Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Casirivimab and Imdevimab (CAS+IMD) in Pediatric Outpatients With COVID-19.

The safety of casirivimab+imdevimab (CAS+IMD) (anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies [mAbs]) in pediatric outpatients with COVID-19 was evaluated in a randomized, phase 1/2/3 trial. Consistent with adults, CAS+IMD was generally well tolerated with low drug-induced immunogenicity rates. The findings support development of next-generation anti-SARS-CoV-2 mAbs for at-risk pediatric patients.

Assessing the safety and pharmacokinetics of casirivimab and imdevimab (CAS+IMD) in a cohort of pregnant outpatients with COVID-19: results from an adaptive, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 1/2/3 study.

OBJECTIVE: Pregnant women with COVID-19 are at elevated risk for severe outcomes, but clinical data on management of these patients are limited. Monoclonal antibodies, such as casirivimab plus imdevimab (CAS+IMD), have proven effective in treating non-pregnant adults with COVID-19, prompting further evaluation in pregnant women. METHODS: A phase 3 portion of an adaptive, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the safety, clinical outcomes, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of CAS+IMD (1200 mg or 2400 mg) in the treatment of pregnant outpatients with COVID-19 (NCT04425629). Participants were enrolled between December 2020 and November 2021, prior to the emergence of Omicron-lineage variants against which CAS+IMD is not active. Safety was evaluated in randomised participants who received study drug (n=80); clinical outcomes were evaluated in all randomised participants (n=82). Only two pregnant participants received placebo, limiting conclusions regarding treatment effect. Infants born to pregnant participants were followed for developmental outcomes ≤1 year of age. RESULTS: In pregnant participants, CAS+IMD was well tolerated, with no grade ≥2 hypersensitivity or infusion-related reactions reported. There were no participant deaths, and only one COVID-19-related medically attended visit. Although two pregnancies (3%) reported issues in the fetus/neonate, they were confounded by maternal history or considered to be due to an alternate aetiology. No adverse developmental outcomes in infants ≤1 year of age were considered related to in utero exposure to the study drug. CAS+IMD 1200 mg and 2400 mg rapidly and similarly reduced viral loads, with a dose-proportional increase in concentrations of CAS+IMD in serum. Pharmacokinetics were consistent with that reported in the general population. Immunogenicity incidence was low. CONCLUSION: CAS+IMD treatment of pregnant outpatients with COVID-19 showed similar safety, clinical outcomes and pharmacokinetic profiles to that observed in non-pregnant adults. There was no evidence of an impact on developmental outcomes in infants ≤1 year of age. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04425629.

Evinacumab in homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: long-term safety and efficacy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by severely elevated LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) and premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. In the pivotal Phase 3 HoFH trial (NCT03399786), evinacumab significantly decreased LDL-C in patients with HoFH. This study assesses the long-term safety and efficacy of evinacumab in adult and adolescent patients with HoFH. METHODS: In this open-label, single-arm, Phase 3 trial (NCT03409744), patients aged ≥12 years with HoFH who were evinacumab-naïve or had previously received evinacumab in other trials (evinacumab-continue) received intravenous evinacumab 15 mg/kg every 4 weeks with stable lipid-lowering therapy. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients (adults: n = 102; adolescents: n = 14) were enrolled, of whom 57 (49.1%) were female. Patients were treated for a median (range) duration of 104.3 (28.3-196.3) weeks. Overall, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were reported in 93 (80.2%) and 27 (23.3%) patients, respectively. Two (1.7%) deaths were reported (neither was considered related to evinacumab). Three (2.6%) patients discontinued due to TEAEs (none were considered related to evinacumab). From baseline to Week 24, evinacumab decreased mean LDL-C by 43.6% [mean (standard deviation, SD), 3.4 (3.2) mmol/L] in the overall population; mean LDL-C reduction in adults and adolescents was 41.7% [mean (SD), 3.2 (3.3) mmol/L] and 55.4% [mean (SD), 4.7 (2.5) mmol/L], respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of patients with HoFH, evinacumab was generally well tolerated and markedly decreased LDL-C irrespective of age and sex. Moreover, the efficacy and safety of evinacumab was sustained over the long term.

Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab in Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Open-label platform trials and a prospective meta-analysis suggest efficacy of anti-interleukin (IL)-6R therapies in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) receiving corticosteroids. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of sarilumab, an anti-IL-6R monoclonal antibody, in the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. METHODS: In this adaptive, phase 2/3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adults hospitalized with COVID-19 received intravenous sarilumab 400 mg or placebo. The phase 3 primary analysis population included patients with critical COVID-19 receiving mechanical ventilation (MV). The primary outcome was proportion of patients with ≥1-point improvement in clinical status from baseline to day 22. RESULTS: There were 457 and 1365 patients randomized and treated in phases 2 and 3, respectively. In phase 3, patients with critical COVID-19 receiving MV (n = 298; 28.2% on corticosteroids), the proportion with ≥1-point improvement in clinical status (alive, not receiving MV) at day 22 was 43.2% for sarilumab and 35.5% for placebo (risk difference, +7.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -7.4 to 21.3; P =.3261), a relative risk improvement of 21.7%. In post hoc analyses pooling phase 2 and 3 critical patients receiving MV, the hazard ratio for death for sarilumab vs placebo was 0.76 (95% CI, .51 to 1.13) overall and 0.49 (95% CI, .25 to .94) in patients receiving corticosteroids at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not establish the efficacy of sarilumab in hospitalized patients with severe/critical COVID-19. Post hoc analyses were consistent with other studies that found a benefit of sarilumab in patients receiving corticosteroids. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT04315298.

Baseline Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Viral Load Is Associated With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Severity and Clinical Outcomes: Post Hoc Analyses of a Phase 2/3 Trial.

BACKGROUND: Elucidating the relationship between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral load and clinical outcomes is critical for understanding coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: The SARS-CoV-2 levels were analyzed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) of nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swab specimens collected at baseline, and clinical outcomes were recorded over 60 days from 1362 COVID-19 hospitalized patients enrolled in a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2/3 trial of sarilumab for COVID-19 (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04315298). RESULTS: In post hoc analyses, higher baseline viral load, measured by both RT-qPCR cycle threshold and log10 copies/mL, was associated with greater supplemental oxygenation requirements and disease severity at study entry. Higher baseline viral load was associated with higher mortality, lower likelihood of improvement in clinical status and supplemental oxygenation requirements, and lower rates of hospital discharge. Viral load was not impacted by sarilumab treatment over time versus placebo. CONCLUSIONS: These data support viral load as an important determinant of clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 requiring supplemental oxygen or assisted ventilation.