Bond Strength of Individually Formed and Prefabricated Fiber-reinforced Composite Posts.

PURPOSE: To investigate the micro push-out bond strength of individually formed (everStick Post) and prefabricated (GC Fiber Post) fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) posts cemented with three different types of self-adhesive composite cements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-two single-rooted human teeth were decoronated, endodontically treated, and had post spaces prepared for everStick Post (n = 21) or GC Fiber Post (n = 21). The teeth were randomly divided into three subgroups (n = 7), and posts were cemented either with G-CEM LinkAce (GC), SpeedCEM (Ivoclar Vivadent) or RelyX U200 (3M Oral Care). Specimens were then perpendicularly sectioned and divided at the cementoenamel junction into two root levels: coronal or apical. A micro push-out test was performed using an 0.8-mm-wide stainless steel plunger. Bond strength was calculated in MPa by dividing the fracture load (N) by the bonded surface area (mm2). Log-transformed data was statistically analyzed using factorial ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test (α < 0.05). Fracture modes were determined employing a stereomicroscope, and differences were evaluated using a likelihood ratio test and Pearson's chi-squared test. Specimens were also observed using SEM. RESULTS: Bond strengths were significantly affected by both post type and root level (p < 0.05), but not by self-adhesive cement (p > 0.05). Fracture types showed a significantly higher prevalence of adhesive fractures at the apical level, with all fractures starting at the cement-dentin interface. CONCLUSION: Individually formed FRC posts demonstrated greater bond strength than their prefabricated FRC counterparts. The apical level of the luted posts yielded lower bond strengths than the coronal level. Failures were predominantly adhesive at the cement-dentin interface.

Light irradiance through novel CAD-CAM block materials and degree of conversion of composite cements.

OBJECTIVE: To assess light irradiance (LI) delivered by two light-curing units (LCU's) and to measure the degree of conversion (DC) of three composite cements, when cured through different thicknesses of two novel CAD-CAM block materials. METHODS: 100-µm-thick films of a dual-curable composite cement (G-CEM LinkAce, GC), a light-curable flowable resin-based composite (RBC) (G-ænial Universal Flo, GC) and a micro-hybrid RBC (G-ænial Posterior, GC) were investigated as luting agents. Two 'polymer-ceramic' CAD-CAM blocks (Cerasmart, GC; Enamic, Vita Zahnfabrik) were sectioned in slabs with different thicknesses (1, 3 and 5mm). LI at the bottom of the specimens was measured using a calibrated spectrometer, while being light-cured through the CAD-CAM block slabs for 40s with a low- (±500mW/cm2) or high- (±1,600mW/cm2) irradiance LCU (n=5). After light-curing, micro-Raman spectra of the composite films were acquired to determine DC at 5min, 10min, 1h and 24h. LI data were statistically analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis followed by post-hoc comparisons, while a linear mixed-effect model was applied for the DC analysis. In addition, the CAD-CAM blocks ultrastructure was characterized upon argon-ion slicing using scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM). Finally, light transmission (LT) through each CAD-CAM block material was assessed using a spectrophotometer. RESULTS: Curing-light attenuation and DC were significantly influenced by thickness and type of the overlying material. LCU only had a significant effect on DC of the micro-hybrid RBC. DC significantly increased over time for all composite cements. CAD-CAM block structural analysis revealed a relatively small and homogenous filler configuration (mean filler size of 0.2-0.5µm) for Cerasmart, while Enamic contained ceramic grains varying in shape and size (1-10µm), which were interconnected by the polymer-based network. LT was much higher at a wavelength range of 300-800nm for Cerasmart than for Enamic. SIGNIFICANCE: Light-curable composite cements can be cured through a restoration up to 2.7-mm thickness, depending on the kind of CAD-CAM material. A high-irradiance LCU only has a limited effect on the maximum thickness of the polymer-ceramic CAD-CAM material that can be cured through.

Bond strength and cement-tooth interfacial characterization of self-adhesive composite cements.

PURPOSE: (1) To determine the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of self-adhesive (SA) composite cements to unetched/etched enamel and dentin, and (2) to characterize the cements' interaction with tooth tissue. METHODS: 51 composite blocks were bonded to smear layer-covered enamel and dentin (three teeth per group). Four SA composite cements (Clearfil SA, G-CEM, RelyX Unicem, SmartCem2), and three multi-step composite cements, two used following an etch-and-rinse (E&R) approach (RelyX ARC, Variolink II 'E&R') and one used following a self-etch (SE) approach (Variolink II ' SE') were investigated. The cement-tooth specimens were perpendicularly sectioned into micro-specimens (1.0 × 1.0 mm) in order to measure the µTBS. The data were statistically analyzed by ANOVA followed by Tukey HSD (P< 0.05). 24 additional specimens (four teeth per group) were prepared for interfacial characterization using SEM. RESULTS: The tested SA cements bonded equally well to enamel and dentin. Etching of enamel improved their bonding effectiveness, which however remained inferior to that of both E&R cements. SEM revealed a very similar interfacial ultrastructure at smear layer-covered enamel and dentin for the SA cements, exhibiting very superficial interaction at enamel and absence of a clearly detectable hybrid layer and resin tags in the dentin tubules. When the SA composite cements were applied to dentin free of a smear layer, regular and long resin tags were formed. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: No significant differences in bonding effectiveness were recorded for the self-adhesive composite cements when bonded to unetched/etched enamel and to dentin. Multi-step etch-and-rinse composite cements showed a better bonding effectiveness to enamel, although this could be approximated by the self-adhesive composite cements when enamel was acid-etched beforehand. On dentin, however, the bond strength of the etch-and-rinse composite cement RelyX ARC was superior.

Bulk-Fill Composites: A Review of the Current Literature.

PURPOSE: The aim of this article was to provide an overview of the literature on the currently available bulk-fill composites, and to describe the common trends as well as the wide variations. The findings may help the clinician to select the proper material with regard to its applicability in various clinical situations. METHODS: The literature up to October 2016 was reviewed based on a PubMed search (keywords: "bulk-fill OR bulkfill OR bulk fill" AND "composite OR composites"). RESULTS: This review revealed that bulk-fill composites differ most from conventional composites in their increased depth of cure, which could mainly be attributed to an increase in translucency. However, the literature is inconsistent regarding the determination of the depth of cure. Flowable "base" bulk-fill composites seem most suitable for narrow cavities deeper than 4 mm, in particular when a higher adaptation potential thanks to better flowability in less accessible cavity configurations is desirable. In more extensive cavities, "full-body" bulk-fill composites with a high filler load are preferable. Then, resistance against wear and fracture becomes increasingly important, while a thicker consistency might also help in obtaining a good contact point. Tests related to shrinkage stress induced by bulk-filling seem inconsistent and their clinical relevance is unclear. CONCLUSION: More clinical studies that specifically focus on bulk-filling deep and large restorations are definitely required to fully explore the clinical benefits of bulk-fill composites.

Biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars using different preparation designs and CAD/CAM materials.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of restoration design ('2.5-mm deep endocrown', '5-mm deep endocrown' or '5-mm deep post&crown') and CAD/CAM material type (composite or lithium disilicate glass-ceramic) on the load-to-failure of endodontically treated premolars in absence of any ferrule. METHODS: The crowns of 48 single-rooted premolars were cut and the roots were endodontically treated. Teeth were randomly divided into six groups (n=8); teeth in each group were restored using one of the two tested materials with standardized CAD/CAM fabricated endocrowns (with either 2.5-mm or 5-mm deep intra-radicular extension) or conventional crowns (5-mm deep post&crown). After cementation using luting composite, the specimens were immersed in distilled water and subjected to 1,200,000 chewing cycles with a load of 50N applied parallel to the long axis of the tooth (0°). After cyclic loading, a compressive load was applied at 45° to the tooth's long axis using a universal testing machine until failure. Load-to-failure was recorded (N) and the specimens were examined under a stereomicroscope with 3.5x magnification to determine the mode of failure. RESULTS: All specimens survived the 1,200,000 chewing cycles. A significant interaction between restoration design and CAD/CAM material was found using two-way ANOVA. In the '2.5-mm deep endocrown' groups, the composite achieved a significantly higher load-to-failure than the lithium disilicate glass-ceramic, while no differences between materials were found in the '5-mm deep endocrown' and '5-mm deep post&crown' groups. More unfavorable failures (root fractures) were observed for higher load-to-failure values. CONCLUSIONS: Only following a '2.5-mm deep endocrown' design, composite appeared more favorable than lithium disilicate glass-ceramic as crown material; this may be explained by their difference in elastic modulus. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Shallow endocrown preparations on premolars present less surface for adhesive luting and a difference in crown material becomes apparent in terms of load-to-failure. The use of a more flexible composite crown material appeared then a better option.

Strain development in bulk-filled cavities of different depths characterized using a non-destructive acoustic emission approach.

OBJECTIVES: (1) To evaluate the effect of cavity depth and composite type on the interfacial debonding in bulk-filled cavities. (2) To correlate the theoretical shrinkage stress and the level of interfacial debonding determined by acoustic emission (AE). METHODS: 80 sound molars were divided in two groups to receive a Class-I cavity (3.5×3.5mm) with 2.5- or 4.0-mm depth. The cavities were restored with either a conventional paste-like (Filtek Z100, 3M ESPE), a conventional flowable (G-ænial Universal Flo, GC), a bulk-fill paste-like (Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill, Ivoclar Vivadent) or a bulk-fill flowable (SDR, Dentsply) composite (n=10). AE signals were recorded from the start of curing for 20min. The cumulative number of AE events was correlated with the theoretical maximum shrinkage stress induced by each composite. Two samples from each group were scanned using micro-computed tomography (µCT) and qualitatively evaluated. RESULTS: Both composite type and cavity depth had a significant influence on the number of AE. The conventional paste-like composite generated significantly more AE than the other composites. The AE number increased sigmoidally in function of time, with a more rapid increase after a few seconds for the conventional composites than for the bulk-fill composites. A strong linear correlation was found between the predicted shrinkage stress values and the total number of AE events for both cavities depth. Representative µCT images showed larger de-bonding areas for 4.0-mm cavities and for conventional composites. SIGNIFICANCE: Premature interfacial or cohesive cracks can already develop during placement/curing of the composite. This might compromise the restoration integrity and in turn affect its survival in the long term. The amount AE events increased linearly with the theoretical maximum shrinkage stress of the composites.

Limited interaction of a self-adhesive flowable composite with dentin/enamel characterized by TEM.

OBJECTIVES: A new category of composite which does not require any acid etching or bonding protocol prior to application has been introduced. The purpose of this study was to characterize the interfacial ultra-structure at enamel and dentin surfaces by means of transmission electron microscopy (TEM). METHODS: Non-carious human third molars were randomly divided into 6 groups (bur-cut dentin, SiC-ground dentin, fractured dentin, bur-cut enamel, SiC-ground enamel, and un-cut enamel). After preparation of the respective surfaces, the self-adhesive flowable composite (Vertise Flow, Kerr) was applied. Non-demineralized/demineralized and non-stained/stained sections of 70-90nm were prepared following common TEM-specimen processing procedures. Additional specimens were immersed in an ammoniacal silver nitrate solution. RESULTS: The composite-dentin interface was free of voids and no de-bonding occurred during specimen preparation. For bur-cut and SiC-ground dentin, no surface demineralization was observed and the smear contained residual hydroxyapatite. On fractured dentin (i.e. without smear interference), a very thin interaction area of 100-200nm without apparent signs of surface demineralization was seen. When the composite was bonded to enamel, a distinct separation between the self-adhesive composite and enamel was present in all three groups. A tight interaction, yet without distinct dissolution of hydroxyapatite, could only be seen in some regions at bur-cut enamel where smear was absent or sparse. Silver nitrate infiltration was associated with the presence of smear. SIGNIFICANCE: The self-adhesive composite showed limited interaction with smear-covered substrates and aprismatic enamel, which explains its inferior diminished bonding capacity in comparison with current adhesives.

Correlative analysis of cement-dentin interfaces using an interfacial fracture toughness and micro-tensile bond strength approach.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the interfacial fracture toughness (iFT) and micro-tensile strength (µTBS) of composite cements bonded to dentin. METHODS: Fifty feldspar ceramic blocks (Vita Mark II, Vita Zahnfabrik) were luted onto dentin using two self-adhesive (G-CEM LinkAce, GC; SpeedCEM, Ivoclar Vivadent), two self-etch (Multilink Primer & Multilink Automix, Ivoclar Vivadent; Scotchbond Universal & RelyX Ultimate, 3 M ESPE), and one etch-and-rinse (Excite F DSC & Variolink II, Ivoclar Vivadent) composite cement (n=10). After 48h in 100% relative humidity at 37°C, one half of each tooth was sectioned in sticks with a chevron notch at the cement-dentin interface and tested in a 4-point bending test setup (iFT). The remaining half of the tooth was sectioned in micro-specimens and stressed in tension until failure (µTBS). The mode of failure was determined with a stereomicroscope at 50× magnification. Data were submitted to Weibull analysis and Pearson's correlation (α=0.05). RESULTS: At 10% probability of failure, no significant differences could be found using iFT, while the etch-and-rinse composite cement Variolink II presented a significantly higher µTBS at this level. At 63.2% probability of failure, the self-adhesive composite cement G-CEM LinkAce revealed a significantly lower µTBS and iFT, and the self-etch cement Multilink Automix also revealed a significantly lower µTBS than all other cements. The correlation found between iFT and µTBS was moderate and not significant (r2=0.618, p=0.11). SIGNIFICANCE: Overall, the etch-and-rinse and 'universal' self-etch composite cements performed best. The micro-tensile bond strength and interfacial fracture toughness tests did not correlate well.

Effect of Bulk-filling on the Bonding Efficacy in Occlusal Class I Cavities.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of bulk filling Class I posterior cavities on bonding to cavity-bottom dentin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two flowable "base" bulk-fill composites (Filtek Bulk Fill Flowable, SDR), one paste-like "full-body" bulk-fill composite (Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill) and one conventional paste-like composite (Filtek Z100) were bonded (G-ænial Bond) to either a flat surface (3.5 x 3.5 x 4 mm; C-factor: 0.18) or a Class I cavity (3.5 x 3.5 x 4 mm; C-factor: 5.8). After 1-week water storage, the restorations were sectioned to obtain 4 rectangular microspecimens that were subjected to microtensile bond strength (µTBS) testing. RESULTS: No significant differences in µTBS were recorded between all composites when bonded onto a flat surface (p > 0.05). When bonded into a Class I cavity, the µTBS of all composites except SDR significantly decreased (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Both the configuration factor and the type of bulk-fill composite were found to have a great impact on bonding to cavity-bottom dentin.

Short fibre-reinforced composite for extensive direct restorations: a laboratory and computational assessment.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a short fibre-reinforced composite (FRC) applied in combination with a conventional filler composite (CFC) on the fatigue resistance, fracture strength, failure mode and stress distribution, for restorations of premolars under two loading angles. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-two inferior premolars received extensive cavities with removal of the lingual cusp. Teeth were restored directly using 'FRC (EverX Posterior, GC) + CFC (G-aenial, GC)' or 'CFC only' and received two fatigue/fracture loadings at two different angles (0°/45°) (n = 8). Data were submitted to two-way ANOVA (α = 5 %) and Tukey test. Failure mode was analysed using SEM. Four 3D finite element (FE) models were constructed and static, linear and elastic analyses were performed. Maximum principal and von Mises stresses were evaluated. RESULTS: All specimens survived the mechanical fatigue simulation. No statistical difference in fracture resistance was recorded between FRC + CFC and CFC only, considering both loading angles (p = 0.115). However, the 0° loading showed a statistical significant higher strength than the 45° loading (p = 0.000). Failure mode analysis revealed more repairable fractures upon 0° loading, versus more root fractures (unrepairable) upon 45° loading. FE revealed a higher amount of stress upon 45° loading, with tensile stress being imposed to the lingual cervical area. CONCLUSION: The fracture strength was not increased using the FRC. Loading at a 45° decreased significantly the fracture resistance. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The restoration of extensive cavities in posterior tooth is a challenge for the clinicians and the choice of the material that increases the fracture strength of tooth-restoration complex is required.

Biomechanical Behavior of Extensively Restored Premolars: Cusp Deformation, Marginal Integrity, and Fracture Resistance.

PURPOSE: To study the biomechanical behavior of extensively restored premolars by determining the effect of the composite type, presence of cusp weakening, and compressive loading on the cusp deformation (CD), marginal integrity (MI), and fracture resistance (FR) of directly restored premolars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty premolars received Class II mesio-occlusal-distal (MOD) cavities and were divided into 4 groups (n = 10) in accordance with the two study variables: composite type (conventional: Filtek Z250 XT [Z250], 3M ESPE; low shrinkage: Venus Diamond [VD], Heraeus-Kulzer) and the presence of cusp weakening (with/without). Cusp deformation upon restoration was assessed using strain gauges during the restorative procedure and thereafter when the restorations were subjected to an occlusal load of 100 N. The samples were subjected to thermal and mechanical cycling. Epoxy resin replicas of the proximal tooth/restoration interfaces were made to analyze the marginal integrity (MI) using scanning electron microscopy. To determine the fracture resistance (FR), the teeth were loaded at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min until fracture. RESULTS: The conventional composite Z250 had higher CD, lower MI, and lower FR than the low-shrinkage composite VD. Cusp weakening had no influence on CD, but MI and FR decreased. CONCLUSION: The low-shrinkage composite VD performed better in restoring extensively destroyed premolars than did Z250.

3D volumetric displacement and strain analysis of composite polymerization.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed at a better understanding of the internal shrinkage patterns within different cavity sizes. METHODS: Ten cylindrical cavities in two sizes were filled with a flowable composite and scanned using X-ray micro-computed tomography (µ-CT) before filling, before and after polymerization. Three-dimensional (3D) non-rigid image registration was applied to sets of two subsequent µ-CT images, before and after polymerization in order to calculate the displacements and strains caused by polymerization shrinkage. RESULTS: 3D volumetric displacement analysis disclosed a main vertical component for both the small and large cavities, however in the latter the downward direction reversed to an upward direction from a depth of approximately 2mm due to debonding at the bottom. Air bubbles and voids in the restorations increased upon polymerization, causing a reverse in strain in the surrounding areas. SIGNIFICANCE: Polymerization-induced shrinkage stress in composite restorations cannot be measured directly. This exploratory study revealed more information on cavity-size dependent shrinkage patterns and opens the way to more extensive studies using different composite materials and varying geometric cavity configurations.

Interfacial fracture toughness of aged adhesive-dentin interfaces.

OBJECTIVE: To assess interfacial fracture toughness of different adhesive approaches and compare to a standard micro-tensile bond-strength (µTBS) test after 6 months water storage. METHODS: Chevron-notched beam fracture toughness (CNB) was determined using a modified ISO 24370:2005 standard. Adhesive-dentin micro-specimens (1.0 mm × 1.0 mm × 8-10 mm) were stressed in tensile until failure to determine the micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS). RESULTS: The highest mean µTBS and interfacial fracture toughness were measured for the multi-step adhesives Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray Noritake) and OptiBond FL (Kerr). While large differences were observed in the bond strength values (from 7.4 to 27.2 MPa) of the one-step self-etch adhesives tested, interfacial fracture toughness was less different (from 0.7 to 1.0 MPam(1/2)). The adhesive with the lowest mean toughness (All-bond Universal, Bisco) had however the highest Weibull reliability, which might be a better parameter in regard to more consistent clinical performance. The self-adhesive composite Vertise Flow (Kerr) scored significantly lower at all levels. SIGNIFICANCE: Although the ranking of the adhesives tested using CNB and µTBS corresponded well, the outcome of CNB appeared more reliable and less variable.

Dentin-smear remains at self-etch adhesive interface.

OBJECTIVE: The bonding potential of 'mild' self-etch adhesives may be compromised due to smear interference, as they may not dissolve/penetrate the smear layer effectively due to their relatively low acidity. We observed that the thickness of the dentin smear layer differed depending on the surface-preparation methodology used. METHODS: The interaction of an (ultra-)mild self-etch adhesive (Clearfil S3 Bond, Kuraray Noritake) with human dentin, prepared either using a medium-grit diamond bur ('thick', clinically relevant smear layer) or 600-grit SiC-paper ('thin' smear layer), or just fractured (smear-free), was evaluated using high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Non-demineralized/demineralized 30-100nm interfacial cross-sections were prepared following common TEM-specimen processing and diamond-knife ultra-microtomy. RESULTS: The adhesive did not dissolve the bur-cut, nor the SiC-ground smear layer, but impregnated it. Within this 'resin-smear complex', hydroxyapatite was abundantly present. At fractured dentin, this complex was not present, while the actual layer of interaction of the adhesive was limited to about 100nm. Non-demineralized 'ultra-thin' (30-50nm) sections confirmed the interfacial ultra-structure to differ for the three surface-preparation methods. An electron dense band was consistently disclosed at the adhesive interface, most likely representing the documented chemical interaction of the functional monomer 10-MDP with Ca. SIGNIFICANCE: The dentin surface-preparation method significantly affects the nature of the smear layer and the interaction with the ultra-mild self-etch adhesive.

3D-microleakage assessment of adhesive interfaces: exploratory findings by µCT.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the feasibility of a 3D-microleakage protocol for the evaluation of various configurations of adhesive-tooth interfaces. METHODS: Three different kinds of specimens were prepared: (1) a Class-I composite restoration placed without any bonding to maximize gap formation at the interface; (2) a glass-fiber post cemented with a self-adhesive composite cement into a prepared root canal; and (3) inlay MOD composite restorations placed with either a 1-step self-adhesive or a 2-step etch-and-rinse composite cement. After silver-nitrate (AgNO3) infiltration, the specimens were scanned using a Skyscan 1172 X-ray microtomograph (µCT; Skyscan Bruker) at 100kV, 100µA and 7.8-9.5µm resolution. Projection images were reconstructed, after which maximum-intensity projections (MIPs) and 3D-volumetric renderings were produced. For the inlays, an additional conventional stereomicroscopic (SM) microleakage evaluation was accomplished after specimen sectioning. RESULTS: MIPs and 3D-renderings from specimens (1) and (2) revealed strongly varying microleakage patterns along the marginal gap/interface. For the specimens of setup (3), the high radiopacity of the 2-step composite cement hindered evaluation of the MIPs. MIP-microleakage patterns along the enamel margin of the restoration cemented with the 1-step composite cement corresponded well to the stereomicroscopic images. SIGNIFICANCE: The reported µCT-protocol revealed good sensitivity to detect AgNO3 infiltration at the adhesive-tooth interface when considerable microleakage was present. When microleakage was less apparent and spread in a more diffuse pattern, evaluation with µCT was less sensitive compared to stereomicroscopic evaluation.

Fracture toughness versus micro-tensile bond strength testing of adhesive-dentin interfaces.

OBJECTIVE: To assess interfacial fracture toughness of different adhesive approaches and compare to a standard micro-tensile bond-strength (µTBS) test. METHODS: Chevron-notched beam fracture toughness (CNB) was measured following a modified ISO 24370 standard. Composite bars with dimensions of 3.0×4.0×25 mm were prepared, with the adhesive-dentin interface in the middle. At the adhesive-dentin interface, a chevron notch was prepared using a 0.15 mm thin diamond blade mounted in a water-cooled diamond saw. Each specimen was loaded until failure in a 4-point bend test setup and the fracture toughness was calculated according to the ISO specifications. Similarly, adhesive-dentin micro-specimens (1.0×1.0×8-10 mm) were stressed in tensile until failure to determine the µTBS. RESULTS: A positive correlation (r(2)=0.64) was observed between CNB and µTBS, which however was only nearly statistically significant, mainly due to the dissimilar outcome of Scotchbond Universal (3M ESPE). While few µTBS specimens failed at the adhesive-dentin interface, almost all CNB specimens failed interfacially at the notch tip. Weibull moduli for interfacial fracture toughness were much higher than for µTBS (3.8-11.5 versus 2.7-4.8, respectively), especially relevant with regard to early failures. SIGNIFICANCE: Although the ranking of the adhesives on their bonding effectiveness tested using CNB and µTBS corresponded well, the outcome of CNB appeared more reliable and less variable. Fracture toughness measurement is however more laborious and requires specific equipment. The µTBS nevertheless appeared to remain a valid method to assess bonding effectiveness in a versatile way.

Bulk-filling of high C-factor posterior cavities: effect on adhesion to cavity-bottom dentin.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of bulk-filling high C-factor posterior cavities on adhesion to cavity-bottom dentin. METHODS: A universal flowable composite (G-ænial Universal Flo, GC), a bulk-fill flowable base composite (SDR Posterior Bulk Fill Flowable Base, Dentsply) and a conventional paste-like composite (Z100, 3M ESPE) were bonded (G-ænial Bond, GC) into standardized cavities with different cavity configurations (C-factors), namely C=3.86 (Class-I cavity of 2.5mm deep, bulk-filled), C=5.57 (Class-I cavity of 4mm deep, bulk-filled), C=1.95 (Class-I cavity of 2.5mm deep, filled in three equal layers) and C=0.26 (flat surface). After one-week water storage, the restorations were sectioned in 4 rectangular micro-specimens and subjected to a micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS) test. RESULTS: Highly significant differences were found between pairs of means of the experimental groups (Kruskal-Wallis, p<0.0001). Using the bulk-fill flowable base composite SDR (Dentsply), no significant differences in µTBS were measured among all cavity configurations (p>0.05). Using the universal flowable composite G-ænial Universal Flo (GC) and the conventional paste-like composite Z100 (3M ESPE), the µTBS to cavity-bottom dentin was not significantly different from that of SDR (Dentsply) when the cavities were layer-filled or the flat surface was build up in layers; it was however significantly lower when the Class-I cavities were filled in bulk, irrespective of cavity depth. SIGNIFICANCE: The filling technique and composite type may have a great impact on the adhesion of the composite, in particular in high C-factor cavities. While the bulk-fill flowable base composite provided satisfactory bond strengths regardless of filling technique and cavity depth, adhesion failed when conventional composites were used in bulk.

Bonding effectiveness of self-adhesive composites to dentin and enamel.

UNLABELLED: Self-adhesive composites (SACs) are claimed to bond to tooth substrate without a separate adhesive. Bonding effectiveness data are however still limited. OBJECTIVES: In SubProject 1, the hypothesis was tested that the micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS) to dentin of two flowable SACs was alike that of a one-step self-etch adhesive (1-SEa) combined with a flowable composite (flowC). In SubProject 2, the hypothesis was tested that the nature of the smear layer did not affect the µTBS of the SACs to dentin/enamel. METHODS: SubProject 1: The µTBS to bur-cut dentin of two SACs (Fusio Liquid Dentin, Pentron; Vertise Flow, Kerr) was measured and compared to that of four 1-SEa/flowC combinations (AdheSe One/Tetric EvoFlow, Ivoclar Vivadent; Adper Prompt L-Pop/Filtek Supreme XT Flowable, 3M ESPE; iBond/Venus flow, Heraeus Kulzer; Xeno V/X-flow, Dentsply) and of one 3-step etch-and-rinse adhesive (3-E&Ra: OptiBond FL, Kerr) combined with Premise Flowable (Kerr). The effect of pre-etching dentin with phosphoric acid on the µTBS of the SAC Vertise Flow (Kerr) was measured as well. SubProject 2: The µTBS of the two SACs and one 1-SEa/flowC combination (Adper Prompt L-Pop/Filtek Supreme XT Flowable, 3M ESPE) to either bur-cut or SiC-paper ground dentin/enamel was measured. The effect of pre-etching enamel with phosphoric acid on the µTBS of the SAC Vertise Flow (Kerr) was also measured. RESULTS: SubProject 1: The µTBS to dentin of both SACs was significantly lower than that of the 1-SEa/flowC and the 3-E&Ra/flowC combinations, of which the latter performed best. The SAC Fusio Liquid Dentin (Pentron) bonded significantly better to dentin than Vertise Flow (Kerr), except when dentin had additionally been pre-etched with phosphoric acid. SubProject 2: Surface smear did not interfere with bonding of the SACs to dentin/enamel, while their µTBS remained significantly lower than that of the 1-SEa/flowC combination. Prior phosphoric-acid etching of dentin/enamel significantly ameliorated the bonding effectiveness of Vertise Flow (Kerr). SIGNIFICANCE: The bonding effectiveness of flowable SACs underscores that of 1-SEa's and one 'gold-standard' 3-E&Ra when combined with their proprietary flowable composite. Consequently, routine clinical application of SACs should be carefully considered.

