Surgeon Assessment of the Technical Impact of Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy on Operable Stage III Melanoma.

INTRODUCTION: The effect of neoadjuvant systemic therapies (NST) on technical aspects of operation for resectable stage III melanoma is unknown. Prospective capture of the estimated and actual degree of difficulty of therapeutic lymphadenectomy at presentation and after NST may inform the relative merits of NST versus surgery followed by adjuvant therapy. METHODS: We designed surgeon survey tools to capture key impressions at baseline prior to NST and postoperatively. We conducted a sub-study within a multi-institutional clinical trial for high-risk operable stage III melanoma (NeoACTIVATE, NCT03554083) which enrolls clinically node-positive patients to 12 weeks of combinatorial NST determined by BRAF status. Survey data were analyzed. RESULTS: Surveys were completed for 24 of 25 patients (96%). Affected nodal basins were cervical (3, 13%) axillary (9, 38%), inguinal ± pelvic (14, 58%); 2 (8%) involved ≥ 2 basins. Baseline estimates included largest affected node size (median/range 4/1.4-11 cm), number of involved nodes (median/range 3/1-10) and tumor fixation (present in 12, 50%). At operation, actual degree of difficulty increased from the baseline estimate in 4 (17%) and decreased in 6 (25%). Surgery was less difficult, average, or more difficult versus usual operation in 4, 9, and 11 cases (17%, 38%, 46%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although many operations were judged to be more difficult than the usual therapeutic lymphadenectomy, operation following NST was more often perceived as easier than more difficult versus baseline impression. Engaging surgical oncologists to perform similar structured assessments across clinical trials will permit cross-study analysis of the effect of NSTs on the technical conduct of lymphadenectomy.

Brachial Plexus Neuritis Associated With Anti-Programmed Cell Death-1 Antibodies: Report of 2 Cases.

Recently, guidelines have been outlined for management of immune-related adverse events occurring with immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer, irrespective of affected organ systems. Increasingly, these complications have been recognized as including diverse neuromuscular presentations, such as demyelinating and axonal length-dependent peripheral neuropathies, vasculitic neuropathy, myasthenia gravis, and myopathy. We present 2 cases of brachial plexopathy developing on anti-programmed cell death-1 checkpoint inhibitor therapies (pembrolizumab, nivolumab). Both cases had stereotypic lower-trunk brachial plexus-predominant onsets, and other clinical features distinguishing them from Parsonage-Turner syndrome (ie, idiopathic plexitis). Each case responded to withholding of anti-programmed cell death-1 therapy, along with initiation of high-dose methylprednisiolone therapy. However, both patients worsened when being weaned from corticosteroids. Discussed are the complexities in the decision to add a second-line immunosuppressant drug, such as infliximab, when dealing with neuritis attacks, for which improvement may be prolonged, given the inherent slow recovery seen with axonal injury. Integrated care with oncology and neurology is emphasized as best practice for affected patients.