Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Hazard Mater ; 471: 134437, 2024 Jun 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38691934

RESUMEN

Crude oil is a hazardous pollutant that poses significant and lasting harm to human health and ecosystems. In this study, Moesziomyces aphidis XM01, a biosurfactant mannosylerythritol lipids (MELs)-producing yeast, was utilized for crude oil degradation. Unlike most microorganisms relying on cytochrome P450, XM01 employed two extracellular unspecific peroxygenases, MaUPO.1 and MaUPO.2, with preference for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and n-alkanes respectively, thus facilitating efficient crude oil degradation. The MELs produced by XM01 exhibited a significant emulsification activity of 65.9% for crude oil and were consequently supplemented in an "exogenous MELs addition" strategy to boost crude oil degradation, resulting in an optimal degradation ratio of 72.3%. Furthermore, a new and simple "pre-MELs production" strategy was implemented, achieving a maximum degradation ratio of 95.9%. During this process, the synergistic up-regulation of MaUPO.1, MaUPO.1 and the key MELs synthesis genes contributed to the efficient degradation of crude oil. Additionally, the phylogenetic and geographic distribution analysis of MaUPO.1 and MaUPO.1 revealed their wide occurrence among fungi in Basidiomycota and Ascomycota, with high transcription levels across global ocean, highlighting their important role in biodegradation of crude oil. In conclusion, M. aphidis XM01 emerges as a novel yeast for efficient and eco-friendly crude oil degradation.


Asunto(s)
Biodegradación Ambiental , Glucolípidos , Oxigenasas de Función Mixta , Petróleo , Tensoactivos , Petróleo/metabolismo , Tensoactivos/metabolismo , Tensoactivos/química , Glucolípidos/metabolismo , Oxigenasas de Función Mixta/metabolismo , Oxigenasas de Función Mixta/genética , Hidrocarburos Policíclicos Aromáticos/metabolismo , Hidrocarburos Policíclicos Aromáticos/química , Alcanos/metabolismo
2.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 29(1): 61-69, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35872173

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Accurately estimating the likelihood of bloodstream infection (BSI) can help clinicians make diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. Many multivariate models predicting BSI probability have been published. This study measured the performance of BSI probability models within the same patient sample. METHODS: We retrieved validated BSI probability models included in a recently published systematic review that returned a patient-level BSI probability for adults. Model applicability, discrimination, and accuracy was measured in a simple random sample of 4485 admitted adults having blood cultures ordered in the emergency department or the initial 48 hours of hospitalization. RESULTS: Ten models were included (publication years 1991-2015). Common methodological threats to model performance included overfitting and continuous variable categorization. Restrictive inclusion criteria caused seven models to apply to <15% of validation patients. Model discrimination was less than originally reported in derivation groups (median c-statistic 60%, range 48-69). The observed BSI risk frequently deviated from expected (median integrated calibration index 4.0%, range 0.8-12.4). Notable disagreement in expected BSI probabilities was seen between models (median (25th-75th percentile) relative difference between expected risks 68.0% (28.6-113.6%)). DISCUSSION: In a large randomly selected external validation population, many published BSI probability models had restricted applicability, limited discrimination and calibration, and extensive inter-model disagreement. Direct comparison of model performance is hampered by dissimilarities between model-specific validation groups.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia , Sepsis , Adulto , Humanos , Probabilidad , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Sepsis/epidemiología , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/epidemiología
3.
Neurohospitalist ; 10(4): 245-249, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32983341

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The diagnosis of transient ischemic attack (TIA) is largely dependent on a process of clinical decision-making that remains poorly characterized in the absence of a validated and accessible biomarker or imaging test. We performed a retrospective chart review to identify variables associated with a final neurologist diagnosis of TIA/stroke. METHODS: Records for all patients seen in The Ottawa Hospital's Stroke Prevention Clinic in 2015 were analyzed for patient and referral characteristics, features of the presenting neurological event, and final diagnosis by a stroke neurologist (classified as definite, possible, or definite not TIA/stroke). Multinomial logistic regression analysis with backward elimination was used to identify variables associated with the final diagnosis. RESULTS: Our inclusion criteria were met by 1894 patients. After backward elimination, 23 potentially important variables were identified, including monocular vision loss (odds ratio [OR]: 30.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.6-63.3), symptoms of sudden onset (OR: 28.3, 95% CI: 14.2-56.2), unilateral weakness affecting 2 or 3 of face, arm, or leg (OR: 17.7, 95% CI: 9.8-31.7), and homonymous hemianopia (OR: 16.6, 95% CI: 8.1-34.0). CONCLUSIONS: Accurate diagnosis of TIA is essential to initiating appropriate secondary stroke prevention therapies. A focus on elements of the patient history most commonly associated with a final diagnosis of TIA/stroke may help to identify patients in greatest need of urgent SPC assessment and allow for the provision of effective and efficient stroke prevention services.

4.
Stroke ; 51(11): 3371-3374, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32993462

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Research suggests that women and men may present with different transient ischemic attack (TIA) and stroke symptoms. We aimed to explore symptoms and features associated with a definite TIA/stroke diagnosis and whether those associations differed by sex. METHODS: We completed a retrospective cohort study of patients referred to The Ottawa Hospital Stroke Prevention Clinic in 2015. Exploratory multinomial logistic regression was used to evaluate candidate variables associated with diagnosis and patient sex. Backwards elimination of the interaction terms with a significance level for staying in the model of 0.25 was used to arrive at a more parsimonious model. RESULTS: Based on 1770 complete patient records, sex-specific differences were noted in TIA/stroke diagnosis based on features such as duration of event, suddenness of symptom onset, unilateral sensory loss, and pain. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary work identified sex-specific differences in the final diagnosis of TIA/stroke based on common presenting symptoms/features. More research is needed to understand if there are biases or sex-based differences in TIA/stroke manifestations and diagnosis.


Asunto(s)
Amaurosis Fugax/fisiopatología , Afasia/fisiopatología , Disartria/fisiopatología , Hemianopsia/fisiopatología , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/diagnóstico , Paresia/fisiopatología , Trastornos Somatosensoriales/fisiopatología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estenosis Carotídea/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/epidemiología , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Fumar/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo
5.
Stroke ; 50(4): 1017-1020, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30869570

RESUMEN

Background and Purpose- The ESCAPE trial (The Endovascular Treatment for Small Core and Anterior Circulation Proximal Occlusion With Emphasis on Minimizing CT to Recanalization Times) was a multicentre, randomized controlled trial of endovascular thrombectomy versus standard care for patients with acute ischemic stroke that allowed patients to be enrolled with deferred consent. We investigated the knowledge and opinions of these patients or their authorized third parties about the consent process. Methods- All patients (or their authorized third parties) enrolled with deferral of consent in ESCAPE were invited to complete a 12-question survey within the first 4 days of enrollment and again at 90 days. Questions investigated knowledge of the ESCAPE trial and opinions on deferral of consent. Results- Of 56 patients enrolled with deferred consent, 33 (59%) completed the initial survey, and of these, 27 (81%) completed the 90-day follow-up. Enrollment with deferred consent was not associated with a significant difference in door-to-randomization times (50.5 versus 57 minutes; P=0.29) but allowed these 56 patients to participate in the trial. Only 52% of respondents understood that patients could be randomized to thrombectomy or standard care, although most understood the other basic principles of the trial. At baseline and at 90 days, respondents disagreed or strongly disagreed with deferred consent in acute stroke trials generally (82% and 78%) and in the ESCAPE trial specifically (93% and 91%). Conclusions- Respondents generally disagreed with the use of deferred consent for enrollment in the ESCAPE trial and in stroke trials more generally.


Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica/cirugía , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Consentimiento Informado , Proyectos de Investigación , Accidente Cerebrovascular/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Trombectomía , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA