RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: After introducing IL-1/IL-6 inhibitors, some patients with Still and Still-like disease developed unusual, often fatal, pulmonary disease. This complication was associated with scoring as DReSS (drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms) implicating these inhibitors, although DReSS can be difficult to recognize in the setting of systemic inflammatory disease. OBJECTIVE: To facilitate recognition of IL-1/IL-6 inhibitor-DReSS in systemic inflammatory illnesses (Still/Still-like) by looking at timing and reaction-associated features. We evaluated outcomes of stopping or not stopping IL-1/IL-6 inhibitors after DReSS reaction began. METHODS: In an international study collaborating primarily with pediatric specialists, we characterized features of 89 drug-reaction cases versus 773 drug-exposed controls and compared outcomes of 52 cases stopping IL-1/IL-6 inhibitors with 37 cases not stopping these drugs. RESULTS: Before the reaction began, drug-reaction cases and controls were clinically comparable, except for younger disease-onset age for reaction cases with preexisting cardiothoracic comorbidities. After the reaction began, increased rates of pulmonary complications and macrophage activation syndrome differentiated drug-reaction cases from drug-tolerant controls (P = 4.7 × 10-35 and P = 1.1 × 10-24, respectively). The initial DReSS feature was typically reported 2 to 8 weeks after initiating IL-1/IL-6 inhibition. In drug-reaction cases stopping versus not stopping IL-1/IL-6-inhibitor treatment, reaction-related features were indistinguishable, including pulmonary complication rates (75% [39 of 52] vs 76% [28 of 37]). Those stopping subsequently required fewer medications for treatment of systemic inflammation, had decreased rates of macrophage activation syndrome, and improved survival (P = .005, multivariate regression). Resolution of pulmonary complications occurred in 67% (26 of 39) of drug-reaction cases who stopped and in none who continued inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: In systemic inflammatory illnesses, recognition of IL-1/IL-6-inhibitor-associated reactions followed by avoidance of IL-1/IL-6 inhibitors significantly improved outcomes.
RESUMEN
Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DReSS) is known to cause mortality and long-term sequelae in the pediatric population, however there are no established clinical practice guidelines for the management of pediatric DReSS. We conducted a scoping review, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, to summarize the currently available data on treatment, mortality, and long-term sequelae of DReSS in children (aged 0-18 years). Data from 644 individuals revealed that various treatment strategies are being used in the management of pediatric DReSS, and strategies were often used in combination. The diversity in treatment approaches cannot be solely attributed to age or disease severity and reflects the lack of evidence-based management guidelines for DReSS. Children are also at risk of developing autoimmune sequelae following DReSS, most commonly thyroid disease and type 1 diabetes mellitus. We found that the eventual development of autoimmune disease was more often associated with DReSS caused by antibiotics, especially minocycline and sulfamethoxazole, in comparison with individuals who did not develop sequelae. In this study, we identify strengths and weaknesses in the currently available literature and highlight that future prospective studies with structured and long-term follow-up of children with DReSS are needed to better understand potential risk factors for mortality and development of sequelae after DReSS.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Hipersensibilidad a Medicamentos , Humanos , Síndrome de Hipersensibilidad a Medicamentos/etiología , Síndrome de Hipersensibilidad a Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Hipersensibilidad a Medicamentos/terapia , Niño , Adolescente , Preescolar , Lactante , Factores de Riesgo , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/inducido químicamente , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
Effective treatment of drug reactions with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DReSS) requires early diagnosis and close monitoring. Diagnosing DReSS is especially challenging in children due to a low incidence rate, heterogeneous clinical presentation, and a lack of (pediatric) diagnostic criteria and clinical practice guidelines. We performed a scoping review, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, to summarize the clinical presentation and diagnostic process of DReSS in children (aged 0-18 years). Data from 644 individuals showed that DReSS manifests differently in children compared to adults. Children have a higher number of organs involved, including higher rates of cardiac and respiratory involvement compared to adults. Children < 6 years of age appear more prone to develop neurologic symptoms. Conversely, eosinophilia, edema, and kidney involvement are less frequently observed in children. Anti-seizure medications are by far the most common causative drug class, but the range of implicated drugs increases as children get older. This study highlights that children with DReSS not only differ from adults but also that differences exist between children of different ages. As such, there is a need to establish pediatric-specific diagnostic criteria. These efforts will promote earlier diagnosis of DReSS and likely lead to improved clinical care offered to children and their families.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Hipersensibilidad a Medicamentos , Humanos , Niño , Síndrome de Hipersensibilidad a Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Hipersensibilidad a Medicamentos/etiología , Adolescente , Preescolar , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Factores de EdadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine the dose-response relationship of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibition in the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS: Participants of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry were eligible for inclusion in the analyses if they started TNF inhibition treatment for JIA. The primary treatment response was determined 3 to 7 months after the start of treatment, based on the JIA American College of Rheumatology Pediatric criteria for improvement, clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score, and persistence of treatment after 6 months. Subsequently, pooled logistic regression models were performed to include long-term follow-up data. The models were adjusted for risk factors associated with poor treatment response. Dosing was expressed by body weight, body surface area, ideal body weight, fat free mass, and lean body mass. RESULTS: Participants treated with adalimumab (n = 328) and etanercept (n = 437) were included in the analyses (median dose 0.82 mg/kg body weight [interquartile range (IQR) 0.66-1.04] and 0.83 mg/kg body weight [IQR 0.75-0.95], respectively). The majority of analyses did not show a relationship between dose and outcome. Where associations were found, results were conflicting. Alternative dosing characteristics based on ideal body weight, fat free mass, and lean body mass did not result in stronger or more consistent associations. CONCLUSION: This study was not able to confirm our hypothesis that increased dosing of TNF inhibitors results in improved treatment outcomes. Although adjustment was performed for risk factors of impaired treatment response, residual confounding by indication likely explains the negative associations found in this study.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Juvenil , Reumatología , Niño , Humanos , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Artritis Juvenil/diagnóstico , Artritis Juvenil/tratamiento farmacológico , Etanercept/efectos adversos , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Reumatología/métodos , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa , Resultado del Tratamiento , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
Core clinical pharmacology principles must be considered when designing and executing neonatal clinical trials. In this review, the authors discuss important aspects of drug dose selection, pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics and pharmacodynamics that stakeholders may consider when undertaking a neonatal or infant clinical trial.
RESUMEN
Hemophagocytic disorders are severe and life-threatening conditions that can be genetic in origin [i.e., primary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)] or result from infections (i.e., secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis), rheumatologic disease [i.e., macrophage activation syndrome (MAS)], and less frequently immunodeficiency or metabolic disease. Although rare, drug-induced hemophagocytosis needs to be considered in the work-up as it requires specific management strategies. Most drug-induced hemophagocytic disorders are related to Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS). We present the case of a 7-year-old girl who initially presented with fever, maculopapular rash, and unilateral lymphadenopathy, who went on to develop hemophagocytosis secondary to DRESS caused by prolonged combination treatment with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. This case illustrates the importance of considering adverse drug reactions in the evaluations of patients with a hemophagocytic process.
RESUMEN
To compare the incidence of respiratory symptoms and short-term consequences between children with Down syndrome and children from the general population, we conducted a prospective parent-reported observational study. Children with Down syndrome (≤ 18 years) were included between March 2012 and June 2014. Caregivers received a baseline questionnaire with follow-up 1-2 years after inclusion. Caregivers received a weekly questionnaire about respiratory symptoms, fever, antibiotic prescriptions, doctor's visits, and consequences for school and work attendance. Children with Down syndrome were compared to a cohort of the general population ("Kind en Ziek" study) with similar weekly questionnaires. A total of 9,011 childweeks were reported for 116 participants with Down syndrome (75% response rate). The frequency of respiratory symptoms was higher in children with Down syndrome than in children from the general population (30% vs 15.2%). In addition, symptoms subsided later (around 8 vs 5 years of age). The seasonal influence was limited, both in children with Down syndrome and children from the general population. Consequences of respiratory disease were significant in children with Down syndrome compared to children from the general population, with a higher rate of doctor's visits (21.3% vs 11.8%), antibiotic prescriptions (47.8% vs 26.3%), and absenteeism from school (55.5% vs 25.4%) and work (parents, 9.4% vs 8.1%). Conclusion: Children with Down syndrome have a higher frequency of respiratory symptoms and symptoms last until a later age, confirming the impression of professionals and caregivers. Individualized treatment plans might prevent unfavorable consequences of chronic recurrent respiratory disease in children with Down syndrome. What is Known: ⢠Children with Down syndrome have an altered immune system and are prone to a more severe course of respiratory tract infections. ⢠The overall conception is that patients with Down syndrome suffer from respiratory tract infections more often. What is New: ⢠Children with Down syndrome suffer from respiratory symptoms more frequently than children from the general population. ⢠The respiratory symptoms in children with Down syndrome subside at a later age compared to children from the general population.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Down , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio , Niño , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Síndrome de Down/complicaciones , Síndrome de Down/epidemiología , Padres , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/complicaciones , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , InternetRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: On April 13, 2017, a bill to legalize cannabis was introduced to the Canadian Parliament and presented to the public. On October 17, 2018, Canada legalized recreational cannabis use. We assessed intoxication severity, reflected by ICU admission rates, risk factors and other characteristics in children who presented to the emergency department (ED) with cannabis intoxication, before and after legalization. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of children 0-18 years who presented to a pediatric ED between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2019 with cannabis intoxication. The pre-legalization period was defined from January 1, 2008 to April 12, 2017 and the peri-post legalization period from April 13, 2017 to December 31, 2019. RESULTS: We identified 298 patients; 232 (77.8%) presented in the pre legalization period and 66 (22.1%) in the peri-post legalization period; median age: 15.9 years (range: 11 months-17.99 years). A higher proportion of children were admitted to the ICU in the peri-post legalization period (13.6% vs. 4.7%, respectively; p = .02). While the median monthly number of cannabis-related presentations did not differ between the time periods (2.1 [IQR:1.9-2.5] in the pre legalization period vs. 1.7 [IQR:1.0-3.0] in the peri-post legalization period; p = .69), the clinical severity did. The proportions of children with respiratory involvement (65.9% vs. 50.9%; p = .05) and altered mental status (28.8% vs. 14.2%; p < .01) were higher in the peri-post legalization period. The peri-post legalization period was characterized by more children younger than 12 years (12.1% vs. 3.0%; p = .04), unintentional exposures (14.4% vs, 2.8%; p = .002) and edibles ingestion (19.7% vs. 7.8%; p = .01). Edible ingestion was an independent predictor of ICU admission (adjusted OR: 4.1, 95%CI: 1.2-13.7, p = .02). CONCLUSIONS: The recreational cannabis legalization in Canada is associated with increased rates of severe intoxications in children. Edible ingestion is a strong predictor of ICU admission in the pediatric population.
Asunto(s)
Cannabis , Adolescente , Canadá/epidemiología , Niño , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Legislación de Medicamentos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe high-dose biologic use when treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS: Patients with JIA enrolled in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry and treated with a biologic after enrollment were eligible. We described the frequency of high-dose biologic use and characteristics of patients receiving high-dose biologics. We used regression modeling to compare 6-month outcomes (using disease activity measures) between those who increased their biologic from standard to high dose (high-dose group) to those who initiated and remained on standard dosing (no-change group), and to those who switched biologic agents (biologic-switch group). We also compared serious adverse events (SAEs) between groups. RESULTS: A total of 5,352 patients with JIA were treated with biologics following enrollment; 1,080 (20%) had ever received a high-dose biologic. There were no significant differences in outcomes between the high-dose group and the biologic-switch group; both improved disease activity measures, including the clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score 10 (-3.53 and -3.95, respectively; P = 0.68). Although the SAE rates in the high-dose group and the biologic-switch group were numerically higher than the no-change group, the event rates were similar, and neither rate was significantly higher than in the no-change group (unadjusted incident rate ratio 2.5 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.7-8.5] and 1.8 [95% CI 0.7-4.6], respectively). CONCLUSION: Dosing escalation appears to be a reasonable choice to improve disease control, but large, prospective, randomized studies evaluating specific biologic agents are needed.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Juvenil , Productos Biológicos , Reumatología , Niño , Humanos , Artritis Juvenil/diagnóstico , Artritis Juvenil/tratamiento farmacológico , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Productos Biológicos/efectos adversos , Factores Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
More than half of women take medications during breastfeeding, predisposing their infants to medication exposure via breast milk. As a result, adverse drug reactions may emerge in the infant, although they are rarely reported. Disposition of maternal drugs in breast milk is described with several key parameters, which include relative infant dose (RID): infant drug intake via milk (weight- and time-adjusted) expressed as a percentage of the similarly adjusted mother's dose. Most drugs show RID values of <10%, indicating that drug concentrations in infant serum do not reach a level known to be therapeutic in adults unless drug clearance is markedly lower than the adult level on a weight basis. RID is a function of milk-to-(maternal) plasma drug concentration ratio (MP ratio) and maternal drug clearance. Therefore, MP ratio between drugs must be interpreted not by itself but with maternal drug clearance of each drug. This is why some drugs such as phenobarbital show an MP ratio of <1 but an RID as high as 50-70%, while morphine shows an MP ratio of 2 but an RID in the range of 5%. Using RID, we interpreted case reports of infant adverse outcomes, and we observed cases with relatively low infant serum concentrations of drug, consistent with low RID, as well as those with near- or above-adult therapeutic serum concentrations, with or without increased drug intake (i.e. high RID). It is important to consider both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors in interpreting adverse outcomes in infants breastfed by a mother taking medications.
Asunto(s)
Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Leche Humana , Adulto , Lactancia Materna/efectos adversos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , LactanciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of augmented renal clearance (ARC) on vancomycin clearance and provide dosage recommendations for paediatric patients with febrile neutropenia following HSCT. METHODS: A population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed based on a two-compartment model structure using a non-linear mixed-effect modelling approach. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted as a target attainment analysis of AUC between 400 mg·h/L and 650 mg·h/L for MRSA at an MIC of 1 mg/L. RESULTS: A total of 165 paediatric patients and 276 vancomycin serum concentrations were analysed in this study. Age, body weight, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and fever (≥38.0°C) were identified as factors that significantly influenced vancomycin clearance. The median eGFR of the population was 143 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 34% of patients showed an eGFR ≥160 mL/min/1.73 m2, which may be classified as ARC. Our simulations showed that current dosing recommendations result in poor target attainment. In particular, children aged 6 months old to 6 years old with ARC require an initial vancomycin dose up to 35%-65% higher than the current dosing guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: ARC is frequently observed in paediatric patients with post-HSCT febrile neutropenia, resulting in a significant increase in vancomycin clearance. We propose a vancomycin dosing strategy for children with febrile neutropenia following HSCT based on eGFR, age, weight and body temperature.
Asunto(s)
Neutropenia Febril , Vancomicina , Antibacterianos , Niño , Neutropenia Febril/tratamiento farmacológico , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Lactante , Método de MontecarloRESUMEN
Importance: Pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing provides preemptive pharmacotherapeutic guidance regarding the lack of therapeutic benefit or adverse drug reactions of PGx targeted drugs. Pharmacogenomic information is of particular value among children with complex medical conditions who receive multiple medications and are at higher risk of developing adverse drug reactions. Objectives: To assess the implementation outcomes of a PGx testing program comprising both a point-of-care model that examined targeted drugs and a preemptive model informed by whole-genome sequencing that evaluated a broad range of drugs for potential therapy among children in a pediatric tertiary care setting. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was conducted at The Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, Ontario, from January 2017 to September 2020. Pharmacogenomic analyses were performed among 172 children who were categorized into 2 groups: a point-of-care cohort and a preemptive cohort. The point-of-care cohort comprised 57 patients referred to the consultation clinic for planned therapy with PGx targeted drugs and/or for adverse drug reactions, including lack of therapeutic benefit, after the receipt of current or past medications. The preemptive cohort comprised 115 patients who received exploratory whole-genome sequencing-guided PGx testing for their heart conditions from the cardiac genome clinic at the Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research. Exposures: Patients received PGx analysis of whole-genome sequencing data and/or multiplex genotyping of 6 pharmacogenes (CYP2C19, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, CYP3A5, VKORC1, and TPMT) that have established PGx clinical guidelines. Main Outcomes and Measures: The number of patients for whom PGx test results warranted deviation from standard dosing regimens. Results: A total of 172 children (mean [SD] age, 8.5 [5.6] years; 108 boys [62.8%]) were enrolled in the study. In the point-of-care cohort, a median of 2 target genes (range, 1-5 genes) were investigated per individual, with CYP2C19 being the most frequently examined; genotypes in 21 of 57 children (36.8%) were incompatible with standard treatment regimens. As expected from population allelic frequencies, among the 115 children in the whole-genome sequencing-guided preemptive cohort, 92 children (80.0%) were recommended to receive nonstandard treatment regimens for potential drug therapies based on their 6-gene pharmacogenetic profile. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, among both the point-of-care and preemptive cohorts, the multiplex PGx testing program provided dosing recommendations that deviated from standard regimens at an overall rate that was similar to the population frequencies of relevant variants.
