In vitro Activity of Ceftaroline Against Isolates of Gram-Positive Bacteria from Patients with Bloodstream Infections Collected as a Part of ATLAS Between 2017 and 2020.

Purpose: To assess the in vitro activity of ceftaroline and a panel of comparator agents against isolates of Gram-positive bacteria, including Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, ß-hemolytic streptococci, and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) from blood collected in Africa and Middle East (AfME), Asia Pacific (APAC), Europe, Latin America (LATAM), and North America from 2017 to 2020 as a part of the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) program. Methods: Susceptibility and minimum inhibitory concentration were determined using broth microdilution for all antimicrobial agents by a central reference laboratory according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) guidelines. Results: Ceftaroline showed good activity (susceptibility ≥89.8%, MIC90 0.008-2 mg/L) against all Gram-positive isolates tested. All isolates of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus, penicillin-susceptible S. pneumoniae, S. agalactiae, S. dysgalactiae, and S. pyogenes were susceptible to ceftaroline (MIC90 0.008-0.25 mg/L). Ceftaroline susceptibility for MRSA isolates was 89.8% globally (MIC90 2 mg/L). Among the comparator agents, all isolates were susceptible to vancomycin, except S. epidermis (susceptibility, 99.9%). Among other agents, daptomycin, linezolid, and tigecycline showed potent activity (susceptibility ≥97.9%, MIC90 0.03-2 mg/L) against all isolates tested. Conclusion: Ceftaroline showed potent in vitro activity against global bloodstream isolates of Gram-positive bacteria collected between 2017 and 2020. Monitoring and surveillance of global as well as regional longitudinal trends of resistance rates among Gram-positive isolates causing bloodstream infections are important to limit the spread of AMR, establish stewardship measures, and manage and appropriately treat infections.

In vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam and comparators against OXA-48-like Enterobacterales collected between 2016 and 2020.

Oxacillinases (OXA)-48-like ß-lactamases are one of the most common resistance determinants among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales reported globally. Moreover, there is no standard treatment available against organisms producing OXA-48-like enzymes, and they are sometimes difficult to detect, making treatment challenging. The objective of this study was to evaluate the distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of blaOXA-48-like Enterobacterales isolates against ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and a panel of comparators collected worldwide from 2016 to 2020 as a part of the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance program. Among all the Enterobacterales isolates collected, 1.8% (1,690/94,052) carried blaOXA-48-like, and a majority of those were identified as K. pneumoniae (86.5%, 1,462/1,690). Among all the blaOXA-48-like isolates, 88.9% (1,502/1,690) were extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-positive, 20.7% (350/1,690) were metallo-ß-lactamase (MBL)-positive, and 8.9% (150/1,690) were ESBL- and MBL-negative. There were 10 different variants of the OXA-48-like family of enzymes detected, with the major variant being blaOXA-48 (50.2%, 848/1,690), blaOXA-232 (29.3%, 496/1,690), and blaOXA-181 (18.0%, 304/1,690). Overall, all the blaOXA-48-like isolates showed a susceptibility of 78.6% to CAZ-AVI. Importantly, high susceptibility to CAZ-AVI was shown by all the blaOXA-48 type, MBL-negative isolates (n = 1,380, ≥99.0%), and all the MBL-negative isolates (n = 1,300, ≥97.6%) of the major variants (blaOXA-48, blaOXA-232, and blaOXA-181) studied. Among the comparator agents, all isolates showed good susceptibility to only tigecycline (>95.0%) and colistin (>78.6%). Considering the limited treatment options available, CAZ-AVI could be considered as a potential treatment option against blaOXA-48-like Enterobacterales. However, routine surveillance and appropriate stewardship strategies for these organisms may help identify emerging resistance mechanisms and effective treatment of infections. IMPORTANCE: Resistance to carbapenems among Enterobacterales is often due to the production of enzymes that are members of the oxacillinases (OXA)-48-like family. These organisms can also be resistant to other classes of drugs and are difficult to identify and treat. This study evaluated the activity of the drug ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and other comparator agents against a global collection of Enterobacterales that produce OXA-48-like enzymes. CAZ-AVI was active against blaOXA-48-like Enterobacterales, and only colistin and tigecycline were similarly active among the comparator agents, highlighting the limited treatment options against these organisms. Continued surveillance of the distribution of these OXA 48-like producing Enterobacterales and monitoring of resistance patterns along with the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship measures to guide antibiotic use and appropriate treatment are necessary to avoid drug resistance among these organisms.

In Vitro Activity of Ceftaroline and Comparators against Bacterial Isolates Collected Globally from Patients with Skin and Soft Tissue Infections: ATLAS Program 2019-2020.

The objective of this study was to assess the in vitro activity of ceftaroline and a panel of comparator agents against isolates causing skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) collected in Africa/Middle East, Asia-Pacific, Europe, and Latin America from 2019-2020. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing criteria. All the methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) isolates were susceptible to ceftaroline. Across all regions, ceftaroline demonstrated potent activity against methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA, susceptibility 89.5-93.7%) isolates. Susceptibility to vancomycin, daptomycin, linezolid, teicoplanin, trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole, and tigecycline was ≥94.1% in MSSA and MRSA isolates. Against ß-hemolytic streptococci isolates, ceftaroline demonstrated very potent activity (MIC90 0.008-0.03 mg/L) across all regions. All ß-hemolytic streptococci isolates were susceptible to linezolid, penicillin, and vancomycin (MIC90 0.06-2 mg/L). Among the extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBL)-negative Enterobacterales tested (E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and K. oxytoca), susceptibility to ceftaroline was high (88.2-98.6%) in all regions. All ESBL-negative Enterobacterales were susceptible to aztreonam. Potent activity was observed for amikacin, cefepime, and meropenem (94.1-100%) against these isolates. Overall, ceftaroline showed potent in vitro activity against isolates of pathogens causing SSTIs. Continuous surveillance of global and regional susceptibility patterns is needed to guide appropriate treatment options against these pathogens.

Ceftazidime-avibactam and comparators against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected globally and in each geographical region between 2017-2020.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess the distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates against ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and a panel of comparator agents collected globally and in each region from 2017-2020 from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance program. METHODS: Susceptibility and minimum inhibitory concentration of all P. aeruginosa isolates were determined using broth microdilution methodology according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. RESULTS: Of the total 29746 isolates of P. aeruginosa collected, 20.9% were multidrug resistant (MDR), 20.7% were extremely drug resistant (XDR), 8.4% were CAZ-AVI-resistant (CAZ-AVI-R), and 3.0% were MBL-positive. Amongst the MBL-positive isolates, the proportion of VIM-positive isolates was highest (77.8%). The highest proportion of MDR (25.5%), XDR (25.0%), MBL-positive (5.7%), and CAZ-AVI-R (12.3%) isolates were in Latin America. Amongst the sources, the highest proportion of isolates were from respiratory sources (43.0%), and the majority of isolates were from non-intensive care unit wards (71.2%). Overall, all P. aeruginosa isolates (90.9%) showed high susceptibility to CAZ-AVI. However, MDR and XDR isolates were less susceptible to CAZ-AVI (≤60.7). The only comparators to which all isolates of P. aeruginosa showed good overall susceptibility were colistin (99.1%) and amikacin (90.5%). However, only colistin was active (≥98.3%) against all the resistant isolates. CONCLUSION: CAZ-AVI presents a potential treatment option against P. aeruginosa infections. However, active monitoring and surveillance, especially of the resistant phenotypes, is warranted for effective treatment of infections caused by P. aeruginosa.

