Selective scalp block decreases short term post-operative pain scores and opioid use after craniotomy: A case series.

There is no consensus on the management of post-craniotomy pain. Several randomized controlled trials have examined the use of a regional scalp block for post-craniotomy pain. We aim to investigate whether scalp block affected short or long-term pain levels and opioid use after craniotomy. This study prospectively administered selective scalp blocks (lesser occipital, preauricular nerve block + pin site block) in 20 consecutive patients undergoing craniotomy for semicircular canal dehiscence. Anesthesia, pain, and opioid outcomes in these patients were compared to 40 consecutive historic controls. There was no significant difference in patient demographics between the two groups and no complications related to selective scalp block. The time between the end of procedure and end of anesthesia decreased in the scalp block group (16 vs 21 min, P = 0.047). Pain scores were significantly less in the scalp block group for the first 4 h, after which there was no statistically significant difference. Time to opioid rescue was longer in the scalp block group (3.6 vs 1.8 h, HR 0.487, P = 0.0361) and opioid use in the first 7 h was significantly less in the scalp block group. Total opioid use, outpatient opioid use, and length of stay did not differ. Selective scalp block is a safe and effective tool for short-term management of postoperative pain after craniotomy and decreases the medication requirement during emergence and recovery. Selective scalp block can speed up OR turnover but is not efficacious in the treatment of postoperative pain beyond this point.

Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Outcomes in a Consecutive Series of 229 Surgical Repairs With Middle Cranial Fossa Craniotomy.

BACKGROUND: Superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) is the appearance of a third mobile window between the middle fossa and the superior semicircular canal. Surgical management is indicated in patients with persistent and debilitating symptoms. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between preoperative variables that may impact postoperative symptomatic resolution. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective analysis was performed on patients who were surgically treated for SSCD. Patients were divided to different cohorts based on unilateral or bilateral nature of the disease. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 229 surgical repairs were analyzed. Mean age was 51 years (± 7.8 years), and 55.9% of patients were female. All cohorts were similar with respect to baseline demographics. The most commonly reported preoperative symptoms were tinnitus, dizziness, and autophony. The greatest symptomatic resolution was seen in autophony, internal sound amplification, hyperacusis, and oscillopsia. The unilateral SSCD cohort had significantly higher improvement of autophony (P = 0.003), aural fullness (P = 0.05), tinnitus (P = 0.006), hearing loss (P = 0.02), dizziness (P = 0.006), and headache (P = 0.007), compared with the bilateral SSCD cohorts. Among patients with bilateral disease, those with unilateral surgery reported greater symptomatic resolution with respect to hyperacusis (P = 0.03), hearing loss (P = 0.02), dizziness (P = 0.03), and disequilibrium (P < 0.001), than those with bilateral operations. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical management of SSCD leads to high rates of postoperative symptomatic improvement. Patients with unilateral SSCD benefit greater symptomatic resolution compared to those with bilateral pathology.