Hereditary angioedema (HAE) in Belgium: results from a national survey.

Background: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare heritable disorder that is characterized by recurrent, circumscribed, nonpitting, nonpruritic, often painful subepithelial swellings of sudden unpredictable onset that generally fade during 48-72 h. Epidemiological data of hereditary angioedema patients in Belgium is lacking. Methods: We set up a nation-wide, multicentric study involving the 8 Belgian hospitals known to follow-up patients with Type I and II HAE. All Belgium HAE patients were asked to fill out questionnaires that mainly covered demographic data, family history, and detailed information about diagnosis, treatment and burden of their Type I and II HAE. Results: 112 patients with type I or type II HAE could be included. Median delay between first symptoms and diagnosis was 7 years. 51% of patients had experienced pharyngeal or tongue swelling and 78% had experienced abdominal symptoms, both known to cause an important reduction in quality of life. 60% of symptomatic patients reported to receive long term prophylactic treatment. Human plasma-derived C1-esterase inhibitor concentrate was used by 56.3% of patients. 16.7% and 27.1% of patients used a 17-α-alkylated androgen and tranexamic acid as long term prophylactic therapy. Conclusions: We present the first nation-wide epidemiological study regarding HAE in Belgium. Our data show that the morbidity of HAE is not to be underestimated. Knowledge and dissemination of this data is critical in raising awareness, encouraging development of therapies and optimising nationwide management.

Clinical practice of hereditary angioedema in Belgium: opportunities for optimized care.

INTRODUCTION: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare disorder characterized by unpredictable painful and potentially life-threatening swelling episodes. The international WAO/EAACI guideline on the diagnosis and management of HAE was recently updated and provides up-to-date guidance for the management of. In this paper, we assessed to what extent the Belgian clinical practice was aligned with the revised guideline, and whether there were opportunities to optimise Belgian clinical practice in HAE. METHODS: We compared the updated international guideline for HAE with information we acquired on Belgian clinical practice, a Belgian patient registry and expert opinion analysis. The Belgian patient registry was developed with the involvement of eight Belgian reference centers for HAE patients. Eight Belgian experts, physicians in the participating centers, included patients in the patient registry and participated in the expert opinion analysis. RESULTS: The main action points to further optimise the Belgian clinical practice of HAE are Work towards total disease control and normalize patients' life by considering the use of new and innovative long-term prophylactic treatment options; (2) inform C1-INH-HAE patients about new long-term prophylactic therapies; (3) assure the availability of on-demand therapy for all C1-INH-HAE patients; (4) implement a more universally used assessment including multiple aspects of the disease (e.g. quality of life assessment) in daily clinical practice; and (5) continue and expand an existing patient registry to assure continued data availability on C1-INH-HAE in Belgium. CONCLUSIONS: In light of the updated WAO/EAACI guideline, five action points were identified and several other suggestions were made to optimise the Belgian clinical practice in C1-INH-HAE.