Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Ind Med ; 56(1): 111-23, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22619114

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The study of workers' health problems possibly associated with stressful conditions requires valid and reliable tools for monitoring risk factors. The present study validates two questionnaires to assess psychosocial risk factors for stress-related illnesses within a sample of Colombian workers. METHODS: The validation process was based on a representative sample survey of 2,360 Colombian employees, aged 18-70 years. Worker response rate was 90%; 46% of the responders were women. Internal consistency was calculated, construct validity was tested with factor analysis and concurrent validity was tested with Spearman correlations. RESULTS: The questionnaires demonstrated adequate reliability (0.88-0.95). Factor analysis confirmed the dimensions proposed in the measurement model. Concurrent validity resulted in significant correlations with stress and health symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: "Work and Non-work Psychosocial Factors Questionnaires" were found to be valid and reliable for the assessment of workers' psychosocial factors, and they provide information for research and intervention.


Asunto(s)
Estrés Psicológico/etiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Colombia , Análisis Factorial , Femenino , Humanos , Liderazgo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Autonomía Profesional , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Recompensa , Factores de Riesgo , Apoyo Social , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Carga de Trabajo , Adulto Joven
2.
Am J Ind Med ; 56(1): 100-10, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22628068

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of psychosocial factors requires instruments that measure dynamic complexities. This study explains the design of a set of questionnaires to evaluate work and non-work psychosocial risk factors for stress-related illnesses. METHODS: The measurement model was based on a review of literature. Content validity was performed by experts and cognitive interviews. Pilot testing was carried out with a convenience sample of 132 workers. Cronbach's alpha evaluated internal consistency and concurrent validity was estimated by Spearman correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Three questionnaires were constructed to evaluate exposure to work and non-work risk factors. Content validity improved the questionnaires coherence with the measurement model. Internal consistency was adequate (α = 0.85-0.95). Concurrent validity resulted in moderate correlations of psychosocial factors with stress symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Questionnaires' content reflected a wide spectrum of psychosocial factors sources. Cognitive interviews improved understanding of questions and dimensions. The structure of the measurement model was confirmed.


Asunto(s)
Estrés Psicológico/etiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de Riesgo , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA