"To prescribe or not to prescribe, that is the question": Perspectives on opioid prescribing for chronic, cancer-related pain from clinicians who treat pain in survivorship.

BACKGROUND: Opioid pain management in cancer survivorship is a complex and understudied topic. METHODS: The authors conducted in-depth, qualitative interviews to understand clinician approaches to opioid pain management in chronic cancer pain and to generate ideas for improvement. They used a rigorous, inductive, qualitative, descriptive approach to examine clinician (n = 20) perspectives about opioid pain management in survivorship, including oncologists (n = 5), palliative care clinicians (n = 8), primary care clinicians (n = 5), and pain management specialists (n = 2). RESULTS: The findings indicated that no consistent medical home exists for chronic pain management in cancer survivors and that there are fundamental differences in how each subspecialty approaches chronic pain management in survivorship (e.g., "Do we think of this as noncancer pain or cancer pain?… This is in this limbo zone-this gray zone-because it's cancer-related pain, right?"). Simultaneously, clinicians are influenced by their peers' perceptions of their opioid prescribing decisions, sparking intraprofessional tension when disagreement occurs. In these instances, clinicians described overthinking and doubting their clinical decision-making as well as a sense of judgment, pressure, and/or shame. Finally, clinicians acknowledged a fear of consequences for opioid prescribing decisions. Specifically, participants cited conflict with patients, sometimes escalating to aggression and threats of violence, as well as potential disciplinary actions and/or legal consequences. CONCLUSIONS: Participants suggested that opportunities to improve chronic cancer pain care include developing clear, systematic guidance for chronic cancer pain management, facilitating clinician communication and consultation, creating tailored survivorship care plans in partnership with patients, and developing accessible, evidence-based, complementary pain treatments.

A qualitative crossroads of rhythm and race: Black patients' experiences living with atrial fibrillation.

Importance: Race-based disparities in atrial fibrillation (AF) outcomes are well-documented, but few studies have investigated individuals' experiences of living with the condition, particularly among Black individuals. Objective: We aimed to identify common themes and challenges experienced by individuals of Black race with AF. Design: A tailored, qualitative script was developed to assess the perspectives of participants in focus groups. Setting: Virtual focus groups. Participants: Three focus groups of 4-6 participants (16 participants total) were recruited from the racial/ethnic minority participants in the Mobile Relational Agent to Enhance Atrial Fibrillation Self-care Trial. Main outcomes and measures: Focus group transcripts were inductively coded to identify common themes. Results: Nearly all participants self-identified as Black race (n = 15, 93.8 %). Participants were mostly male (62.5 %) with mean age of 67 (range 40-78) years. Three themes were identified. First, participants described physical and mental burdens associated with having AF. Second, participants described AF as being a condition that is difficult to manage. Lastly, participants identified key tenets to support self-management of AF (self-education, community support, and patient-provider relationships). Conclusions and relevance: Participants reported AF is unpredictable and challenging to manage, and that social and community supports are essential. The social and behavioral themes identified in this qualitative research highlight the need for tailored clinical strategies for AF self-management which incorporate individuals' social contexts. Trial registration: National Clinical Trial number 04075994.