Patient Interaction With the Health Care System Following a Nonopioid Discharge Strategy for Anterior Urethroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Continued efforts have been made to minimize postoperative opioids following urologic interventions. Studies show that patient-reported pain outcomes are similar between those patients discharged with and without opioids following anterior urethroplasty, but we do not know what impact this has on health care utilization. We aim to show that a nonopioid discharge following anterior urethroplasty does not increase postoperative health care utilization. METHODS: Five hundred patients who underwent anterior urethroplasty from January 2016 to October 2022 were identified from retrospective chart review. Patient demographic information, surgical characteristics, and postoperative interactions with the health care system were extracted from the electronic medical record. We then compared these outcomes by discharge opioid prescription status. RESULTS: A total of 253 patients were discharged without an opioid prescription. Patients who received an opioid were more likely to have had a perineal incision (73% vs 64%, P = .02), more likely to have had an overnight hospital stay (30% vs 14%, P < .01), and were more likely to have been prescribed an opioid preoperatively (13% vs 7%, P = .03). There were overall low rates of interaction with the health system in both groups with no significant difference in 30-day unplanned office visits, emergency department visits, or office phone calls. Overall, by the end of our study period 97% were discharged without an opioid and 94% of patients were discharged the same day. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing anterior urethroplasty can safely be discharged home without opioids following surgery without undue postoperative burden on the health care system.

Surgical Outcomes and Prediction of Complications Following High-complexity Buried Penis Reconstruction.

PURPOSE: With uniform modern approaches to adult acquired buried penis reconstruction, this study provides updated results on surgical outcomes for complex cases while evaluating the relative influence of medical, surgical, and socioeconomic factors on these results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review was conducted of all patients undergoing initial buried penis reconstruction including escutcheonectomy and penile skin grafting at 1 tertiary center from 2015 through 2022. Summary scores for frailty and socioeconomic status were calculated with the Modified Frailty Index and Area Deprivation Index, respectively. RESULTS: The cohort included 103 patients. Median age was 51 years (IQR 44-65), and median BMI was 43 (IQR 38-49). Frail patients (≥2 Modified Frailty Index risk factors) accounted for 27% of the population while socioeconomic disadvantage (≥85th percentile on Area Deprivation Index) affected 33% of patients. Twenty-eight percent of repairs included a panniculectomy. Rate of revision for a poor outcome was 3.9% with median follow-up of 11 months. Complications were frequent (50%) with most being Clavien I or II (41%) and related to wound dehiscence (31%) or infection (30%). Frail patients had a higher rate of complication (71% vs 41%, P = .01) and were 6 times more likely to experience a complication on multivariable logistic regression (OR 6.41, 95% CI: 1.77-23.22, P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: The modern approach to complex buried penis reconstruction results in a low revision rate; however, low-grade complications are frequent. Patient frailty identifies those at highest risk for complication, offering an opportunity for counseling and preoperative preparation.