RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patient reports of unprofessional conduct by surgeons have been linked to postprocedure complications and increased risk for malpractice claims. Coworkers are also positioned to observe and report unprofessional behaviors, including concerns related to delivery of competent medical care, clear and respectful communication, integrity, and responsibility. This study compared rates of coworker concerns between plastic surgeons and other physicians (other surgical specialists and nonsurgeons), and characterized whether plastic surgery subspecialties differed in their rates of complaints. METHODS: Coworker concern data from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2019, were retrieved from the Vanderbilt Center for Patient and Professional Advocacy's Coworker Observation Reporting System database. Specialty was classified as plastic surgery, non-plastic surgical, and nonsurgical. The plastic surgery cohort was further characterized by sex, medical school graduation year, predominant practice type (reconstructive only, aesthetic only, or hybrid), and postresidency training (ie, completion of a fellowship). RESULTS: The study cohort included 34,170 physicians (302 plastic surgeons, 7593 non-plastic surgeons, and 26,275 nonsurgeons). A greater proportion of plastic surgeons (13.6%) had one or more coworker concerns compared with nonsurgeons (10.8%) and non-plastic surgeons (6.1%) ( P < 0.001). The most prevalent concern category reported for plastic surgeons was clear and respectful communication. Among plastic surgeons who had no concerns versus those who had at least one concern, there was no significant difference when comparing sex, medical school graduation year, predominant practice type, or postresidency training. CONCLUSIONS: Plastic surgeons in this cohort study received more coworker reports than other surgeons and nonsurgical physicians. These data may be used by institutions to identify plastic surgeons at risk for preventable postprocedure complications and intervene with peer feedback intended to promote self-regulation.
Asunto(s)
Mala Praxis , Cirujanos , Cirugía Plástica , Humanos , Cirugía Plástica/educación , Estudios de Cohortes , Mala Conducta ProfesionalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Prompt diagnosis of breast implant infection is critical to reducing morbidity. A high incidence of false-negative microbial culture mandates superior testing modalities. Alpha defensin-1 (AD-1), an infection biomarker, has outperformed culture in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection with sensitivity/specificity of 97%. After previously demonstrating its feasibility in breast implant-related infection (BIRI), this case-control study compares the accuracy of AD-1 to microbial culture in suspected BIRI. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved, prospective, multicenter study was conducted of adults with prior breast implant reconstruction undergoing surgery for suspected infection (cases) or prosthetic exchange/revision (controls). Demographics, perioperative characteristics, antibiotic exposure, and implant pocket fluid were collected. Fluid samples underwent microbial culture, AD-1 assay, and adjunctive markers (C-reactive protein, lactate, cell differential); diagnostic performance was assessed by means of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy from receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, with values of P < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: Fifty-three implant pocket samples were included (cases, n = 20; controls, n = 33). All 20 patients with suspected BIRI exhibited cellulitis, 65% had abnormal drainage, and 55% were febrile. All suspected BIRIs were AD-1 positive (sensitivity, 100%). Microbial culture failed to grow any microorganisms in four BIRIs (sensitivity, 80%; P = 0.046); Gram stain was least accurate (sensitivity, 25%; P < 0.001). All tests demonstrated 100% specificity. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses yielded the following areas under the curve: AD-1, 1.0; microbial culture, 0.90 ( P = 0.029); and Gram stain, 0.62 ( P < 0.001). Adjunctive markers were significantly higher among infections versus controls ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Study findings confirm the accuracy of AD-1 in diagnosing BIRI and indicate superiority to microbial culture. Although further study is warranted, AD-1 may facilitate perioperative decision-making in BIRI management in a resource-efficient manner. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, II.
Asunto(s)
Implantes de Mama , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , alfa-Defensinas , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , alfa-Defensinas/análisis , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Biomarcadores/análisis , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
The orthopedic surgery residency application process is highly competitive, and residency programs rely on objective measures, such as the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 score, to assist in applicant selection. To deemphasize standardized test scores and improve student well-being, governing bodies have elected to change the Step 1 examination to a pass/fail grading system beginning in 2022. Given the utility of Step 1 in the orthopedic surgery residency application process, this change will significantly affect how applicants are assessed. To determine how this change will affect the process, we developed and validated a 19-item anonymous electronic survey and invited program directors (PDs) from orthopedic surgery residency programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education to respond. The 86 surveys that were completed represented a 43.2% response rate (86 of 199). Only 4.7% of orthopedic surgery PDs believe that this change is a good idea, and 91.7% of PDs believe that the change will make it more difficult to compare applicants objectively. In addition, 90.7% of PDs report that they will increase emphasis on the Step 2 CK (clinical knowledge) examination in comparing residency applicants for their program, with 90.4% of PDs reporting that they will require students to submit their Step 2 scores via the Electronic Residency Application Service. These results indicate that changing the Step 1 scoring to pass/fail is unpopular among orthopedic surgery PDs. Further, losing the numeric Step 1 score will increase reliance on Step 2 scores and emphasis on less objective measures, such as where an applicant attended medical school. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(5):e257-e262.].
Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Procedimientos Ortopédicos , Ortopedia , Acreditación , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Evaluación Educacional/métodos , Humanos , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/educación , Ortopedia/educación , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Delays in treatment of burn injuries can lead to significant morbidity, loss of function, and poor aesthetic appearance. Preventing conversion from partial- to full-thickness burns may help mitigate these sequelae. The pathophysiology of burn wound conversion remains unknown, but an overactive immune response is thought to be implicated. The purpose of this study was to determine whether downregulating the immune response via tacrolimus can decrease burn wound conversion. METHODS: Assembly of the microfluidic hydrogels was achieved by embedding microfibers within a hydrogel scaffold composed of a gelatin-alginate blend. Tacrolimus stock solution for intraperitoneal injection was made by re-suspending powdered tacrolimus in DMSO at 10 mg/mL. 24 young (2-4 months) and 24 old (>16 months) mice were given partial thickness burns. The treatment cohort received either tacrolimus ointment with a hydrogel dressing (6 young and 6 old) or an intraperitoneal injection of a tacrolimus solution (6 young and 6 old), while the control cohort only received either only the microcapillary hydrogel dressing or an intraperitoneal injection of saline. Mice were euthanized at day 3 after injury and skin samples were taken. Burn depth was evaluated using Vimentin immunostaining. RESULTS: In old mice, intraperitoneal injection of tacrolimus was able to significantly reduce burn wound depth compared to intraperitoneal injection of saline (p = 0.011). Similarly in old mice, topical hydrogel with tacrolimus was able to significantly reduce burn wound depth compared to hydrogel alone (p < 0.001). Topical hydrogel with tacrolimus was able to mitigate the detrimental effects of older age on wound conversion, such that burn wounds of older mice treated with tacrolimus hydrogel dressing had similar burn depths as younger mice (p = 0.240). CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing a combination treatment of tacrolimus and microcapillary hydrogel is able to rescue the negative effects of aging and prevent partial- to full-thickness burn wound conversion. Hopefully these findings will encourage deeper investigation into the possible therapeutic advantages of utilizing immunosuppressive agents to decrease morbidity after burn injuries. Future research will need to specifically investigate IL-2 as an inhibitory target in the acute inflammatory cascade of burn injury.
Asunto(s)
Quemaduras , Hidrogeles , Ratones , Animales , Hidrogeles/uso terapéutico , Quemaduras/tratamiento farmacológico , Tacrolimus/farmacología , Tacrolimus/uso terapéutico , Cicatrización de Heridas , Vendajes , EnvejecimientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Burn injury remains a serious cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Severity of burns is determined by the percentage of burned area compared to the body surface area, age of patient, and by the depth of skin and soft tissue involvement; these factors determine management as well as prospective outcomes. The pathophysiology of partial- to full-thickness burn conversion remains poorly understood and is associated with a worse overall prognosis. Recent studies have demonstrated that an altered inflammatory response may play a significant role in this conversion and therefore a reduction in early inflammation is crucial to ultimately decreasing burn severity and morbidity. We hypothesize that the application of a microcapillary gelatin-alginate hydrogel loaded with anti-TNF-α (infliximab) monoclonal antibodies to a partial-thickness burn will reduce inflammation within partially burned skin and prevent further progression to a full-thickness burn. METHODS: Assembly of the microfluidic hydrogels is achieved by embedding microfibers within a hydrogel scaffold composed of a gelatin-alginate blend, which is then soaked in a solution containing anti-TNF-α antibodies for drug loading. 12 young (2-4 months) and 12 old (>16 months) mice were given partial thickness burns. The treatment cohort received the anti-TNF-α infused hydrogel with an occlusive dressing and the control cohort only received an occlusive dressing. Mice were euthanized at post-burn day 3 and skin samples were taken. Burn depth was evaluated using Vimentin immunostaining. RESULTS: All mice in the treatment cohort demonstrated decreased conversion of burn from partial to full thickness injury (old = p < 0.01, young = p < 0.001) as compared to the control group. Old mice had greater depth of burn than young mice (p < 0.001). There were greater eosinophils in the treatment cohort for both young and old mice, but it did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The application of a novel microcapillary gelatin-alginate hydrogel infused with anti-TNF-α antibody to partial thickness burns in mice showed reduction in partial to full thickness burn secondary progression as compared to controls using this murine model; this promising finding might help decrease the high morbidity and mortality associated with burn injuries.
