacy data and enabled robust interpretation from a Phase 2 clinical trial.

Levels of CXCL13 and sICAM-1 correlate with disease activity score in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tocilizumab.

BACKGROUND: Tocilizumab (TCZ), a humanized monoclonal antibody against the interleukin-6 receptor, has been proven to be a safe and effective treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Because RA is a heterogenous disease and patient response to treatments can vary, identifying characteristics that predict which patients are more likely to respond to TCZ is important for optimal patient care. Serum levels of C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 13 (CXCL13) and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1) have been associated with response to TCZ in patients with RA. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association of CXCL13 and sICAM-1 with disease activity and response to TCZ in patients with early RA and those with inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD-IR). METHODS: Baseline and week 24 serum CXCL13 and sICAM-1 levels were measured using available patient samples from the FUNCTION (early RA) and LITHE (DMARD-IR) trials. Correlations between CXCL13 and sICAM-1 levels and Disease Activity Score in 28 joints calculated with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) at baseline and between change in CXCL13 and sICAM-1 and change in DAS28-ESR at week 24 were estimated. CXCL13 and sICAM-1 changes from baseline to week 24 were compared between treatment arms. The effects of TCZ treatment and baseline DAS28-ESR, CXCL13 and sICAM-1 levels on DAS28-ESR remission and 50% improvement per the American College of Rheumatology (ACR50) response at week 24 were determined. RESULTS: Overall, 458 patients from FUNCTION and 287 patients from LITHE were included. Correlation of baseline serum CXCL13 and sICAM-1 levels with DAS28-ESR was weak to moderate. CXCL13 and sICAM-1 levels decreased significantly at week 24 in TCZ-treated patients in both the early-RA and DMARD-IR populations. CXCL13 and sICAM-1 changes correlated moderately to weakly with DAS28-ESR changes at week 24 in both populations. The treatment regimen, but not baseline CXCL13 and sICAM-1 levels, had a significant effect on the likelihood of DAS28-ESR remission and ACR50 response. CONCLUSIONS: Although CXCL13 and sICAM-1 are modestly associated with RA disease activity, they do not predict response to TCZ in all RA populations.

Glucocorticoid Dosages and Acute-Phase Reactant Levels at Giant Cell Arteritis Flare in a Randomized Trial of Tocilizumab.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to evaluate glucocorticoid dosages and serologic findings in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) flares. METHODS: Patients with GCA were randomly assigned to receive double-blind dosing with either subcutaneous tocilizumab (TCZ) 162 mg weekly plus 26-week prednisone taper (TCZ-QW + Pred-26), every-other-week TCZ plus 26-week prednisone taper (TCZ-Q2W + Pred-26), placebo plus 26-week prednisone taper (PBO + Pred-26), or placebo plus 52-week prednisone taper (PBO + Pred-52). Outcome measures were prednisone dosage, C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) at the time of flare. RESULTS: One hundred patients received TCZ-QW + Pred-26, 49 received TCZ-Q2W + Pred-26, 50 received PBO + Pred-26, and 51 received PBO + Pred-52. Of the 149 TCZ-treated patients, 36 (24%) experienced flare, 23 (64%) of whom were still receiving prednisone (median dosage 2.0 mg/day). Among 101 PBO + Pred-treated patients, 59 (58%) experienced flare, 45 (76%) of whom were receiving prednisone (median dosage 5.0 mg/day). Many flares occurred while patients were taking >10 mg/day prednisone: 9 (25%) in the TCZ groups and 13 (22%) in the placebo groups. Thirty-three flares (92%) in TCZ-treated groups and 20 (34%) in PBO + Pred-treated groups occurred with normal CRP levels. More than half of the PBO + Pred-treated patients had elevated CRP levels without flares. Benefits of the TCZ and prednisone combination over prednisone alone for remission induction were apparent by 8 weeks. CONCLUSION: Most GCA flares occurred while patients were still receiving prednisone. Acute-phase reactant levels were not reliable indicators of flare in patients treated with TCZ plus prednisone or with prednisone alone. The addition of TCZ to prednisone facilitates earlier GCA control.

Adverse Events in Giant Cell Arteritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis Patient Populations: Analyses of Tocilizumab Clinical Trials and Claims Data.

INTRODUCTION: The safety profile of tocilizumab (TCZ) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is well established. TCZ was approved to treat giant cell arteritis (GCA) in 2017 in the USA and Europe, and its safety profile in patients with GCA continues to be defined. The objective of this analysis was to examine incidence rates (IRs) of adverse events of special interest (AESI) occurring during the TCZ clinical development program and in healthcare claims data in patients with GCA or RA. METHODS: TCZ-naïve patients with GCA or RA were identified in the MarketScan administrative healthcare claims database. TCZ-treated patients with GCA from the GiACTA trial and TCZ-treated patients with RA from pooled clinical trial data were analyzed. The IRs of AESI (AESI IRs) were calculated for all cohorts. In the claims cohorts, risks of AESI were estimated using Poisson regression. RESULTS: TCZ-naïve claims cohorts comprised 4804 patients with GCA [mean (standard deviation) age 73.4 (9.8) years; follow-up 3.9 (3.1) years] and 15,164 patients with RA [age 60.3 (8.2) years; follow-up, 4.5 (2.8) years]. TCZ-treated clinical trial cohorts comprised 149 patients with GCA [age 69.5 (8.4) years; exposure approx. 138 patient-years (PY)] and 7647 with RA [age 52 (12.6) years; exposure approx. 22,394 PY]. The IRs of infections, stroke, malignancies, myocardial infarction, and gastrointestinal perforations in the GCA claims cohort exceeded those in the RA claims cohort; the risk of AESI (adjusted for age and glucocorticoid use) was higher in patients with GCA than in those with RA. Similar patterns to the claims cohorts in terms of the AESI IRs were observed in clinical trial cohorts, although the number of events was limited in the GCA trial cohort. CONCLUSION: Higher IRs of AESI were observed in patients with GCA versus those with RA in both TCZ-naïve and -treated cohorts. Differences in underlying disease, age, and glucocorticoid use may influence AESI incidence, irrespective of intervention. FUNDING: This study was funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd and Genentech, Inc. Article processing charges were funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Plain language summary is available for this article.

Health-related quality of life in patients with giant cell arteritis treated with tocilizumab in a phase 3 randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) treated with tocilizumab (TCZ) every week or every other week and prednisone tapering achieved superior rates of sustained remission to patients treated with placebo and prednisone tapering in a randomised controlled trial. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients from this trial is now reported. METHODS: Exploratory analyses of SF-36 PCS and MCS and domain scores, PtGA and FACIT-Fatigue were performed in patients treated with weekly subcutaneous TCZ 162 mg plus 26-week prednisone taper (TCZ-QW + Pred-26) or placebo plus 26-week or 52-week prednisone tapers (PBO + Pred-26 or PBO + Pred-52). These analyses were performed on responder and non-responder patients, including those who achieved the primary outcome and those who experienced flare and received escape prednisone doses. RESULTS: Baseline SF-36 PCS, MCS and domain scores were low, indicating impaired HRQOL related to GCA. At week 52, least squares mean (LSM) changes in PCS scores improved with TCZ-QW + Pred-26 but worsened in both PBO + Pred groups (p <  0.001). LSM changes in MCS scores increased with TCZ-QW + Pred-26 versus PBO + Pred-52 (p < 0.001). Treatment with TCZ-QW + Pred-26 resulted in significantly greater improvement in four of eight SF-36 domains compared with PBO + Pred-26 and six of eight domains compared with PBO + Pred-52 (p < 0.01). Improvement with TCZ-QW + Pred-26 met or exceeded minimum clinically important differences (MCID) in all eight domains compared with five domains with PBO + Pred-26 and none with PBO + Pred-52. Domain scores in the TCZ-QW + Pred-26 group at week 52 met or exceeded age- and gender-matched normative values (A/G norms). LSM changes from baseline in FACIT-Fatigue scores increased significantly with TCZ-QW + Pred-26, exceeding MCID and A/G norms (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with GCA receiving TCZ-QW + Pred-26 reported statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in SF-36 and FACIT-Fatigue scores compared with those receiving prednisone only. Improvements in the TCZ-QW + Pred-26 group led to recovery of HRQOL to levels at least comparable to those of A/G-matched normative values at week 52 and exceeded normative values in five of eight domains. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01791153. Date of registration: February 13, 2013.

Levels of CXCL13 and sICAM-1 correlate with disease activity score in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tocilizumab

Abstract Background: Tocilizumab (TCZ), a humanized monoclonal antibody against the interleukin-6 receptor, has been proven to be a safe and effective treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Because RA is a heterogenous disease and patient response to treatments can vary, identifying characteristics that predict which patients are more likely to respond to TCZ is important for optimal patient care. Serum levels of C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 13 (CXCL13) and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1) have been associated with response to TCZ in patients with RA. Objectives: To evaluate the association of CXCL13 and sICAM-1 with disease activity and response to TCZ in patients with early RA and those with inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD-IR). Methods: Baseline and week 24 serum CXCL13 and sICAM-1 levels were measured using available patient samples from the FUNCTION (early RA) and LITHE (DMARD-IR) trials. Correlations between CXCL13 and sICAM-1 levels and Disease Activity Score in 28 joints calculated with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) at baseline and between change in CXCL13 and sICAM-1 and change in DAS28-ESR at week 24 were estimated. CXCL13 and sICAM-1 changes from baseline to week 24 were compared between treatment arms. The effects of TCZ treatment and baseline DAS28-ESR, CXCL13 and sICAM-1 levels on DAS28-ESR remission and 50% improvement per the American College of Rheumatology (ACR50) response at week 24 were determined. Results: Overall, 458 patients from FUNCTION and 287 patients from LITHE were included. Correlation of baseline serum CXCL13 and sICAM-1 levels with DAS28-ESR was weak to moderate. CXCL13 and sICAM-1 levels decreased significantly at week 24 in TCZ-treated patients in both the early-RA and DMARD-IR populations. CXCL13 and sICAM-1 changes correlated moderately to weakly with DAS28-ESR changes at week 24 in both populations. The treatment regimen, but not baseline CXCL13 and sICAM-1 levels, had a significant effect on the likelihood of DAS28-ESR remission and ACR50 response. Conclusions: Although CXCL13 and sICAM-1 are modestly associated with RA disease activity, they do not predict response to TCZ in all RA populations.

Impact of tocilizumab administered intravenously or subcutaneously on patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have shown tocilizumab (TCZ) administered intravenously or subcutaneously with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) to be superior to csDMARDs alone for improving rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity. This study evaluated the effect of TCZ-intravenous and TCZ-subcutaneous on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in three RCT populations. METHODS: OPTION (NCT00106548), BREVACTA (NCT01232569) and SUMMACTA (NCT01194414) were independent RCTs evaluating the efficacy and safety of TCZ-intravenous and/or TCZ-subcutaneous with csDMARDs in patients with RA. PROs included patient global assessment, pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue and Short Form-36. Study outcomes included the proportions of patients reporting changes from baseline in PRO scores ≥ minimum clinically important differences (MCID) and scores ≥ age and gender-matched normative values. RESULTS: In OPTION, more patients who received TCZ-intravenous reported improvements in PROs ≥MCID (50%-82% vs 31%-57%) and scores ≥ normative values (16%-44% vs 5%-28%) at week 16 compared with placebo. Similarly, a greater proportion of patients in BREVACTA who received TCZ-subcutaneous reported improvements ≥ MCID (54%-73% vs 42%-55%) and scores ≥ normative values (8%-34% vs 4%-25%) at week 12 compared with placebo. In SUMMACTA, 61%-84% of patients who received TCZ-subcutaneous and 64%-84% of those who received TCZ-intravenous reported improvements ≥ MCID and 14%-41% and 15%-24%, respectively, scores ≥ normative values at week 24. CONCLUSIONS: TCZ-intravenous or TCZ-subcutaneous with csDMARDs resulted in more patients reporting clinically meaningful improvements and PRO scores ≥ normative values compared with placebo. These improvements were similar with TCZ-intravenous and TCZ-subcutaneous.

Risk Associated with Cumulative Oral Glucocorticoid Use in Patients with Giant Cell Arteritis in Real-World Databases from the USA and UK.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of giant cell arteritis (GCA) involves immediate initiation of high-dose glucocorticoid therapy with slow tapering of the dose over many months. Chronic exposure to glucocorticoids is associated with serious comorbidities. The objective of this analysis was to determine the glucocorticoid exposure and risk of glucocorticoid-related adverse events (AEs) in real-world patients with GCA. METHODS: Data from the Truven Healthcare MarketScan® database (from January 1, 2000, to June 30, 2015) and the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD; from January 1, 1995, to August 31, 2013) were used to retrospectively analyze patients aged ≥ 50 years with GCA in the USA and UK, respectively. Outcomes included oral glucocorticoid use (cumulative prednisone-equivalent exposure), glucocorticoid-related AEs and the association of AE risk with glucocorticoid exposure over 52 weeks. RESULTS: Of the 4804 patients in the US MarketScan database and 3973 patients in the UK CPRD database included, 71.3 and 74.6% were women and mean age was 73.4 and 73.0 years, respectively. Median starting glucocorticoid dose and cumulative glucocorticoid dose at 52 weeks were 20-50 mg/day and 4000-4800 mg, respectively. The most frequent glucocorticoid-related AEs were hypertension and eye, bone health, and glucose tolerance conditions. In the first year after diagnosis, the likelihood of any glucocorticoid-related AE was significantly increased for each 1 g increase in cumulative glucocorticoid dose in the US and UK cohorts (odds ratio [95% CI], 1.170 [1.063, 1.287] and 1.06 [1.03, 1.09], respectively; P < 0.05 for both). Similar trends were observed for the risk of glucocorticoid-related AEs over full follow-up (mean, USA: 3.9 years, UK: 6.3 years). CONCLUSIONS: In real-world patients with GCA, increased cumulative glucocorticoid exposure was associated with an increased risk of glucocorticoid-related AEs. FUNDING: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Plain language summary available for this article.

Impact of tocilizumab monotherapy on patient-reported outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis from two randomised controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: Two randomised controlled trials, AMBITION (NCT00109408) and ADACTA (NCT01119859), showed tocilizumab (TCZ) monotherapy superior to methotrexate (MTX) and adalimumab (ADA) monotherapy, respectively, for improving rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity. This study compared the benefit of TCZ versus MTX or ADA monotherapy for improving patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with RA. METHODS: PROs included patient global assessment (PtGA), pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue and Short Form-36 (SF-36) physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) and eight domain scores. Outcomes included proportions of patients reporting changes from baseline in PRO scores ≥minimum clinically important differences (MCID) and ≥age-matched and gender-matched normative values at 24 weeks. RESULTS: In AMBITION, TCZ-treated patients reported significantly greater mean improvements in HAQ (-0.7 vs -0.5), FACIT-Fatigue (8.7 vs 5.7), SF-36 PCS (9.8 vs 7.8) and five SF-36 domains at week 24 than with MTX; 45.0%-84.0% of TCZ-treated patients reported improvements ≥MCID, and 24.3%-52.1% reported scores ≥normative values across all PROs versus 39.4%-81.8% and 14.5%-45.0%, respectively, with MTX. In ADACTA, TCZ-treated patients reported significantly greater improvements in PtGA (-42.3 vs -31.8), pain (-40.1 vs -28.7), SF-36 MCS (7.9 vs 5.0) and three SF-36 domains than with ADA; 57.7%-83.3% of TCZ-treated patients reported improvements ≥MCID, and 22.1%-49.3% reported scores ≥normative values across all PROs versus 13.6%-37.8%, respectively, with ADA. CONCLUSIONS: TCZ monotherapy resulted in more patients reporting clinically meaningful PRO improvements and PRO scores ≥normative values compared with MTX or ADA monotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT00109408 and NCT01119859; Post-results.

