Pleural empyema - single center experience.

INTRODUCTION: Retrospective analysis of a group of patients treated for pleural empyema in the Department of Surgery, University Hospital Pilsen, over the last ten years. METHOD: We evaluated a group of patients treated for pleural empyema in the Department of Surgery, University Hospital in Pilsen, during the period 2007-2016. We focused on the demographic data of this group, the causes of empyema in these patients, surgical procedures performed in connection with empyema, the microbial species found in empyema, and, last but not least, on morbidity and lethality. RESULTS: We treated 103 patients with pleural empyema during the above period - 80 men (77.7%) and 23 women (22.3%) aged 23-83 years (average age 59.4 years). 64 patients had a history of surgical or invasive procedure (62.1%). The length of history was traceable in 55 patients (53.4%) and was 23.1 days on average, remaining unclear in the rest of the group. 1/3 of cases were metapneumonic empyemas, 1/3 postoperative empyemas and 1/3 of the cases were due to other reasons. The most commonly cultivated bacterial genus was Streptococcus, species Staphylococcus aureus. The most common surgery was chest drainage (51%). 13 patients died (lethality 12.6%) after surgery, the most common cause of death being sepsis; postoperative morbidity was 34%. CONCLUSION: Pleural empyema is a serious condition with very high morbidity and lethality. Surgical procedures done to manage empyema are associated with a very high risk of necessary reoperation. Positive mycological culture from empyema seems to be associated with a higher risk of complications and death. Key words: empyema - thoracic drainage - thoracotomy - lung decortication - videothoracoscopy.

Can the One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification method of lymph nodes examination make the staging of pulmonary tumours more precise?

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this article is to compare the sensitivity of detecting micrometastases in hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes in case of primary (non-small cell) and secondary (metastases of colorectal carcinoma) pulmonary tumours using standard histopathological examination with haematoxylin-eosin staining, immunohistochemistry examination with Anti-Cytokeratin 19 antibody and examination based on the One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification method. METHOD: During radical surgical treatment of primary non-small cell lung carcinoma and pulmonary metastases of colorectal carcinoma, hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes of 100 patients enrolled in the study in the period from 2015 to 2017 were extracted based on a standard classification. These lymph nodes were subsequently divided along the longitudinal axis into 4 identical parts where part one and three on the left were intended for examination based on the One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification method, whereas parts two and four were subjected to histopathological examination. In evaluating the respective parts of the nodes by histological examination, the nodes were first examined by a standard procedure that involves haematoxylin-eosin staining, followed by immunohistochemistry examination with Anti-Cytokeratin 19 antibody. The One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification method was performed in the kit supplied by Sysmex (Kobe, Japan) and is based on the detection of cytokeratin 19 mRNA (messenger ribonucleic acid) by reverse transcription coupled with isothermal amplification. RESULTS: A total of 1,426 lymph nodes of the patients enrolled in the study were extracted and examined using the above mentioned methodology. In 78 patients (78%), identical results were obtained using haematoxylin-eosin staining, immunohistochemistry with Anti-Cytokeratin 19 and One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification. Micrometastases in the lymph nodes using the One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification method in the absence of the other methods were proven in 16 patients (16%). Only in 3 cases (3%), the examination by haematoxylin-eosin staining, or immunohistochemistry with Anti-Cytokeratin 19, was positive while One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification was negative. The results obtained by immunohistochemistry with Anti-Cytokeratin 19 antibody were practically the same as those obtained by haematoxylin-eosin staining (97%). CONCLUSION: The results of the study have demonstrated a higher percentage of metastases detected in hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes if the One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification method of examination was used compared to haematoxylin-eosin staining and immunohistochemistry with Anti-Cytokeratin 19 antibody (upstaging in 16%). This shows that the examination of lymph nodes using the One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification method can have a certain potential to make the pulmonary tumours staging more accurate. On the other hand, immunohistochemistry with Anti-Cytokeratin 19 antibody seems to be not so useful. However, it is necessary to prove this hypothesis in follow-up studies, or where applicable, in a larger cohort of patients. Another task is to ascertain, by careful patient monitoring, the influence of the micrometastases detected in their lymph nodes using the One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification method on these patients' follow-up. Key words: lung cancer - lymph nodes - H&E - IHC CK19 - OSNA assay.

[Traumatic pneumothorax - diagnosis and treatment of 322 cases over a five-year period]. / Traumatický pneumotorax - diagnostika a lécba 322 prípadu v petiletém období.

INTRODUCTION: Retrospective analysis of a set of patients treated for traumatic pneumothorax in the Trauma Centre of Teaching Hospital in Pilsen over a period of five years. METHOD: In total, 322 patients with traumatic pneumothorax were treated in the study period 20122016. The set included subjects whose injury fell within the definition of traumatic pneumothorax and who underwent either primary treatment or secondary transport to the Trauma Centre following basic treatment in another health facility on the day that the trauma occurred. The exclusion criterion was a pneumothorax <1 cm; in addition, patients with inconclusive findings from imaging screening were not included in the set. Basic demographic information, the mechanism, type and laterality of the traumatic pneumothorax, the Injury Severity Score, associated injuries, diagnostic procedures, timing, method and outcome of the treatment, as well as any complications and reoperations, were identified in the set. Other assessed information included deaths of patients with traumatic pneumothorax, including the cause and time of death in relation to the time of admission to the Trauma Centre. RESULTS: The vast majority of traumatic pneumothoraces (94.1%) occurred as a result of blunt chest trauma, car accidents being the most common mechanism (about 28%). Closed pneumothoraces dominated (91.3%). Traumatic pneumothorax was part of a polytrauma in about one half of the injured. The average Injury Severity Score within the set was 20 points. Traumatic pneumothorax was diagnosed in more than three quarters of the patients based on clinical examination and computed tomography. The most common therapeutic procedure was drainage of the relevant pleural cavity (259 patients - 80.5%). Almost two thirds of surgical procedures were carried out within 1 hour of admission to the Trauma Centre. Complications associated with traumatic pneumothorax treatment were reported in 10.2% of the cases, and 33 reoperations were carried out. 15 patients (4.7%) in the set died, out of which 12 on the day of the trauma, all of them as a result of decompensated traumatic shock. CONCLUSION: Traumatic pneumothorax is a relatively frequent type of chest trauma found in up to half of the patients with chest trauma as part of a polytrauma. It usually occurs as closed pneumothorax as a result of blunt chest trauma. The diagnostic process is based on clinical examination and chest radiogram. However, ultrasound examination could be an alternative to chest radiogram in emergency situations. Computed tomography is the method of first choice for more serious traumas and inconclusive findings. To manage this condition, proper drainage of the relevant pleural cavity is sufficient in the vast majority of the patients. With timely diagnosis and adequate therapeutic intervention, the prognosis for patients with traumatic pneumothorax is favourable.Key words: traumatic pneumothorax - diagnosis - chest drainage.

[Penetrating chest trauma - experience of the Pilsen University Hospital Trauma Centre]. / Penetrující poranení hrudníku - zkusenosti Traumacentra Fakultní nemocnice Plzen.

