The lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio is a superior predictor of overall survival compared to established biomarkers in HCC patients undergoing liver resection.

The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) in patients undergoing hepatectomy and to compare it to established biomarkers including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). Medical records were retrospectively analyzed for 652 HCC patients undergoing hepatectomy at the Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University and the First People's Hospital of Changde between April 2004 to April 2012. The correlation between the LMR and clinical variables were analyzed in Kaplan-Meier log-rank survival analysis and then multivariate Cox regression models trying to find relation with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the LMR(AUC:0.627) for predicting long-term survival was greater than that of the NLR(AUC:0.600) and the PLR(AUC:0.520).Multivariate analysis showed LMR to be an independent risk factor for OS (P = 0.002), and the NLR and PLR were not independently significant. Subgroup analysis also showed that LMR was significantly associated with poor DFS and OS in patients positive for HBsAg or with cirrhosis (both P < 0.001).Elevated preoperative LMR is an independently associated with poor OS and DFS in HCC patients following curative resection and appears to be superior to NLR and PLR.

Advantages with prophylactic PEG-rhG-CSF versus rhG-CSF in breast cancer patients receiving multiple cycles of myelosuppressive chemotherapy: an open-label, randomized, multicenter phase III study.

BACKGROUND: PEG-rhG-CSF reduces neutropenia and improves chemotherapy safety. In China's registration trial (CFDA: 2006L01305), we assessed its efficacy and safety against rhG-CSF, and prospectively explored its value over multiple cycles of chemotherapy. METHODS: In this open-label, randomized, multicenter phase 3 study, breast cancer patients (n = 569) were randomized to receive PEG-rhG-CSF 100 µg/kg, PEG-rhG-CSF 6 mg, or rhG-CSF 5 µg/kg/d after chemotherapy. The primary endpoints were the incidence and duration of grade 3/4 neutropenia during cycle 1. Secondary endpoints included the incidence and duration of grade 3/4 neutropenia during cycles 2-4, the incidence of febrile neutropenia, and the safety. RESULTS: A once-per-cycle PEG-rhG-CSF at either 100 µg/kg or 6 mg was not different from daily injections of rhG-CSF for either incidence or duration of grade 3/4 neutropenia. Interestingly, a substantial difference was noted during cycle 2, and the difference became bigger over cycles 3-4, reaching a statistical significance at cycle 4 in either incidence (P = 0.0309) or duration (P = 0.0289) favoring PEG-rhG-CSF. A significant trend toward a lower incidence of all-grade adverse events was noted at 129 (68.98%), 142 (75.53%), and 160 (82.47%) in the PEG-rhG-CSF 100 µg/kg and 6 mg and rhG-CSF groups, respectively (P = 0.0085). The corresponding incidence of grade 3/4 drug-related adverse events was 2/187 (1.07%), 1/188 (0.53%), and 8/194 (4.12%), respectively (P = 0.0477). Additionally, PFS in metastatic patients preferred PEG-rhG-CSF to rhG-CSF despite no significance observed by Kaplan-Meier analysis (n = 49, P = 0.153). CONCLUSIONS: PEG-rhG-CSF is a more convenient and safe formulation and a more effective prophylactic measure in breast cancer patients receiving multiple cycles of chemotherapy.