Diagnosis and management of Evans syndrome in adults: first consensus recommendations.

Evans syndrome is a rare disease marked by a severe clinical course, high relapse rate, infectious and thrombotic complications, and sometimes fatal outcome. Management is highly heterogeneous. There are several case reports but few large retrospective studies and no prospective or randomised trials. Here, we report the results of the first consensus-based expert recommendations aimed at harmonising the diagnosis and management of Evans syndrome in adults. After reviewing the literature, we used a fuzzy Delphi consensus method, with two rounds of a 42-item questionnaire that were scored by a panel of 13 international experts from five countries using a 7-point Likert scale. Panellists were selected by the core panel on the basis of their personal experience and previous publications on Evans syndrome and immune cytopenias; they met virtually throughout 2023. The panellists recommended extensive clinical and laboratory diagnostic tests, including bone marrow evaluation and CT scan, and an aggressive front-line therapy with prednisone (with or without intravenous immunoglobulins), with different treatment durations and tapering for immune thrombocytopenia and autoimmune haemolytic anaemias (AIHAs). Rituximab was strongly recommended as first-line treatment in cold-type AIHA and as second-line treatment in warm-type AIHA and patients with immune thrombocytopenia and antiphospholipid antibodies, previous thrombotic events, or associated lymphoproliferative diseases. However, rituximab was discouraged for patients with immunodeficiency or severe infections, with the same applying to splenectomy. Thrombopoietin receptor agonists were recommended for chronic immune thrombocytopenia and in the case of previous grade 4 infection. Fostamatinib was recommended as third-line or further-line treatment and suggested as second-line therapy for patients with previous thrombotic events. Immunosuppressive agents have been moved to third-line or further-line treatment. The panellists recommended the use of recombinant erythropoietin in AIHA in the case of inadequate reticulocyte counts, use of the complement inhibitor sutimlimab for relapsed cold AIHA, and the combination of rituximab plus bendamustine in Evans syndrome secondary to lymphoproliferative disorders. Finally, recommendations were given for supportive therapy, platelet or red blood cell transfusions, and thrombotic and antibiotic prophylaxis. These consensus-based recommendations should facilitate best practice for diagnosis and management of Evans syndrome in clinical practice.

Clinical outcomes of ruxolitinib treatment in 595 intermediate-1 risk patients with myelofibrosis: The RUX-MF Real-World Study.

BACKGROUND: Ruxolitinib (RUX) is a JAK1/2 inhibitor approved for the therapy of myelofibrosis (MF) based on clinical trials including only intermediate2-high risk (INT2/HIGH) patients. However, RUX is commonly used in intermediate-1 (INT1) patients, with scarce information on responses and outcome. METHODS: The authors investigated the benefit of RUX in 1055 MF patients, included in the "RUX-MF" retrospective study. RESULTS: At baseline (BL), 595 (56.2%) patients were at INT1-risk according to DIPSS (PMF) or MYSEC-PM (SMF). The spleen was palpable at <5 cm, between 5 and 10 cm, and >10 cm below costal margin in 5.9%, 47.4%, and 39.7% of patients, respectively; 300 (54.1%) were highly symptomatic (total symptom score ≥20). High-molecular-risk (HMR) mutations (IDH1/2, ASXL-1, SRSF2, EZH2, U2AF1Q157) were detected in 77/167 patients. A total of 101 (19.2%) patients had ≥1 cytopenia (Hb < 10 g/dL: n.36; PLT <100 x 109/L: n = 43; white blood cells <4 x 109/L: n = 40). After 6 months on RUX, IWG-MRT-defined spleen and symptoms response rates were 26.8% and 67.9%, respectively. In univariate analysis, predictors of SR at 6 months were no HMR mutations odds ratio [OR], 2.0, p = .05], no cytopenia (OR, 2.10; p = .01), and blasts <1% (OR, 1.91; p = .01). In multivariate analysis, absence of HMR maintained a significant association (OR, 2.1 [1.12-3.76]; p = .01). CONCLUSIONS: In INT1 patients, responses were more frequent and durable, whereas toxicity rates were lower compared to INT2/high-risk patients. Presence of HMR mutations, cytopenia, and peripheral blasts identified less-responsive INT1 patients, who may benefit for alternative therapeutic strategies.

Liver and spleen shear-wave elastography in the diagnosis and severity staging of myeloproliferative diseases and myelofibrosis.

AIMS: Spleen and liver stiffness, investigated by VCTE (Vibration-Controlled Transient Elastography), have been associated with marrow fibrosis in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Tissue stiffness can be assessed by shear wave point (pSWE) and bidimensional elastography (2DSWE). Spleen stiffness (SS) values were higher in Myelofibrosis (MF) and Polycythemia Vera (PV) compared to Essential Thrombocythemia (ET). We aimed to identify SWE differences between MPN patients and healthy volunteers; to evaluate specific SWE features in patients with MF, PV and ET; to establish a correlation with bone marrow fibrosis in patients with myeloproliferative disease. METHODS: Patients with myeloproliferative disease and healthy volunteers performed evaluation of spleen and liver stiffness (LS) by pSWE and 2DSWE. RESULTS: A total of 218 subjects were included: 143 with myeloproliferative disease (64 MF, 29.4%, 33 PV, 15.1% and 46 ET, 21.1%), and 75 (34.4%) healthy volunteers. Compared to volunteers, MF patients had greater spleen (pSWE 40.9 vs. 26.3 kPa, p < 0.001; 2DSWE 34.9 vs. 20.1 kPa, p < 0.001), and liver stiffness (pSWE 7.72 vs. 5.52 kPa, p < 0.001; 2DSWE 6.96 vs. 5.01 kPa, p < 0.001). In low (0-1) (n = 81, 60.4%) versus high-grade bone marrow fibrosis (2-3) (n = 42, 39.6%), is evident a higher median stiffness in patients with higher grades of fibrosis both for liver (pSWE 5.2 vs. 6.65 kPa; 2DSWE 5.1 vs. 6.05 kPa) and spleen (pSWE 27.2 vs. 37.9 kPa, 2DSWE 21.7 vs 30.75 kPa-p < 0.001 in both). CONCLUSION: SWE evaluation distinguishes MF patients from HV and ET/PV and may help in MPN diagnosis. LS and SS values are associated with bone marrow fibrosis grade.

Long-term pharmacodynamic and clinical effects of twice- versus once-daily low-dose aspirin in essential thrombocythemia: The ARES trial.

Patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) are treated with once-daily low-dose aspirin to prevent thrombosis, but their accelerated platelet turnover shortens the antiplatelet effect. The short-term Aspirin Regimens in EsSential Thrombocythemia trial showed that twice-daily aspirin dosing restores persistent platelet thromboxane (TX) inhibition. However, the long-term pharmacodynamic efficacy, safety and tolerability of twice-daily aspirin remain untested. We performed a multicenter, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint, phase-2 trial in which 242 patients with ET were randomized to 100 mg aspirin twice- or once-daily and followed for 20 months. The primary endpoint was the persistence of low serum TXB2, a surrogate biomarker of antithrombotic efficacy. Secondary endpoints were major and clinically relevant non-major bleedings, serious vascular events, symptom burden assessed by validated questionnaires, and in vivo platelet activation. Serum TXB2 was consistently lower in the twice-daily versus once-daily regimen on 10 study visits over 20 months: median 3.9 ng/mL versus 19.2 ng/mL, respectively; p < .001; 80% median reduction; 95% CI, 74%-85%. No major bleeding occurred. Clinically relevant non-major bleedings were non-significantly higher (6.6% vs. 1.7%), and major thromboses lower (0.8% vs. 2.5%) in the twice-daily versus once-daily group. Patients on the twice-daily regimen had significantly lower frequencies of disease-specific symptoms and severe hand and foot microvascular pain. Upper gastrointestinal pain was comparable in the two arms. In vivo platelet activation was significantly reduced by the twice-daily regimen. In patients with ET, twice-daily was persistently superior to once-daily low-dose aspirin in suppressing thromboxane biosynthesis and reducing symptom burden, with no detectable excess of bleeding and gastrointestinal discomfort.

