Has the non-resection rate decreased during the last two decades among patients undergoing surgical exploration for pancreatic adenocarcinoma?

PURPOSE: To determine if improvement in imaging reduces the non-resection rate (NRR) among patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: From 2000 to 2019, 751 consecutive patients with PDAC were considered eligible for a intention-to-treat pancreatectomy and entered the operating room. In April 2011, our institution acquired a dual energy spectral computed tomography (CT) scanner and liver diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) was included in the imaging workup. We consequently considered 2 periods of inclusion: period #1 (February 2000-March 2011) and period #2 (April 2011-August 2019). RESULTS: All patients underwent a preoperative CT scan with a median delay to surgery of 18 days. Liver DW-MRI was performed among 407 patients (54%). Median delay between CT and surgery decreased (21 days to 16 days, P < .01), and liver DW-MRI was significantly most prescribed during period #2 (14% vs 75%, P < .01). According to the intraoperative findings, the overall NRR was 24.5%, and remained stable over the two periods (25% vs 24%, respectively). While vascular invasion, liver metastasis, and carcinomatosis rates remained stable, para-aortic lymph nodes invasion rate (0.4% vs 4.6%; P < 0.001) significantly increased over the 2 periods. The mean size of the bigger extra pancreatic tumor significantly decrease (7.9 mm vs 6.4 mm (P < .01), respectively) when the resection was not done. In multivariate analysis, CA 19-9 < 500 U/mL (P < .01), and liver DW-MRI prescription (P < .01) favoured the resection. CONCLUSIONS: Due to changes in our therapeutic strategies, the NRR did not decrease during two decades despite imaging improvement.

Patient outcome according to the 2017 international consensus on the definition of borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the usefulness of the 2017 definition of borderline pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR-PDAC) in fit patients (performance status 0-1) based on anatomical (A) and biological dimensions (B). METHODS: From 2011 to 2018, 139 resected patients with BR-PDAC according to the 2017 definition were included: 18 patients underwent upfront pancreatectomy (CA 19-9 > 500 U/mL and/or regional lymph node metastasis; BR-B group), and 121 received FOLFIRINOX (FX) induction chemotherapy and were divided into BR-A (CA 19-9 < 500 U/mL, no regional lymph node metastasis; n = 68) and BR-AB (CA 19-9 > 500 U/mL and/or regional lymph node metastasis; n = 53) groups. RESULTS: The 3 groups were comparable according to patient characteristics (except for back pain (P < .01) and CA 19-9 (P < .01)), intraoperative data, and postoperative courses. BR-AB patients required more venous resections (P < .01). The 3 groups were comparable on pathologic findings, except that BR-B patients had more lymph node invasions (P = .02). Median overall survival (OS) of the 121 patients was 45 months. In multivariate analysis, venous resection (P = .039) and R1 resection (P = .012) were poorly linked with OS, whereas BR-A classification (P < .01) independently favored OS. Median survival times of BR-A, BR-AB, and BR-B groups were undetermined, 27 months, and 20 months (P < .001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 2017 definition was relevant for sub-classifying patients with BR-PDAC. The anatomical dimension (BR-A) was a favorable prognostic factor, whereas the biological dimension (BR-AB and BR-B) poorly impacted survival.

Outcomes of pancreatic adenocarcinoma that was not resected because of isolated para-aortic lymph node involvement.

PURPOSE: Survival appears to be poor in cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with para-aortic lymph node involvement (PALN+). However, resection is still performed in these cases because the prognostic impact of PALN+remains controversial. METHODS: PALN+was intraoperatively found in 14 patients (4.8%) with resectable PDAC who consequently did not undergo pancreatectomy. RESULTS: The median overall survival time after laparotomy was 21 months. The 1- and 3-year overall survival rates were 58.3% and 25%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We support the advisability of reconsidering pancreatectomy in patients with intraoperatively detected PALN+because the reported survival of such patients who undergo pancreatectomy is poorer than the survival observed for patients in our series.

Risk factors of exocrine and endocrine pancreatic insufficiency after pancreatic resection: A multi-center prospective study.

Management of functional consequences after pancreatic resection has become a new therapeutic challenge. The goal of our study is to evaluate the risk factors for exocrine (ExoPI) and endocrine (EndoPI) pancreatic insufficiency after pancreatic surgery and to establish a predictive model for their onset. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1, 2014 and June 19, 2015, 91 consecutive patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) or left pancreatectomy (LP) (72% and 28%, respectively) were followed prospectively. ExoPI was defined as fecal elastase content<200µg per gram of feces while EndoPI was defined as fasting glucose>126mg/dL or aggravation of preexisting diabetes. The volume of residual pancreas was measured according to the same principles as liver volumetry. RESULTS: The ExoPI and EndoPI rates at 6 months were 75.9% and 30.8%, respectively. The rate of ExoPI after PD was statistically significantly higher than after LP (98% vs. 21%; P<0.001), while the rate of EndoPI was lower after PD vs. LP, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (28% vs. 38.5%; P=0.412). There was no statistically significant difference in ExoPI found between pancreatico-gastrostomy (PG) and pancreatico-jejunostomy (PJ) (100% vs. 98%; P=1.000). Remnant pancreatic volume less than 39.5% was predictive of ExoPI. CONCLUSION: ExoPI occurs quasi-systematically after PD irrespective of the reconstruction scheme. The rate of EndoPI did not differ between PD and LP.

Resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma: Is R0 resection an illusion? Genetic evaluation of venous resection margin affirmed unrecognized disease.

PURPOSE: To assess the K-ras gene mutation in the histologically negative venous margin of a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) specimen and its impact on survival. METHOD: From 2007 to 2010, 22 patients underwent R0 PD for resecable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. All specimens were stained and the portal vein (PV) bed was identified by blue ink; a 2mm3 sample (including the blue ink) was cut from a microscopic free-tumor block. DNA was extracted and assessed by quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction to detect the K-ras gene mutation. Twelve specimens (55%) (kras+ group) were identified with a K-ras mutation in the venous margin resection, and 10 specimens (kras- group) did not have K-ras mutation detected in the venous margin resection. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable. Overall 3years survival of patients of kras+ group versus patients of kras- group was 0 and 17% (P=0.03), respectively. Median survival time of patients of kras+ group versus patients of kras- group was 16months vs 25months (P=0.04; 95% confidence interval [1,11-1,88]), respectively. CONCLUSION: Genetic evaluation of venous resection margin affirmed unrecognized disease with strong impact on survival in more than 50% of patients with histologically R0 resection.

Resectable invasive IPMN versus sporadic pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: Should these two different diseases receive the same treatment? A matched comparison study of the French Surgical Association (AFC).

PURPOSE: To compare survival and impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IIPMN) and sporadic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: From 2005 to 2012, 240 patients underwent pancreatectomy for IIPMN and 1327 for PDAC. Exclusion criteria included neoadjuvant treatment, pancreatic resection other than PD, vascular resection, carcinoma in situ, or <11 examined lymph nodes. Thus, 82 IIPMN and 506 PDAC were eligible for the present study. Finally, The IIPMN group was matched 1:2 to compose the PDAC group according to TNM disease stage, perineural invasion, lymph node ratio, and margin status. RESULTS: There was no difference in patient's characteristics, intraoperative parameters, postoperative outcomes, and histologic parameters. Overall survival and disease-free survival times were comparable between the 2 groups. In each group, overall survival time was significantly poorer in patients who did not achieve adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.03 for the IIPMN group; p = 0.03 for the PDAC group). In lymph-node negative patients of the IIPMN group, adjuvant chemotherapy did not have any significant impact on overall survival time (OR = 0.57; 95% CI [0.24-1.33]). Considering the whole population (i.e. patients with IIPMN and PDAC; n = 246), patients who did not achieve adjuvant chemotherapy had poorer survival (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The courses of IIPMN and PDAC were similar after an optimized stage-to-stage comparison. Adjuvant chemotherapy was efficient in both groups. However, in lymph node negative patients, adjuvant chemotherapy seemed not to have a significant impact.

'Peripheric' pancreatic cysts: performance of CT scan, MRI and endoscopy according to final pathological examination.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of pre-operative staging in patients with peripheral pancreatic cystic neoplasms (pPCNs). METHODS: From 2005 to 2011, 148 patients underwent a pancreatectomy for pPCNs. The pre-operative examination methods of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) were compared for their ability to predict the suggested diagnosis accurately, and the definitive diagnosis was affirmed by pathological examination. RESULTS: A mural nodule was detected in 34 patients (23%): only 1 patient (3%) had an invasive pPCN at the final histological examination. A biopsy was performed in 79 patients (53%) during EUS: in 55 patients (70%), the biopsy could not conclude a diagnosis; the biopsy provided the correct and wrong diagnosis in 19 patients (24%) and 5 patients (6%), respectively. A correct diagnosis was affirmed by CT, EUS and pancreatic MRI in 60 (41%), 103 (74%) and 80 (86%) patients (when comparing EUS and MRI; P = 0.03), respectively. The positive predictive values (PPVs) of CT, EUS and MRI were 70%, 75% and 87%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic MRI appears to be the most appropriate examination to diagnose pPCNs accurately. EUS alone had a poor PPV. Mural nodules in a PCN should not be considered an indisputable sign of pPCN invasiveness.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor: A multivariate analysis of factors influencing survival.

