HPV L1 detection discriminates cervical precancer from transient HPV infection: a prospective international multicenter study.

The benefits of cytology-based cervical cancer screening programs in reducing morbidity and mortality are well recognized. Especially, overtreatment of human papillomavirus (HPV) high-risk positive early dysplastic lesions may have a negative impact on reproductive outcomes for fertile women. To optimize the clinical management an objective standard is needed to distinguish precancer that requires treatment, from spontaneously resolving HPV infections. In the current study, we examined the prognostic relevance of HPV-L1 capsid protein analysis with Cytoactiv in an international prospective multicenter study including 908 HPV high-risk positive early dysplastic lesions (LSIL/HSIL) during a follow-up period of 54 months. The clinical end points of the study were histologically confirmed CIN3+ as progression, CIN1/2 for stable disease and repeated negative Pap smears as spontaneous clinical remission. The difference of the clinical outcome of HPV-L1-negative and HPV-L1-positive cases was statistically highly significant (P-value<0.0001) independent of the classification as mild dysplasia (LSIL) and moderate dysplasia (HSIL). Of the HPV-L1-negative HPV high-risk positive mild/moderate dysplasias 84% progressed to CIN3, as compared with only 20% of the HPV-L1-positive cases. The data from our study show that HPV-L1 detection allows to identify transient HPV infections and precancerous lesions within the group of HPV high-risk positive early dysplastic lesions. The high progression rate of HPV-L1-negative mild and moderate dysplasia emphasizes the precancerous nature of these lesions. A close follow-up with colposcopy and histological evaluation is advisable and removal of these lesions should be considered. The low malignant potential of HPV-L1-positive cases, however, indicates transient HPV infection, justifying a watch and wait strategy with cytological follow-up, thus preventing overtreatment especially for women in their reproductive age.

The reality in the surveillance of breast cancer survivors-results of a patient survey.

BACKGROUND: International guidelines for the surveillance of breast cancer patients recommend a minimized clinical follow-up including routine history and physical examination and regularly scheduled mammograms. However, the abandonment of scheduled follow-up examinations in breast cancer survivors remains a contradiction to established follow-up guidelines for other solid tumours. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report the patients' view on the basis of a survey performed in two separate geographical areas in Germany. The questionnaires were sent out to 2.658 patients with a history of breast cancer. RESULTS: A total of 801 patients (30.1%) responded to the questionnaire. The results of the survey can be summarized in two major categories: First, necessity for surveillance was affirmed by a majority (>95%), and 47.8% of the organized patients answered that there was a need for more intensive diagnostic effort during follow-up. The main expectation from an intensified follow-up was the increased feeling of security as expressed by >80% of the women. Second, the present survey indicates that most of the regularly scheduled follow-up visits were expanded using extensive laboratory and imaging procedures exceeding the quantity of examinations recommended in the present follow-up guidelines. CONCLUSION: Despite the fact that only one third of the patients responded to the questionnaire, the survey indicates that a majority of physicians who treated these patients still do not accept the present follow-up guidelines. To some extent this may be explained by the observation that patients and possibly also their doctors trust that intensified follow-up increases diagnostic security and survival. Since considerable changes in the treatment options of breast cancer have been made during the last decades a new trial of investigations in follow-up is warranted.