Prednisone vs high-dose dexamethasone in newly diagnosed adult primary immune thrombocytopenia: a randomized trial.

ABSTRACT: A debate exists regarding which type of corticosteroids (standard-dose prednisone [PDN] or high-dose dexamethasone [HD-DXM]) is the best first-line treatment for adult patients with newly diagnosed untreated primary immune thrombocytopenia (pITP). An ad hoc study compared PDN with HD-DXM in newly diagnosed untreated patients with pITP (aged ≥18 but ≤80 years, platelet count of ≤20 or >20 but <50 × 109/L, and bleeding score of ≥8). Patients were randomised to receive PDN 1 mg/kg per day from days 0 to 28 (Arm A) or HD-DXM 40 mg per day for 4 days, every 14 days, for 3 consecutive courses (Arm B). Fifty-nine of 113 patients (52.2%) were randomized to Arm A and 54 of 113 (47.8%) to Arm B. In evaluable patients, total initial responses (complete response [CR], partial response [PR], minimal response [MR]) were 44 of 56 (78.57%) in Arm A and 46 of 49 (93.88%) in Arm B at days 42 and 46, respectively (P = 0.0284). Total final responses (at day 180 from initial response) were 26 of 43 (60.47%) in Arm A and 23 of 39 (58.97%) in Arm B (P = 0.8907). Total persistent responses (at 12 months from initial response) were 25 of 31 (80.65%) in Arm A and 20 of 36 (55.56%) in Arm B (P = 0.0292). Seven relapses occurred. Median follow-up was 44.4 months. Overall survival was 100% at 48 months, overall disease-free survival was 81.11% at 48 months from day 180. PDN and pulsed HD-DXM were well tolerated; HD-DXM allows effective initial responses but less long lasting than PDN. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00657410.

Ropeginterferon phase 2 randomized study in low-risk polycythemia vera: 5-year drug survival and efficacy outcomes.

In patients with low-risk polycythemia vera, exposure to low-dose Ropeginterferon alfa-2b (Ropeg) 100 µg every 2 weeks for 2 years was more effective than the standard treatment of therapeutic phlebotomy in maintaining target hematocrit (HCT) (< 45%) with a reduction in the need for phlebotomy without disease progression. In the present paper, we analyzed drug survival, defined as a surrogate measure of the efficacy, safety, adherence, and tolerability of Ropeg in patients followed up to 5 years. During the first 2 years, Ropeg and phlebotomy-only (Phl-O) were discontinued in 33% and 70% of patients, respectively, for lack of response (12 in the Ropeg arm vs. 34 in the Phl-O arm) or adverse events (6 vs. 0) and withdrawal of consent in (3 vs. 10). Thirty-six Ropeg responders continued the drug for up to 3 years, and the probability of drug survival after a median of 3.15 years was 59%. Notably, the primary composite endpoint was maintained in 97%, 94%, and 94% of patients still on drug at 3, 4, and 5 years, respectively, and 60% of cases were phlebotomy-free. Twenty-three of 63 Phl-O patients (37%) failed the primary endpoint and were crossed over to Ropeg; among the risk factors for this failure, the need for more than three bloodletting procedures in the first 6 months emerged as the most important determinant. In conclusion, to improve the effectiveness of Ropeg, we suggest increasing the dose and using it earlier driven by high phlebotomy need in the first 6 months post-diagnosis.

Sustained response off-treatment in eltrombopag-treated adult patients with ITP who are refractory or relapsed after first-line steroids: Primary, final, and ad-hoc analyses of the Phase II TAPER trial.

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is characterized by reduced platelet count due to increased destruction and is categorized according to the time following diagnosis (newly diagnosed, persistent, chronic). First-line corticosteroid therapy is associated with transient response, high relapse rates, and considerable toxicity. TAPER (NCT03524612) is a Phase II, prospective, single-arm trial investigating whether eltrombopag can induce a sustained response off-treatment (SRoT) in adult patients with ITP after first-line corticosteroid failure. This study defines SRoT as an off-treatment period wherein platelet count remains above 30 × 109 /L in the absence of bleeding or rescue therapy. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved SRoT until Month 12, which was 30.5% (n = 32/105; p < .0001 testing hypothesis H1: proportion >15%) following eltrombopag tapering and discontinuation, and median SRoT duration was ~8 months until Month 12. Median platelet count increased within 1 month of treatment and remained elevated until Month 12. Quality of life improved within 3 months and was maintained. Headache (21%) was the most common adverse event. None of the 4 deaths reported were considered treatment-related. In summary, ~one-third of patients achieved SRoT until Month 12 following eltrombopag tapering and discontinuation. An ad-hoc early-use analysis, stratified by ITP duration at baseline, assessed initial hematologic responses and safety. Results suggest that eltrombopag has similar efficacy in newly diagnosed and later stages of ITP. In follow-up until Month 24, a median SRoT duration of ~22 months was observed (n = 20). The safety profile was comparable across analyses and ITP duration groups and aligned with its well-established safety profile.

Incidence of blast phase in myelofibrosis patients according to anemia severity at ruxolitinib start and during therapy.

BACKGROUND: Anemia is frequently present in patients with myelofibrosis (MF), and it may be exacerbated by treatment with the JAK2-inhibitor ruxolitinib (RUX). Recently, a relevant blast phase (BP) incidence has been reported in anemic MF patients unexposed to RUX. METHODS: The authors investigated the incidence of BP in 886 RUX-treated MF patients, included in the "RUX-MF" retrospective study. RESULTS: The BP incidence rate ratio (IRR) was 3.74 per 100 patient-years (3.74 %p-y). At therapy start, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3-4 anemia (hemoglobin [Hb] <8 g/dL) and severe sex/severity-adjusted anemia (Hb <8/<9 g/dL in women/men) were present in 22.5% and 25% patients, respectively. IRR of BP was 2.34 in patients with no baseline anemia and reached respectively 4.22, 4.89, and 4.93 %p-y in patients with grade 1, 2, and 3-4 anemia. Considering the sex/severity-adjusted Hb thresholds, IRR of BP was 2.85, 4.97, and 4.89 %p-y in patients with mild/no anemia, moderate, and severe anemia. Transfusion-dependent patients had the highest IRR (5.03 %p-y). Progression-free survival at 5 years was 70%, 52%, 43%, and 27% in patients with no, grade 1, 2, and 3-4 anemia, respectively (p < .001). At 6 months, 260 of 289 patients with no baseline anemia were receiving ruxolitinib, and 9.2% had developed a grade 3-4 anemia. By 6-month landmark analysis, BP-free survival was significantly worse in patients acquiring grade 3-4 anemia (69.3% vs. 88.1% at 5 years, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights that anemia correlates with an increased risk of evolution into BP, both when present at baseline and when acquired during RUX monotherapy. Innovative anemia therapies and disease-modifying agents are warranted in these patients.

A Prognostic Model to Predict Ruxolitinib Discontinuation and Death in Patients with Myelofibrosis.

