Fetal bladder morphology as a predictor of outcome in fetal lower urinary tract obstruction.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluate survival of fetuses with severe Lower Urinary Tract Obstruction (LUTO) based on bladder morphology. We hypothesize that fetuses with a "floppy" appearing bladder on initial prenatal ultrasound will have worse infant outcomes than fetuses with full/rounded bladders. METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed all cases of LUTO evaluated in our fetal center between January 2013 and December 2021. Ultrasonographic assessment, renal biochemistry, and bladder refilling contributed to a "favorable" or "unfavorable" evaluation. Bladder morphology on initial ultrasound was classified as "floppy" or "full/rounded." Vesicoamniotic shunting was offered for favorably evaluated fetuses. Baseline demographics, ultrasound parameters, prenatal evaluations of fetal renal function, and infant outcomes were collected. Fetuses diagnosed with severe LUTO were included in analysis using descriptive statistics. The primary outcome measured was survival at 6 months of life. RESULTS: 104 LUTO patients were evaluated; 24 were included in analysis. Infant survival rate at 6 months was 60% for rounded bladders and 0% for floppy bladders (p = 0.003). Bladder refill adequacy was lower in fetuses with floppy bladders compared with rounded bladders (p value < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: We propose that bladder morphology in fetuses with severe LUTO may be a prognostication factor for predicting infant outcomes and provides a valuable, noninvasive assessment tool.

Evaluation and Disposition of Fetal Myelomeningocele Repair Candidates: A Large Referral Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Fetal myelomeningocele (fMMC) repair yields superior outcomes to postnatal repair and is increasingly offered at select fetal centers. OBJECTIVES: To report the fMMC referral process from initial referral to evaluation and surgical intervention in a large fetal referral center. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients referred to Texas Children's Fetal Center for fMMC between September 2013 and January 2018, reviewing the process from referral to final disposition. The stepwise evaluation included a phone interview followed by multidisciplinary consultation at our fetal center. We modified the Management of Myelomeningocele Study inclusion and exclusion criteria to allow a maternal body mass index of 35-40 on an individual basis. RESULTS: A total of 204 referrals were contacted for a phone interview; 175 (86%) pursued outpatient evaluation, and 80 (46%) of them qualified for repair. Among the eligible patients, 37 (46%) underwent fetoscopic repair, 20 (25%) underwent open repair, and 17 (21%) declined prenatal surgery. Of the 89 noneligible patients (53%) excluded upon outpatient evaluation, 64 (72%) were excluded for fetal and 17 (19%) for maternal reasons. No hindbrain herniation (16%) and maternal BMI and/or hypertension (5%) were the most common reasons for fetal and maternal exclusion, respectively. A total of 31% of our referral population underwent fetal surgery. CONCLUSIONS: A small percentage of fMMC referrals ultimately undergo prenatal surgery. Stepwise evaluation and multidisciplinary teams are key to the success of large referral programs.