The Association Between the Central Sensitisation Inventory and Temporomandibular Disorders Is Confounded by Migraine, Depression, Widespread Pain and Parafunction. A Cross-Sectional Telehealth Study.

BACKGROUND: Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are conditions that involve the temporomandibular joints, masticatory muscles, and associated tissues, causing orofacial pain. Central sensitisation (CS) is a relevant part of the TMD pathophysiology. Migraine, psychological aspects, parafunctional oral habits and widespread pain are commonly associated with both TMD and CS and could confound the association between them. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between painful TMD and the Central Sensitisation Inventory (CSI) score, and to assess the presence of confounders in this association. METHODS: Cross-sectional study that assessed women with and without orofacial pain complaints using telehealth. The TMD Pain Screener and an online physical examination determined the presence of painful TMD. The following questionnaires were applied: CSI, Headache Screening Questionnaire, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Oral Behavior Checklist, Jaw Functional Limitation Scale and the Nordic musculoskeletal questionnaire. A single regression investigated the association between the CSI score and TMD, and a multiple regression investigated the effect of the other outcomes as possible confounders. Confounding was considered present when the association between TMD and the CSI score changed more than 10% after adding a possible confounder to the regression model. RESULTS: Forty-two women with painful TMD and 53 without TMD were included. There was a significant association between the CSI score and the presence of painful TMD (R2 = 0.639; p < 0.001). This association changed when the following outcomes were added to the model: presence of migraine, symptoms of depression, widespread pain and parafunctional oral habits. CONCLUSION: The positive association between TMD and the CSI score was confounded by migraine, symptoms of depression, widespread pain and parafunctional oral habits.

Incidence of interappointment emergencies in multiple-visit root canal treatments performed with or without intracanal medicament by undergraduate students.

Objectives: This retrospective cohort study examined the incidence of interappointment emergencies during multiple-visit molar root canal treatments conducted by undergraduate students. Treatments performed without the use of intracanal medicament were compared to treatments that incorporated calcium hydroxide as an intracanal medicament. Materials and Methods: Interappointment emergencies, defined as instances of pain or swelling that required the patient to make an unscheduled follow-up visit, were recorded for up to 2 months after the intervention. To avoid the influence of obturation on the observed incidence of emergency visits, only unscheduled visits occurring between the start and end of the root canal treatment were included. Results: Of the 719 patients included in this study, 77 (10.7%) were recorded as experiencing interappointment emergencies. Of these emergencies, 62% occurred within 2 weeks following the most recent intervention. In the group of patients who did not receive intracanal medicament, the incidence of interappointment emergencies was 11.9% (46 of 385 patients). In comparison, this rate was 9.3% (31 of 334 patients) among those who received calcium hydroxide as an intracanal medicament (odds ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-2.15; p = 0.249). Conclusions: Interappointment emergencies may arise at any point during root canal treatment, but they most commonly occur within the first 2 weeks following intervention. The omission of intracanal medicament in multiple-visit molar root canal treatments, performed by undergraduate students, did not significantly increase the incidence of these emergencies.

Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Headache Screening Questionnaire into Brazilian Portuguese.

BACKGROUND: The Headache Screening Questionnaire (HSQ) was created and validated to enable health professionals to screen for migraine and tension-type headaches. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the HSQ, creating the Brazilian version of the HSQ (HSQ-BR). DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study. METHOD: The Brazilian version of the HSQ was developed following the processes of translation, synthesis, back-translation, expert committee review, and pre-testing. The translation phase involved two independent translators whose mother language was Brazilian Portuguese and who also were fluent in Dutch. The back-translation phase involved two independent translators whose mother language was Dutch and who also were fluent in Portuguese. The expert committee based their decisions on semantic, idiomatic, experiential, and conceptual equivalences. To verify the comprehension of the questionnaire, 60 subjects (73.3% women) with headaches with a mean age of 32.8 ± 12.0 years, participated in the pre-test phase. RESULTS: During the translation process, some terms and expressions were changed to obtain cultural equivalence to the original HSQ. The process of translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the HSQ to the Brazilian culture and Portuguese language, including its scoring algorithms for migraine and tension-type headache, was successfully concluded, as the comprehension of each item of the questionnaire was over 90% on the pre-test. CONCLUSION: The HSQ-BR has been created.

Reduction of Somatic Tinnitus Severity is Mediated by Improvement of Temporomandibular Disorders.

BACKGROUND: Successful orofacial treatment can reduce tinnitus severity in patients with somatic tinnitus (ST). However, it is still unclear to what extent the degree of reduction in temporomandibular disorders (TMD) actually contributes to the decrease in tinnitus severity after orofacial treatment. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the mediating effect of reduction in TMD pain on the improvement of tinnitus severity after multidisciplinary orofacial treatment. METHODS: A total of 80 patients with moderate to severe ST attributed to the temporomandibular region, were recruited from a tertiary tinnitus clinic. At baseline, patients were randomly assigned to the orofacial treatment group or to the control group. Both groups received a minimum of information and advice regarding their tinnitus complaints. The orofacial treatment group received orofacial physical therapy complemented with occlusal splints when needed, while the control group received no other treatment. A mediation analysis was performed according to the steps described by Baron and Kenny and the proportion of the mediating effect was calculated for the potential mediator: "change in TMD pain," measured by a one-point decrease in TMD pain screener score. RESULTS: Our analysis showed that 35% of the observed decrease in tinnitus severity can be attributed to a reduction in TMD pain. A significant total effect of orofacial treatment compared with control on the change in tinnitus functional index (TFI) score was found (B = 0.253 p = 0.025 Cl for B = 1.265-18.576). Orofacial treatment was also significantly related to the change in TMD pain (Exp (B) = 2.800, p = 0.034 Cl for Exp B 1.081-7.251). Additionally, the change in TMD pain screener score was significantly related to the change in TFI score (B = -0.273 p = 0.016 Cl for B = -19.875 to -2.119). CONCLUSION: Reduction of TMD pain is a mediating factor in the decrease of tinnitus severity after multidisciplinary orofacial treatment. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Orofacial treatment can be used to decrease tinnitus severity in patients with TMD related somatic tinnitus.

Prognostic Indicators for Positive Treatment Outcome After Multidisciplinary Orofacial Treatment in Patients With Somatosensory Tinnitus.

INTRODUCTION: Subjective tinnitus that is influenced by the somatosensory system is called somatosensory tinnitus (ST). When ST is related to the temporomandibular area, multidisciplinary orofacial treatment can reduce tinnitus severity. It is, however, unknown if we can predict this positive outcome. The aim of this study is to look for prognostic indicators that can predict a positive outcome after multidisciplinary orofacial treatment in patients with ST. METHODS: Patients were included when they were diagnosed with temporomandibular-related ST and received a maximum of 18 sessions of orofacial treatment during a 9-week program. Predictors for positive treatment outcome were identified using univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses with the Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ) and the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) as dependent variables. RESULTS: The results of 101 patients were included in the analysis. Immediately after multidisciplinary orofacial treatment, a clinically relevant decrease in TQ score was significantly associated with "shorter duration of tinnitus" [odds ratio (OR) 0.99], "higher initial score on the TQ somatic subscale" (OR 1.52), and "painful palpation of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ)" (OR 2.46). After 9 weeks of follow-up, the "higher initial score on the TQ somatic subscale" remained as the sole predictor (OR 1.44). A clinically relevant decrease on TFI after 9 weeks of follow-up was predicted by "female gender" (OR 2.70), "younger age" (OR 0.96), "shorter duration of the tinnitus" (OR 0.99), "lower pressure pain thresholds (PPT) on TMJ" (OR 0.99), "lower PPT on sternocleidomastoid origin" (OR 0.99), and "better speech in noise perception" (OR 0.88). A multivariate model comprising "shorter duration of tinnitus" and "higher initial score on the somatic subscale of the TQ" correctly predicts the clinically relevant decrease in TQ score after treatment in 68.5%. A second multivariate model comprising "female gender," "younger age," and "shorter duration of the tinnitus" correctly predicts a clinically significant decrease on TFI after follow-up in 68.1%. CONCLUSION: We were able to identify various prognostic indicators. "Younger female patients" with a "shorter duration of tinnitus" and a "higher initial score on the TQ somatic subscale" appear to have the best prognosis after multimodal orofacial therapy.

