A Continuing Educational Program Supporting Health Professionals to Manage Grief and Loss.

Health professionals working in oncology face the challenge of a stressful work environment along with impacts of providing care to those suffering from a life-threatening illness and encountering high levels of patient loss. Longitudinal exposure to loss and suffering can lead to grief, which over time can lead to the development of compassion fatigue (CF). Prevalence rates of CF are significant, yet health professionals have little knowledge on the topic. A six-week continuing education program aimed to provide information on CF and support in managing grief and loss and consisted of virtual sessions, case-based learning, and an online community of practice. Content included personal, health system, and team-related risk factors; protective variables associated with CF; grief models; and strategies to help manage grief and loss and to mitigate against CF. Participants also developed personal plans. Pre- and post-course evaluations assessed confidence, knowledge, and overall satisfaction. A total of 189 health professionals completed the program (90% nurses). Reported patient loss was high (58.8% > 10 deaths annually; 12.2% > 50). Improvements in confidence and knowledge across several domains (p < 0.05) related to managing grief and loss were observed, including use of grief assessment tools, risk factors for CF, and strategies to mitigate against CF. Satisfaction level post-program was high. An educational program aiming to improve knowledge of CF and management of grief and loss demonstrated benefit.

The impact of the document international work group in death, dying and bereavement: assumptions and principles underlying standards for terminal care.

This article reflects on the development and impact of the International Workgroup on Death, Dying and Bereavement's (IWG) pivotal document on The Assumptions and Principles Underlying Standards for Terminal Care. It was at the Ars Moriendi meetings in Columbia, Maryland that the author first met Bob and Bunny Kastenbaum. The meeting led to the development of IWG and the first task of this group was the development of the "Standards" document. The initial document reflected the pioneering work already being done by Kastenbaum and others on the committee and then was formative in the development of other documents such as the National Hospice Association Standards. Participants in the original workgroup were asked for their reflections on the significance of the document and the literature was surveyed to assess the impact of the "Standards" document on the field.

Comparison and Literature Review of Occupational Stress in a Palliative Radiotherapy Clinic's Interprofessional Team, the Radiation Therapists, and the Nurses at an Academic Cancer Centre.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the predisposing factors for occupational stress within the Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program (RRRP), radiation therapists (RTs), and registered nurses (RNs) at the Odette Cancer Centre (OCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All RRRP team members (n = 15, including radiation oncologists, residents, and students), RTs (n = 130), and ambulatory care nurses (n = 80) at the OCC were asked to complete a demographics form on professional background and three validated surveys designed to evaluate stress. The Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) was used to assess burnout in the workplace through assessment of personal accomplishment, emotional exhaustion, and depersonalization; the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) assessed psychological morbidity; and the Professional Quality of Life Scale (ProQOL) assessed compassion satisfaction, compassion fatigue, and burnout. Univariate general linear regression was used to determine significant demographic predictors for occupational stress, and one-way analysis of variance was used to compare stress among the three groups. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 28%: 80% for RRRP, 20% for RTs, and 31% for RNs. Females were more likely to report greater personal accomplishment (P = .0393). Being younger (P = .0041), male (P = .0056), having less professional experience (P = .008), and being in the RRRP (P = .0019) was associated with greater depersonalization. Greater self-reported spirituality was predictive of higher compassion satisfaction (P = .0064); those reporting no or lower spirituality experienced higher levels of burnout (P = .0053). Higher GHQ-12 scores (greater stress) were reported by participants that spend more of their work time with palliative patients, and lower GHQ-12 scores (less stress) was reported in participants that participated in stress-relieving activities. A significant difference between groups was only seen in the MBI scale assessing depersonalization (P = .0077), with the RRRP experiencing greater depersonalization. For burnout subscales, 59.0% (RNs), 40.0% (RRRP), and 58.3% (RTs) reported low levels of personal accomplishment; 50% (RNs), 20% (RRRP), and 25% (RTs) reported high levels of emotional exhaustion; and 86.3% (RNs), 53.3% (RRRP), and 66.7% (RTs) reported low levels of depersonalization. CONCLUSION: Greater psychological stress was seen in respondents that worked primarily with palliative patients. Individuals that identified themselves as being spiritual had higher professional satisfaction with work, whereas a detached response to professional practice was associated with being younger, male, having less work experience, and being a member of the RRRP team. Future initiatives should place emphasis on promoting stress-relieving activities, the necessity for stress management courses, and the overall importance of increasing awareness of the potential signs and causes of occupational stress.

Self-care of physicians caring for patients at the end of life: "Being connected... a key to my survival".

Physicians providing end-of-life care are subject to a variety of stresses that may lead to burnout and compassion fatigue at both individual and team levels. Through the story of an oncologist, we discuss the prodromal symptoms and signs leading to burnout and compassion fatigue and present the evidence for prevention. We define and discuss factors that contribute to burnout and compassion fatigue and consider factors that may mitigate burnout. We explore the practice of empathy and discuss an approach for physicians to maximize wellness through self-awareness in the setting of caring for patients with end-stage illness. Finally, we discuss some practical applications of self-care in the workplace.

Meaning, spirituality, and wellness in cancer survivors.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the concepts of meaning, spirituality, and wellness in cancer survivors. DATA SOURCES: Review and research articles, books, and personal experience as a nurse psychotherapist and as a cancer survivor. CONCLUSION: Cancer survivors often rely on their religious and spiritual beliefs as a way of deriving meaning during their illness experience and survivorship, as well as a way of coping with and coming to terms with the concept of death. The measurement of religion and spirituality in health and cancer survivorship is challenging because of the difficulty in defining terms and in developing ways of measuring the concepts. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Nurses have the opportunity to explore the meaning of cancer and spirituality in the lives of their patients. Such discussions can allow for the introduction of concepts of wellness including changes in lifestyle habits and social support that may improve quality of life for cancer survivors.

Barriers to communication regarding end-of-life care: perspectives of care providers.

OBJECTIVE: Communication regarding end-of-life care is frequently perceived as suboptimal, despite the intent of both health care providers and patients. We interviewed health care providers to determine their perspective regarding these barriers to communication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven focus groups with a total of 10 attending physicians, 24 residents, and 33 nurses were convened to explore barriers to end-of-life discussions on the Internal Medicine service at a 600-bed tertiary care hospital in Toronto, Canada. An interview schedule was designed to elicit information regarding the process of end-of-life discussions, barriers to these discussions, and possible interventions for limiting such barriers. Transcripts were qualitatively analyzed by 6 raters who independently identified "themes." Themes were refined using the Delphi technique and classified under broader "categories." RESULTS: Four main categories of barriers emerged, relating to (1) patients, (2) the health care system, (3) health care providers, and (4) the nature of this dialogue. Attending physicians and residents most frequently identified patient-related factors as barriers to discussions, followed by system, dialogue, and provider barriers (43%, 39%, 10%, and 8%, respectively, for attending physicians; 40%, 34%, 13%, and 13%, respectively, for residents). Nurses similarly identified patient-related and system barriers most frequently, but provider barriers were discussed more often than dialogue barriers (46%, 28%, 22%, and 4%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Attending physicians, residents, and nurses perceive the recipients of their care, and the system within which they provide this care, to be the major source of barriers to communication regarding end-of-life care. This finding may impact on the effectiveness of quality-improvement initiatives in end-of-life care.