Bonding effectiveness of a new 'multi-mode' adhesive to enamel and dentine.

OBJECTIVES: Self-etch adhesives are well adopted in general practice, obviously primarily thanks to their ease of use and fast application time. Nevertheless, phosphoric acid is still often recommended to beforehand etch enamel following a so-called 'selective' enamel-etch technique, this in particular when most cavity margins end in enamel. The purpose of this study was to test if a new one-step adhesive can be applied in a multi-mode manner, this following different, either 'full' or 'selective', self-etch and etch-and-rinse approaches. Specific research hypotheses tested were that prior phosphoric-acid etching did not affect the bonding effectiveness of the one-step adhesive to enamel and dentine, and that the bonding effectiveness to dentine was also not affected when the adhesive was applied either following a 'dry-bonding' or 'wet-bonding' etch-and-rinse technique. METHODS: The micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS) of the one-step self-etch adhesive G-Bond Plus (GC, Tokyo, Japan; 1-SEA) was measured when it was bonded to bur-cut enamel following either a 'self-etch' or an 'etch-and-rinse' adhesive protocol, and to bur-cut dentine when applied following either a 'self-etch', a 'dry-bonding' or a 'wet-bonding' etch-and-rinse adhesive protocol. Bond-strength testing was corroborated by ultra-structural analysis of the interfacial interaction at enamel and dentine using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). RESULTS: Prior phosphoric-acid etching significantly increased the bonding effectiveness of the 1-SEA to enamel. A clearly enhanced micro-retentive surface was revealed by TEM. To dentine, no statistically significant difference in bonding effectiveness was recorded when the 1-SEA was either applied following a self-etch or both etch-and-rinse approaches. The 'dry-bonding' etch-and-rinse protocol was significantly more effective than its 'wet-bonding' version. TEM however revealed indications of low-quality hybridisation following both etch-and-rinse approaches, in particular in the form of a porous and poorly resin-infiltrated collagen mesh. CONCLUSIONS: While phosphoric-acid etching definitely improved bonding of the one-step self-etch adhesive to enamel, one should be more careful with additional phosphoric-acid etching of dentine. Although the bond strength was not reduced, the resultant adhesive interface appeared ultra-structurally more vulnerable to biodegradation.

TEM characterization of a silorane composite bonded to enamel/dentin.

OBJECTIVES: The low-shrinking composite composed of combined siloxane-oxirane technology (Filtek Silorane, 3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) required the development of a specific adhesive (Silorane System Adhesive, 3M ESPE), in particular because of the high hydrophobicity of the silorane composite. The purpose of this study was to characterize the interfacial ultra-structure at enamel and dentin using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). METHODS: Non-demineralized/demineralized 70-90 nm sections were prepared following common TEM specimen processing procedures. RESULTS: TEM revealed a typical twofold build-up of the adhesive resin, resulting in a total adhesive layer thickness of 10-20 microm. At bur-cut enamel, a tight interface without distinct dissolution of hydroxyapatite was observed. At bur-cut dentin, a relatively thin hybrid layer of maximum a few hundreds of nanometer was formed without clear surface demineralization. No clear resin tags were formed. At fractured dentin, the interaction appeared very superficial (100-200 nm). Distinct resin tags were formed due to the absence of smear plugs. Silver-nitrate infiltration showed a varying pattern of both spot- and cluster-like appearance of nano-leakage. Traces of Ag were typically detected along some part of the enamel-adhesive interface and/or between the two adhesive resin layers. Substantially more Ag-infiltration was observed along the dentin-adhesive interface of bur-cut dentin, as compared to that of fractured dentin. CONCLUSIONS: The nano-interaction of Silorane System Adhesive should be attributed to its relatively high pH of 2.7. The obtained tight interface at both enamel and dentin indicates that the two-step self-etch adhesive effectively bridged the hydrophilic tooth substrate with the hydrophobic silorane composite.