Trial of Tocilizumab in Giant-Cell Arteritis.

BACKGROUND: Giant-cell arteritis commonly relapses when glucocorticoids are tapered, and the prolonged use of glucocorticoids is associated with side effects. The effect of the interleukin-6 receptor alpha inhibitor tocilizumab on the rates of relapse during glucocorticoid tapering was studied in patients with giant-cell arteritis. METHODS: In this 1-year trial, we randomly assigned 251 patients, in a 2:1:1:1 ratio, to receive subcutaneous tocilizumab (at a dose of 162 mg) weekly or every other week, combined with a 26-week prednisone taper, or placebo combined with a prednisone taper over a period of either 26 weeks or 52 weeks. The primary outcome was the rate of sustained glucocorticoid-free remission at week 52 in each tocilizumab group as compared with the rate in the placebo group that underwent the 26-week prednisone taper. The key secondary outcome was the rate of remission in each tocilizumab group as compared with the placebo group that underwent the 52-week prednisone taper. Dosing of prednisone and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: Sustained remission at week 52 occurred in 56% of the patients treated with tocilizumab weekly and in 53% of those treated with tocilizumab every other week, as compared with 14% of those in the placebo group that underwent the 26-week prednisone taper and 18% of those in the placebo group that underwent the 52-week prednisone taper (P<0.001 for the comparisons of either active treatment with placebo). The cumulative median prednisone dose over the 52-week period was 1862 mg in each tocilizumab group, as compared with 3296 mg in the placebo group that underwent the 26-week taper (P<0.001 for both comparisons) and 3818 mg in the placebo group that underwent the 52-week taper (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Serious adverse events occurred in 15% of the patients in the group that received tocilizumab weekly, 14% of those in the group that received tocilizumab every other week, 22% of those in the placebo group that underwent the 26-week taper, and 25% of those in the placebo group that underwent the 52-week taper. Anterior ischemic optic neuropathy developed in one patient in the group that received tocilizumab every other week. CONCLUSIONS: Tocilizumab, received weekly or every other week, combined with a 26-week prednisone taper was superior to either 26-week or 52-week prednisone tapering plus placebo with regard to sustained glucocorticoid-free remission in patients with giant-cell arteritis. Longer follow-up is necessary to determine the durability of remission and safety of tocilizumab. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01791153 .).

Serious adverse effects associated with glucocorticoid therapy in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA): A nested case-control analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is an inflammatory vasculitis preferentially affecting large and medium-sized arteries. High-dose oral glucocorticoids (GCs) are the mainstay of GCA therapy. Using data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), we examined the risk of oral GC-related serious adverse events (SAEs) in a UK population of patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA). METHODS: We conducted a series of nested case-control analyses in GCA patients to examine the effect of increasing dose of prednisolone on the risk of developing diabetes, glaucoma, osteoporosis, fractures, serious infection requiring hospitalization, and death. We used conditional logistic regression to calculate the unadjusted and multivariate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs for the associations between prednisolone use and the risks of all outcomes of interest. We stratified the analyses by increasing cumulative prednisolone use and average daily dose. RESULTS: In the multivariate analyses, we observed a trend of increasing risk of diabetes and osteoporosis with increasing cumulative dose of oral prednisolone (ptrend < 0.05). GCA patients in the highest daily dose category (30mg/d) had an increased risk of diabetes (adjusted OR, 95% CI) (4.7, 2.8-7.8), osteoporosis (1.9, 1.2-2.9), fractures (2.6, 1.6-4.3), glaucoma (3.5, 2.0-6.1), serious infection (3.3, 2.2-5.2), and death (2.1, 1.3-3.5) compared to those with lower average daily prednisolone doses (5mg/d). CONCLUSION: Compared to lower average daily prednisolone doses, high average daily doses were associated with an increased risk of serious adverse effects.

