Use of Tigecycline in Pediatric Patients With Infections Predominantly Due to Extensively Drug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria.

BACKGROUND.: Emergence of extensively drug-resistant (XDR) bacteria has forced clinicians to use off-label antimicrobial agents such as tigecycline. We present our experience on salvage use of tigecycline for the treatment of infections caused by XDR Gram-negative bacteria in critically ill children and review published cases. METHODS.: We conducted a retrospective chart review in pediatric departments of a tertiary level hospital from January 2009 to May 2014. Patients were identified using pharmacy database. For the literature review, relevant articles were identified from PubMed. RESULTS.: In our case series, 13 children (7 males) with a median age of 8 years (range, 2.5 months-14 years) received tigecycline for ≥2 days as treatment for healthcare-associated infections including 5 bacteremias, 6 lower respiratory tract infections, and 3 other infections. Isolated pathogens were XDR Gram-negative bacteria except 1. A loading dose (range, 1.8-6.5 mg/kg) was given in all except 2 cases. Maintenance dose was given at 1-3.2 mg/kg q12 h. Other antimicrobials including colistin and aminoglycosides (85% and 62%, respectively) were coadministered to all patients. No serious adverse events were detected in these very ill children. Twenty cases of children treated with tigecycline were previously published, mostly for multidrug-resistant/XDR bacteria. An episode of acute pancreatitis and neutrophil engraftment delay in 2 cases were reported during tigecycline treatment. Analyzing reported and all our cases together, mortality in bloodstream infections was 86%, whereas in nonbacteremic cases it was 24% (P = .009). CONCLUSIONS.: Tigecycline, given at the range of administered doses as salvage therapy and in combination with other antimicrobial agents, seemed to be well tolerated in a series of mainly critically ill pediatric patients and demonstrated relatively good clinical response in nonbacteremic patients.

Evaluation of the New Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Ventilator-Associated Event Module and Criteria in Critically Ill Children in Greece.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the new adult Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) ventilator-associated event (VAE) module in critically ill children and compare with the traditionally used CDC definition for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). DESIGN Retrospective observational study of mechanically ventilated children in a pediatric intensive care unit in Greece January 1-December 31, 2011. METHODS Assessment of new adult CDC VAE module including 3 definition tiers: ventilator-associated condition (VAC), infection-related VAC, and possible/probable ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAE-VAP); comparison with traditional CDC criteria for clinically defined pneumonia in mechanically ventilated children (PNEU-VAP). We recorded Pediatric Risk of Mortality score at admission (PRISM III), number of ventilator-days, and outcome. RESULTS Among 119 patients with mechanical ventilation (median [range] number of ventilator-days, 7 [1-183]), 19 patients experienced VAC. Criteria for VAE-VAP were fulfilled in 12 of 19 patients with VAC (63%). Children with either VAC or VAE-VAP were on ventilation more days than patients without these conditions (16.5 vs 5 d, P=.0006 and 18 vs 5 d, P<.001, respectively), whereas PRISM-III score was similar between them. Mortality was significant higher in patients with new VAE-VAP definition (50%), but not in patients with VAC (31.6%), than the patients without new VAE-VAP (14%, P=.007) or VAC (15%, P=.1), respectively. No significant association was found between PNEU-VAP and death. Incidences of PNEU-VAP and VAE-VAP were similar, but the agreement was poor. CONCLUSIONS VAE-VAP and PNEU-VAP found similar prevalence in critically ill children but with poor agreement. However, excess of death was significantly associated only with VAE-VAP. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016:1-5.