Limited content overlap between commonly used self-report instruments for central (pain) sensitization in rheumatology.

Objectives: Central pain mechanisms may be prominent in a considerable subset of rheumatology patients with persistent pain. Several self-report instruments have been used in previous research to infer the presence and severity of central sensitization (CS) that stem from different definitions or approaches of CS. The current study aimed to evaluate and quantify the overlap of actual symptoms measured among self-report measures of CS in rheumatology. Methods: We used Fried's (2017) comprehensive systematic approach to analyse the content of five commonly used or typical self-report measures (Generalized Pain Questionnaire, Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire, Central Sensitization Inventory, Central Aspects of Pain in the Knee scale and the painDETECT) used in rheumatology research and to visualize and quantify the overlap in symptoms measured. Results: The five instruments together measured 39 different symptoms, most of which could be grouped into nociplastic pain manifestations (7 symptoms), neuropathic pain qualities (5 symptoms), and psychosomatic symptoms and emotional distress (25 symptoms). Most symptoms (74.4%) were unique to a single instrument. Thermal allodynia was the most frequently measured symptom across the different instruments, assessed in four of the measures. Average content overlap was very low and ranged from no overlap at all to moderate overlap (Jaccard index = 0.43) between pairs of instruments. Conclusion: There is high heterogeneity and limited overlap in the content of self-report measures used to infer central pain sensitization. This may lead to results that are specific to the particular instrument and may limit the generalizability and comparability of study findings in rheumatology research.

Multimodal Imaging of Structural Damage and Inflammation in Psoriatic Arthritis: A comparison of DMARD-Naive and DMARD-Failure Patients.

OBJECTIVES: To compare inflammatory and structural differences in active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) between disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-naive and DMARD-failure patients using diverse imaging approaches for future analyses. Additionally, to explore the influence of patient characteristics (clinical and demographic variables) on imaging findings. METHODS: Of the 80 patients included from the first cohort of the ongoing multicentre TOFA-PREDICT trial, 40 were DMARD-naive and 40 were DMARD-failure (csDMARD failure; 1 prior bDMARD excluding etanercept was allowed), all meeting classification criteria for PsA with a minimum disease duration of eight weeks. Baseline conventional radiographs of hands and feet, MRIs of both ankles, and whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT were evaluated for inflammatory and structural imaging parameters, including Sharp-van der Heijde (SHS), Heel Enthesitis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (HEMRIS) and Deauville synovitis scoring. Differences between groups and the influence of patient characteristics were examined with multiple linear regression. RESULTS: At baseline, patient characteristics were similar between groups. Imaging parameters showed limited inflammation and structural damage. Inflammatory imaging parameters were not significantly different (p> 0.200). Among structural parameters, only HEMRIS Achilles tendon structural damage was significantly different (p= 0.024, R2=0.071) and, SHS Joint Space Narrowing was not statistically significant (p= 0.050, R2=0.048) with higher values for both in DMARD-failures. After correction of patient characteristics, these differences in imaging disappeared (both p> 0.600). CONCLUSION: At baseline, PsA patient groups were comparable concerning structural and inflammatory imaging parameters, especially after correcting for patient characteristics. Thus, DMARD-naive and DMARD-failure patient groups may be combined in future PsA progression and treatment decision studies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT: 2017-003900-28.

The burden of adverse drug reactions reported by patients in the Dutch ADR monitor: a proof of concept.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to describe the burden of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported by patients participating in the Dutch ADR Monitor using a multifactorial burden measurement instrument. METHODS: The Dutch ADR Monitor is a cohort event monitoring system that collects information on ADR experiences, including burden. This study includes the initial data (November 2022 until May 2023). Patients were asked if experienced ADRs impacted 7 domains of burden: appearance, medical treatment, daily life, fatigue, physical consequences, mental consequences and the course of ADRs. Burden was scored from 0 to 10 on impacted domains. The distributions of these burden scores were demonstrated in Likert plots. The burden between persistent and recurrent ADRs was compared. RESULTS: 92 patients reported 199 ADRs. Impact on the domains fatigue and daily life were experienced most frequently, except for skin and subcutaneous tissue ADRs, where impact on appearance and mental consequences were experienced most frequently. Fatigue was considered the most burdensome domain. No difference in burden was found between persistent (median = 7, IQR = 4) and recurrent ADRs (median = 6, IQR = 4, p = 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study investigating burden of ADRs on 7 domains in patients with chronic diseases. Impact on the domain fatigue was considered most burdensome.

Patients with skin and subcutaneous ADRs experienced impact on appearance and mental consequences most often, but found impact on fatigue most burdensome.For most reported ADRs, patients scored the highest burden on the domain fatigue and thus found impact on this domain to be the most burdensome.Patients with skin and subcutaneous ADRs experienced impact on appearance and mental consequences most often, but found impact on fatigue most burdensome.

Quantification of longitudinal patient-reported burden of adverse drug reactions attributed to the use of TNF-α inhibitors in inflammatory rheumatic diseases: an observational prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of knowledge on patient perspectives on adverse drug reactions (ADRs) attributed to the use of biologics. The aim of this study is to quantify the burden over time of ADRs attributed to TNF-α inhibitors in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs) and investigate whether the burden over time differs between different types of ADRs. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Data were used from the Dutch Biologic Monitor (DBM), an observational prospective cohort study for patient-reported ADRs attributed to biologics. Patients with an IRD using a TNF-α inhibitor reporting an ADR, lasting for three consecutive questionnaires, were included. Questionnaires were sent every 2 months and the burden was scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Burden scores were analyzed using linear mixed models. RESULTS: Data from 166 unique patients reporting 274 ADRs were included. The burden score decreased every month by 0.29 points (95% CI -0.34 - -0.24) on average on a 5-point Likert-type scale. The burden score for infections and infestations decreased significantly faster than the burden score for injection site reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported burden of ADRs attributed to the use of a TNF-α inhibitor in patients with IRDs decreased significantly over time, especially for infections and infestations.

Responsiveness and sensitivity of PROMs to change in disease activity status in early and established rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) capturing activity limitations, health impact, pain, fatigue and work ability are responsive and sensitive to changes in disease activity status in patients with early and established rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: All early RA patients (n = 557) from the tREACH-trial and established RA patients (n = 188) from the TARA-trial were included. Both studies were multicentre, single-blinded trials with a treat-to-target management approach. The following PROMs were studied: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index(HAQ-DI), morning stiffness severity, EQ-5D, general health, 36-item short form(SF-36), joint pain, fatigue and productivity loss. Mean changes in PROMs between two consecutive visits were compared with changes in disease activity status(remission, low disease activity and active disease) using linear mixed models and standardised response means. Additionally, the proportion of individual observations that showed an expected PROM response to disease activity status alterations was calculated. RESULTS: HAQ-DI, morning stiffness severity, general health, EQ-5D and joint pain demonstrated responsiveness to improvement or worsening of disease activity status in both early and established RA. SF-36 physical and mental component scale, fatigue and productivity loss did not show this effect in both groups. Across nearly all PROMs, the magnitude of change and the proportion of individual observations that reflect a shift from and to active disease remained low. CONCLUSION: HAQ-DI, morning stiffness severity, EQ-5D, general health and joint pain are responsive to disease activity status alterations on a group level in both early and established RA. For the individual patient the responsiveness of these PROMs is poor. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: tREACH trial (www.isrctn.com, ISRCTN26791028) and TARA trial (www.onderzoekmetmensen.nl, NTR2754).

What benefit-risk trade-offs are acceptable to rheumatoid arthritis patients during treatment selection? Evidence from a multicountry choice experiment.

OBJECTIVE: Understanding preferences of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can facilitate tailored patient-centric care. This study elicited trade-offs that patients with RA were willing to make during treatment selection. METHODS: Patients with RA completed an online discrete choice experiment, consisting of a series of choices between hypothetical treatments. Treatment attributes were selected based on literature review and qualitative patient interviews. Eligible patients were ≥18 years old, diagnosed with RA, receiving systemic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy, and residents of Europe or USA. Male patients were oversampled for subgroup analyses. Data were analysed using a correlated mixed logit model. RESULTS: Of 2090 participants, 42% were female; mean age was 45.2 years (range 18-83). Estimated effects were significant for all attributes (p<0.001) but varied between patients. Average relative attribute importance scores revealed different priorities (p<0.001) between males and females. While reducing pain and negative effect on semen parameters was most important to males, females were most concerned by risk of blood clots and serious infections. No single attribute explained treatment preferences by more than 30%. Preferences were also affected by patients' age: patients aged 18-44 years placed less importance on frequency and mode of treatment administration (p<0.05) than older age groups. Patients were willing to accept higher risk of serious infections and blood clots in exchange for improvements in pain, daily activities or administration convenience. However, acceptable trade-offs varied between patients (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Treatment preferences of patients with RA were individual-specific, but driven by benefits and risks, with no single attribute dominating the decision-making.

