RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between postpartum depression (PPD) screening results in pediatric primary care and subsequent infant preventive and acute care utilization. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of 5,341 infants born in 2021 whose mothers were screened for PPD at a well-child visit during the first 6 months. Logistic regression was used to examine that association between a positive PPD screen and 1) adherence to the 12-month well-child visit, and 2) any acute care visits (urgent care or emergency department visits) from 6-15 months. The association between PPD screen and number of acute care visits was examined with negative binomial logistic regression. RESULTS: The incidence of positive PPD screens was 15.6% in the first 6 months. There was no significant difference in 12-month well-child visit adherence based on PPD screening (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.91; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.77 to 1.06; p-value: 0.206). The odds of having any acute care visit were higher among infants whose mothers screened positive for PPD (aOR: 1.2; 95% CI: 1.0 to 1.3; p-value: 0.009). There was a significant difference in the incidence rate of acute care visits based on PPD screening results (incidence rate ratio: 1.1; 95% CI: 1.0 to 1.2; p-value: 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Screening positive for PPD was associated with subsequent acute care utilization but not 12-month preventive care. Primary care providers may need to proactively follow-up after acute care visits to ensure both infant health and maternal needs are met, connecting mothers to resources as needed.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of behavioral health interventions delivered within pediatric integrated primary care models on clinical outcomes. METHODS: We searched Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, and SCOPUS for studies published from January 1, 1998, to September 20, 2023. We included studies that evaluated onsite behavioral health integration in pediatric primary care using a comparator condition (usual, enhanced usual care, or waitlist). Outcome data on symptom change, impairment/quality of life, health indicator, and behavior change were extracted using Covidence software. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline was followed Risk of bias analysis was conducted using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. We used multilevel meta-analysis to synthesize multiple outcomes nested within studies. Open Science Foundation pre-registration: #10.17605/OSF.IO/WV7XP. RESULTS: In total, 33 papers representing 27 studies involving 6,879 children and caregivers were included. Twenty-four studies were randomized controlled trials and three were quasi-experimental designs. Seventeen papers reported on treatment trials and 16 reported on prevention trials. We found a small overall effect size (SMD = 0.19, 95% confidence interval [0.11, 0.27]) supporting the superiority of integrated primary care to usual or enhanced usual care. Moderator analyses suggested similar effectiveness between co-located and integrated models and no statistically significant differences were found between treatment and prevention trials. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that integrated primary care is superior to usual and enhanced usual care at improving behavior, quality of life, and symptoms. Integrated primary care research needs improved standards for reporting to promote better synthesis and understanding of the literature.