Effectiveness of the implementation project 'Don't forget the mouth!' of community dwelling older people with dementia: a prospective longitudinal single-blind multicentre study protocol (DFTM!).

BACKGROUND: The oral health of community dwelling frail older people is poor, and depends on the oral health care provisions available within their own community. The implementation project 'Don't forget the mouth!' (i.e., the intervention) was created with the aim of maintaining and improving the oral health and the general health of community dwelling frail older people, with education and interdisciplinary collaborations of health care professionals and informal caregivers. Critical scientific assessment of the intervention will be described in this study protocol, focused on community dwelling older people with dementia. METHODS: This protocol describes a prospective longitudinal single-blind multicentre study, which will take place in 14 towns, each with an intervention and a control group receiving oral health care as usual. Assessment will take place four times during 12 months (i.e., at baseline, after 3, 6, and 12 months). Participants are 65 years and older, community dwelling, and suspected of dementia by their home care worker. The home care organizations will inform, and approach their clients about the study, before the researcher will reach out. The effectiveness of the intervention will be determined with the primary outcome variable 'oral hygiene', assessed through the presence of dental plaque (DP) or dental prosthetic plaque (DPP). The secondary outcome variables are: 'oral health', 'oral health related quality of life', 'oral health care behaviour', 'general health and care dependency', and 'compliance of the health care professionals'. DISCUSSION: This protocol aims to assess the effectiveness of the implementation project 'Don't forget the mouth!' focused on community dwelling older people with dementia. The strengths of the current study are the national roll-out of the intervention, interdisciplinary collaborations and education, and the scientific evaluation over the course of 12 months. The threats and weaknesses are in the recruitment procedure, and the adherence and compliance of the health care professionals to the project. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Netherlands Trail Register NTR6159 .

Diagnostic accuracy of three screening questions (3Q/TMD) in relation to the DC/TMD in a specialized orofacial pain clinic.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of three screening questions (3Q/TMD) in relation to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD), in a specialized clinic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consecutive patients, >18 years, referred with a possible TMD complaint to the Orofacial Pain and Dysfunction clinic, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, the Netherlands, were included in the study. All patients (n = 449; mean age 44 years; 72% females), answered the 3Q/TMD and the DC/TMD questionnaire before a DC/TMD examination. The 3Q/TMD constitutes of two questions on weekly pain from the jaw, face and temple region (Q1), and on function (Q2), and one function-related question on weekly catching and/or locking of the jaw (Q3). Q1 and Q2 were evaluated in relation to a DC/TMD pain diagnosis and Q3 in relation to a subgroup of DC/TMD intra-articular diagnosis, referred to as the reference standard. RESULTS: In total, 44% of patients received a pain-related DC/TMD diagnosis and 33% an intra-articular reference DC/TMD diagnosis. Sensitivity for the two pain screening questions was high (0.83-0.94), whereas specificity was low (0.41-0.55). For the function-related question, sensitivity was low (0.48), whereas specificity was high (0.96). CONCLUSIONS: In a specialized pain clinic, the two pain questions (Q1, Q2) are positive in most patients with pain-related TMD. Therefore, in case of a positive response, further diagnostic procedures for TMD pain are warranted. For the functional screening question (Q3), a positive response is indicative for an intra-articular DC/TMD diagnosis, while in case of a negative outcome, an intra-articular TMD might still be present.