Most patients with myelofibrosis (MF) discontinue ruxolitinib (JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor) in the first 5 years of therapy due to therapy failure. As the therapeutic possibilities of MF are expanding, it is critical to identify patients predisposed to early ruxolitinib monotherapy failure and worse outcomes. We investigated predictors of early ruxolitinib discontinuation and death on therapy in 889 patients included in the "RUX-MF" retrospective study. Overall, 172 patients were alive on ruxolitinib after ≥5 years (long-term ruxolitinib, LTR), 115 patients were alive but off ruxolitinib after ≥5 yrs (short-term RUX, STR), and 123 patients died while on ruxolitinib after <5 yrs (early death on ruxolitinib, EDR). The cumulative incidence of the blast phase was similar in LTR and STR patients (p = 0.08). Overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in LTR pts (p = 0.002). In multivariate analysis, PLT < 100 × 109/L, Hb < 10 g/dL, primary MF, absence of spleen response at 3 months and ruxolitinib starting dose <10 mg BID were associated with higher probability of STR. Assigning one point to each significant variable, a prognostic model for STR (STR-PM) was built, and three groups were identified: low (score 0-1), intermediate (score 2), and high risk (score ≥ 3). The STR-PM may identify patients at higher risk of failure with ruxolitinib monotherapy who should be considered for alternative frontline strategies.

Use and positioning of fostamatinib in the management of primary chronic immune thrombocytopenia: an Italian expert opinion.

Fostamatinib, a spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk) inhibitor, represents a new therapeutic opportunity for patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in Europe and Italy. However, the positioning of this drug in patient's therapeutic sequence is undefined within the most recent international guidelines. The conclusions from a consensus meeting between Italian experts, whose task was to outline the profile of the ideal candidate to receive fostamatinib, are reported here. A modified Delphi methodology was used to achieve shared statements, which were reported in a narrative form. In particular, the panelists examined the strengths and weaknesses of the registration studies in terms of clinical outcomes, the safety profile of fostamatinib, the drug's impact on the quality of life of patients with chronic ITP, and the potential benefits of its use in the pandemic era. Although the experience with thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) and the amount of data from real-world studies suggest the preferential use of these drugs as a second-line treatment in most patients, the absence of an increased thrombotic risk in the clinical trials could make fostamatinib a reasonable choice in patients with an increased risk of vascular events. An unstable platelet count during TPO-RAs might also justify a switch to the Syk inhibitor, which is more likely to stabilize the platelet count in responders. Fostamatinib may be preferred to immunosuppressors during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, in patients at infectious risk, or in case of contraindication to splenectomy. Finally, the novel mechanism of action makes it an attractive drug in multi-refractory patient.

Predictors of Response to Hydroxyurea and Switch to Ruxolitinib in HU-Resistant Polycythaemia VERA Patients: A Real-World PV-NET Study.

In polycythemia vera (PV), the prognostic relevance of an ELN-defined complete response (CR) to hydroxyurea (HU), the predictors of response, and patients' triggers for switching to ruxolitinib are uncertain. In a real-world analysis, we evaluated the predictors of response, their impact on the clinical outcomes of CR to HU, and the correlations between partial or no response (PR/NR) and a patient switching to ruxolitinib. Among 563 PV patients receiving HU for ≥12 months, 166 (29.5%) achieved CR, 264 achieved PR, and 133 achieved NR. In a multivariate analysis, the absence of splenomegaly (p = 0.03), pruritus (p = 0.002), and a median HU dose of ≥1 g/day (p < 0.001) remained associated with CR. Adverse events were more frequent with a median HU dose of ≥1 g/day. Overall, 283 PR/NR patients (71.3%) continued HU, and 114 switched to ruxolitinib. In the 449 patients receiving only HU, rates of thrombosis, hemorrhages, progression, and overall survival were comparable among the CR, PR, and NR groups. Many PV patients received underdosed HU, leading to lower CR and toxicity rates. In addition, many patients continued HU despite a PR/NR; however, splenomegaly and other symptoms were the main drivers of an early switch. Better HU management, standardization of the criteria for and timing of responses to HU, and adequate intervention in poor responders should be advised.

Immune Thrombocytopenia Onset and Relapse During the COVID-19 Pandemic. A Monocenter Study.

