Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 32
Filtrar
2.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(5): e2410288, 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38717772

RESUMEN

Importance: Currently, mortality risk for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with an uncomplicated postprocedure course is low. Less is known regarding the risk of in-hospital ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF). Objective: To evaluate the risk of late VT and VF after primary PCI for STEMI. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included adults aged 18 years or older with STEMI treated with primary PCI between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2018, identified in the US National Cardiovascular Data Registry Chest Pain-MI Registry. Data were analyzed from April to December 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the risk of late VT (≥7 beat run of VT during STEMI hospitalization ≥1 day after PCI) or VF (any episode of VF≥1 day after PCI) associated with cardiac arrest and associations between late VT or VF and in-hospital mortality in the overall cohort and a cohort with uncomplicated STEMI without prior myocardial infarction or heart failure, systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, reinfarction, or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 40%. Results: A total of 174 126 eligible patients with STEMI were treated with primary PCI at 814 sites in the study; 15 460 (8.9%) had VT or VF after primary PCI, and 4156 (2.4%) had late VT or VF. Among the eligible patients, 99 905 (57.4%) at 807 sites had uncomplicated STEMI. The median age for patients with late VT or VF overall was 63 years (IQR, 55-73 years), and 75.5% were men; the median age for patients with late VT or VF with uncomplicated STEMI was 60 years (IQR, 53-69 years), and 77.7% were men. The median length of stay was 3 days (IQR, 2-7 days) for the overall cohort with late VT or VF and 3 days (IQR, 2-4 days) for the cohort with uncomplicated STEMI with late VT or VF. The risk of late VT or VF was 2.4% (overall) and 1.7% (uncomplicated STEMI). Late VT or VF with cardiac arrest occurred in 674 patients overall (0.4%) and in 117 with uncomplicated STEMI (0.1%). LVEF was the most significant factor associated with late VT or VF with cardiac arrest (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] for every 5-unit decrease ≤40%: 1.67; 95% CI, 1.54-1.85). Late VT or VF events were associated with increased odds of in-hospital mortality in the overall cohort (AOR, 6.40; 95% CI, 5.63-7.29) and the cohort with uncomplicated STEMI (AOR, 8.74; 95% CI, 6.53-11.70). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, a small proportion of patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI had late VT or VF. However, late VT or VF with cardiac arrest was rare, particularly in the cohort with uncomplicated STEMI. This information may be useful when determining the optimal timing for hospital discharge after STEMI.


Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Taquicardia Ventricular , Fibrilación Ventricular , Humanos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/estadística & datos numéricos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/cirugía , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/complicaciones , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Taquicardia Ventricular/terapia , Taquicardia Ventricular/mortalidad , Taquicardia Ventricular/etiología , Fibrilación Ventricular/terapia , Fibrilación Ventricular/mortalidad , Estudios de Cohortes , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo
7.
10.
11.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 82(13): 1373-1376, 2023 09 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37730294
13.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 81(17): 1740-1742, 2023 05 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37100491
14.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes ; 13(7): e006204, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32586105

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Catheterization laboratory (cath lab) activation time is a newly available process measure for patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction requiring inter-hospital transfers for primary percutaneous coronary intervention that reflects inter-facility communication and urgent mobilization of interventional laboratory resources. Our aim was to determine whether faster activation is associated with improved reperfusion time and outcomes in the American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline Accelerator-2 Project. METHODS AND RESULTS: From April 2015 to March 2017, treatment times of 2063 patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction requiring inter-hospital transfer for primary percutaneous coronary intervention from 12 regions around the United States were stratified by cath lab activation time (first hospital arrival to cath lab activation within [timely] or beyond 20 minutes [delayed]). Median cath lab activation time was 26 minutes, with a delayed activation observed in 1241 (60.2%) patients. Prior cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease, arterial hypotension at admission, and black or Latino ethnicity were independent factors of delayed cath lab activation. Timely cath lab activation patients had shorter door-in door-out times (40 versus 68 minutes) and reperfusion times (98 versus 135 minutes) with 80.1% treated within the national goal of ≤120 minutes versus 39.0% in the delayed group. CONCLUSIONS: Cath lab activation within 20 minutes across a geographically diverse group of hospitals was associated with performing primary percutaneous coronary intervention within the national goal of ≤120 minutes in >75% of patients. While several confounding factors were associated with delayed activation, this work suggests that this process measure has the potential to direct resources and practices to more timely treatment of patients requiring inter-hospital transfer for primary percutaneous coronary intervention.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Transferencia de Pacientes , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Anciano , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico por imagen , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
15.
Circulation ; 141(24): 2004-2025, 2020 06 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32539609

RESUMEN

The 143 low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) of the world constitute 80% of the world's population or roughly 5.86 billion people with much variation in geography, culture, literacy, financial resources, access to health care, insurance penetration, and healthcare regulation. Unfortunately, their burden of cardiovascular disease in general and acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in particular is increasing at an unprecedented rate. Compounding the problem, outcomes remain suboptimal because of a lack of awareness and a severe paucity of resources. Guideline-based treatment has dramatically improved the outcomes of STEMI in high-income countries. However, no such focused recommendations exist for LMICs, and the unique challenges in LMICs make directly implementing Western guidelines unfeasible. Thus, structured solutions tailored to their individual, local needs, and resources are a vital need. With this in mind, a multicountry collaboration of investigators interested in LMIC STEMI care have tried to create a consensus document that extracts transferable elements from Western guidelines and couples them with local realities gathered from expert experience. It outlines general operating principles for LMICs focused best practices and is intended to create the broad outlines of implementable, resource-appropriate paradigms for management of STEMI in LMICs. Although this document is focused primarily on governments and organizations involved with improvement in STEMI care in LMICs, it also provides some specific targeted information for the frontline clinicians to allow standardized care pathways and improved outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Consenso , Países en Desarrollo/economía , Recursos en Salud/economía , Pobreza/economía , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/economía , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/epidemiología , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/economía , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/normas , Personal de Salud/economía , Personal de Salud/normas , Recursos en Salud/normas , Humanos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/economía , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Terapia Trombolítica/economía , Terapia Trombolítica/normas
19.
Circulation ; 137(4): 376-387, 2018 01 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29138292

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Regional variations in reperfusion times and mortality in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction are influenced by differences in coordinating care between emergency medical services (EMS) and hospitals. Building on the Accelerator-1 Project, we hypothesized that time to reperfusion could be further reduced with enhanced regional efforts. METHODS: Between April 2015 and March 2017, we worked with 12 metropolitan regions across the United States with 132 percutaneous coronary intervention-capable hospitals and 946 EMS agencies. Data were collected in the ACTION (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network)-Get With The Guidelines Registry for quarterly Mission: Lifeline reports. The primary end point was the change in the proportion of EMS-transported patients with first medical contact to device time ≤90 minutes from baseline to final quarter. We also compared treatment times and mortality with patients treated in hospitals not participating in the project during the corresponding time period. RESULTS: During the study period, 10 730 patients were transported to percutaneous coronary intervention-capable hospitals, including 974 in the baseline quarter and 972 in the final quarter who met inclusion criteria. Median age was 61 years; 27% were women, 6% had cardiac arrest, and 6% had shock on admission; 10% were black, 12% were Latino, and 10% were uninsured. By the end of the intervention, all process measures reflecting coordination between EMS and hospitals had improved, including the proportion of patients with a first medical contact to device time of ≤90 minutes (67%-74%; P<0.002), a first medical contact to device time to catheterization laboratory activation of ≤20 minutes (38%-56%; P<0.0001), and emergency department dwell time of ≤20 minutes (33%-43%; P<0.0001). Of the 12 regions, 9 regions reduced first medical contact to device time, and 8 met or exceeded the national goal of 75% of patients treated in ≤90 minutes. Improvements in treatment times corresponded with a significant reduction in mortality (in-hospital death, 4.4%-2.3%; P=0.001) that was not apparent in hospitals not participating in the project during the same time period. CONCLUSIONS: Organization of care among EMS and hospitals in 12 regions was associated with significant reductions in time to reperfusion in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction as well as in in-hospital mortality. These findings support a more intensive regional approach to emergency care for patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/organización & administración , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Regionalización/organización & administración , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/cirugía , Tiempo de Tratamiento/organización & administración , Transporte de Pacientes/organización & administración , Anciano , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/fisiopatología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
20.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 6(10)2017 Oct 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29066448

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline STEMI (ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction) Systems Accelerator program, conducted in 16 regions across the United States to improve key care processes, resulted in more patients being treated within national guideline goals (time from first medical contact to device: <90 minutes for direct presenters to hospitals capable of performing percutaneous coronary intervention; <120 minutes for transfers). We examined whether the effort reduced reperfusion disparities in the proportions of female versus male and black versus white patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: In total, 23 809 patients (29.3% female, 82.3% white, and 10.7% black) presented with acute STEMI between July 2012 and March 2014. Change in the proportion of patients treated within guideline goals was compared between sex and race subgroups for patients presenting directly to hospitals capable of performing percutaneous coronary intervention (n=18 267) and patients requiring transfer (n=5542). The intervention was associated with an increase in the proportion of men treated within guideline goals that presented directly (58.7-62.1%, P=0.01) or were transferred (43.3-50.7%, P<0.01). An increase was also seen among white patients who presented directly (57.7-59.9%, P=0.02) or were transferred (43.9-48.8%, P<0.01). There was no change in the proportion of female or black patients treated within guideline goals, including both those presenting directly and transferred. CONCLUSION: The STEMI Systems Accelerator project was associated with an increase in the proportion of patients meeting guideline reperfusion targets for male and white patients but not for female or black patients. Efforts to organize systems of STEMI care should implement additional processes targeting barriers to timely reperfusion among female and black patients.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/etnología , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/terapia , Negro o Afroamericano , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/etnología , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Población Blanca , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/diagnóstico , Anciano , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Transferencia de Pacientes , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/tendencias , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Factores de Riesgo , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA