Selective Reduction of Cysteine Mutant Antibodies for Site-Specific Antibody-Drug Conjugates.

Developing site-specific conjugation technologies for antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) aims to produce more homogeneous and controlled drug-loaded ADCs to reduce variability and thereby improve the therapeutic index. This article presents a technology that uses cysteine mutant antibodies and mild phosphine-based reductants to prepare site-specific ADCs. The two types of cysteine mutant antibodies, designated C6v1 and C6v2, have one of the interchain disulfide-forming cysteines in the Fab region in the light chain (LC214) or in the heavy chain (HC220) substituted by alanine (or other amino acids), respectively. Certain phosphine-based reductants were found to selectively reduce the "unpaired" cysteines, at the heavy chain (HC220) for C6v1 or at the light chain (LC214) for C6v2 while keeping the interchain disulfide bonds in the hinge region intact, resulting in 90% of DAR2 species and more than 95% of the desired specific conjugation at HC or LC following conjugation to maleimide moieties. The reduction method shows consistent selectivity toward various C6v1 or C6v2 antibody backbones. Sensitivity toward buffer pH for some reductants can be used to optimize reductant reactivity and selectivity. The technology can be further expanded to generate site-specific DAR4 or dual-payload ADCs based on C6v1 or C6v2 antibodies. This technology offers a method to control drug-loading and conjugation sites using a mild one-pot process, as compared to the reduction-oxidation methods used in technologies such as THIOMAB, and shows superior DAR profiles and process simplification as compared to other selective reduction methods.

Discovery of ABBV-154, an anti-TNF Glucocorticoid Receptor Modulator Immunology Antibody-Drug Conjugate (iADC).

Stable attachment of drug-linkers to the antibody is a critical requirement, and for maleimide conjugation to cysteine, it is achieved by ring hydrolysis of the succinimide ring. During ADC profiling in our in-house property screening funnel, we discovered that the succinimide ring open form is in equilibrium with the ring closed succinimide. Bromoacetamide (BrAc) was identified as the optimal replacement, as it affords stable attachment of the drug-linker to the antibody while completely removing the undesired ring open-closed equilibrium. Additionally, BrAc also offers multiple benefits over maleimide, especially with respect to homogeneity of the ADC structure. In combination with a short, hydrophilic linker and phosphate prodrug on the payload, this afforded a stable ADC (ABBV-154) with the desired properties to enable long-term stability to facilitate subcutaneous self-administration.

Principles and procedures for handling out-of-domain and indeterminate results as part of ICH M7 recommended (Q)SAR analyses.

The International Council for Harmonization (ICH) M7 guideline describes a hazard assessment process for impurities that have the potential to be present in a drug substance or drug product. In the absence of adequate experimental bacterial mutagenicity data, (Q)SAR analysis may be used as a test to predict impurities' DNA reactive (mutagenic) potential. However, in certain situations, (Q)SAR software is unable to generate a positive or negative prediction either because of conflicting information or because the impurity is outside the applicability domain of the model. Such results present challenges in generating an overall mutagenicity prediction and highlight the importance of performing a thorough expert review. The following paper reviews pharmaceutical and regulatory experiences handling such situations. The paper also presents an analysis of proprietary data to help understand the likelihood of misclassifying a mutagenic impurity as non-mutagenic based on different combinations of (Q)SAR results. This information may be taken into consideration when supporting the (Q)SAR results with an expert review, especially when out-of-domain results are generated during a (Q)SAR evaluation.

A consortium-driven framework to guide the implementation of ICH M7 Option 4 control strategies.

The ICH M7 Option 4 control of (potentially) mutagenic impurities is based on the use of scientific principles in lieu of routine analytical testing. This approach can reduce the burden of analytical testing without compromising patient safety, provided a scientifically rigorous approach is taken which is backed up by sufficient theoretical and/or analytical data. This paper introduces a consortium-led initiative and offers a proposal on the supporting evidence that could be presented in regulatory submissions.

Principles and procedures for implementation of ICH M7 recommended (Q)SAR analyses.

The ICH M7 guideline describes a consistent approach to identify, categorize, and control DNA reactive, mutagenic, impurities in pharmaceutical products to limit the potential carcinogenic risk related to such impurities. This paper outlines a series of principles and procedures to consider when generating (Q)SAR assessments aligned with the ICH M7 guideline to be included in a regulatory submission. In the absence of adequate experimental data, the results from two complementary (Q)SAR methodologies may be combined to support an initial hazard classification. This may be followed by an assessment of additional information that serves as the basis for an expert review to support or refute the predictions. This paper elucidates scenarios where additional expert knowledge may be beneficial, what such an expert review may contain, and how the results and accompanying considerations may be documented. Furthermore, the use of these principles and procedures to yield a consistent and robust (Q)SAR-based argument to support impurity qualification for regulatory purposes is described in this manuscript.

An aldol-based synthesis of (+)-peloruside a, a potent microtubule stabilizing agent.

A convergent synthesis of the marine natural product (+)-peloruside has been reported. This target has been assembled through the successive application of two methyl ketone boron aldol addition reactions to the latent C(7)-C(11) dialdehyde synthon. This approach afforded a 22-step synthesis of this natural product. The influence of resident stereocenters on aldol reaction diastereoselection has been examined in detail.

Substitution on the A-ring confers to bryopyran analogues the unique biological activity characteristic of bryostatins and distinct from that of the phorbol esters.

A close structural analogue of bryostatin 1, which differs from bryostatin 1 only by the absence of the C(30) carbomethoxy group (on the C(13) enoate of the B-ring), has been prepared by total synthesis. Biological assays reveal a crucial role for substitution in the bryostatin 1 A-ring in conferring those responses which are characteristic of bryostatin 1 and distinct from those observed with PMA.

Synthetic studies toward the bryostatins: a substrate-controlled approach to the A-ring.

[reaction: see text] The synthesis of a C1-C13 A-ring subunit of bryostatin 1 is detailed. The key features of the approach include the convergent fragment assembly with a highly stereoselective construction of the C7-C8 bond indicated above.

Synthetic Studies Toward Bryostatin 1: Preparation of a C(1)-C(16) Fragment by Pyran Annulation.

An expeditious assembly of a C(1)-C(16) subunit of bryostatin 1 is described. A pyran annulation reaction was utilized to form the B-ring by reaction of a hydroxy-allylsilane with a fully elaborated A-ring subunit. This annulation process proceeded with complete diastereoselectivity and in excellent isolated yield despite the presence of potentially sensitive functionality in the A-ring segment.

Intramolecular Baylis-Hillman and morita reactions using unsaturated thiol ester substrates containing enolizable aldehydes.

[reaction: see text] Previously unknown intramolecular Baylis-Hillman and Morita reactions involving cyclization of an unsaturated thiol ester onto a pendant aldehyde function are reported. These can be used successfully for the preparation of both cyclopentenols and cyclohexenols, but the results are very sensitive to substrate and precise reaction conditions.