Re-evaluation of the critical concentration for ethambutol antimicrobial sensitivity testing on the MGIT 960.

The critical concentration (CC) for ethambutol testing on the Bactec MGIT 960 M. tuberculosis susceptibility testing has been questioned in recent publications. In this study, we correlate susceptibility results from the Bactec 460, MGIT 960 and embB gene sequencing to determine if the Bactec MGIT 960 adequately detects ethambutol resistance. We discovered discrepancies between the methods that highlight a need to re-evaluate ethambutol susceptibility testing recommendations, namely by considering lowering currently recommended CC on the MGIT 960. Further studies on the clinical significance of low-level ethambutol resistance are also required.

Pharmacodynamic activity of ceftobiprole compared with vancomycin versus methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) and vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) using an in vitro model.

BACKGROUND: This study compared the pharmacodynamics of ceftobiprole and vancomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA) and vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA) using an in vitro model. METHODS: Two methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), two community-associated (CA)-MRSA, one healthcare-associated (HA)-MRSA, three VISA and two VRSA were studied. The pharmacodynamic model was inoculated with a concentration of 1 x 10(6) cfu/mL and ceftobiprole dosed every 8 h (at 0, 8 and 16 h) to simulate the fC(max) and t(1/2) obtained after 500 mg intravenous (iv) every 8 h dosing (fC(max,) 30 mg/L; t(1/2,) 3.5 h). Vancomycin was dosed every 12 h (at 0 and 12 h) to simulate fC(max) and t(1/2) obtained after 1 g iv every 12 h dosing (fC(max), 20 mg/L; t(1/2), 8 h). Samples were collected over 24 h to assess viable growth. RESULTS: Ceftobiprole T > MIC of > or =100% (ceftobiprole MICs, < or =2 mg/L) was bactericidal (> or =3 log(10) killing) against MSSA, CA-MRSA, HA-MRSA, VISA and VRSA at 16 and 24 h. Vancomycin fAUC(24)/MIC of 340 (vancomycin MIC, 1 mg/L for MSSA and MRSA) resulted in a 1.8-2.6 log(10) reduction in colony count at 24 h. Vancomycin fAUC(24)/MIC of 85-170 (vancomycin MIC, 2-4 mg/L for VISA) resulted in a 0.4-0.7 log(10) reduction at 24 h. Vancomycin fAUC(24)/MIC of 5.3 (vancomycin MIC, 64 mg/L for VRSA) resulted in a limited effect. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftobiprole T > MIC of > or =100% (ceftobiprole MICs, < or =2 mg/L) was bactericidal (> or =3 log(10) killing) against MSSA, CA-MRSA, HA-MRSA, VISA and VRSA at 16 and 24 h. Vancomycin was bacteriostatic against MSSA, MRSA and VISA, while demonstrating no activity against VRSA.