Underactive bladder, Fowler's syndrome are potentially curable by uterosacral ligament repair.

Underactive bladder (UAB) is essentially an inability of the bladder to properly empty. UAB symptoms, when they co-occur with posterior fornix syndrome (PFS) symptoms (urge, frequency, nocturia, chronic pelvic pain), can be cured/improved, surgically by uterosacral ligament (USL) repair, non-surgically, by devices which give mechanical support of the USLs or strengthening pelvic muscle and ligaments with squatting-based exercises. The pathogenic pathway from weak USLs to UAB (and PFS) is that, when the muscles which externally open the posterior wall of the urethra contract against lax USLs, their contractile force weakens, and they cannot open the urethra adequately. The detrusor then contracts against a relatively unopened urethra to cause obstructive symptoms (i.e., UAB) such as slow stream, intermittent stream (stopping and starting), hesitancy (difficulty starting), feeling of incomplete emptying, and post-micturition dribble. Co-occurrence of PFS symptoms indicates that UAB may be part of the PFS, with USL causation, which can be tested by a tampon or probe in the posterior fornix. If the emptying (and other) PFS symptoms improve, it is a sign that UAB, and Fowler's syndrome (FS) can potentially be cured or improved by USL repair. Following USL repair, many studies have recorded very significant improvement in emptying symptoms, and objective tests, for example, postvoid residual (PVR), decreased natural bladder volume, and decreased emptying time. FS and UAB are most likely a part of the PFS and, therefore, potentially curable by USL repair.

Principles of surgery according to the Integral Theory Paradigm (ITP).

A core concept of the Integral Theory System is that "ligaments are for structure; vagina is for function". The vagina and uterus should be conserved. Because the vagina is an organ, its collagen and elastin, which are so necessary for its function, cannot regenerate once they are removed. Removing the uterus involves severing the descending uterine artery, which is the principal blood supply of the proximal part of the uterosacral ligaments (USLs), and so may cause atrophy, which can cause future incontinence problems because of collagen loss after menopause. The diagnostic algorithm guides which of the five pelvic ligaments need repair. Native ligament plication can be adequate for prolapse/symptom cure, but only in premenopausal women. Postmenopausal women are usually collagen deficient and require collagen-creating tapes or wide-bore polyester sutures to restore structural collagen in the ligaments. Of extreme importance, vaginal tissue excision should be avoided, as consequent scarring may cause "tethered vagina syndrome" (TVS). TVS can cause massive uncontrolled urine loss because the scar tissue in the bladder neck area of the vagina can link the more powerful posterior muscles to the anterior, so the posterior urethra wall is forcibly pulled open, when given the signal to close. Instead of vaginal excision, a "concertina" suture technique re-assigns and shrinks excess vaginal tissue to normal anatomy by 6 weeks. In conclusion, the five key surgical principles of the Integral Theory System are: ligaments are for structure, vagina is for function; structure (prolapse) and function (symptoms) are related; repair the structure and you will restore the function; avoid vaginal excision and hysterectomy; create new collagen to reinforce the damaged ligaments.

Perioperative Outcomes and Complication Rates in Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Patients After Prior Prostate Biopsy-Does It Really Make a Difference? A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

Introduction: Before holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), many patients have undergone short-term prostate biopsy (PB) to rule out the presence of prostate cancer. The aim of this study is to determine whether a short-term PB before HoLEP has an impact on the perioperative outcomes or complications of HoLEP. Methods: In total, 734 consecutive patients treated with HoLEP at a tertiary care university hospital between January 2021 and July 2023 were retrospectively enrolled. Patients who had PB within 6 months before HoLEP were matched to patients who underwent PB more than 6 months or had no PB before HoLEP using propensity score matching (PSM) based on age, prostate volume (PV), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), preoperative urinary tract infection (UTI), and surgeon. Perioperative parameters, such as operation time (OT), enucleation efficiency (EF), as well as complications according to the Satava classification, the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC), and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) were evaluated. Results: In total, 206 patients were matched. Age, PV, PSA, as well as the presence of a preoperative UTI and surgeons did not differ significantly between both groups after PSM. There were no significant differences in mean OT (75 vs. 81 minutes, p = 0.28) and EF (2.13 vs. 2.13 g/min, p = 0.99). No differences were noted regarding intraoperative (16 vs. 25, p = 0.16) or postoperative complications graded by CDC (p = 0.53) and CCI (p = 0.92). Conclusion: PB within 6 months preoperatively before HoLEP showed no effect on perioperative outcomes or intra- and postoperative complications.

Pulse modulation in En-Bloc HoLEP: does it really matter? A propensity score matched analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is an established option in the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Pulse modulation, such as MOSES® technology, has recently been introduced and may offer potential advantages in HoLEP. METHODS: Perioperative data from 117 patients who underwent MOSES® laser enucleation of the prostate (MoLEP) were collected. Propensity score matching using prostate volume, age, body mass index (BMI), and anticoagulant intake was performed using a database of 237 patients treated with HoLEP. In total, 234 patients were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Prostate volume (104 vs. 102 ml), age (70 vs. 71 years), BMI (27 vs. 27), and anticoagulant intake (34 vs. 35%) did not differ significantly between the groups. There were no significant differences in operation time (61.5 vs. 58.1 min, p = 0.42), enucleation efficiency (2.5 vs. 2.6 g/min, p = 0.74), hemostasis time (7.8 vs. 8 min, p = 0.75) and hemoglobin drop (0.9 vs. 0.7 mg/dl, p = 0.48). The complication rates were low in both groups (16.2% for HoLEP and 17.1% for MoLEP). No differences were noted in the Clavien-Dindo Classification (p = 0.63) and the Comprehensive Complication Index (p = 0.24). The rate of complications > CDC IIIa was 0.9% for HoLEP (endoscopic coagulation) and 1.7% for MoLEP (2 cases of endoscopic coagulation). No transfusions were administered. CONCLUSION: Overall, the enucleation efficiency was high in both groups and the procedure time was short. HoLEP is an efficient and safe treatment option in experienced hands, regardless of the use of pulse modulation technology.