Asunto(s)
Pruebas Genéticas/estadística & datos numéricos , Pediatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/estadística & datos numéricos , Pruebas en el Punto de Atención/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina de Precisión/métodos , Medicina de Precisión/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Terciaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Ontario , Proyectos PilotoRESUMEN
Down syndrome fits an immunophenotype of combined immunodeficiency with immunodysregulation, manifesting with increased susceptibility to infections, autoimmunity, autoinflammatory diseases, and hematologic malignancies. Qualitative and quantitative alterations in innate and adaptive immunity are found in most individuals with Down syndrome. However, there is substantial heterogeneity and no correlation between immunophenotype and clinical presentation. Previously, it was thought that the immunological changes in Down syndrome were caused by precocious aging. We emphasize in this review that the immune system in Down syndrome is intrinsically different from the very beginning. The overexpression of specific genes located on chromosome 21 contributes to immunodeficiency and immunodysregulation, but gene expression differs between genes located on chromosome 21 and depends on tissue and cell type. In addition, trisomy 21 results in gene dysregulation of the whole genome, reflecting the complex nature of this syndrome in comparison to well-known inborn errors of immunity that result from monogenic germline mutations. In this review, we provide an updated overview focusing on inborn errors of adaptive immunity in Down syndrome.
Asunto(s)
Inmunidad Adaptativa/genética , Síndrome de Down/genética , Síndrome de Down/inmunología , Enfermedades de Inmunodeficiencia Primaria/genética , Enfermedades de Inmunodeficiencia Primaria/inmunología , Animales , Autoinmunidad/genética , Biomarcadores , Relación CD4-CD8 , Supervivencia Celular/genética , Supervivencia Celular/inmunología , Citocinas/metabolismo , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades , Humanos , Sistema Inmunológico/inmunología , Sistema Inmunológico/metabolismo , Inmunidad Innata/genética , Mediadores de Inflamación/metabolismo , Interferones/metabolismo , Activación de Linfocitos/genética , Activación de Linfocitos/inmunología , Modelos Biológicos , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfocitos T , Subgrupos de Linfocitos T/inmunología , Subgrupos de Linfocitos T/metabolismo , Timo/embriología , Timo/inmunología , Timo/metabolismoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Men of reproductive age increasingly use recreational drugs. While many of these substances may reduce the quantity and quality of sperm, less is known about the effects of these exposures on their offspring. We performed a scoping review to summarize the available literature and identify areas for future research on the outcome of live-born offspring of fathers who were exposed to recreational drugs before conception. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted of the Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases, which included keywords for the following substances: cannabis-related products, cocaine, heroin, hallucinogens, ecstasy and amphetamines. In total, 2,983 records were screened, and 129 publications were selected for full-text assessment. Publications were included if (a) the timing of exposure included the preconceptional period, and (b) if outcomes in live-born offspring were compared with an unexposed group. RESULTS: We included 30 publications, of which 15 animal studies and 15 human studies. Animal studies showed neurocognitive abnormalities, in particular in male offspring. Interestingly, these outcomes depend significantly on the method of exposure (i.e., fixed-dose administration vs. variable self-administration, which mimics addiction). Human studies were limited to specific congenital malformations and childhood cancers, which showed small increased odds ratios. CONCLUSIONS: While animal studies describe impaired neurocognitive outcomes following paternal exposure to recreational drugs, data in humans is currently lacking. Human studies require sound methodology in order to confirm findings on congenital malformations and childhood cancers. In addition, future neurocognitive studies require parental neurocognitive assessments to correct for confounding effects (i.e., role of genetics).
Asunto(s)
Drogas Ilícitas , Exposición Paterna , Animales , Niño , Padre , Femenino , Fertilización , Humanos , Drogas Ilícitas/efectos adversos , Nacimiento Vivo , Masculino , Exposición Paterna/efectos adversos , EmbarazoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Before a clinician decides whether treatment with TNF inhibition in children with JIA has failed, one should ensure adequate systemic exposure has been achieved. Therapeutic drug monitoring might allow for improved treatment outcome with lower treatment-associated costs. However, this requires understanding of the pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics, and the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationship for children with JIA. We performed a scoping review to summarize the available literature and identify areas for future research. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted of the Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane databases as well as the clinicaltrials.gov registry. In total, 3959 records were screened and 130 publications were selected for full text assessment. RESULTS: Twenty publications were included and divided into three categories: PK (n = 9), PK/PD (n = 3) and anti-drug antibodies (n = 13). Industry involvement was significant in 14 publications. Although data are limited, systemic exposure to TNF inhibitors is generally lower in younger children but meta-analysis is not possible. The PK/PD relationship has had limited study but there is partial evidence for infliximab. Anti-drug antibodies are common, and are related to impaired clinical outcome with adalimumab and infliximab therapy. CONCLUSION: The current knowledge about the PK and PK/PD of TNF inhibitors in the treatment of children with JIA is limited, which prevents the introduction of TDM. Re-analysis of available data from previous trials, incorporation of pharmacologic assessments into existing biorepository studies as well as new prospective PK and PK/PD trials are required to obtain this knowledge.