Incidence of ESBLs and carbapenemases among Enterobacterales and carbapenemases in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected globally: results from ATLAS 2017-2019.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the global and regional distribution of ESBLs in Enterobacterales and carbapenemases in Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. METHODS: Antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates collected from ATLAS (2017-2019) was determined per CLSI guidelines. Enterobacterales exhibiting meropenem MICs ≥2 mg/L and/or ceftazidime/avibactam and/or aztreonam/avibactam MICs ≥16 mg/L, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae with aztreonam and/or ceftazidime MICs ≥2 mg/L, and P. aeruginosa with meropenem MICs ≥4 mg/L were screened for ß-lactamases by PCR and sequencing. RESULTS: Globally, ESBL-positive E. coli (23.7%, 4750/20047) and K. pneumoniae (35.1%, 6055/17229) carried predominantly the CTX-M-15 variant (E. coli: 53.9%; K. pneumoniae: 80.0%) with highest incidence in Africa/Middle East (AfME). Among carbapenem-resistant (CR) E. coli (1.1%, 217/20047) and Enterobacter cloacae (3.8%, 259/6866), NDMs were predominant (E. coli in AfME: 62.5%; E. cloacae in Asia Pacific: 59.7%). CR K. pneumoniae (13.3%, 2299/17 229) and P. aeruginosa (20.3%, 4187/20 643) carried predominantly KPC (30.9%) and VIM (14.7%), respectively, with highest frequency in Latin America. Among ESBL-positive Enterobacterales, susceptibility to ceftazidime/avibactam (>90.0%) and amikacin (>85.0%) was higher than to piperacillin/tazobactam (>45.0%) and ciprofloxacin (>7.4%). In CR Enterobacterales, susceptibility to amikacin (>54.0%) and ceftazidime/avibactam (>31.0%) was higher than to ciprofloxacin (>2.7%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (>0.5%). CR P. aeruginosa similarly demonstrated higher susceptibility to amikacin (63.4%) and ceftazidime/avibactam (61.9%) than to ciprofloxacin (26.2%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (25.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Varied distribution of resistance genotypes across regions among ESBL-positive Enterobacterales and CR Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa provide crucial insights on major resistance mechanisms and trends observed in recent years. Continued surveillance is warranted for monitoring global dissemination and resistance.

Evaluation of in vitro activity of ceftaroline against pathogens associated with community-acquired pneumonia: ATLAS program 2017-2019.

OBJECTIVES: Ceftaroline is an important therapeutic option for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Antimicrobial susceptibility to ceftaroline and other antimicrobial agents against Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Haemophilus influenzae isolates collected worldwide from identified respiratory tract sources is reported by age groups (0-18, 19-65, and >65 years). METHODS: Antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates, collected as part of the ATLAS program (2017-2019), was performed per EUCAST/CLSI guidelines. RESULTS: S. aureus (N = 7103; methicillin-susceptible S. aureus [MSSA] = 4203; methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA] = 2791), S. pneumoniae (N = 4823; EUCAST/CLSI, penicillin-intermediate S. pneumoniae [PISP] = 1408/870; penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae [PRSP] = 455/993), and H. influenzae (N = 3850; ß-lactamase [ßL]-negative = 3097; ßL-positive = 753) isolates were collected from respiratory tract specimens. Susceptibility to ceftaroline was 89.08%-97.83% for S. aureus, 99.95%-100% for MSSA, and 78.07%-92.74% for MRSA isolates across age groups; S. aureus as well as MRSA isolates derived from the 0-18 years age group demonstrated the highest susceptibility rates to ceftaroline. Susceptibility to ceftaroline was 98.25%-99.77% for S. pneumoniae, 99.74%-100% for PISP, and 86.23%-99.04% for PRSP isolates across age groups. Across all age groups, susceptibility to ceftaroline was 89.53%-99.70% for H. influenzae, 93.02%-100% for ßL-negative, and 77.78%-98.35% for ßL-positive isolates. CONCLUSION: Irrespective of age, susceptibility to ceftaroline was high among the majority of S. aureus, S. pneumoniae, and H. influenzae isolates collected in this study.

Epidemiology of Resistance Determinants Identified in Meropenem-Nonsusceptible Enterobacterales Collected as Part of a Global Surveillance Study, 2018 to 2019.

The objective of this study was to describe the frequency of resistance determinants in meropenem-nonsusceptible (MEM-NS) Enterobacterales isolates collected in 2018 and 2019 as a part of the ATLAS global surveillance program. Among a total of 39,368 Enterobacterales isolates collected in 2018 and 2019, 5.7% were MEM-NS (MIC ≥2 µg/mL). Among the different regions, the proportion of MEM-NS isolates ranged from 1.9% (North America) to 8.4% (Asia/Pacific). The majority of MEM-NS isolates collected were of the species Klebsiella pneumoniae (71.5%). Among the MEM-NS Enterobacterales isolates collected, metallo-ß-lactamases (MBL) were identified in 36.7%, KPC in 25.5%, and OXA-48-like in 24.1%. The predominance of resistance mechanisms among MEM-NS isolates varied by region: MBLs were dominant in isolates collected in Africa and Middle East (AfME, 49%) and Asia/Pacific (59.4%), OXA-48-like carbapenemases were predominant in Europe (30%), and KPC in Latin America (51.9%) and North America (53.6%). NDM ß-lactamases accounted for the majority of MBLs identified (88.4%). Of the 38 carbapenemase variants identified, NDM-1 (68.7%), KPC-2 (54.6%), OXA-48 (54.3%), and VIM-1 (76.1%) were the common variants within their respective families. Among the MEM-NS isolates, 7.9% co-carried two carbapenemases. Notably, the proportion of MEM-NS Enterobacterales increased from 4.9% in 2018 to 6.4% in 2019. The results of this study show a continuation of the trend of increasing carbapenem-resistance within clinical Enterobacterales with mechanisms of resistance varying across different regions. The existential threat to public health posed by the continued spread of nearly untreatable pathogens requires a multifaceted approach to prevent the collapse of modern medicine.

Study of an antifungal medicine isavuconazole used in treatment of mold infections in China: A plain language summary.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: Molds are types of fungus that can cause sickness and death. Mold infections are increasing in China. Until 2022, medicines that can effectively treat all mold infections were still lacking in China. This summary of a study originally published in the journal Infection and Drug Resistance. The study took place in China and tested a medicine called isavuconazole on mold samples to check if isavuconazole can be used to treat mold infections. Isavuconazole became available in China in January 2022 as a capsule (a hard gel-covered pill filled with a dose of medicine) and in June 2022 as an injection or a shot. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: Isavuconazole stopped the growth of most molds. Other medicines were needed at higher amounts to stop the growth of molds. WHAT DO THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY MEAN?: Isavuconazole is another option to treat mold infections in China.

Ceftazidime-avibactam activity against Gram-negative respiratory isolates collected between 2018 and 2019.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess the in vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and a panel of comparator agents against isolates of Enterobacter spp., Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected in 2018 and 2019 by different centres worldwide from patients with respiratory tract infections. METHODS: Susceptibility and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of all organisms were determined using broth microdilution methodology for CAZ-AVI, and a panel of comparator antimicrobial agents by a central reference laboratory according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing guidelines. RESULTS: CAZ-AVI demonstrated potent antimicrobial activity against isolates of Enterobacter spp. (97.6% susceptibility, MIC90, 1 µg/ml), E. coli (98.5% susceptibility, MIC90, 0.25 µg/ml), K. pneumoniae (94.7% susceptibility, MIC90 2 µg/ml), and P. aeruginosa (91.2% susceptibility, MIC90 8 µg/ml). CAZ-AVI was also active (susceptibility >85%) against MDR isolates for all organisms except P. aeruginosa. Only a small proportion (<10%) of all isolates of Enterobacter spp. and E. coli were identified as XDR compared to isolates of K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa isolates (>20%). Susceptibility to CAZ-AVI was high (>70%) among XDR isolates of Enterobacter spp., K. pneumoniae, and E. coli, compared to P. aeruginosa (<70%). Among the comparator agents, only colistin showed consistent activity across all the organisms (>85%). CONCLUSION: Gram-negative respiratory isolates collected in 2018-2019 showed high susceptibility to CAZ-AVI; CAZ-AVI represents a potential treatment option against infection caused by these organisms.

Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Comparators Against Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Collected Globally from Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance: 2018-2019.

This study assessed the in vitro antimicrobial activity of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and a panel of comparator agents, including aztreonam, cefepime, ceftazidime, meropenem, imipenem, colistin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and tigecycline against isolates of fluoroquinolone-resistant (FQ-R) Klebsiella pneumoniae collected in 2018 and 2019 from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) program. Susceptibility and minimum inhibitory concentration were determined using broth microdilution for all antimicrobial agents by a central reference laboratory according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing guidelines. Of all the K. pneumoniae isolates (n = 10,906), 44.1% (4,814/10,906) were FQ-R. Of these, 71.3% (3,432/4,814) were extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-positive, and 10.4% (499/4,814) were CAZ-AVI-resistant. CAZ-AVI showed high susceptibility (>87%) against all the FQ-R K. pneumoniae isolates. However, metallo- ß-lactamase-positive isolates showed low susceptibility (3.8%; 18/470) to CAZ-AVI. Among the different geographical regions, CAZ-AVI showed the highest activity against isolates collected from North America (98.2%, 216/220) and lowest against those collected from Asia Pacific (APAC) (81.7%; 882/1,079). Among comparator agents, carbapenems showed a relatively lower susceptibility (<71.5%), while only tigecycline and colistin were active (>85%) across all isolates. In conclusion, CAZ-AVI may be a potential treatment option for FQ-R K. pneumoniae isolates. However, increasing CAZ-AVI resistance among ESBL-positive and metallo-ß-lactamase-positive isolates and in isolates from APAC warrants continuous surveillance.

Global update on the in vitro activity of tigecycline and comparators against isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii and rates of resistant phenotypes (2016-2018).

OBJECTIVES: This study presents 2016-2018 in vitro antimicrobial activity data and rates of resistant phenotypes for clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii from Africa/Middle East, Asia/South Pacific, Europe, Latin America, and North America. METHODS: A total of 4320 A. baumannii isolates were collected across all regions between 2016 and 2018. The in vitro antimicrobial activities of amikacin, colistin, levofloxacin, meropenem, and tigecycline were determined using the broth microdilution methodology of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. MICs were interpreted using the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints (version 11.0). Rates of subsets that were resistant to amikacin, colistin, levofloxacin, and meropenem, according to EUCAST breakpoints, are also presented. RESULTS: In each region, tigecycline and colistin were active against isolates of A. baumannii (MIC90 values, 1 or 2 mg/L) and the lowest rate of resistance was to colistin (1.2%-7.3%). The rates of resistance to the panel of agents were generally lower among A. baumannii from North America (1.3%-42.7%), compared with the other regions. Fewer than 11% of meropenem-resistant A. baumannii were also resistant to colistin. The rates of amikacin-, levofloxacin- and meropenem-resistant A. baumannii were lowest in North America and mostly higher in Africa/Middle East and Latin America. CONCLUSION: In each geographical region, tigecycline and colistin maintained good in vitro antimicrobial activity against isolates of A. baumannii, including antimicrobial-resistant subsets. The higher rates of meropenem-resistant isolates, particularly in Africa/Middle East and Latin America, require continued monitoring because of the scarcity of effective treatment options.

In vitro Activity of Isavuconazole and Comparators Against Clinical Isolates of Molds from a Multicenter Study in China.

Purpose: Monitoring antifungal susceptibility patterns for new or established antifungals is imperative. Antifungal resistance is frequent in molds, frequently leading to invasive mold infections (IMIs) in immunocompromised patients with high morbidity and mortality. Limited availability of effective antifungals for treatment of IMIs in China is an enormous challenge. The purpose of this study was to monitor in vitro antifungal resistance profiles of mold isolates from China, with a particular focus on evaluating in vitro isavuconazole (ISA) activity against these isolates, contributing to the treatment guidance in clinics. Methods: We evaluated the in vitro activity of ISA and its comparators (voriconazole [VOR] and amphotericin B [AMB]) against 131 clinical isolates of Aspergillus spp. (n = 105) and Mucorales order (n = 26) collected between 2017 and 2020 from China. Results: ISA and VOR exhibited similar in vitro activity against Aspergillus spp., with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)50 of 1 µg/mL and MIC90 of 2 µg/mL, respectively. Overall, AMB was less active than azoles against Aspergillus spp. (MIC50: 4 µg/mL, MIC90: 8 µg/mL). Against the Mucorales order, ISA demonstrated MIC50 of 0.5 µg/mL and MIC90 of 1 µg/mL; however, one strain each of Mucor circinelloides and Syncephalastrum racemosum were resistant to ISA (MICs: >8 µg/mL). VOR exhibited little or no activity (MIC50: 8 µg/mL, MIC90: >8 µg/mL) against the Mucorales order, whereas AMB had MIC50 and MIC90 of 1 µg/mL. Conclusion: This was the first multicenter, in vitro study conducted in China and demonstrated the excellent activities of ISA against most species of the Mucorales order. MIC indicated an advantage over currently available azole antifungals, positioning ISA as a potential alternative to VOR for clinical management of IMIs. As with other antimicrobials, clinicians should employ stewardship and best practices in relation to potential resistance to new azole antifungals.

Antifungal drugs work together to treat germs causing fungal infections.

Life-threatening infections can be caused by a fungus called Candida auris (shortened to C. auris) that is found in the hospital environment. This study looked at how well different drugs could treat C. auris infection. Samples were collected from 36 people who had C. auris infection. The samples were treated with single drugs and in combination. We found that the main drug types did not work on most samples. Genetic differences we found in the C. auris samples could explain why the main drugs did not work. However, a drug called isavuconazole worked on almost all samples. We also found that a drug called anidulafungin worked better against C. auris when it was combined with either isavuconazole or another drug called voriconazole. To read the full Plain Language Summary of this article, click on the View Article button above and download the PDF.

Evaluation of Synergistic Activity of Isavuconazole or Voriconazole plus Anidulafungin and the Occurrence and Genetic Characterization of Candida auris Detected in a Surveillance Program.

A total of 15 Candida auris isolates from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program between 2006 and 2019 were combined with 21 isolates from other collections for the evaluation of antifungal susceptibility and synergy against anidulafungin plus voriconazole or isavuconazole using the checkerboard method. Surveillance isolates were analyzed for genetic relatedness and resistance mechanisms. Applying the tentative statistical epidemiological cutoff values and the Centers for Disease Control tentative breakpoints, 32/36 isolates were resistant to fluconazole, 5/36 were resistant to amphotericin B, 5/36 were non-wild-type (NWT) to anidulafungin, 3/36 were NWT to micafungin, and 1/36 and 10/36 were NWT to isavuconazole and voriconazole, respectively. Of these, 10 isolates were multidrug resistant, which means that these isolates were resistant to 2 antifungal classes. Synergy or partial synergy was noted in 5/36 and 22/36, respectively, of the isolates with the combination of anidulafungin plus voriconazole, and 11/36 and 19/36 isolates, respectively, for the combination of anidulafungin plus isavuconazole. Multilocus sequence type (MLST) analysis of the 15 SENTRY isolates demonstrated that the isolates from the US were genetically related to, but different from, isolates from Latin America (Panama and Colombia) and Germany. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis showed that the 15 SENTRY isolates belonged to the described international clades and had associated Erg11 alterations, including 11 isolates displaying K143R, one displaying F126L, and one displaying Y501H alterations and a fluconazole MIC result of ≥64 mg/liter. Resistance mechanisms were not observed in the two isolates displaying fluconazole MIC values at 4 and 16 mg/liter. Isavuconazole displayed activity and greater synergy when tested with anidulafungin than seen with anidulafungin plus voriconazole against the C. auris clinical isolates that displayed resistance phenotypes.

A current and historical perspective on disparities in US childhood pneumococcal conjugate vaccine adherence and in rates of invasive pneumococcal disease: Considerations for the routinely-recommended, pediatric PCV dosing schedule in the United States.

Previous research has suggested that reducing the US 4-dose PCV13 schedule to a 3-dose schedule may provide cost savings, despite more childhood pneumococcal disease. The study also stressed that dose reduction should be coupled with improved PCV adherence, however, US PCV uptake has leveled-off since 2008. An estimated 24-36% of US children aged 5-19 months are already receiving a reduced PCV schedule (i.e., missing ≥1 dose). This raises a practical concern that, under a reduced, 3-dose schedule, a similar proportion of children may receive ≤2 doses. It is also unknown if a reduced, 3-dose PCV schedule in the United States will afford the same disease protection as 3-dose schedules used elsewhere, given lower US PCV adherence. Finally, more assurance is needed that, under a reduced schedule, racial, socioeconomic, and geographic disparities in PCV adherence will not correspond with disproportionately higher rates of pneumococcal disease among poor or minority children.

Vaccines: A review of immune-based interventions to prevent and treat disease.

The enormous gains made in public health during the 20th century, through the prevention and treatment of infectious disease, have contributed to dramatic improvements in the quality and length of the human lifespan. Continued advances in medicine are dependent on addressing several challenges including the increase in existing and new resistance to antibiotics, the decrease in productivity of the research and development (R&D) ecosystem, uncertain regulatory pathways, and an economic environment that rewards innovation for developing therapeutics that involve long cycle times from idea to a product. In this article, we consider important issues pertaining to the development of vaccines with particular emphasis on preclinical requirements, optimal dose selection, design, execution, and reporting of clinical trials for regulatory submission, planning and implementation of post-approval life-cycle programs, and emerging themes in therapeutic vaccines.