Newly diagnosed vs. relapsing giant cell arteritis: Baseline data from the GiACTA trial.

OBJECTIVE: To report entry criteria and clinical features of patients with newly diagnosed and relapsing giant cell arteritis (GCA) enrolled in a randomized trial of tocilizumab, an interleukin-6 receptor-alpha inhibitor. METHODS: Newly diagnosed GCA was defined as diagnosis ≤6 weeks before baseline. Relapsing GCA was defined as diagnosis >6 weeks before baseline with ≥2 consecutive weeks of prednisone ≥40mg/day. All patients had active GCA within 6 weeks of baseline. All statistical results are exploratory. RESULTS: Of 251 patients, 119 (47%) had newly diagnosed and 132 (53%) had relapsing GCA. Mean age was 69 years in both subsets; 75% were women. Relapsing patients were heavier [difference in means (95% CI): women, 4.18kg (0.49-7.87, P = 0.027); men, 8.25kg (1.42-15.09, P = 0.019)] and had higher mean body mass index [difference in means (95% CI): women, 1.72kg/m2 (0.44-2.99, P = 0.009); men, 2.85kg/m2 (0.32-5.37, P = 0.028)]. Relapsers had higher baseline prevalence of depression (16% vs. 4%) and osteopenia/osteoporosis (33% vs. 23%, P = 0.002 and P = 0.062, respectively). At diagnosis, 67% had new-onset headaches; 34% had mouth pain/jaw claudication. One-fifth had polymyalgia rheumatica symptoms but no cranial manifestations; 62% had positive temporal artery biopsy findings; 37% were enrolled on the basis of cross-sectional imaging study findings. CONCLUSIONS: Demographics of the GiACTA population reflect the epidemiologic profile of GCA. Baseline comorbidities associated with glucocorticoids were more prevalent among relapsing patients than among those with newly diagnosed disease, highlighting the need for new GCA treatment options. More than one-third of patients were enrolled based on large-vessel imaging.

Incidence of outcomes potentially associated with corticosteroid therapy in patients with giant cell arteritis.

OBJECTIVE: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is an inflammatory disorder of blood vessels that preferentially affects large- and medium-sized arteries. High-dose oral corticosteroids (CS) are the mainstay of GCA therapy. Using data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink, we quantified and compared the incidence of selected potentially CS-associated adverse outcomes in patients with and without GCA. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective follow-up study of GCA and non-GCA patients to examine the incidence of adverse outcomes attributable to CS use. Eligibility criteria for the GCA group included a first-time diagnosis of GCA at age 50 years or older with receipt of ≥1 prescription(s) for prednisolone. GCA patients were matched to a GCA-free comparison group of equal size on age, sex, general practice, and calendar time. We estimated incidence rates and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for diabetes, osteoporosis, glaucoma, fractures, serious infection requiring hospitalization, and death for GCA and non-GCA patients and compared all-cause hospitalizations between the two groups. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 5011 GCA and 5011 matched non-GCA patients. Approximately 74% were women, and mean age at GCA diagnosis was 72.9 years. The IR for all outcomes was greater in the GCA group than the non-GCA group. IRRs [95% confidence intervals (CIs)] were as follows: diabetes 1.4 (1.2-1.7), osteoporosis 2.4 (2.1-2.8), fractures 1.4 (1.2-1.6), glaucoma 2.0 (1.6-2.5), serious infection requiring hospitalization 1.5 (1.3-1.7), and death 1.2 (1.0-1.3). CONCLUSION: Compared with age- and sex-matched non-GCA patients, patients with GCA were at increased risk for diabetes, osteoporosis, fracture, and glaucoma and at a marginally increased risk for death.