RESUMEN
The optimal surgical treatment strategy for gastric cancer in older patients needs to be carefully evaluated due to increased vulnerability of older patients. We performed a database search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies that included patients ≥70 years with potentially resectable stage I-III gastric cancer. Postoperative and survival outcomes were compared between groups undergoing 1) gastrectomy vs conservative treatment (best supportive care or non-operative treatment), 2) minimally invasive (MIG) vs open gastrectomy (OG), or 3) extended vs limited lymphadenectomy. When possible, results were pooled using risk ratios (RR). Thirty-one studies were included. Six retrospective studies compared overall survival (OS) between gastrectomy (N = 2332) and conservative treatment (N = 246). Longer OS was reported in the gastrectomy group in all studies, but study quality was low and meta-analysis was not feasible. Eighteen cohort studies compared MIG (N = 3626) and OG (N = 5193). MIG was associated with fewer complications (pooled RR 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.54-0.84). OS was not different between the groups. Two RCTs and five cohort studies compared outcomes between extended (N = 709) and limited lymphadenectomy (N = 1323). Complication rates were comparable between the groups. Two cohort studies found longer OS or cancer-specific survival after extended lymphadenectomy. No quality of life (QoL) or functional outcomes were reported. In older patients with gastric cancer, there is low-quality evidence for better OS after gastrectomy vs conservative treatment. Compared to OG, MIG was associated with less postoperative morbidity. The evidence to support extended lymphadenectomy is limited. QoL and functional outcomes should be addressed in future studies.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Neoplasias Gástricas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Gastrectomía/métodos , Humanos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Open transthoracic esophagectomy is the worldwide gold standard in the treatment of resectable esophageal cancer. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy (RAMIE) for esophageal cancer may be associated with reduced blood loss, shorter intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and less cardiopulmonary morbidity; however, long-term oncologic results have not been reported to date. METHODS: Between June 2007 and September 2011, a total of 108 patients with potentially resectable esophageal cancer underwent RAMIE at the University Medical Centre Utrecht, with curative intent. All data were recorded prospectively. RESULTS: Median duration of the surgical procedure was 381 min (range 264-636). Pulmonary complications were most common and were observed in 36 patients (33 %). Median ICU stay was 1 day, and median overall postoperative hospital stay was 16 days. In-hospital mortality was 5 %. The majority of patients (78 %) presented with T3 and T4 disease, and 68 % of patients had nodal-positive disease (cN1-3). In 65 % of patients, neoadjuvant treatment (chemotherapy 57 %, chemoradiotherapy 7 %, radiotherapy 1 %) was administered, and in 103 (95 %) patients, a radical resection (R0) was achieved. The median number of lymph nodes was 26, median follow-up was 58 months, 5-year overall survival was 42 %, median disease-free survival was 21 months, and median overall survival was 29 months. Tumor recurrence occurred in 51 patients and was locoregional only in 6 (6 %) patients, systemic only in 31 (30 %) patients, and combined in 14 (14 %) patients. CONCLUSION: RAMIE was shown to be oncologically effective, with a high percentage of R0 radical resections and adequate lymphadenectomy. RAMIE provided good local control with a low percentage of local recurrence at long-term follow up.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esofagectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Robótica/métodos , Toracoscopía , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirugía , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Transthoracic oesophagectomy requires prolonged one-lung ventilation causing systemic and local inflammatory responses. Application of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to the collapsed lung potentially reduces pulmonary damage, hypoxia, and consequent inflammation. This randomized controlled trial studied the influence of CPAP applied to the collapsed right lung during thoracoscopic oesophagectomy on local and systemic inflammatory response. METHODS: Broncho-alveolar lavage fluid (BALF) from the right collapsed and left ventilated lung and serum samples were obtained during surgery from 30 patients undergoing thoracolaparoscopic oesophagectomy for cancer who were randomized for one-lung ventilation with or without CPAP applied to the collapsed right lung. Concentrations of cytokines and chemokines, in BALF and serum, were determined with Luminex. RESULTS: Patients from the control (no CPAP) group had significantly increased concentrations of interleukin (IL)-1α, IL-1ß, IL-10, tumour necrosis factor-alpha, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α, pulmonary and activation-regulated chemokine (PARC), and IL-8 in the collapsed (right) lung when compared with patients from the CPAP group (P<0.05). The ventilated (left) lung of the control group showed increased concentrations of monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 and MIP-1α (P<0.05). Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines increased during surgery, but did not differ between the control and CPAP groups. CONCLUSIONS: A significantly lower local immune response was observed during one-lung ventilation when CPAP was applied to the collapsed lung. The findings suggest a beneficial effect of CPAP on the collapsed lung during oesophagectomy with one-lung ventilation.
Asunto(s)
Quimiocinas/inmunología , Presión de las Vías Aéreas Positiva Contínua/métodos , Citocinas/inmunología , Esofagectomía/métodos , Inflamación/inmunología , Ventilación Unipulmonar/métodos , Anciano , Quimiocina CCL3/inmunología , Quimiocinas CC/inmunología , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunidad , Interleucina-1/inmunología , Interleucina-10/inmunología , Interleucina-8/inmunología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/inmunologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cyclooxygenase isoenzyme-2 (COX-2) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) contribute to angiogenesis and are overexpressed in various malignancies. The aim of the study was to evaluate expression, prognostic value and correlation between COX-2 and VEGF expression in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). METHODS: Surgical specimens of 154 patients with EAC were used to construct a tissue micro array (TMA). TMA sections were immunohistochemically stained for COX-2 and VEGF and scored on intensity of staining. RESULTS: Estimated 5-year cancer specific survival was 37%. High COX-2 and VEGF expression was observed in 39 (26.5%) and in 77 (53.8%) tumors, respectively. Both markers were associated with poor cancer specific survival (p = .022 and p = .004, respectively, log rank). No significant correlation was found between VEGF and COX-2 expression (r = 063; p = .455). In multivariate analysis, high COX-2 expression (HR 1.65; 95% CI 1.04-2.61; p = .034) was associated with overall survival. In patients with T3 tumors, COX-2 expression was an independent prognostic factor for cancer specific survival (HR 1.81 95% CI 1.10-2.95; p = .019). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study that evaluated the prognostic value and correlation of COX-2 and VEGF expression in a large and homogenous population of patients with EAC. No correlation between COX-2 and VEGF expression was found. Both markers were expressed in EAC and were associated with poor prognosis. The findings support the use of COX-2 and VEGF inhibitors in future clinical studies.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/metabolismo , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Ciclooxigenasa 2/metabolismo , Neoplasias Esofágicas/metabolismo , Isoenzimas/metabolismo , Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/metabolismo , Adenocarcinoma/genética , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Intervalos de Confianza , Ciclooxigenasa 2/genética , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/genética , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esofagectomía/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Invasividad Neoplásica/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Análisis de Supervivencia , Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/genéticaRESUMEN
The impact of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) on short term perioperative outcomes as opposed to open transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) and transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE) is still under debate. This systematic review attempts to answer whether minimally invasive surgery has improved short term outcomes compared to conventional open surgery in the management of esophageal cancer. A systematic literature search was performed using synonyms for esophagectomy, cancer and minimally invasive surgery. Ten case-controlled studies were retrieved and one systematic review. Data collection was grouped by surgical approach. Overall MIE data shows decreased blood loss (577 mL for conventional open surgery versus 312 mL for MIE) and reduction of hospital and ICU stay (open 19.6 days versus MIE 14.9 days, and open 7.6 days versus MIE 4.5 days respectively). Total complication rates are 60.4% for open esophagectomy and 43.8% for MIE. Pulmonary complications occur in 22.9% and 15.1% of respective procedures. Mean lymph node retrieval was higher in MIE (open 20.2 versus MIE 23.8). This review confirms the feasibility and safeness of minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer. Moreover, the retrieved studies collectively point towards improved short term outcomes after MIE. These results should be confirmed in randomized controlled trials.