Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Artif Organs ; 48(9): 1038-1048, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38660764

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe respiratory failure due to COVID-19 who are not under mechanical ventilation may develop severe hypoxemia when complicated with spontaneous pneumomediastinum (PM). These patients may be harmed by invasive ventilation. Alternatively, veno-venous (V-V) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may be applied. We report on the efficacy of V-V ECMO and invasive ventilation as initial advanced respiratory support in patients with COVID-19 and acute respiratory failure due to spontaneous PM. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study performed between March 2020 and January 2022. Enrolled patients had COVID-19 and acute respiratory failure due to spontaneous PM and were not invasively ventilated. Patients were treated in the intensive care unit (ICU) with invasive ventilation (invasive ventilation group) or V-V ECMO support (V-V ECMO group) as the main therapeutic option. The primary outcomes were mortality and ICU discharge at 90 days after ICU admission. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were included in this study (invasive ventilation group: 13 [59%]; V-V ECMO group: 9 [41%]). The V-V ECMO strategy was significantly associated with lower mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.33 [95% CI 0.12-0.97], p = 0.04). Five (38%) patients in the V-V ECMO group were intubated and eight (89%) patients in the invasive ventilation group required V-V ECMO support within 30 days from ICU admission. Three (33%) patients in the V-V ECMO group were discharged from ICU within 90 days compared to one (8%) patient in the invasive ventilation group (HR 4.71 [95% CI 0.48-45.3], p = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary data suggest that V-V ECMO without invasive ventilation may improve survival in COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure due to spontaneous PM. The study's retrospective design and limited sample size underscore the necessity for additional investigation and warrant caution.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Enfisema Mediastínico , Respiración Artificial , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Humanos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/terapia , COVID-19/mortalidad , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfisema Mediastínico/terapia , Enfisema Mediastínico/etiología , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/mortalidad , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/virología , Anciano , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Adulto , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA