RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cast removal can be associated with considerable noise exposure, especially impacting the pediatric patient and provider. Although noise generation from cast saws has been deemed safe by the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention standards, there are no current studies on the effects of cast material on noise levels generated. METHODS: A simulated casting model utilizing plaster, fiberglass, and plaster with fiberglass overwrapping was used for experimental testing. Four different casting conditions were tested, with 5 samples in each group. Samples were tested using 2 different cast saws: a standard cast saw and a quiet saw. Each saw was used for 30 seconds of continuous cutting for each sample, measuring peak, mean, and minimum sound levels in decibels with sound level meters. Noise levels were measured at 18, 36, and 72 in (20, 91, and 183 cm) from the saw, comparing saw and cast types against ambient noise and baseline cast-saw noises. Between-group comparisons were performed using univariate analyses. RESULTS: Mean noise generation differed between casting materials, with plaster material demonstrating significantly greater noise levels than fiberglass casts at all distances for each saw type. Increasing fiberglass thickness significantly increased the mean noise levels with standard (18-in distance for 10 and 5 ply: 87.4 and 85.8 dB; p = 0.0004) and quiet cast saws (78.3 and 76.1 dB; p = 0.041. Additionally, the quiet cast saw provided a 5.7 to 10.6 dB reduction in mean and peak noise levels, varying by casting material and distance. CONCLUSIONS: Occupational noise exposure can be mitigated with the use of fiberglass casting material that is not >5 ply in thickness, with a quiet cast saw for removal. The use of a quiet cast saw substantially decreased noise exposure to patients and staff members over standard orthopaedic cast saws.
Asunto(s)
Quemaduras , Exposición Profesional , Quemaduras/prevención & control , Moldes Quirúrgicos , Niño , Remoción de Dispositivos/efectos adversos , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Femoral neck stress fractures are a common condition affecting military service members, most noticeably during basic combat training. Previous studies have investigated the risk factors for femoral neck stress fracture development in basic trainees and outcomes associated with treatment; however, few studies have focused on operatively treated femoral neck stress fracture in the military trainee. Doing so would be important not only for the military, but also providers caring for athletes, such as distance runners, who have a heightened risk for femoral neck stress fracture development. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What proportion of US Army trainees completing basic combat training at Fort Jackson, SC, USA, who undergo surgery for femoral neck stress fracture during basic training subsequently leave military service because of the injury? (2) What factors are related to the patient or the fracture are associated with a higher likelihood of military separation? (3) What factors on the initial MRI are associated with progression of the stress fracture extent? METHODS: A retrospective study of a longitudinally maintained database of stress injuries involving basic combat trainees from a single military post was reviewed over a 3-year period. Inclusion criteria included basic trainees undergoing surgery for a femoral neck stress fracture between January 2018 and June 2020 with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Surgery was indicated for service members with complete and tension-sided femoral neck stress fractures and those with high risk compression-sided stress fractures, generally representing fractures involving more than 50% of the femoral neck width. Over the study period, 57 service members (51% [29 of 57] women with a mean age of 24 years) underwent surgery for a femoral neck stress fracture, and all 57 had a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Identified service members underwent independent data collection including injury and radiographic parameters based on chart and imaging review. Documented fracture line progression on repeat imaging was present in 39% of service members, with a mean fracture line progression of 55% of the femoral neck width. Service members were subdivided based upon the ability to return to military service at 1 year. Univariate analysis was performed using patient and injury variables to identify factors associated with the ability to return to military service. RESULTS: Overall, 58% (33 of 57) of service members who had a femoral neck stress fracture treated surgically underwent military separation. A higher proportion of service members who demonstrated fracture line progression leading to surgical treatment remained in the military (58% [14 of 24] versus 30% [10 of 33]; odds ratio 0.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1 to 0.9]; p = 0.03). With the numbers available, we found no other patient- or fracture-related variables associated with military separation, although we suspect we may have been underpowered on some of these comparisons, in particular gender (61% [20 of 33] of individuals separated after surgery for this injury were women compared with 38% [9 of 24] who were retained; OR 2.6 [95% CI 0.9 to 7.56]; p = 0.09). The extent of osseous edema on T1-weighted imaging in association with a hip effusion demonstrated a significant positive correlation with final fracture percentage (r = 0.62; p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Military service members with a femoral neck stress fracture initially managed nonoperatively but with progression of the fracture line requiring surgical intervention were more likely to return to military duties and complete basic combat training, suggesting that early diagnosis of femoral neck stress fractures may be associated with better functional recovery after surgical treatment. Additionally, the extent of the osseous edema on initial MRI T1-weighted imaging sequences may help predict the final extent of femoral neck stress fractures on repeat imaging. Further investigations should incorporate patient-reported outcomes and further explore factors associated with fracture progression and the inability to return to active duty or sport. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas del Cuello Femoral , Fracturas por Estrés , Personal Militar , Adulto , Edema , Femenino , Fracturas del Cuello Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas del Cuello Femoral/cirugía , Cuello Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Cuello Femoral/cirugía , Fracturas por Estrés/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas por Estrés/etiología , Fracturas por Estrés/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Chemical prophylaxis using low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is considered a standard of care for venous thromboembolism in trauma patients. Our center performs a head computed tomography (CT) scan 24 hours after initiation with prophylactic LMWH in the setting of a known traumatic brain injury (TBI). The purpose was to determine the overall incidence of ICH progression after chemoprophylaxis in patients with a TBI. METHODS: This retrospective study was performed at a Level I trauma center, from 1/1/2014 to 12/31/2017. Study patients were drawn from the institution's trauma registry based on Abbreviated Injury Score codes. RESULTS: 778 patients met all inclusion criteria after initial chart review. The proportion of patients with an observed radiographic progression of intracranial hemorrhage after LMWH was 5.8%. 3.1% of patients had a change in clinical management. Observed radiographic progression after LMWH prophylaxis and the presence of SDH on initial CT, the bilateral absence of pupillary response in the emergency department, and a diagnosis of dementia were found to have statistically significant correlation with bleed progression after LMWH was initiated. CONCLUSION: Over a 4-year period, the use of CT to evaluate for radiographic progression of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage 24 hours after receiving LMWH resulted in a change in clinical management for 3.1% of patients. The odds of intracranial hemorrhage progression were approximately 6.5× greater in patients with subdural hemorrhage on initial CT, 3.1× greater in patients with lack of bilateral pupillary response in ED, and 4.2× greater in patients who had been diagnosed with dementia.