Mental Health of Children With Special Educational Needs and the Return to In-Person Learning After the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Importance: There is limited evidence on whether the quality of life and behavior of children with special educational needs (SEN) have improved or worsened since schools reopened after COVID-19-related school closures. Objective: To describe the changes in the mental well-being of children and adolescents with SEN during the initial 6 months of resuming in-person learning after COVID-19-related school closures. Design, Setting, and Participants: This repeated cross-sectional study reported data from surveys completed by parents and caregivers of children and adolescents aged 3 to 18 years with SEN studying at special schools in Hong Kong. The first cohort was obtained during COVID-19-related school closure in April 2020 (wave 1) and the second cohort was obtained 6 months after school resumption with data collection between July and October 2021 (wave 2). Data analysis occurred from January to June 2022. Exposure: Diagnosis of a disability or disorder that required school-based special educational programming. Main Outcomes and Measures: Children's emotional and behavioral difficulties (measured with the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire [SDQ]), quality of life (measured with the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory [PedsQL]), lifestyle habits, parental stress, and parental well-being (measured with the PedsQL Family Impact Module) were assessed. Cross-sectional comparisons of well-being between the 2 waves were conducted using analysis of covariance, and multiple regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with mental health outcomes in wave 2. Results: In wave 1, a total of 456 parents and caregivers of children with SEN (mean [SD] age, 7.44 [3.98] years; 315 boys [69.1%]; 141 girls [30.9%]) responded to the surveys. In wave 2, 519 parents and caregivers of children with SEN (mean [SD] age, 8.16 [4.47] years; 365 boys [70.3%]; 154 girls [29.7%]) responded. After school resumption, preschoolers aged 3 to 5 years with SEN had significantly fewer emotional difficulties (mean [SD] SDQ score, 3.26 [2.39] vs 2.68 [2.03]; standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.07-0.46; Bonferroni-corrected P = .04) and conduct difficulties (mean [SD] SDQ score, 2.88 [1.89] vs 2.41 [1.91]; SMD = 0.25; 95% CI, 0.05-0.44; Bonferroni-corrected P = .01), whereas adolescents had more conduct difficulties (mean [SD] SDQ score, 1.62 [1.50] vs 2.37 [3.02]; SMD = 0.41; 95% CI, 0.13-0.70; Bonferroni-corrected P = .049). The overall quality of life of school-aged children with SEN aged 6 to 11 years worsened after school resumption (mean [SD] PedsQL score, 67.52 [17.45] vs 60.57 [16.52]; SMD = 0.41; 95% CI, 0.19-0.62; Bonferroni-corrected P = .002). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this repeated cross-sectional study suggest that preschoolers with SEN had improved emotional and behavioral functioning when school resumed after COVID-19-related closures. School-aged children with SEN, adolescents with SEN, and children with intellectual disabilities were at risk of reduced quality of life, indicating that additional support should be offered to vulnerable groups as they return to schools.

Factors that facilitate recognition and management of domestic violence by primary care physicians in a Chinese context - a mixed methods study in Hong Kong.

BACKGROUND: Domestic violence is common in the community. Many of its victims present to primary care physicians (PCPs) but are not being recognized and managed. The barriers, with specific reference to a Chinese cultural context, were investigated earlier. This paper explored the factors which facilitated the process of recognizing and managing suspected cases of domestic violence by PCPs in Hong Kong. METHODS: Four focus group interviews were conducted to explore in-depth the experiences of PCPs in recognition, management and referral of domestic violence cases from which facilitators were identified. The relevant themes were then investigated in a questionnaire survey with 504 PCPs working in public and private sectors. RESULTS: The focus group participants emphasized mood symptoms as useful indicators for probable abuse and continuity of care was important to unmask issues of domestic violence. The top facilitators perceived by the respondents of the survey included: a trusting doctor-patient relationship (99.8%), good communication skills (99.0%), patients' unexplained bruises (96.3%), medical history (94.6%), and mood symptoms (94.4%). Further, the survey found that PCPs with longer years of practice, a medical degree obtained from Western countries, and postgraduate training in family counselling or psychological medicine perceived more facilitators in managing domestic violence. CONCLUSIONS: Without a local screening policy and training protocol to manage domestic violence, PCPs regarded their skills in mental healthcare and good relationships with patients as the key facilitators. While training in mental health care helps PCPs manage domestic violence, a specific protocol emphasizing medical-social collaboration is anticipated to facilitate them to take a more proactive and effective stance from screening to management.