Perceptions and utilization of tele-orthodontics: a survey of the members of the American Association of Orthodontists.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate orthodontists' utilization and perceptions of tele-orthodontics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 30-item online survey was distributed to members of the American Association of Orthodontists (AAO). The questionnaire encompassed topics concerning the orthodontists' utilization, perceptions, clinical applications, limitations, and concerns regarding tele-orthodontics. Descriptive statistics were employed, and comparisons between responses from users and non-users were conducted  using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: 152 members completed the survey, (response rate: 2.4%). More than two third of respondents (69.74%) were users of tele-orthodontics. Users were more aligned with the belief that tele-orthodontics facilitates effective communication (mean ± standard deviation (SD) 4.06 ± 0.83 vs. 3.33 ± 0.94, p < 0.001). Both groups agreed on the requirement of patient fees for tele-orthodontic visits (mean ± SD: 3.62 ± 1.11 users vs. 3.74 ± 1.02 non-users, p = 0.659), and on the capability  of the system to reduce unwarranted referrals (p = 0.20). The majority of participants acknowledged  the utility of the system in monitoring aligners' patients (89% in users vs. 61% in non-users, p < 0.001). Non-users expressed greater concerns regarding privacy risks (mean ± SD: 3.06 ± 0.97 users vs. 3.57 ± 0.86 non-users, p = 0.002). Both groups stressed the significance of obtaining informed consent before utilizing tele-orthodontics. CONCLUSIONS: The widespread acceptance of tele-orthodontics among AAO members was apparent, as demonstrated by their recognition of its effectiveness. There was notable variation in how users and non-users perceived tele-orthodontics. The study's results offer valuable insights into both the potential benefits and drawbacks of incorporating this technology into clinical practice from the clincians' perspective.

Color and Chemical Stability of 3D-Printed and Thermoformed Polyurethane-Based Aligners.

The significant rise in the use of clear aligners for orthodontic treatment is attributed to their aesthetic appeal, enhancing patient appearance and self-confidence. The aim of this study is to evaluate the aligners' response to common staining agents (coffee, black tea, Coca-Cola, and Red Bull) in color and chemical stability. Polyurethane-based thermoformed and 3D-printed aligners from four brands were exposed to common beverages to assess color change using a VITA Easyshade compact colorimeter after 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, and 7 days, as well as chemical stability using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. The brand, beverage, and manufacturing method significantly influence color stability. ATR-FTIR analysis revealed compositional differences, with variations in response to beverage exposure affecting the integrity of polymer bonds. Color change analysis showed coffee as the most potent staining agent, particularly affecting Tera Harz TC85 aligners, while ClearCorrect aligners exhibited the least susceptibility. 3D-printed aligners showed a greater color change compared to thermoformed ones. Aligners with a PETG outer layer are more resistant to stains and chemical alterations than those made of polyurethane. Additionally, 3D-printed polyurethane aligners stain more than thermoformed ones. Therefore, PETG-layered aligners are a more reliable choice for maintaining the aesthetic integrity of aligners.

Retrospective evaluation of the success rate and factors associated with the stability of alveolar ridge orthodontic miniscrews: Pilot study.