Asunto(s)
Quemaduras , Hidrogeles , Alginatos/uso terapéutico , Animales , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Gelatina , Humanos , Inflamación , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Ratones , Estudios Prospectivos , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfaRESUMEN
Virtual quizzing is a viable model for continuing education at a large scale, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. By leveraging technology, microlearning encourages mobile education that is engaging, flexible, and accessible. Learners reported that this format was effective and preferable to traditional methods of education, suggesting further opportunity for innovation.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study examines the validity of optical mark recognition, a novel user interface, and crowdsourced data validation to rapidly digitize and extract data from paper COVID-19 assessment forms at a large medical center. METHODS: An optical mark recognition/optical character recognition (OMR/OCR) system was developed to identify fields that were selected on 2,814 paper assessment forms, each with 141 fields which were used to assess potential COVID-19 infections. A novel user interface (UI) displayed mirrored forms showing the scanned assessment forms with OMR results superimposed on the left and an editable web form on the right to improve ease of data validation. Crowdsourced participants validated the results of the OMR system. Overall error rate and time taken to validate were calculated. A subset of forms was validated by multiple participants to calculate agreement between participants. RESULTS: The OMR/OCR tools correctly extracted data from scanned forms fields with an average accuracy of 70% and median accuracy of 78% when the OMR/OCR results were compared with the results from crowd validation. Scanned forms were crowd-validated at a mean rate of 157 seconds per document and a volume of approximately 108 documents per day. A randomly selected subset of documents was reviewed by multiple participants, producing an interobserver agreement of 97% for documents when narrative-text fields were included and 98% when only Boolean and multiple-choice fields were considered. CONCLUSION: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it may be challenging for health care workers wearing personal protective equipment to interact with electronic health records. The combination of OMR/OCR technology, a novel UI, and crowdsourcing data-validation processes allowed for the efficient extraction of a large volume of paper medical documents produced during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/diagnóstico , Intercambio de Información en Salud , Almacenamiento y Recuperación de la Información , Colaboración de las Masas , Humanos , Médicos , Interfaz Usuario-ComputadorRESUMEN
Empyema necessitans is characterized by the extension of a pleural empyema into adjacent structures beyond the pleural space. Although rare, it adds significant complications to patients already suffering from pleural empyema. Standard of surgical care has yet to be characterized or described in the literature. Here, we describe the unusual presentation of a 55-year-old man with methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus empyema necessitans and outline both our surgical intervention and thoracic reconstruction. We present our case's presentation, management, and outcome. We then review the literature and describe a multidisciplinary approach for management. Empyema necessitans is a very rare and morbid condition requiring urgent intervention to promote optimal outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Empiema Pleural , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Empiema Pleural/diagnóstico por imagen , Empiema Pleural/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cavidad Pleural , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/terapia , Staphylococcus aureusRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Resident Aesthetic Clinics (RACs) are an important element for training in plastic surgery residency programs. RACs provide increased exposure to aesthetic surgery as well as greater autonomy in clinical decision making. In an effort to increase RAC volume and thereby enhance resident education, we made two important changes to our operations. First, we reduced the resident surgeons' fees by 75%, and second, we began utilizing social media to promote our residency program and their involvement in aesthetic surgery. METHODS: Total RAC cases were queried using a RAC specific billing code and individual chief resident case logs for quality control. To generate an accurate timeframe, cases and procedures were compared from 18 months before and after the implemented changes. RESULTS: We found that the number of cases and procedures increased by 135% and 255%, respectively. The five most commonly performed procedures were liposuction, augmentation mammoplasty, abdominoplasty, mastopexy, and rhytidectomy. CONCLUSION: By both reducing the resident surgeons' fee and promoting the RAC on social media, we have demonstrated a pronounced increase in both cases and procedures performed by residents. As other institutions seek to increase resident exposure to aesthetic surgery, they may consider similar changes to these. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors: www.springer.com/00266 ."