RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of native magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) regarding different ligamentous lesions of the wrist and to analyze the influence of technical characteristics, such as field strength, application of fat saturation, 3-dimensional sequences, and wrist coils. METHODS: A systematic search was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Studies that were published before February 12, 2024, were included. All studies comparing the diagnostic accuracy of native wrist MRI with that of wrist arthroscopy for suspected ligamentous lesions were included. Results were analyzed by anatomic localization and technical aspects of the MRI. To assess the quality of included studies, we used the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. RESULTS: The systematic search revealed 5,181 articles. Thirty-seven studies, reporting 3,893 ligamentous lesions, were eligible for inclusion. The studies displayed heterogeneity in terms of technical conditions, such as field strength, the use of wrist coils, the application of 3-dimensional sequences, and fat saturation. Research methods also varied. Overall sensitivity and specificity were 0.78 (0.66-0.86) and 0.81 (0.70-0.89) for 1.5-T MRI, whereas sensitivity was 0.73 (0.68-0.78) and specificity was 0.90 (0.59-0.98) for 3-T MRI. There was no significant difference between the 2 subgroups (P = .3807 and P = .4248). Sensitivity was 0.82 (0.75-0.87) for triangular fibrocartilage complex lesions, 0.63 (0.50-0.74) for scapholunate ligament tears, and 0.41 (0.25-0.60) for lunotriquetral ligament lesions. Specificity for triangular fibrocartilage complex lesions was 0.82 (0.73-0.89), for scapholunate ligament tears was 0.86 (0.73-0.93), and for lunotriquetral ligament lesions was 0.93 (0.81-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity and specificity of MRI are influenced by the anatomic location of the lesion and technical conditions. In terms of diagnostic accuracy, no significant difference was found between 1.5-T and 3-T MRI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, systematic review of Level II-III studies.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of steroid injections to other injectable therapies in partial-thickness rotator cuff (RC) tears. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed until October 25, 2021, in 3 databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, MEDLINE). Eligible studies compared the efficacy of steroid, hyaluronic acid (HA), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), the combination of HA and PRP (HA + PRP), and adipose-derived regenerative cells in RC tears. The primary outcomes were the visual analog scale (VAS), Constant-Murley Shoulder Outcome Score (CMS) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form. Using paired and network meta-analysis, we calculated pooled mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: We included a total of 7 articles in the quantitative synthesis. In shorter periods, the HA + PRP combination was superior to the other substances we investigated (HA + PRP: VAS [0-4 weeks]: MD: -0.99 [95% CI, -1.62 to -0.36]; CMS [0-3 months]: 20.56 [95% CI, 16.18 to 24.94]. This combination was followed by the use of HA or PRP alone, depending on the duration of follow-up and the outcome being studied. In our study, short-term results suggest that saline is superior to steroids for partial tears, but this trend is reversed at 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The HA and PRP combination is currently the most effective in partial RC tear treatment in the short term. After 6 months, there is no meaningful difference, so the benefits of the combination are short term. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, including Level I to II studies.
RESUMEN
The importance of finite element analysis (FEA) is growing in orthopedic research, especially in implant design. However, Young's modulus (E) values, one of the most fundamental parameters, can range across a wide scale. Therefore, our study aimed to identify factors influencing E values in human bone specimens. We report our systematic review and meta-analysis based on the recommendation of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guideline. We conducted the analysis on November 21, 2021. We included studies investigating healthy human bone specimens and reported on E values regarding demographic data, specimen characteristics, and measurement specifics. In addition, we included study types reporting individual specimen measurements. From the acquired data, we created a cohort in which we performed an exploratory data analysis that included the explanatory variables selected by random forest and regression trees methods, and the comparison of groups using independent samples Welch's t test. A total of 756 entries were included from 48 articles. Eleven different bones of the human body were included in these articles. The range of E values is between 0.008 and 33.7 GPa. The E values were most heavily influenced by the cortical or cancellous type of bone tested. Measuring method (compression, tension, bending, and nanoindentation), the anatomical region within a bone, the position of the bone within the skeleton, and the bone specimen size had a decreasing impact on the E values. Bone anisotropy, specimen condition, patient age, and sex were selected as important variables considering the value of E. On the basis of our results, E values of a bone change with bone characteristics, measurement techniques, and demographic variables. Therefore, the evaluation of FEA should be performed after the standardization of in vitro measurement protocol. © 2023 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.