BACKGROUND: An uncommon location for placing miniscrews, used to provide anchorage control in various tooth movements, is the alveolar ridge. This study aimed to provide an evaluation of the success rate of alveolar ridge miniscrews and examine variables that might impact their success. METHODS: Charts for 295 patients who had miniscrews were screened. Twenty patients (5 male and 15 female: average age = 38.15 ± 15.10 years) with a total of 50 alveolar ridge miniscrews were analyzed. A customized data form was used to collect patients' and miniscrews' related variables. Kaplan-Meier estimator was used for the survival function, whereas Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to associate collected variables with alveolar ridge miniscrew survival. RESULTS: In total, 31 (62.0%) miniscrews were stable and 19 (38.0%) failed. The survival time for those that failed was 6.03 ± 7.08 months. The follow-up period for those that survived was 35.84 ± 19.47 months. Male gender versus female (hazard ratio [HR] 2.46; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-4.48; P = 0.003), and if the miniscrew was a replacement versus non-replacement (HR 0.27; 95% CI 0.07-0.99; P = 0.048) influenced the survival. Additionally, miniscrews that were used for both indirect and direct or indirect anchorage alone plus those with evidence of splinting showed a 100% survival rate, which led to an HR 0 (P < 0.001). When the previously mentioned variables were modeled, none seemed to have a significant effect on failure except for splinting and type of anchorage (P < 0.001), because none of the splinted miniscrews failed. CONCLUSIONS: The failure rate of alveolar ridge miniscrews was (38.0%) over 6.03 ± 7.08 months. The survival rate was (62.0%) over 35.84 ± 19.47 months. The evidence of splinting and the type of anchorage had a significant effect on survival probability.

Assessment of the efficacy of various maxillary molar intrusion therapies: a systematic review.

AIMS: To systematically assess the efficacy of the various interventions used to intrude maxillary molars. Furthermore, to evaluate associated root resorption, stability of intrusion, subsequent vertical movement of mandibular molars, cost effectiveness, compliance, patient reported outcomes and adverse events. METHODS: A pre-registered and comprehensive literature search of published and unpublished trials until March 22nd 2023 with no language restriction applied in PubMed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, DOSS, CENTRAL, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, Web of Science, Global Index Medicus, Dissertation and Theses Global, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Trip (PROSPERO: CRD42022310562). Randomized controlled trials involving a comparative assessment of treatment modalities used to intrude maxillary molars were included. Pre-piloted data extraction forms were used. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used for risk of bias assessment, and The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used for certainty of evidence appraisal. RESULTS: A total of 3986 records were identified through the electronic data search, of which 24 reports were sought for retrieval. Of these, 7 trials were included. One trial was judged at high risk of bias, while the others had some concerns. Based on individual small sample studies, maxillary molar intrusion was achieved using temporary anchorage devices (TADs) and rapid molar intruder appliance (RMI). It was also observed to a lesser extent with the use of open bite bionator (OBB) and posterior bite blocks. The molar intruder appliance and the posterior bite blocks (spring-loaded or magnetic) also intruded the lower molars. Root resorption was reported in two studies involving TADs. None of the identified studies involved a comparison of conventional and TAD-based treatments for intrusion of molars. No studies reported outcomes concerning stability, cost-effectiveness, compliance and patient-reported outcomes. Insufficient homogeneity between the included trials precluded quantitative synthesis. The level of evidence was very low. CONCLUSIONS: Maxillary molar intrusion can be attained with different appliances (removable and fixed) and with the use of temporary anchorage devices. Posterior bite blocks (spring-loaded or magnetic) and the RMI offer the additional advantage of intruding the mandibular molars. However, stability of the achieved maxillary molar intrusion long term is unclear. Further high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed.

A National Assessment of Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Cleft Lip Repair.

PURPOSE: This study examined the impact of patient race/ethnicity on the likelihood of experiencing delays to surgery, post-operative surgical complications, and prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS) following primary cleft lip (CL) repair. METHODS: Patients who underwent CL repair were identified in the 2006-2012 Kids' Inpatient Database. Primary outcomes were defined as treatment after 6-months-old, presence of any surgical complication, LOS >1 day, and total hospital charges. Multivariable analyses were performed to adjust for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics that might account for differences in outcomes. RESULTS: There were 5927 eligible patients with cleft lip: 3724 White, 279 Black, 1316 Hispanic, 277 Asian/Pacific-Islander, and 331 other race/ethnicity. Across all outcomes, there were significant unadjusted differences (p<0.001) by race/ethnicity, with White children having the lowest odds of delayed surgery, complications, and prolonged LOS, and the lowest charges. Multivariable analyses suggested that differences in baseline health status may account for much of this disparity in combination with factors such as income, insurance type, and location. Even after adjusting for co-variates, significantly increased odds of delayed surgery and higher charges remained for Hispanic and Asian/PI patients. CONCLUSION: There are significant differences in the odds of delays, complications, prolonged hospital stays, and total charges among CL patients of different race/ethnicity. Advocacy efforts to ameliorate disparity in early infant health may subsequently improve equity in cleft outcomes.

Characterizing orthodontic tooth movement in real time using dental monitoring scans: A pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: This pilot study aimed to quantify the magnitude and type of tooth movement occurring in short time intervals within the regular monthly orthodontic visits for patients with fixed appliances and undergoing maxillary canine retraction. Additionally, this pilot study aimed to provide a descriptive evaluation for the accuracy and reliability of the Dental Monitoring (DM)-captured scans to those of an iTero digital scans in an extraction space closure model. SETTINGS AND SAMPLE POPULATION: 3D intraoral photographic scans (DM) for 12 patients with maxillary first premolar extractions in a single-centre academic institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve patients treated with fixed appliances and undergoing space closure for maxillary premolar extraction(s) were included. Nickel-titanium (200 g) closing coil springs were used for canine retraction. At initiation of space closure (T1), iTero scans were acquired, and patients were instructed to take DM scans every 4-5 days until their next visit in 4-5 weeks (T2). At T2, a final iTero scan in addition to a DM scan was taken. The number of patients who did the scans regularly as instructed declined as time elapsed. Stereolithography (STL) files generated from the DM scans were superimposed with the STL files from the iTero scans using GOM Inspect software to determine the accuracy of the DM 3D models. To assess rate, type and direction of tooth movement, each of the 3D image STL files generated from the DM scans, taken every 4-5 days by each patient, was superimposed on the previously captured scan. The rate of tooth movement for the maxillary molars and canines was calculated in the 3 planes of space (X, Y, Z) at each time point, until the end of the experiment. RESULTS: Preliminary results indicated that the maxillary canines appeared to be displaced the greatest amount in the first 4-5 days with initial distolateral movement. As time elapsed, the rate of tooth movement decreased, and the tooth started moving distolingually. CONCLUSIONS: Dental monitoring software provides a high-tech platform to monitor tooth movement in a 'real-time' approach. Accuracy of the photographic scans in relationship to the intraoral scans appears promising. There seems to be some evidence that the greatest amount of movement occurs initially in the first few days after activation, dropping thereafter to become a slower constant rate of tooth movement.

Ridge mini-implants, a versatile biomechanical anchorage device whose success is significantly enhanced by splinting: a clinical report.

OBJECTIVES: This clinical report aims to highlight the factors affecting the clinical success of alveolar ridge mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage and provide an overview of the biomechanical versatility of this miniscrew and steps involving the proper technique of its placement. METHODS: For this clinical report, charts for 295 patients who had temporary anchorage devices (TADs) were screened. Twenty patients [15 females and 5 males: mean age = 38.15 ± 15.10 years] with 50 alveolar ridge mini-screws were assessed. A descriptive summary of the main factors affecting their clinical success and the technique employed for their placement was comprehensively discussed and illustrated, in addition to the presentation of some clinical cases illustrating their potential clinical uses. RESULTS: The survival duration (7.32 ± 9.01 months) and clinical success of the alveolar ridge mini-implants that failed (19/50) seem to be affected primarily by 2 factors: splinting; none of the splinted mini-implants failed (0/10) compared to (19/40) of the single mini-implants that failed, and the length of the used mini-implant; the average length of the mini-implants that did not fail was 9.23 mm. Additionally, it appears that these mini-implants are biomechanically robust and durable, those that did not fail had an average survival duration of 35.97 ± 19.79 months. CONCLUSION: Ridge mini-implants offer significant biomechanical versatility in patients with partially edentulous ridges needing complex pre-prosthetic orthodontic movements. The presence of splinting and the length of the used mini-implants are factors that might affect the clinical success of the alveolar ridge mini-implants.

The dark side of fixed retainers: Case series.

This article focuses on on the presentation and management 9 adult patients who experienced complications because of their maxillary or mandibular fixed retainers 5-33 years after orthodontic treatment. Such complications include the development of an anterior crossbite, open bite, incisal cant, and twist- and x-effects. The detrimental effects on periodontal health were highlighted, especially in the mandibular canines. A range of fixed retainer types was identified, including flexible spiral wire bonded to 4 maxillary or 6 mandibular anterior teeth, rigid wire bonded to mandibular canines only and fiber-reinforced composite fixed retainer. Orthodontic retreatment was necessary in all patients using fixed appliances or clear aligners. Radiographic findings from cone-beam computed tomography or orthopantomogram before and after retreatment are presented when available. Despite the improvement of teeth position clinically, the cone-beam computed tomography scans taken directly after the completion of orthodontic retreatment did not show notable improvement with regards to root proximity to the cortical plates. The prevention of further complications was highlighted, including the use of dual retention, remote monitoring, frequent follow-up appointments and the importance of developing clear guidelines for monitoring patients in retention for treating clinicians and general dentists to promote early detection of adverse changes.

Insight on the influence of technology-enhanced learning in orthodontics' education: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: Technology-enhanced learning (TEL) provides a pliable and current way to present orthodontic curriculum material to students. This review aimed to assess the effectiveness of TEL compared with traditional learning methods in the field of orthodontics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The search comprised randomised controlled trials (RCTs) related to orthodontics' interactive learning from the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL, Psyclnfo, ERIC, Web of Science, Dissertations and Theses Global. Two authors performed the screening, data extraction and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane tool (Rob 2) blindly and in duplicate. Kirkpatrick's 4-level evaluation model was used to evaluate educational outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 3131 records were identified of which 11 RCT were included. On level 1 (Reaction), students had a positive attitude towards TEL. On level 2 (Learning), included studies did not report any significant knowledge improvement when TEL was compared with traditional learning strategies. One study assessed level 3 (Behaviour), where students felt that flipped classroom learning created feelings of greater confidence. On level 4 (Results), most studies suggested that TEL tools are as equally effective in imparting information as traditional tools and recommended that both methods should be considered in teaching students. CONCLUSION: Technology-enhanced learning techniques might have the potential to enhance educational outcomes in orthodontic education and students seem to enjoy the implementation of technology in the learning process. These educational tools should be used as an adjunct to the traditional didactic classroom, and not as a replacement, due to the challenges encountered with their application.

Assessment of the occlusal outcomes in patients treated with orthognathic surgery and clear aligners.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective two-centre study aimed to evaluate the occlusal outcomes in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery with clear aligners. METHODS: A retrospective chart review and occlusal outcomes for 15 patients (10 females and five males) with different types of dentofacial deformities in the anteroposterior, vertical and transverse dimensions, who underwent orthognathic surgery in conjunction with clear aligners were evaluated. Weighed Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index scores of the pre-treatment and post-treatment digital models were used to assess initial complexity, final occlusal outcomes and degree of improvement with surgery and clear aligners. RESULTS: The mean post-treatment PAR score was 3.5 ± 2.54, which was a statistically significant improvement from the pre-treatment PAR score of 27.63 ± 12.09, an 87% improvement was achieved. All subcategories of the PAR index showed statistically significant improvement except for midline assessment component. CONCLUSIONS: Occlusal outcomes with aligners showed great improvement as indicated with the PAR index scores. Orthognathic surgical cases can be treated efficiently with aligners and future studies should compare occlusal outcomes between orthognathic surgical patients treated with clear aligners and those treated with fixed appliances.

Comparable Skeletal and Dental Movements Achieved Using Conventional and Surgery-First Techniques in Class III Patients.

PURPOSE: The surgery-first (SF) approach to orthognathic surgery has been proposed as a more efficient method to correct the dentofacial deformity. This study aimed to evaluate if the magnitude of skeletal and dental changes achieved in Class III patients treated with either conventional orthognathic surgery (COS) or SF techniques differ. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of Class III orthognathic surgery patients between January 2006 and May 2020 with available pre- and post-treatment lateral cephalograms was conducted at an academic institution. The primary predictor variable was surgery technique: COS or SF. Assessed outcome variables included cephalometric skeletal parameters: SNA, SNB, ANB, Wits Appraisal, Sn-GoGn, and FMA; and dental parameters: U1-SN, U1-NA (°), U1-NA (mm), L1-NB (°), L1-NB (mm), and overjet. Within-group posttreatment parameters were analyzed with paired t tests. Pretreatment, posttreatment, and between-group parameter changes were analyzed by 2-sided 2-sample independent t tests. Potential covariates, including gender, surgical procedure, previous conventional treatment, extractions (excluding 3rd molars), crowding, and midline discrepancy, were analyzed using Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: Thirty-nine subjects were included in this study: 1) 21 COS (age: 20.9 ± 8.7 years) and 2) 18 SF (age: 19.6 ± 5.0 years). Cohorts were comparable (P > .05) for all analyzed covariates. COS showed statistically significant increases in L1-GoGn (3.31 ± 6.23°; P = .024), overjet (4.26 ± 3.99 mm; P < .001), ANB (3.5 ± 2.79°; P < .001), SNA (3.5 ± 1.85°; P < .001), and Wits Appraisal (3.78 ± 4.97 mm; P = .002). SF showed statistically significant increases in L1-GoGn (4.19 ± 4.85°; P = .002), L1-NB (3.08 ± 4.13°; P = .006), L1-NB (0.79 ± 1.35 mm; P = .023), overjet (5.82 ± 2.96 mm; P < .001), ANB (5.51 ± 3°; P < .001), SNA (4.13 ± 2.38°; P < .001), and Wits Appraisal (5.92 ± 3.42 mm; P < .001) and statistically significant decreases in U1-NA (-3.69 ± 7.35°; P = .048) and SNB (-1.38 ± 2.14°; P = .014). There were no statistically significant differences in skeletal or dental parameters between groups when adjusted for pretreatment levels of that parameter. The mean treatment duration was 38 months (standard deviation = 12.7) in COS and 17.6 months (standard deviation = 5.2) in SF. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that skeletal and dental changes between groups were not statistically different, despite an average 20-month difference in treatment duration. This suggests that either technique can be used to achieve comparable degrees of skeletal and dental movement in Class III patients.

Association between initial complexity, frequency of refinements, treatment duration, and outcome in Invisalign orthodontic treatment.

INTRODUCTION: This study explored possible associations between treatment duration, initial complexity, outcomes in Invisalign therapy, and the number of refinements. METHODS: Three-dimensional models (initial, final, and refinements) of 355 Invisalign patients (114 males and 241 females; 33.8 ± 17.1 years) were analyzed using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index questionnaire tool in the Ortho Analyzer software (version 2.0; 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) to calculate the weighted total and individual PAR index scores for each component of the PAR index. Data related to demographics, treatment duration, and the number of refinements were collected. RESULTS: Treatment duration increased as the number of refinements increased. Percent of improvement was higher in PAR ≥22 group than PAR <22 with an increase in the number of refinements: 83.3% vs 73.8% for 2 refinements; 94.7% vs 91.2% for 3 refinements; and 100% vs 85.7% for ≥4 refinements. Those who achieved great improvement or improvement and those who did not were significantly different in treatment duration (P <0.001 and P = 0.027), number of refinements (≥3 refinements; P <0.001), initial occlusal severity (PAR ≥22; P <0.01 and P = 0.031). Most subjects achieved improvement after the first refinement (64.5% for PAR <22 and 78.5% for PAR ≥22). Few had ≥4 refinements, and if they did, none achieved improvement with additional refinements. CONCLUSIONS: Initial complexity for an Invisalign case is associated with treatment duration, achieved outcomes, and the number of refinements. Treatment duration increased with an increased number of refinements. Great improvement or improvement for the first time dropped to 0 if additional refinements were carried out after 3. Therefore, performing additional refinements does not necessarily mean better occlusal outcomes.

Evaluation of interproximal reduction in individual teeth, and full arch assessment in clear aligner therapy: digital planning versus 3D model analysis after reduction.

AIM: To evaluate the correspondence between the interproximal reduction (IPR) performed clinically and that programmed in ClinCheck® and further assess which teeth showed an amount of implemented IPR (I-IPR) that corresponds with that programmed in ClinCheck®. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pre- (T0) and post-treatment (T1) ClinCheck® digital models for 75 subjects (30 males and 45 females), mean age (38 ± 15) years, were included. To calculate the amount of I-IPR, Ortho Analyzer software (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) was used to measure the mesiodistal widths for the maxillary and mandibular teeth from second premolar to the contralateral second premolar on the initial (T0) and final (T1) STL models. I- IPR performed by tooth was obtained by comparing the mesiodistal width of each tooth at T0 and T1. The amount of programmed IPR (P-IPR) in ClinCheck® was compared to that implemented clinically using the following formula: IPR difference = (P-IPR) - (I-IPR). RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were observed between the average value of digitally programmed and implemented IPR per tooth for both the maxillary (p < .0001) and mandibular (p < .0001) teeth. The mean P-IPR for the maxillary teeth was 0.28 ± 0.16 mm versus the mean I-IPR of 0.15 ± 0.15 mm. In the mandibular arch, the mean P-IPR was 0.31 ± 0.17 mm, while the I-IPR was 0.17 ± 0.16 mm. The mean I-IPR was consistently lower than the mean P-IPR regardless of teeth and sites (p < 0.0001). The difference between the P-IPR compared to the I-IPR was larger for mandibular anterior teeth than for maxillary anterior teeth (p = 0.0302) and larger for maxillary posterior teeth than mandibular posterior teeth (p = 0.0059). CONCLUSION: The amount of implemented-IPR in clear aligner therapy is less than that digitally programmed for most teeth. Regardless of the regions, I-IPR was consistently lower than that programmed. Mandibular anterior teeth and maxillary posterior teeth showed greater discrepancy between P-IPR and I-IPR than the maxillary anterior and mandibular posteriors. Further prospective studies are needed to determine the factors affecting the precision of IPR and the clinical implications of a significantly reduced I-IPR on treatment outcomes.

The biological sex lens on early orthopaedic treatment duration and outcomes in Class III orthodontic patients: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Treatment outcomes for Class III orthopaedic treatment are highly unpredictable and dependent on the timing of interception, age, and biological sex. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to assess the effects of sex dimorphism on outcomes and duration of orthopaedic treatment for Class III malocclusion in young children. SEARCH METHODS: Unrestricted search in six electronic databases until May 2021 was conducted. Supplemented by search in resources for published, unpublished literature, and ongoing trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized and non-randomized controlled trials reporting the use of Class III growth modification appliances, with baseline and outcome data for both sexes, were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Study selection and data extraction were performed blindly and in duplicate by two reviewers. ROBINS-I, Cochrane Risk of Bias, and GRADE tools were used for certainty assessment. RESULTS: A total of 2429 records were screened. Four trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria, one was a randomized clinical trial (RCT) comparing facemask and facemask with mini-screw. Two clinical trials evaluated the effects of facemask appliance, one had a control group, another was prospective non-controlled. One compared the effects of the maxillary protraction bow appliance to a no treatment control. Two of the clinical trials were appraised as low and one was appraised as high risk of bias. The overall certainty of the available evidence was assessed as moderate. There was significant clinical heterogeneity in terms of methodology, type of intervention, and the measured outcomes, precluding a meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Minimal variations in sagittal, vertical, and dentoalveolar post-treatment cephalometric changes were reported between sexes. The available evidence is unclear to support these variations. Long-term-powered RCTs assessing cephalometric outcomes between sexes until the end of growth spurt and without pooling are not available, therefore, much needed. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO database number CRD42020185797.