Reimagining Nephrology Fellowship Education to Meet the Future Needs of Nephrology: A Report of the American Society of Nephrology Task Force on the Future of Nephrology.

The American Society of Nephrology (ASN) Task Force on the Future of Nephrology was established in April 2022 in response to requests from the American Board of Internal Medicine and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education regarding training requirements in nephrology. Given recent changes in kidney care, ASN also charged the task force with reconsidering all aspects of the specialty's future to ensure that nephrologists are prepared to provide high-quality care for people with kidney diseases. The task force engaged multiple stakeholders to develop 10 recommendations focused on strategies needed to promote: ( 1 ) just, equitable, and high-quality care for people living with kidney diseases; ( 2 ) the value of nephrology as a specialty to nephrologists, the future nephrology workforce, the health care system, the public, and government; and ( 3 ) innovation and personalization of nephrology education across the scope of medical training. This report reviews the process, rationale, and details (the "why" and the "what") of these recommendations. In the future, ASN will summarize the "how" of implementing the final report and its 10 recommendations.

A Retrospective Study of Clinical and Economic Burden of Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Information on the economic burden of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is sparse. This study characterized health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs in patients with FSGS, and evaluated the impact of nephrotic range proteinuria on these outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective, observational cohort study used administrative claims data from the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart Database from October 2015 to December 2019. Patients with FSGS (n = 844; first claim = index event) between April 2016 and December 2018 were matched on index date, age, sex, and race to non-FSGS controls (n = 1688). FSGS nephrotic range (urine protein/creatinine ratio >3000 mg/g or albumin/creatinine ratio >2000 mg/g) and non-nephrotic subpopulations were identified. Baseline comorbidities, 12-month post-index all-cause HCRU and costs (per patient per year [PPPY]), and immunosuppressant prescriptions were compared between matched cohorts and between FSGS subpopulations. RESULTS: Comorbidity burden was higher in FSGS. Of 308 patients with available urine protein/creatinine ratio/albumin/creatinine ratio results, 36.4% were in nephrotic range. All-cause HCRU was higher in FSGS across resource categories (all P < 0.0001); 50.6% of FSGS and 23.3% of controls were prescribed glucocorticoids (P < 0.0001). Mean total medical costs were higher in FSGS ($59,753 vs. $8431 PPPY; P < 0.0001), driven by outpatient costs. Nephrotic range proteinuria was associated with higher all-cause inpatient, outpatient, and prescription costs versus nonnephrotic patients (all P < 0.0001), resulting in higher total costs ($70,481 vs. $36,099 PPPY; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: FSGS is associated with significant clinical and economic burdens; the presence of nephrotic range proteinuria increased the economic burden. New treatment modalities are needed to reduce proteinuria, help improve patient outcomes, and reduce HCRU and associated costs.

Cytokine Clearances in Critically Ill Patients on Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We sought to quantify any differences in cytokine clearance between continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH-convective) compared to continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD-diffusive). METHODS: We conducted a 20 patient, multicenter, prospective, open-label randomized trial (CVVH or CVVHD) at continuous renal -replacement therapy (CRRT) initiation. Blood, urine, and effluent were collected at 0, 4, 24, and 48 h after initiation of CRRT. Serum electrolytes, cytokines levels, and clearances were measured. Cytokines studies included IL-1ß, IL-1RA, IL-6, IL-10, and TNFα. RESULTS: We randomized 20 patients to receive CRRT. After 4 h of CRRT there was no difference in total cytokine levels or change in cytokine concentrations across the 2 groups. With the exception of IL-1 RA, all cytokines levels decreased across patient groups regardless of modality. There was no significant difference in cytokine concentration across CRRT modality for any time point. CONCLUSION: Within the first 4 h of CRRT initiation, there is no significant difference between cytokine or solute clearance between CVVH and CVVHD.

Adrenocorticotropic hormone analog use for podocytopathies.

BACKGROUND: Adrenocorticotropic hormone is being increasingly studied for treatment of various glomerulopathies, most notably membranous nephropathy. Less data are available regarding its use in idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) secondary to minimal change disease (MCD) or focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). We report here our experience with H.P. Acthar(®) Gel (repository corticotropin injection) as first-line or subsequent therapy in patients with INS. METHODS: Data were taken from three patients with MCD and ten patients with FSGS from around the US, who were treated with Acthar Gel as initial or subsequent therapy. Treatment was solely at the discretion of the primary nephrologist without a specific protocol. A complete response (CR) was defined as final urine protein-to-creatinine ratio <500 mg/g and a partial response (PR) as 50% decrease without rise of serum creatinine. Side effects and tolerability were noted. RESULTS: All three patients with MCD received Acthar Gel as second-line or later immunosuppressive (IS) therapy and all responded (one CR and two PRs). Two of the ten patients with FSGS received Acthar Gel as first-line IS therapy, while the other eight had failed multiple agents. Four of the ten patients with FSGS had responses, including two CRs and two PRs. The three patients with MCD tolerated therapy well without side effects. Five patients with FSGS tolerated therapy well, while five had various steroid-like side effects, resulting in therapy discontinuation in two patients. CONCLUSION: Acthar Gel is a viable alternative IS agent for treatment of INS in patients intolerant or resistant to conventional therapy. More data are needed to better define its appropriate place.

Does renal replacement therapy improve outcome? Controversies in acute kidney injury.

All aspects of current treatment of acute kidney injury (AKI), including renal replacement therapy (RRT), are basically supportive. Emergent RRT is indicated in the management of AKI with refractory pulmonary edema, hyperkalemia or metabolic acidosis, or when uremic symptoms or signs develop. More aggressive practitioners use prophylactic RRT inpatients with sustained anuria, persistent oliguria with progressive azotemia and a probable glomerular filtration rate < 10 ml/min, or to prevent uncontrolled positive fluid balance in patients with AKI. However, this approach to RRT initiation in AKI is largely supported by retrospective analyses rather than prospective clinical trials. The approach to RRT dosing in AKI is more evidence-based. Outcomes in single-center studies of higher intensity versus standard RRT (intermittent and/or continuous) have been in consistent. However, two large multicenter negative randomized trials have shifted the weight of evidence towards suggesting provision of an effectively delivered standard dose of RRT in AKI, rather than seeking to increase RRT intensity.

Epidemiology of hypertensive kidney disease.

The prevalence of hypertension, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) attributable to hypertension continues to rise worldwide. Identifying the precise prevalence of CKD attributable to hypertension is difficult owing to the absence of uniform criteria to establish a diagnosis of hypertensive nephropathy. Despite the increasing prevalence of CKD-associated hypertension, awareness of hypertension among individuals with CKD remains suboptimal and rates of blood-pressure control remain poor. Targeted subgroups involved in studies of CKD seem to reach better rates of blood-pressure control, suggesting that this therapeutic goal can be achieved in patients with CKD. Elevated blood-pressure levels are associated with CKD progression. However, the optimal blood-pressure level and pharmacological agent remains unclear. Physicians treating patients with CKD must recognize the importance of maintaining optimal salt and volume balance to achieve blood-pressure goals. Furthermore, agents that modify the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis can be an important adjunct to therapy and physicians must monitor expected changes in serum creatinine and electrolyte levels after their administration. Hypertension remains a common factor complicating CKD. Future investigations identifying early signs of hypertension-related CKD, increasing awareness of the effects of hypertension in CKD and determining optimal therapeutic interventions might help reduce the incidence of hypertensive nephropathy.

The effects of heart failure on renal function.

Heart-kidney interactions have been increasingly recognized by clinicians and researchers who study and treat heart failure and kidney disease. A classification system has been developed to categorize the different manifestations of cardiac and renal dysfunction. Work has highlighted the significant negative prognostic effect of worsening renal function on outcomes for individuals with heart failure. The etiology of concomitant cardiac and renal dysfunction remains unclear; however, evidence supports alternatives to the established theory of underfilling, including effects of venous congestion and changes in intra-abdominal pressure. Conventional therapy focuses on blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system with expanding use of direct renin and aldosterone antagonists. Novel therapeutic interventions using extracorporeal therapy and antagonists of the adenosine pathway show promise and require further investigation.

Changing attitudes toward influenza vaccination in U.S. Kidney transplant programs over the past decade.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Influenza infection in transplant recipients is often associated with significant morbidity. Surveys were conducted in 1999 and 2009 to find out if the influenza vaccination practices in the U.S. transplant programs had changed over the past 10 years. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: In 1999, a survey of the 217 United Network for Organ Sharing-certified kidney and kidney-pancreas transplant centers in the U.S. was conducted regarding their influenza vaccination practice patterns. A decade later, a second similar survey of 239 transplant programs was carried out. RESULTS: The 2009 respondents, compared with 1999, were more likely to recommend vaccination for kidney (94.5% versus 84.4%, P = 0.02) and kidney-pancreas recipients (76.8% versus 48.5%, P < 0.001), family members of transplant recipients (52.5% versus 21.0%, P < 0.001), and medical staff caring for transplant patients (79.6% versus 40.7%, P < 0.001). Physicians and other members of the transplant team were more likely to have been vaccinated in 2009 compared with 1999 (84.2% versus 62.3% of physicians, P < 0.001 and 91.2% versus 50.3% of nonphysicians, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests a greater adoption of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention influenza vaccination guidelines by U.S. transplant programs in vaccinating solid-organ transplant recipients, close family contacts, and healthcare workers.

Effect of blood pressure lowering on markers of kidney disease progression.

Hypertension remains a common comorbidity and cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD). As the number of patients with CKD grows, so does the need to identify modifiable risk factors for CKD progression. Data on slowing progression of CKD or preventing end-stage renal disease with aggressive blood pressure control have not yielded definitive conclusions regarding ideal blood pressure targets. Shifting the focus of antihypertensive therapy to alternative markers of end-organ damage, specifically proteinuria, has yielded some promise in preventing the progression of CKD. Nevertheless, proteinuria and decline in estimated GFR may represent an irreversible degree of injury to the kidney that limits the impact of any therapy. The identification and use of novel markers of kidney injury to assess the impact of antihyper-tensive therapy may yield clearer direction with regard to optimal management of hypertension in the setting of CKD.

The use of renal replacement therapy in acute decompensated heart failure.

The worsening of renal function in the context of decompensated heart failure is an increasingly common clinical scenario, dubbed the cardiorenal syndrome. Its development is not completely understood; however, it results from the hemodynamic and neurohumoral alterations that occur in the setting of left ventricular pressure and volume overload with poor cardiac output. Diuretics have been the mainstay of treatment; however, they are often unsuccessful in reversing the vicious cycle of volume overload, worsening cardiac function, and azotemia. Renal replacement therapy (RRT) in the form of isolated or continuous ultrafiltration (UF) with or without a component of solute clearance (hemofiltration or hemodialysis) has been increasingly utilized as a therapeutic tool in this setting. Initial clinical trial data on the use of UF have demonstrated promising cardiac outcomes with regard to fluid removal and symptom relief without worsening renal function. The addition of a component of solute clearance may provide additional benefits in these patients with varying degrees of renal impairment. The exact clinical setting in which the various forms of RRT should be applied as initial or early therapy for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) remains unknown. More research examining the use of RRT in ADHF is necessary; however, it appears that the patients with the most severe clinical presentations have the best chance of benefiting from the early application of RRT.

Inflammation in renal atherosclerotic disease.

The study of renal atherosclerotic disease has conventionally focused on the diagnosis and management of renal artery stenosis. With the increased understanding of atherosclerosis as a systemic inflammatory process, there has been increased interest in vascular biology at the microvasculature level. While different organ beds share some features, the inflammation and injury in the microvasculature of the kidney has unique elements as well. Understanding of the pathogenesis yields a better understanding of the clinical manifestations of renal atherosclerotic disease, which can be very subtle. Furthermore, identifying the molecular mechanisms responsible for the progression of kidney damage can also direct clinicians and scientists toward targeted therapies. Existing therapies used to treat atherosclerotic disease in other vascular beds may also play a role in the treatment of renal atherosclerotic disease.