INTRODUCTION: Retrospective analysis of a set of patients treated for penetrating chest trauma in the Trauma Centre at University Hospital Pilsen over seventeen years. METHOD: Overall, 96 injured with penetrating chest trauma were treated in the study period 2000-2016. Basic demographics, the mechanism, type, location and extent of the penetrating chest trauma, Injury Severity Score, existence of associated injuries, diagnostic procedures, timing and method of the chest trauma treatment as well as any complications and reoperations were identified in the set. Other collected information included deaths of the injured, and the cause and time of death in relation to the time of admission to the Trauma Centre. RESULTS: The most common mechanism of injury was attack by a stabbing weapon (54%) and the most common type of injury was pulmonary laceration (33%). The average Injury Severity Score within the set was 24 points. The most common therapeutic procedure was pleural cavity drainage (47 patients), and less than 40% of the cases required revision surgery by means of thoracotomy or sternotomy. One patient died immediately after being admitted to the Trauma Centre without a chance to apply any therapy; three other patients died during resuscitative thoracotomy or laparotomy. Post-operative complications occurred in 13 patients (13.5%) and required 14 reoperations. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm of penetrating chest trauma is primarily determined by the condition of the injured. Adequate drainage of the relevant pleural cavity is sufficient to treat one half of the patients; on the other hand, 40% of traumas, injuries of the heart, large vessels and gunshot wounds in particular, require urgent revision surgery by means of thoracotomy or sternotomy. If the injured patient is transported to a specialized centre for timely treatment, the prognosis of penetrating chest traumas is quite favourable.Key words: penetrating chest trauma - diagnosis - chest drainage - thoracotomy - sternotomy.

[Chest Injury and its Surgical Treatment in Polytrauma Patients. Five-Year Experience]. / Poranení hrudníku a jeho operacní lécba u polytraumatizovaných nemocných v petiletém období.

UNLABELLED: PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Thoracic trauma, one of the most frequent injuries in patients with multiple traumata, is found in 50 to 80% of these patients and it is crucial for the patient's prognosis. It accounts for 25% of all death from polytraumatic injuries. The aim of this retrospective study was an analysis of the occurrence of chest injuries in polytrauma patients and their surgical treatment in the Trauma Centre or Department of Surgery of the University Hospital Pilsen in a five-year period. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with injuries meeting the definition of polytrauma and an Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥16 were included. The demographic characteristics, mechanism of multiple trauma, ISS value and chest injury were recorded in each patient. The number of injured patients in each year of the study was noted. In the patients with chest injury, the type of injury and method of treatment were assessed. The therapy was further analysed including its timing. The number of deaths due to polytrauma involving chest injury, the cause of death and its time in relation to the patient's admission to the Trauma Centre were evaluated. RESULTS In the period 2010-14, 513 polytrauma patients were treated; of them 371 (72.3%) were men with an average age of 40.5 years. The most frequent cause of injury was a traffic accident (74%). The average ISS of the whole group was 35 points. Chest injury was diagnosed in 469 patients (91.4%) of whom only five (1.1%) had penetrating injury. Pulmonary contusion was most frequent (314 patients; 67%). A total of 212 patients with chest injury underwent surgery (45.2%); urgent surgery was performed in 143 (67.5%), acute surgery in 49 (23.1%) and delayed surgery in 63 (29.7%) patients. Chest drainage was the major surgical procedure used in the whole group. Of 61 patients who died, 52 had chest injury. In this subgroup the most frequent cause of death was decompensated traumatic shock (26 patients; 50%). In the whole group, 32 polytrauma patients died within 24 hours of injury (61.5%). CONCLUSIONS Chest injury, almost always blunt, is often diagnosed in polytrauma patients. A prevalent cause of multiple trauma is a traffic accident. Chest injury most frequently involves pulmonary contusion. Nearly half of chest injuries require surgery, of which 2/3 are urgent procedures. The procedure most frequently performed in polytrauma patients with chest injury is chest drainage and this is also a sufficient procedure in 75% of surgically treated patients. KEY WORDS: polytrauma, chest injury, pulmonary contusion, surgical treatment, chest drainage.

[Spontaneous pneumomediastinum (Hammans syndrome)]. / Spontánní pneumomediastinum (Hammanuv syndrom).

Spontaneous pneumomediastinum, also known as Hammans or Macklins syndrome, is a disease characterized by low incidence, which affects predominantly the male population, and whose cause is unknown. It is an acute event that shows rapid recovery of clinical symptoms and radiological findings. It should be considered in the differential diagnosis of chest pain, and also differentiated from the much more serious secondary pneumomediastinum. The authors present 2 cases of this disease seen at their department during 1 week.