BACKGROUND: The outcomes of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are extremely diverse, and determining the best strategy, optimal timing of therapy and the therapeutic results depend on understanding prognostic factors. We determined the clinical, radiological and histological factors associated with survival and tumor recurrence for patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. METHODS: From January 1, 1991 to December 31, 2011, 127 patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor underwent pancreatectomy. The variables including clinical characteristics, surgical data and pathological findings were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: There were 103 patients with non-functional tumors (81%). Sixty-four patients (50%) underwent left pancreatectomy, 51 (42%) patients underwent pancreatico-duodenectomy, 12 (9%) patients underwent enucleation and 2 patients (1%) underwent central pancreatectomy. Forty-eight patients (38%) had synchronous liver metastases. Six patients (5%) required portal vein resection, and 19 (15%) patients required enlarged "en-bloc" resection of adjacent organs. The overall morbidity and mortality rates were 48% and 2.3%, respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 94%, 84%, and 74%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, synchronous liver metastases (p = 0.02) and portal vein resection (p < 0.01) were independent prognostic factors of survival. CONCLUSIONS: Synchronous liver metastases and portal vein resection were found to be independent factors influencing survival.

Pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma in elderly patients: postoperative outcomes and long term results: a study of the French Surgical Association.

AIM: To determine the benefit of surgery for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinomas (PAs) in elderly patients. METHODS: From 2004 to 2009, 932 patients with resectable PAs underwent pancreatectomies without neoadjuvant treatment in 37 institutions. The patients were divided into three groups according to age: <70 years (control group; n = 580); 70-79 years (70s group, n = 288), and ≥ 80 years (80s group; n = 64). Preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative, and histological data were recorded to assess the postoperative course and survival. RESULTS: Preoperative or intraoperative characteristics, and the histological findings were comparable in the three groups. Postoperative mortality and morbidity rates did not differ in the three groups. Adjuvant therapies were more frequently used in younger patients than in elderly patients (p < 0.01). The overall 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates of control group/70's group/80's group were 82.2%/75.7%/75.7%, 49.9%/41.8%/31%, and 38.7%/33.2%/0%, respectively (p = 0.16). The median survival of the control, 70s, and 80s groups was 24 months, 35.3 months, and 30 months, respectively. Four independent prognostic indicators were identified by multivariate analysis: venous invasion (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.12), arterial invasion (HR = 2.96), positive lymph nodes (HR = 2.25), and adjuvant treatment (HR = 0.65). CONCLUSIONS: Fit elderly patients with resectable PAs should not be excluded from surgical resection of PA solely because of their real age. Moreover, elderly patients seem to obtain similar advantages from pancreatectomies than younger patients.

BAYPAN study: a double-blind phase III randomized trial comparing gemcitabine plus sorafenib and gemcitabine plus placebo in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Sorafenib is an oral anticancer agent targeting Ras-dependent signaling and angiogenic pathways. A phase I trial demonstrated that the combination of gemcitabine and sorafenib was well tolerated and had activity in advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) patients. The BAYPAN study was a multicentric, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized phase III trial comparing gemcitabine/sorafenib and gemcitabine/placebo in the treatment of APC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The patient eligibility criteria were locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, no prior therapy for advanced disease and a performance status of zero to two. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). The patients received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) i.v., weekly seven times followed by 1 rest week, then weekly three times every 4 weeks plus sorafenib 200 mg or placebo, two tablets p.o., twice daily continuously. RESULTS: Between December 2006 and September 2009, 104 patients were enrolled on the study (52 pts in each arm) and 102 patients were treated. The median and the 6-month PFS were 5.7 months and 48% for gemcitabine/placebo and 3.8 months and 33% for gemcitabine/sorafenib (P = 0.902, stratified log-rank test), respectively. The median overall survivals were 9.2 and 8 months, respectively (P = 0.231, log-rank test). The overall response rates were similar (19 and 23%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The addition of sorafenib to gemcitabine does not improve PFS in APC patients.

Two-stage hepatectomy: who will not jump over the second hurdle?

BACKGROUND: Two-stage hepatectomy uses compensatory liver regeneration after a first noncurative hepatectomy to enable a second curative resection in patients with bilobar colorectal liver metastasis (CLM). OBJECTIVE: To determine the predictive factors of failure of two-stage hepatectomy. METHOD: Between 2000 and 2010, 48 patients with irresectable CLM were eligible for two-stage hepatectomy. The planned strategy was a) cleaning of the left hepatic lobe (first hepatectomy), b) right portal vein embolisation and c) right hepatectomy (second hepatectomy). Six patients had occult CLM (n = 5) or extra-hepatic disease (n = 1), which was discovered during the first hepatectomy. Thus, 42 patients completed the first hepatectomy and underwent portal vein embolisation in order to receive the second hepatectomy. Eight patients did not undergo a second hepatectomy due to disease progression. RESULTS: Upon univariate analysis, two factors were identified that precluded patients from having the second hepatectomy: the combined resection of a primary tumour during the first hepatectomy (p = 0.01) and administration of chemotherapy between the two hepatectomies (p = 0.03). An independent association with impairment to perform the two-stage strategy was demonstrated by multivariate analysis for only the combined resection of the primary colorectal cancer during the first hepatectomy (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Due to the small number of patients and the absence of equivalent conclusions in other studies, we cannot recommend performance of an isolated colorectal resection prior to chemotherapy. However, resection of an asymptomatic primary tumour before chemotherapy should not be considered as an outdated procedure.

HLA-DR and B7-2 (CD86) monocyte expressions after major cancer surgery: profile in sepsis.

AIM: HLA-DR monocyte expression may be affected by major surgery. A potential mechanism for monocyte activation is the engagement of costimulatory receptors (B7-2 or CD-86). The aim of the present study was to determine the possible role of monocyte HLA-DR and B7-2 molecules in the occurrence of postoperative sepsis after major cancer surgery. METHODS: This was an observational study in 25 consecutive patients undergoing major elective surgery. Flow cytometry measures were used to determine the expression of HLA-DR and its costimulatory receptors before (day 0) and after surgery (day 1 and day 2). RESULTS: After surgery, the rate of monocytes expressing HLA-DR decreased significantly in all the patients. As compared with day 0, the rate of monocytes expressing B7-2 decreased in all the patients (P<0.03). In the septic group, it remained significantly decreased postoperatively. In the non-septic group, it reached baseline levels at day 2. CONCLUSION: Results suggest a key role for costimulatory molecules in modulating inflammatory response in the context of subsequent postoperative sepsis after major cancer surgery. These molecules may be involved, in association with HLA-DR, in postoperative monocyte dysfunction.

[Predictive factors of tumour response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer and correlation of these factors with survival]. / Facteurs prédictifs de réponse à la radiochimiothérapie néoaduvante dans les cancers rectaux localement évolués et corrélation de ces facteurs avec la survie.

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery is the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to correlate tumour response to survival and to identify predictive factors for tumour response after chemoradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1998 to 2008, 168 patients with histologically-proven locally advanced adenocarcinoma treated by preoperative chemoradiation before total mesorectal excision were retrospectively studied. They received a radiation dose of 45 Gy with a concomitant 5-fluoro-uracil-based chemotherapy. Analysis of tumour response was based on the lowering of T stage between pre-treatment endorectal ultrasound and pathologic specimens. Overall and progression-free survival was correlated with tumour response. Tumour response was analysed with predictive factors. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 34 months. Five-year disease-free survival and overall survival were respectively of 44.4% and 74.5% in the whole population, 83.4% and 83.4% in patients with pathological complete response, 38.6% and 71.9% in patients with tumour downstaging, 29.1% and 58.9% in patients with absence of response. A pre-treatment concentration of carcinoembryonnic antigen below 5 ng/mL was significantly associated with tumour downstaging and significantly independently associated with pathologic complete tumour response (P = 0.019). CONCLUSION: Downstaging and complete response after chemoradiation improved progression-free survival and overall survival of locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma. In multivariate analysis, a pre-treatment concentration of carcinoembryonnic antigen below 5 ng/mL was associated with complete tumour response, hence with tumour downstaging.

Neoadjuvant docetaxel-based chemoradiation for resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: New neoadjuvant regimen was safe and provided an interesting pathologic response.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of a new neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) docetaxel-based regimen in patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head or body. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 34 patients with histologically-confirmed resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma were included in this prospective two-center phase II study. Radiotherapy was delivered at the dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions of 1.8 Gy per fractions, 5 days/week, over 5 weeks. Docetaxel was administered as a 1-h intravenous (IV) infusion repeated every week during 5 weeks. The dose was 30 mg/m(2)/week. All patients were restaged after completion of CRT. RESULTS: Tumor progression was documented in 11 patients (32%), stable disease was documented in 20 patients (59%), and partial remission was documented in 3 patients (9%). 23 patients still with local disease at restaging underwent explorative laparotomy. Of this, 17 patients (50%) had a curative pancreaticoduodenectomy with lymphadenectomy. Morbidity and mortality rates were 29% and 0%, respectively. Three patients (17%) had complete histological responses and 5 patients had minimal residual disease. All resected patients (n = 17) underwent R0 resection. The median and five-year survival times for the resected patients were 32 months and 41%, respectively. Among the resected patients, ten (59%) died as a result of recurrent pancreatic cancer without local tumor bed recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant docetaxel-based chemoradiation is well-tolerated. Resected patients had a prolonged survival time. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings and determine the role of such a neoadjuvant approach.

Pancreatic endocrine tumor with neoplastic venous thrombus and bilobar liver metastasis. A case report.

We report the case of an asymptomatic 56-year-old woman with a metastatic pancreatic endocrine tumor, fortuitously discovered by abdominal imaging. A CT-scan showed a large mass in the pancreatic tail invading the spleen and stomach; in addition, there was neoplastic thrombus within the spleno-mesentericoportal venous confluence and bilobar liver metastases. Surgical resection was performed in two stages. The first procedure was an extended left pancreatectomy with venous thrombectomy and "clearance" of the left hepatic lobe. During the interval, embolization of the right portal vein was carried out. Right hepatectomy and radiofrequency destruction of residual metastases was then performed. On the basis of completeness of the resection and the histopathological data, the patient did not undergo any adjuvant therapy, in accordance with French guidelines. At 1 year of follow-up, there was no evidence of recurrence.

Reduced interleukin-12 release from stimulated monocytes in patients with sepsis after major cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: Major cancer surgery is a high-risk situation for sepsis in the post-operative period. The aim of this study was to assess the relation between the monocyte production of IL-12 and the development of post-operative sepsis in patients undergoing major cancer surgery. METHODS: In 19 patients undergoing major cancer surgery, the production of cytokines by basal and lipolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated monocytes was measured before and after (from day 1 to day 3 and day 7) surgery. Seven of them developed a post-operative sepsis. Ten healthy volunteers were used as controls for the assessment of pre-operative values. RESULTS: Before surgery, the production of interleukin (IL)-12 p40 by LPS-stimulated monocytes was similar in the patients and the healthy volunteers. The production of IL-12 p40 by unstimulated monocytes was higher in the patients than in the healthy volunteers. IL-12 production did not differ between the septic and the non-septic patients. After surgery, the production of IL-12 p40 was dramatically reduced in the LPS-stimulated monocytes of the septic patients from day 1 to day 3, as compared with that of the non-septic patients. Before surgery, the production of IL-6, IL-10, and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) in the patients was significantly higher than that of the healthy volunteers for both stimulated and unstimulated monocytes. After surgery, the production of these cytokines by both stimulated and unstimulated monocytes of the septic patients was similar to that of the non-septic patients. Intragroup analysis showed significant changes for IL-6, IL-10, and IL-1ra under all conditions, with the exception of changes in unstimulated monocytes of septic patients that were not significant for IL-10 release. CONCLUSION: After surgery, the septic patients showed drastic failure to up-regulate monocyte LPS-stimulated production of IL-12 p40.

[Omental flap for vessel coverage during pancreaticoduodenectomy: a modified technique]. / Epiploolastie de couverture des vaisseaux au cours d'une duodénopancréatectomie céphalique: technique modifiée.

INTRODUCTION: In 1994, a technique of omental flap development and interposition to cover the celiac and mesenteric vessels was described. Its aim was to isolate the pancreatic anastomosis from the vessels dissected during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and thereby to reduce the consequences of postoperative pancreatic fistula - particularly the risk of postoperative bleeding. TECHNIQUE: We describe this technique adding a simple modification consisting of passage of the pancreatic remnant through an omental window before completion of the pancreaticodigestive anastomosis. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients underwent PD using an omental flap to cover the celiomesenteric vessels. No postoperative deaths occurred. The rate of PF was 23% and the rate of postoperative hemorrhage was 3% (two patients). No complications related to the omental flap were observed. All postoperative hemorrhages originated from the transected surface of the pancreatic remnant and were successfully treated by transgastrotomy simple suture. CONCLUSION: This simple technique has no specific morbidity; it isolates the celiac and mesenteric vessels from the pancreatic anastomosis and therefore may reduce the risk of severe postoperative bleeding after PD.