Increased vascular inflammation on PET/CT in psoriatic arthritis patients in comparison with controls.

BACKGROUND: Patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, possibly due to a chronic inflammatory state. OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this study was to investigate the difference in vascular inflammation, measured with 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT), in PsA patients and controls. We conducted a secondary analysis to assess the association between clinical parameters of disease activity with vascular inflammation in PsA. METHODS: We included a total of 75 PsA patients with active peripheral arthritis (defined as ≥2 tender and swollen joints) from an ongoing clinical trial (EudraCT 2017-003900-28) and a retrospective group of 40 controls diagnosed with melanoma, without distant metastases and not receiving immunotherapy. The main outcome measure was aortic vascular inflammation which was measured on PET/CT scans using target-to-background ratios. Clinical disease activity in PsA was assessed with joint counts, body surface area and the Disease Activity index for PsA. Laboratory assessments included C reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. RESULTS: Vascular inflammation was increased in patients with PsA in comparison with controls (mean target-to-background ratio for entire aorta, respectively, 1.63±0.17 vs 1.49±0.16; p=<0.001). This association remained significant after correction for gender, age, body mass index, mean arterial pressure and aortic calcification (p=0.002). Vascular inflammation was not associated with disease-related parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic vascular inflammation was significantly increased in patients with active PsA compared with controls. This evidence supports the theory that inflammation in PsA is not limited to the skin and joints but also involves the vascular system.

Factors associated with treatment intensification in patients with axial spondyloarthritis and high disease activity in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate which factors are associated with treatment intensification (TI) in axial spondylarthritis (axSpA) patients with high disease activity (HDA). METHODS: Patients with axSpA and HDA (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score [ASDAS]≥2.1) from the Dutch SpA-Net registry were included. TI was defined as: 1) higher dose or shorter interval of the same drug, 2) switch from current drug to another due to inefficacy, or 3) addition of a new drug. Only anti-inflammatory drugs were considered. Primary determinants considered were ASDAS, Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society Health Index (ASAS HI) and physician global (PhGA). Acceptable symptom state according to patient (PASS-patient) or physician (PASS-physician) were included in sensitivity analyses. Patient-centered and physician-centered logistic regression models were used to investigate the association between potential determinants and TI. RESULTS: In total, 121 patients with HDA were included. TI was conducted in a minority (41/121, 33.9%), and mainly involved a switch or addition of a drug. In multivariable regression analyses, a higher ASDAS was associated with TI in the patient-centered model (ORASDAS = 1.94, [95%CI 1.00-3.74]). However, in the physician-centered model, this association attenuated, and PhGA or PASS-physician were the primary factors associated with TI (ORPhGA = 1.71 [1.24-2.34]; ORPASS-physician = 94.95). Interestingly, patient-centered factors (ASAS HI/PASS-patient/education level) did not contribute to TI. CONCLUSION: In practice, treatment is intensified in a minority of axSpA patients with HDA. Physician-centered factors are associated with the decision to change treatment, independently of disease activity or patient perspective. Further research is needed to better understand these decisions.

Test-Retest Reliability of the Generalized Pain Questionnaire in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Preliminary Reference Values for Non-Clinical and Several Clinical Samples.

Introduction: Generalized pain hypersensitivity is a characteristic feature in many different types of chronic pain. Recently, a 7-item self-reported Generalized Pain Questionnaire (GPQ) was developed to evaluate the presence and severity of generalized pain hypersensitivity in chronic pain patients. Here, we evaluate the test-retest reliability of the GPQ and report on preliminary reference values for various patient groups and healthy subjects. Methods: Eighty-five patients diagnosed with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) completed the GPQ twice over a 2-week interval. Relative and absolute indicators of reliability were determined using data of 69 patients (81.2% retest response rate). Using readily available datasets, preliminary reference data were established in two nonclinical populations (NCP1; N = 30 and NCP2; N = 111), and for patients diagnosed with RA (N = 114), gout (N = 97), fibromyalgia (N=98), or neuropathy (N = 25), or participants in a pain rehabilitation program (N = 33). Results: Total GPQ scores had an ICC of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.67 to 0.86). While no systematic or proportional differences were found for the GPQ total score; two (near-)significant systematic differences were observed for the individual questions. The standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change were 2.22 and 6.2, respectively. Mean ± SD scores were found to be 0.8 ± 1.2 (NCP1), 4.0 ± 4.6 (NCP2), 6.4 ± 5.5 (Gout), 6.5 ± 5.1 (RA), 8.1 ± 4.5 (Neuropathy), 13.6 ± 4.0 (Rehabilitation) and 16.0 ± 5.0 (Fibromyalgia). Discussion: This study shows that the GPQ has acceptable reliability to be used as a tool to evaluate the presence and intensity of generalized pain hypersensitivity. The absolute measures of reliability and the preliminary reference values reported here aid in the interpretation of future studies with the GPQ.

Further evaluation of inflammatory and non-inflammatory aspects of pain in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Objective: A high discrepancy between the number of tender and swollen joints (e.g. ΔTSJ ≥ 7) has previously been used as an indication for the presence of changes in central mechanisms in patients with moderate-to-high disease activity. In this study, we explored whether the ΔTSJ can also be used to obtain insights into the underlying pain mechanisms in patients with on average well-controlled disease activity. Methods: A 2 year retrospective analysis of routinely obtained 28-joint DAS (DAS28) components was performed on 45 patients with low inflammatory activity at the group level. All patients underwent pressure pain threshold (PPT) and electrical pain threshold (EPT) measurements and completed four self-report questionnaires [short-form 36 (SF-36v2); central sensitization inventory (CSI); generalized pain questionnaire (GPQ); and the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS)]. Results: Patients with a ΔTSJ ≥ 3 at least once in the past 2 years showed significantly lower EPT and PPT values and higher levels of pain and disability on the SF-36v2 compared with the ΔTSJ < 3 group. Furthermore, GPQ scores were significantly higher in those with ΔTSJ ≥ 3, while CSI and PCS scores were similar. Conclusion: These findings suggest that in patients in the ΔTSJ ≥ 3 group, mechanisms other than inflammation (only) underlie the pain. Moreover, our findings suggest that among the multiple potential underlying psychological mechanisms, pain catastrophizing (as measured by the PCS) and psychological hypervigilance (as measured by the CSI) do not play an important role. These findings could be useful in the clinical management of the patient. Depending on the dominant mechanism underlying the (persistent) pain, patients might respond differently to treatment.

Development of a Framework Structuring Themes in the Course of Adverse Drug Reactions from a Patient's Perspective.

INTRODUCTION: There is a need for more extensive information about adverse drug reactions (ADRs) for patients than currently available, including information on the course of ADRs. Aspects characterising the course of ADRs from the patient perspective have not been identified before. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop a framework based on common themes in the course of ADRs identified from patient descriptions in patient-reported ADRs. METHODS: In this qualitative study, patient descriptions of the course of patient-reported ADRs were analysed by a thematic analysis with an inductive approach using three different existing datasets containing patient-reported ADRs. Two datasets included patient-reported ADRs from cohort event monitoring of biologics and direct oral anticoagulants and one dataset included spontaneous reports from patients concerning medication for lower urinary tract symptoms. A conceptual framework was developed from the identified main themes and subthemes. RESULTS: Patient-reported data concerning 3888 ADRs were analysed. Six main themes with multiple subthemes were identified from patient descriptions of the course of ADRs. Four themes were descriptive: frequency of an ADR episode, duration of an ADR episode, moment or period of ADR occurrence, and development in the intensity of the ADR. Two themes concerned factors influencing the course of ADRs: triggering factors and improving factors. CONCLUSIONS: The presented framework illustrates that patients describe extensive details on the course and timeframe of ADRs. The identified themes provide a basis for improving the systematic data collection of more extensive details about ADRs from patients as a first step towards the provision of more comprehensive ADR information to patients.

Factors Associated With Residual Disease in Axial Spondyloarthritis: Results From a Clinical Practice Registry.

OBJECTIVE: To explore residual disease, defined as substantial symptoms and disease burden despite a remission or low disease activity (LDA) state, in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), and to determine which factors are associated with residual disease. METHODS: For this cross-sectional observational study, 1 timepoint per patient was used from SpA-Net, a web-based monitoring registry for SpA. Patients with an Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) < 2.1 (LDA) were included. Indicators of residual disease (outcomes) included fatigue (primary outcome), pain, physical functioning, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and peripheral symptoms. Sex was the primary explanatory factor for residual disease. Other explanatory factors included demographics and disease-related factors. Associations between these factors and presence and extent of residual disease were explored using logistic and linear regression. RESULTS: In total, 267 patients in an LDA state were included. Mean age was 50.6 (SD 14.3) years and 100 (37.5%) were female. Residual disease occurred frequently (n = 114 [42.7%] had fatigue scores > 4/10; n = 34 [17.8%] had pain scores > 4/10), including in those in remission (ASDAS < 1.3). Physical HRQOL was reduced in 27% and moderate/poor in 33%. Multivariable regression analyses showed that reported fatigue was more severe and prevalent in female patients (fatigue severity [0-10]: Bfemale = 0.78, 95% CI 0.18-1.38; fatigue > 4/10: ORfemale = 3.29, 95% CI 1.74-6.20). Other indicators of residual disease (ie, pain, peripheral symptoms, physical HRQOL) were also more severe and/or more prevalent in females. CONCLUSION: Residual disease is frequent in patients with axSpA who are in an LDA state, including remission, and it is particularly prevalent in female patients. Future studies should address how to manage or prevent residual disease in axSpA.

Recurring Fatigue After Biologic Administration: Patient-Reported Data from the Dutch Biologic Monitor.

BACKGROUND: Fatigue is a common problem in immune-mediated inflammatory disease (IMID) patients, significantly impacting their quality of life. OBJECTIVES: In this study, we describe the pattern and characteristics of fatigue as a patient-reported adverse drug reaction (ADR) of biologics, and compared patient and treatment characteristics with patients reporting other ADRs or no ADRs. METHODS: In this cohort event monitoring study, the description and characteristics of fatigue reported as a possible ADR in the Dutch Biologic Monitor were assessed and analysed for commonly recurring themes or patterns. Baseline and treatment characteristics of patients with fatigue and patients reporting other ADRs or no ADRs were compared. RESULTS: Of 1382 participating patients, 108 patients (8%) reported fatigue as an ADR of a biologic. Almost half of these patients (50 patients, 46%) described episodes of fatigue during or shortly after biologic injection, which often recurred following subsequent injections. Patients with fatigue were significantly younger than patients with other ADRs or patients without ADRs (median age for patients with fatigue, 52 years; median age for patients with other ADRs, 56 years; and median age for patients without ADRs, 58 years); significantly more often smoked (25% vs. 16% and 15%); used infliximab (22% vs. 9% and 13%), rituximab (9% vs. 3% and 1%) or vedolizumab (6% vs. 2% and 1%); and significantly more often had Crohn's disease (28% vs. 13% and 13%) and other comorbidities (31% vs. 20% and 15%). Patients with fatigue significantly less frequently used etanercept (12% vs. 29% and 34%) or had rheumatoid arthritis (30% vs. 45% and 43%). CONCLUSIONS: IMID patients may experience fatigue as a postdosing effect of biologics.

Impact of adverse drug reactions on the treatment pathways of early rheumatoid arthritis patients: a prospective observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Several patient characteristics may be of influence on treatment pathways of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in clinical practice. The aim of this study is to analyze treatment pathways of early RA patients stratified for gender and adverse drug reaction (ADR) occurrence. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Treatment pathways of patients included in the DREAM-RA treat-to-target cohort I between 16th of July 2006-30th of April 2020 were assessed. Treatment pathways were visualized in Sankey diagrams. Follow-up time, duration per treatment and the number of treatments received were stratified for gender and ADR occurrence and analyzed. Independent t-tests and chi-square tests were performed where applicable. RESULTS: Treatment pathways of 372 patients (follow-up: 2488.4 years, mean 6.7 ± 3.7 years) were analyzed. The Sankey diagrams visualize that treatment pathways became increasingly varied and complex over time. No significant differences were found when comparing female patients and male patients. However, the average treatment duration was shorter in patients with ADRs (1.8 vs. 2.7 years, p < 0.05), and the number of treatments higher (3.5 vs. 2.5, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment pathways increase in complexity over time. Differences were found between patients with and without ADRs, with patients that experience ADRs receiving more and shorter treatments.

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of combined asynchronous telemonitoring and patient-initiated care for spondyloarthritis: protocol for a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial (TeleSpA Study).

INTRODUCTION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, an accelerated uptake of remote monitoring strategies, replacing traditional face-to-face care, has been observed. However, data on the effects of remote care interventions for patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases remain scarce and interpretation is hampered by study heterogeneity and research quality concerns. High-quality evidence is required to guide future implementation in clinical practice, with health economic analyses identified as an important knowledge gap. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing telemonitoring with conventional care for patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) are currently lacking. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: TeleSpA is a pragmatic, multicentre RCT investigating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of combined asynchronous telemonitoring and patient-initiated follow-up for patients with SpA, compared with conventional care. Two-hundred patients will be recruited at two hospitals and randomised (1:1) to the study intervention or standard care. The primary endpoint is a reduction in the number of follow-up visits by ≥25% in the intervention compared with standard care group, during a 1-year period. Secondary endpoints are (a) non-inferiority of the study intervention with regard to health outcomes, quality of care and patient-reported experience with care; and (b) cost-effectiveness of the intervention, evaluated through a prospective trial-based cost-utility analysis. In addition, experiences with the study intervention will be assessed among patients and healthcare providers, and factors associated with primary and secondary endpoints will be identified. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of the Academic Hospital Maastricht/Maastricht University (NL71041.068.19/METC 19-059). Results will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04673825.

The impact of health literacy: associations with disease activity and medication prescription in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the longitudinal associations between health literacy profiles and disease activity and medication prescription in patients with RA. METHODS: Patients with RA who previously completed the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) and were assigned 1 of 10 distinct health literacy profiles based on cluster analysis were further aggregated into three groups: 'several health literacy limitations', 'some health literacy limitations' and 'good health literacy'. Linear mixed modelling (LMM) was used to analyse the association between health literacy groups and disease activity over the course of 1 year. Chi-squared tests and logistic regression analyses were used to compare medication prescriptions between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients with RA were included. LMM showed a significant effect of health literacy group on disease activity over time (P = 0.010). Patients with 'good health literacy' had significantly lower disease activity over time [28-joint DAS with ESR (DAS28-ESR) = 2.4] than patients with 'several health literacy limitations' (DAS28-ESR = 3.1), independent of age, gender and education level. Patients with 'good health literacy' were most often prescribed a biologic DMARD (50%), whereas patients with 'some health literacy limitations' more commonly received a conventional synthetic DMARD only [72.7%; odds ratio (OR) 4.24], and patients with 'several health literacy limitations' were more often prescribed prednisolone (52.4%; OR 3.56). CONCLUSION: Significant differences in longitudinal disease activity and medication prescription were observed between groups with different health literacy levels. These results stress the importance of insights into the role of health literacy in treatment and outcomes in patients with RA.

Sex differences in adverse drug reactions from Adalimumab and etanercept in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

BACKGROUND: We examine sex differences in relation to the nature, frequency, and burden of patient-reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, or axial spondyloarthritis patients using etanercept or adalimumab from the Dutch Biologic Monitor were sent bimonthly questionnaires concerning experienced ADRs. Sex differences in the proportion and nature of reported ADRs were assessed. Additionally, 5-point Likert-type scales reported for the burden of ADRs, were compared between sexes. RESULTS: In total 748 consecutive patients were included (59% female). From the women 55% reported ≥1 ADR, which was significantly higher than 38% of the men that reported ≥1 ADR (p < 0.001). A total of 882 ADRs were reported comprising 264 distinct ADRs. The nature of the reported ADRs differed significantly between both sexes (p = 0.02). Women in particular reported more injection site reactions than men. The burden of ADRs was similar between sexes. CONCLUSIONS: Sex differences in the frequency and nature of ADRs, but not in ADR burden, exist during treatment with adalimumab and etanercept in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. This should be taken into consideration when investigating and reporting results on ADRs and when counseling patients in daily clinical practice.

First-time adverse drug reactions, survival analysis, and the share of adverse drug reactions in treatment discontinuation in real-world rheumatoid arthritis patients: a comparison of first-time treatment with adalimumab and etanercept.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to compare nature and frequency of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), time to first ADR, drug survival, and the share of ADRs in treatment discontinuation of first-time treatment with adalimumab (ADA) and etanercept (ETN) in real-world RA patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Retrospective, single-center cohort study including naïve patients treated between January 2003-April 2020. Time to first ADR and drug survival of first-time treatment were studied using Kaplan-Meier and Cox-regression models up to 10 years, with 2- and 5-year post-hoc sensitivity analysis. Nature and frequencies of first-time ADRs and causes of treatment discontinuation were assessed. RESULTS: In total, 416 patients (ADA: 255, ETN: 161, 4865 patient years) were included, of which 92 (22.1%) experienced ADR(s) (ADA: 59, 23.1%; ETN: 33, 20.4%). Adjusted for age, gender and concomitant conventional DMARD use, ADA was more likely to be discontinued than ETN up to 2-, 5- and 10-year follow-up (adjusted HRs 1.63; 1.62; 1.59 (all p<0.001)). ADRs were the second reason of treatment discontinuation (ADA 20.7%, ETN 21.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite seemingly different nature and frequencies, ADRs are the second reason of treatment discontinuation for both bDMARDs. Furthermore, 2-, 5-, and 10-year drug survival is longer for ETN compared to ADA.

Disease-specific ADRs of TNF-α inhibitors as reported by patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a registry-based prospective multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The extent to which adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of biologics differ per immune-mediated inflammatory disease (IMID), and the relevance of tailoring ADR information per IMID is not fully investigated. We aimed to compare patient-reported ADRs attributed to adalimumab and etanercept between different inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: ADR reports from IRD patients were extracted from the Dutch Biologic Monitor. ADR frequencies were compared using Fischer-Freeman-Halton exact test and the influence of covariates was assessed using binomial logistic regression.A total, of 729 participants were included, of which 354 participants reported 887 unique ADRs. ADR frequencies were not significantly different between the IRDs. Rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis including axial spondyloarthritis patients had an increased risk of ADRs related to 'Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders' and as compared to psoriatic arthritis patients. Etanercept use, combination therapy with methotrexate and/or corticosteroids, and age also influenced the risk of reporting specific ADRs. CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences in frequencies and nature of patient-reported ADRs attributed to adalimumab and etanercept between different IRDs. However, more research is needed to align patients' and health-care professionals' perspectives to improve knowledge on disease-specific ADRs.

Analysis and visualization of the course and burden over time of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) attributed to TNFα-inhibitors in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs).

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate course and burden over time of ADRs attributed to TNFα-inhibitors in IRD-patients, and whether Sankey diagrams and polar plots can visualize this. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Data on ADRs experienced during the Dutch Biologic Monitor (January 2017 till December 2022) were used in this study. We selected IRD-patients using a TNFα-inhibitor, reporting skin reactions/infections/injection site reactions and completing ≥3 questionnaires (i.e. the initial report and ≥2 follow-ups). Course was scored as worsening/improving/remaining stable/resolving and as (non-)recurrent. Patients scored burden from 1 (no burden) to 5 (very high burden). Sankey diagrams and polar plots visualized this. RESULTS: 202 patients were included, reporting 353 ADRs. Most skin reactions were stable (25.0%). Most infections resolved (50.8%). Injection site reactions were mostly recurrent (72.3%). Skin reactions and infections tended to decrease in burden . Infections had highest burden at start, which mostly decreased over time. Injection site reactions had a low and stable burden. CONCLUSIONS: Skin reactions attributed to TNFα-inhibitors by IRD-patients are stable with a slightly decreasing burden over time. Infections have highest burden at start but resolved mostly. Injection site reactions have a low and stable burden. Sankey diagrams and polar plots are suitable to visualize this.