Background And Objectives: Several infections and vaccinations can provoke immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) onset or relapse. Information on ITP epidemiology and management during the Covid-19 pandemic is scarce. In a large monocenter ITP cohort, we assessed the incidence and risk factors for: 1) ITP onset/relapse after Covid19 vaccination/infection; 2) Covid19 infection. Methods: Information on the date/type of anti-Covid-19 vaccine, platelet count before and within 30 days from the vaccine, and date/grade of Covid-19 was collected via phone call or during hematological visits. ITP relapse was defined as a drop in PLT count within 30 days from vaccination, compared to PLT count before vaccination that required a rescue therapy OR a dose increase of an ongoing therapy OR a PLT count <30 ×109/L with ≥20% decrease from baseline. Results: Between February 2020 and January 2022, 60 new ITP diagnoses were observed (30% related to Covid-19 infection or vaccination). Younger and older ages were associated with a higher probability of ITP related to Covid19 infection (p=0.02) and vaccination (p=0.04), respectively. Compared to Covid-19-unrelated ITP, Infection- and vaccine-related ITP had lower response rates (p=0.03) and required more prolonged therapy (p=0.04), respectively. Among the 382 patients with known ITP at the pandemic start, 18.1% relapsed; relapse was attributed to Covid-19 infection/vaccine in 52.2%. The risk of relapse was higher in patients with active disease (p<0.001) and previous vaccine-related relapse (p=0.006). Overall, 18.3% of ITP patients acquired Covid19 (severe in 9.9%); risk was higher in unvaccinated patients (p<0.001). Conclusions: All ITP patients should receive ≥1 vaccine dose and laboratory follow-up after vaccination, with a case-by-case evaluation of completion of the vaccine program if vaccine-related ITP onset/relapse and with tempest initiation of antiviral therapy in unvaccinated patients.

Nationwide Survey on the Use of Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists (TPO-RA) for the Management of Immune Thrombocytopenia in Current Clinical Practice in Italy.

Background: Two thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA), romiplostim and eltrombopag, are currently widely adopted as second-line ITP therapy even in the absence of robust evidence on their comparative advantages over rituximab or splenectomy or their preferential use in some specific clinical contexts. Methods: An online survey was distributed between May 2021 and June 2021 to collect standardized information on TPO-RA use in Italy. Results: Eighty-eight hematologists from 79 centers completed the survey. Eighty-four percent would use TPO-RA earlier than formally indicated, without a preference for young or elderly in 82% of respondents. No clear preference for either romiplostim or eltrombopag was indicated. Seventy-two percent would use TPO-RA in young patients aiming at a complete response followed by tapering, a strategy considered by only 16% in the elderly. Switching between the two agents was considered appropriate in case of insufficient response or intolerance. Tapering schedule by reducing the dosage and prolonging the intervals between administrations was preferred by 73% of respondents. TPO-RA was considered a risk factor for thrombosis by only 35%, and 94% would administer TPO-RA in elderly patients also in the presence of other thrombotic risk factors. Thirty-three percent of respondents would withdraw TPO-RA in case of thrombosis. The TPORA administration has been reported to be preferred over anti-CD20 or splenectomy by about half of the participants due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions: Significant discrepancies in TPO-RA use emerged from the survey, and participants would appreciate consensus-based specific guidance on the practical use of TPO-RA.

Does Cytokine-Release Syndrome Induced by CAR T-Cell Treatment Have an Impact on the Pharmacokinetics of Meropenem and Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Patients with Hematological Malignancies? Findings from an Observational Case-Control Study.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a promising approach for some relapse/refractory hematological B-cell malignancies; however, in most patients, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) may occur. CRS is associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) that may affect the pharmacokinetics of some beta-lactams. The aim of this study was to assess whether the pharmacokinetics of meropenem and piperacillin may be affected by CAR T-cell treatment. The study included CAR T-cell treated patients (cases) and oncohematological patients (controls), who were administered 24-h continuous infusion (CI) meropenem or piperacillin/tazobactam, optimized by therapeutic drug monitoring, over a 2-year period. Patient data were retrospectively retrieved and matched on a 1:2 ratio. Beta-lactam clearance (CL) was calculated as CL = daily dose/infusion rate. A total of 38 cases (of whom 14 and 24 were treated with meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam, respectively) was matched with 76 controls. CRS occurred in 85.7% (12/14) and 95.8% (23/24) of patients treated with meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam, respectively. CRS-induced AKI was observed in only 1 patient. CL did not differ between cases and controls for both meropenem (11.1 vs. 11.7 L/h, p = 0.835) and piperacillin (14.0 vs. 10.4 L/h, p = 0.074). Our findings suggest that 24-h CI meropenem and piperacillin dosages should not be reduced a priori in CAR T-cell patients experiencing CRS.

Ruxolitinib in cytopenic myelofibrosis: Response, toxicity, drug discontinuation, and outcome.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cytopenic myelofibrosis (MF) have more limited therapeutic options and poorer prognoses compared with patients with the myeloproliferative phenotype. AIMS AND METHODS: Prognostic correlates of cytopenic phenotype were explored in 886 ruxolitinib-treated patients with primary/secondary MF (PMF/SMF) included in the RUX-MF retrospective study. Cytopenia was defined as: leukocyte count <4 × 109 /L and/or hemoglobin <11/<10 g/dL (males/females) and/or platelets <100 × 109 /L. RESULTS: Overall, 407 (45.9%) patients had a cytopenic MF, including 249 (52.4%) with PMF. In multivariable analysis, high molecular risk mutations (p = .04), intermediate 2/high Dynamic International Prognostic Score System (p < .001) and intermediate 2/high Myelofibrosis Secondary to Polycythemia Vera and Essential Thrombocythemia Prognostic Model (p < .001) remained associated with cytopenic MF in the overall cohort, PMF, and SMF, respectively. Patients with cytopenia received lower average ruxolitinib at the starting (25.2 mg/day vs. 30.2 mg/day, p < .001) and overall doses (23.6 mg/day vs. 26.8 mg/day, p < .001) and achieved lower rates of spleen (26.5% vs. 34.1%, p = .04) and symptom (59.8% vs. 68.8%, p = .008) responses at 6 months compared with patients with the proliferative phenotype. Patients with cytopenia also had higher rates of thrombocytopenia at 3 months (31.1% vs. 18.8%, p < .001) but lower rates of anemia (65.6% vs. 57.7%, p = .02 at 3 months and 56.6% vs. 23.9% at 6 months, p < .001). After competing risk analysis, the cumulative incidence of ruxolitinib discontinuation at 5 years was 57% and 38% in patients with cytopenia and the proliferative phenotype (p < .001), whereas cumulative incidence of leukemic transformation was similar (p = .06). In Cox regression analysis adjusted for Dynamic International Prognostic Score System score, survival was significantly shorter in patients with cytopenia (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Cytopenic MF has a lower probability of therapeutic success with ruxolitinib as monotherapy and worse outcome. These patients should be considered for alternative therapeutic strategies.

Sustained response off therapy after fostamatinib: A chronic refractory ITP case report.

Fostamatinib is a SYK-inhibitor drug recently approved by the FDA and EMA for treating chronic immune thrombocytopenia. This drug induces a response in about 40% of patients and has a good toxicity profile. It is known that discontinuing thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TRAs) with the maintenance of sustained response off therapy is possible. On fostamatinib, we do not yet have such information. In this case report, we describe the story of a woman with a multirefractory immune thrombocytopenia (steroids, splenectomy, rituximab, both available TRAs). After 16 years from diagnosis, she started fostamatinib therapy within a clinical trial and achieved a complete response. Grade 1-2 headache and diarrhea occurred during the first months of therapy. These adverse events were resolved with dose reduction of fostamatinib. Despite the dose reduction, the platelet count remained steadily above 80 × 109/L. After 4 years, fostamatinib was gradually reduced and finally discontinued with no drop in platelet count. This is the first case in which fostamatinib discontinuation resulted in a sustained response off therapy.

Ropeginterferon versus Standard Therapy for Low-Risk Patients with Polycythemia Vera.

BACKGROUND: Whether phlebotomy alone can adequately maintain target hematocrit in patients with low-risk polycythemia vera (PV) remains elusive. METHODS: In a phase 2 open-label randomized trial, we compared ropeginterferon alfa-2b (ropeg; 100 µg every 2 weeks) with phlebotomy only regarding maintenance of a median hematocrit level (≤45%) over 12 months in the absence of progressive disease (primary end point). In follow-up, crossover to the alternative treatment group was allowed if the primary end point was not met. RESULTS: In total, 127 patients were enrolled (ropeg: n=64; standard group: n=63). The primary end point was met in 81% and 51% in the ropeg and standard groups, respectively. Responders continued the assigned treatment until month 24 and maintained response in 83% and 59%, respectively (P=0.02). Ropeg responders less frequently experienced moderate/severe symptoms (33% vs. 67% in the standard group) and palpable splenomegaly (14% vs. 37%) and showed normalization of ferritin levels and blood counts. Nonresponders at 12 months crossed over to the standard (n=9) or ropeg (n=23) group; in patients switched to ropeg only, 7 of 23 met the response criteria in 12 months, and phlebotomy need was high (4.7 per patient per year). Discontinuation because of adverse events occurred in seven patients treated with ropeg. CONCLUSIONS: In this 24-month trial, ropeg was superior to phlebotomy alone in maintaining hematocrit on target. No dose-limiting side effects or toxicities were noted; 9.2% of patients on ropeg and no patients on standard treatment developed neutropenia. (Funded by AOP Health and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03003325.)

Thrombopoietin receptor agonists increase splenic regulatory T-cell numbers in immune thrombocytopenia.

Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA) are a valid therapy for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), due to megakaryocyte stimulation and (poorly characterised) immune-modulatory effects. The spleen is pivotal in the pathogenesis of ITP, yet little is known on its immune microenvironment and on effects of TPO-RA on this organ. To address these topics, we analysed 35 spleens removed for primary refractory ITP. Pre-splenectomy TPO-RA administration correlated with increased splenic regulatory T cells (Tregs), type 2 T-helper cells and histiocyte density and with reduced red pulp sinusoids. Surgical outcome was not associated with TPO-RA administration, other pre-splenectomy therapies and/or Treg density. In conclusion, TPO-RA affect the splenic microenvironment, but this has no impact on splenectomy outcome.

Peripheral blasts are associated with responses to ruxolitinib and outcomes in patients with chronic-phase myelofibrosis.

BACKGROUND: The presence of peripheral blasts (PB) is a negative prognostic factor in patients with primary and secondary myelofibrosis (MF) and PB ≥4% was associated with a particularly unfavorable prognosis. Ruxolitinib (RUX) is the JAK1/2 inhibitor most used for treatment of MF-related splenomegaly and symptoms. Its role has not been assessed in correlation with PB. METHODS: In 794 chronic-phase MF patients treated with RUX, we evaluated the impact of baseline percentage of PB on response (spleen and symptoms responses) and outcome (RUX discontinuation-free, leukemia-free, and overall survival). Three subgroups were compared: PB-0 (no PB, 61.3%), PB-4 (PB 1%-4%, 33.5%), and PB-9 (PB 5%-9%, 5.2%). RESULTS: At 3 and 6 months, spleen responses were less frequently achieved by PB-4 (P = .001) and PB-9 (P = .004) compared to PB-0 patients. RUX discontinuation-free, leukemia-free, and overall survival were also worse for PB-4 and PB-9 patients (P = .001, P = .002, and P < .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Personalized approaches beyond RUX monotherapy may be useful in PB-4 and particularly in PB-9 patients.