Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Environ Res ; 159: 422-426, 2017 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28858755

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this analysis was to contrast trends in exposure-report calls and informational queries (a measure of public interest) about mercury to the Florida Poison Control Centers over 2003-2013. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Poison-control specialists coded calls to Florida Poison Control Centers by substance of concern, caller demographics, and whether the call pertained to an exposure event or was an informational query. For the present study, call records regarding mercury were de-identified and provided along with daily total number of calls for statistical analysis. We fit Poisson models using generalized estimating equations to summarize changes across years in counts of daily calls to Florida Poison Control Centers, adjusting for month. In a second stage of analysis, we further adjusted for the total number of calls each day. We also conducted analyses stratified by age of the exposed. RESULTS: There was an overall decrease over 2003-2013 in the number of total calls about mercury [Ratio per year: 0.89, 95% CI: (0.88, 0.90)], and calls about mercury exposure [Ratio per year: 0.84, 95% CI: (0.83, 0.85)], but the number of informational queries about mercury increased over this time [Ratio per year: 1.15 (95% CI: 1.12, 1.18)]. After adjusting for the number of calls of that type each day (e.g., call volume), the associations remained similar: a ratio of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.89) per year for total calls, 0.85 (0.83, 0.86) for exposure-related calls, and 1.17 (1.14, 1.21) for informational queries. CONCLUSION: Although, the number of exposure-related calls decreased, informational queries increased over 2003-2013. This might suggest an increased public interest in mercury health risks despite a decrease in reported exposures over this time period.


Asunto(s)
Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Mercurio , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones/tendencias , Florida , Humanos , Distribución de Poisson
2.
JAMA ; 296(20): 2476-9, 2006 Nov 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17119144

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Botulism is a potentially lethal paralytic disease caused primarily by toxins of the anaerobic, spore-forming bacterium Clostridium botulinum. Although botulinum toxin A is available by prescription for cosmetic and therapeutic use, no cases of botulism with detectable serum toxin have previously been attributed to cosmetic or therapeutic botulinum toxin injections. On November 27, 2004, 4 suspected botulism case-patients with a link to cosmetic botulinum toxin injections were reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical, epidemiological, and laboratory aspects of 4 suspected cases of iatrogenic botulism. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Case series on 4 botulism case-patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical characteristics of the 4 case-patients, epidemiological associations, and mouse bioassay neutralization test results from case-patient specimens and a toxin sample. RESULTS: Clinical characteristics of the 4 case-patients were consistent with those of naturally occurring botulism. All case-patients had been injected with a highly concentrated, unlicensed preparation of botulinum toxin A and may have received doses 2857 times the estimated human lethal dose by injection. Pretreatment serum toxin levels in 3 of the 4 case-patients were equivalent to 21 to 43 times the estimated human lethal dose; pretreatment serum from the fourth epidemiologically linked case-patient was not available. A 100-microg vial of toxin taken from the same manufacturer's lot as toxin administered to the case-patients contained a toxin amount sufficient to kill approximately 14,286 adults by injection if disseminated evenly. CONCLUSIONS: These laboratory-confirmed cases of botulism demonstrate that clinical use of unlicensed botulinum toxin A can result in severe, life-threatening illness. Further education and regulation are needed to prevent the inappropriate marketing, sale, and clinical use of unlicensed botulinum toxin products.


Asunto(s)
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A , Botulismo/etiología , Técnicas Cosméticas/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/administración & dosificación , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/sangre , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/normas , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/provisión & distribución , Botulismo/sangre , Botulismo/diagnóstico , Botulismo/epidemiología , Análisis por Conglomerados , Técnicas Cosméticas/normas , Humanos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica/epidemiología , Legislación de Medicamentos , Dosificación Letal Mediana , Estados Unidos
3.
Public Health Rep ; 121(6): 658-65, 2006.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17278400

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Ciguatera fish poisoning is a potentially life-threatening disease caused by eating coral reef fish contaminated with ciguatoxins and is the most common marine poisoning. However, existing surveillance systems capture few cases. To improve regional ciguatera surveillance in South Florida, this study compared ciguatera illnesses in the Florida Poison Information Center-Miami (FPICM) call database to ciguatera cases in the Florida Department of Health (FDOH) disease surveillance systems. METHODS: Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify predictors of when FPICM reported ciguatera illnesses to FDOH and whether FDOH confirmed reported ciguatera cases. RESULTS: FPICM staff preferentially reported ciguatera illnesses that were of shorter duration (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.84 per additional illness day; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74, 0.97); outbreak-associated (AOR = 7.0; 95% CI 2.5, 19.5); and clinically more severe (AOR = 21.6; 95% CI 2.3, 198.5). Among ciguatera illnesses reported to FDOH, outbreak-associated illnesses were more likely than single, sporadic illnesses to become confirmed surveillance cases (crude OR = 11.1; 95% CI 2.0, 62.5). CONCLUSIONS: The over-representation of outbreak-associated ciguatera cases underestimates the true contribution of sporadic illnesses to ciguatera disease burden. This bias should be considered when evaluating surveillance systems that include both outbreak-associated and sporadic illness reports.


Asunto(s)
Intoxicación por Ciguatera/epidemiología , Notificación de Enfermedades , Vigilancia de la Población , Alimentos Marinos , Animales , Ciguatoxinas/farmacología , Florida/epidemiología , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA