Healthcare resource utilisation and costs associated with AL amyloidosis: a retrospective matched cohort study.

We conducted a retrospective population-based, matched cohort study using the National Health Insurance Research Database to estimate healthcare resource utilisation (HRU) and costs in patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis in Taiwan. Cases were matched 10:1 by age, sex, and area of residence to patients without AL amyloidosis (comparators) randomly selected from the database during the same time period. Annual all-cause HRU and costs for 3 years were quantified. AL amyloidosis-attributable costs were obtained by subtracting all-cause HRU costs incurred by comparators from cases. The mean age of all patients was 60.78 years and 59.07% were male. Co-morbidities were more frequent in cases than comparators. By 6 months after diagnosis, 12.1% of cases had died versus 0.9% of comparators. In the first year, cases had 103% more outpatient visits, 177% more emergency room visits, were hospitalised 4-times more frequently, and spent 5.5-times more days in hospital than comparators, and total healthcare costs were > sixfold higher. Costs incurred during the first year after diagnosis accounted for 55% of the 3-year cumulative cost. High HRU costs associated with delayed diagnosis and end-organ damage indicate a need for earlier diagnosis and more effective treatments for AL amyloidosis.

Impact of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone therapy on overall survival in multiple myeloma patients: Analysis of the emerging-markets subgroup of the TOURMALINE-MM1 trial.

Ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (ixazomib-Rd) showed clinical efficacy over placebo-Rd in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) in the TOURMALINE-MM1 trial. Over a median follow-up of ∼85 months, as patients showed disease progression, they received subsequent novel therapies that confounded the overall survival (OS) benefit. Here, we conducted a post hoc analysis in 148 patients from seven countries defined as emerging markets, with limited access to novel therapies for MM during the trial period, to describe the impact of these therapies on OS. Patients were randomised to ixazomib-Rd (n = 71) or placebo-Rd (n = 77). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 18.7 versus 10.2 months, with ixazomib-Rd versus placebo-Rd (hazard ratio [HR], 0.504; p = 0.008) demonstrating a statistically significant improvement as observed in the primary trial. The median OS improved by 32.6 months with ixazomib-Rd over placebo-Rd (63.5 vs. 30.9 months; HR, 0.794; p = 0.261); however, the statistically significant benefit seen in PFS was not observed for OS. Improvement with ixazomib-Rd over placebo-Rd was observed in overall response (81.7% vs. 64.9%; odds ratio [OR], 2.38; p = 0.019) and complete response (22.5% vs. 3.9%; OR, 7.57; p < 0.001). Patient-reported quality of life and use of subsequent therapies were similar across treatment groups. No new safety concerns were identified. Compared with the main cohort, median OS was 10 months longer with ixazomib-Rd and 21 months shorter with placebo-Rd in this subgroup, indicating a clinically meaningful survival benefit of ixazomib-Rd treatment in this patient population with limited access to subsequent novel therapies.

Improved response rates with bortezomib in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: an observational study in Chinese patients.

INTRODUCTION: Bortezomib, a novel proteasome inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). Efficacy and safety of bortezomib is well known; however, it was necessary to validate the data in patients with different ethnic backgrounds. The efficacy and safety of bortezomib was assessed in patients from China with relapsed/refractory MM in a real-world scenario. METHODS: This prospective, non-interventional, observational study enrolled both male and female Chinese patients, aged ≥18 years and diagnosed with relapsed or refractory MM. Administration of intravenous bortezomib at 1.3 mg/m2 was recommended twice a week for 2 weeks (days 1, 4, 8 and 11), followed by a 10-day rest period (maximum of 8 cycles) and a follow-up every 12 weeks for 3 years. Efficacy assessments included best response, objective response rate (ORR), time to response, duration of response, and overall survival. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 517 patients were enrolled with a median age of 58.7 years. Patients predominantly had immunoglobulin G type (46.2%) and stage III (47.8%) myeloma. Overall, 202 (42.3%) patients had partial response as best response, ORR was 88.9% and the proportion of patients exhibiting complete response was 24.7%. The median time to response observed was 27 (21-40) days. Median time to progression was 415 days and median overall survival was 475 days. Thrombocytopenia (14.4%) was the most common adverse event. CONCLUSION: Bortezomib demonstrated clinical response in majority of patients and was well tolerated in this observational study in Chinese patients with relapsed/refractory MM.