Detecting Gene-Gene Interaction among DNA Repair Genes in Chinese non-Syndromic Cleft lip with or Without Palate Trios.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to investigate the gene-gene interactions associated with NSCL/P among DNA repair genes. DESIGN: This study included 806 NSCL/P case-parent trios from China. Quality control process was conducted for genotyped single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located in six DNA repair genes (ATR, ERCC4, RFC1, TYMS, XRCC1 and XRCC3). We tested gene-gene interactions with Cordell's method using statistical package TRIO in R software. Bonferroni corrected significance level was set as P = 4.24 × 10-4. We also test the robustness of the interactions by permutation tests. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 806 NSCL/P case-parent trios (complete trios: 682, incomplete trios: 124) with Chinese ancestry. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Not applicable. RESULTS: A total of 118 SNPs were extracted for the interaction tests. Fourteen pairs of significant interactions were identified after Bonferroni correction, which were confirmed in permutation tests. Twelve pairs were between ATR and ERCC4 or XRCC3. The most significant interaction occurred between rs2244500 in TYMS and rs3213403 in XRCC1(P = 8.16 × 10-15). CONCLUSIONS: The current study identified gene-gene interactions among DNA repair genes in 806 Chinese NSCL/P trios, providing additional evidence for the complicated genetic structure underlying NSCL/P. ATR, ERCC4, XRCC3, TYMS and RFC1 were suggested to be possible candidate genes for NSCL/P.

Identification of genetic loci jointly influencing COVID-19 and coronary heart diseases.

BACKGROUND: Comorbidities of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)/coronary heart disease (CHD) pose great threats to disease outcomes, yet little is known about their shared pathology. The study aimed to examine whether comorbidities of COVID-19/CHD involved shared genetic pathology, as well as to clarify the shared genetic variants predisposing risks common to COVID-19 severity and CHD risks. METHODS: By leveraging publicly available summary statistics, we assessed the genetically determined causality between COVID-19 and CHD with bidirectional Mendelian randomization. To further quantify the causality contributed by shared genetic variants, we interrogated their genetic correlation with the linkage disequilibrium score regression method. Bayesian colocalization analysis coupled with conditional/conjunctional false discovery rate analysis was applied to decipher the shared causal single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). FINDINGS: Briefly, we observed that the incident CHD risks post COVID-19 infection were partially determined by shared genetic variants. The shared genetic variants contributed to the causality at a proportion of 0.18 (95% CI 0.18-0.19) to 0.23 (95% CI 0.23-0.24). The SNP (rs10490770) located near LZTFL1 suggested direct causality (SNPs → COVID-19 → CHD), and SNPs in ABO (rs579459, rs495828), ILRUN(rs2744961), and CACFD1(rs4962153, rs3094379) may simultaneously influence COVID-19 severity and CHD risks. INTERPRETATION: Five SNPs located near LZTFL1 (rs10490770), ABO (rs579459, rs495828), ILRUN (rs2744961), and CACFD1 (rs4962153, rs3094379) may simultaneously influence their risks. The current study suggested that there may be shared mechanisms predisposing to both COVID-19 severity and CHD risks. Genetic predisposition to COVID-19 is a causal risk factor for CHD, supporting that reducing the COVID-19 infection risk or alleviating COVID-19 severity among those with specific genotypes might reduce their subsequent CHD adverse outcomes. Meanwhile, the shared genetic variants identified may be of clinical implications for identifying the target population who are more vulnerable to adverse CHD outcomes post COVID-19 and may also advance treatments of 'Long COVID-19.'

Synergism of cell adhesion regulatory genes and instant air pollutants on blood pressure elevation.

Accumulating evidence suggests that an instant exposure to particulate matter (PM) may elevate blood pressure (BP), where cell-adhesion regulatory genes may be involved in the interplay. However, few studies to date critically examined their interaction, and it remained unclear whether these genes modified the association. To assess the association between instant PM exposure and BP, and to examine whether single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) mapped in four cell adhesion regulatory genes modify the relationship, a cross-sectional study was performed, based on the baseline of an ongoing family-based cohort in Beijing, China. A total of 4418 persons from 2089 families in Northern China were included in the analysis. Four tagged SNPs in cell adhesion regulatory genes were selected among ZFHX3, CXCL12, RASGRP1 and MIR146A. A generalized additive model (GAM) with a Gaussian link was adopted to estimate the change in blood pressure after instant PM2.5 or PM10 exposure. A cross-product term of PM2.5/PM10 and genotype was incorporated into the GAM model to test for interaction. The study observed that an instant exposure to either PM2.5 or PM10 was found to be associated with elevated systolic blood pressure (SBP). On average, a 10 µg/m3 increase in instant exposure to PM2.5 and PM10 concentration corresponded to 0.140% (95% CI: 0.014%-0.265%, P = 0.029) and 0.173% (95% CI: 0.080%-0.266%, P < 0.001) higher SBP. However, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was not elevated as the PM2.5 or PM10 concentration increased (P > 0.05). A synergetic interaction on SBP was observed between SNPs in four cell adhesion regulatory genes (rs2910164 in MIR146A, rs2297630 in CXCL12, rs7403531 in RASGRP1, and rs7193343 in ZFHX3) and instant PM2.5 exposure (Pfor interaction <0.05). Briefly, as carriers of risk alleles in each of these four genes increased, an enhanced association was found between instant PM2.5 exposure and SBP.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and cardiovascular diseases: A Mendelian randomization study.

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is associated with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). However, the results are inconsistent, and the causality remains to be established. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the potential causal relationship between NAFLD and CVDs, including arterial stiffness, coronary artery disease, heart failure, stroke, ischemic stroke and its subtypes using two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR). METHODS: Genetic instruments were used as proxies for NAFLD. Publicly available summary-level data were obtained from the UK Biobank, the CARDIoGRAMplusC4D Consortium, the MEGASTROKE Consortium, and other consortia. Six complementary MR methods were performed, including inverse variance weighted method (IVW), MR-Egger, weighted median, weighted mode, MR-PRESSO, and MR-RAPS. RESULTS: NAFLD was significantly associated with arterial stiffness (ß = 0.04 [95%CI, 0.02-0.06], P = 5.53E-04). Moreover, the results remained consistent and robust in the sensitivity analysis. As for heart failure, the IVW method suggested that NAFLD was significantly associated with heart failure (OR = 1.08, 95%CI: 1.02-1.14, P = 0.005) in the absence of pleiotropy. However, there were no significant associations of NAFLD with coronary artery disease, stroke, ischemic stroke, or any ischemic stroke subtype. CONCLUSION: The MR study supported the causal effect of NAFLD on arterial stiffness. However, the study did not provide enough evidence suggesting the causal associations of NAFLD with heart failure, coronary artery disease, and any stroke subtypes.

Wound complications and bleeding with new oral anticoagulants in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

AIMS: The results of associations between new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and wound complications after total joint arthroplasty remain inconsistent. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to make comparisons with low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) on the clinical outcomes of total wound complications, together with other efficacy and safety endpoints to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of NOACs. METHODS: This meta-analysis was conducted based on a published protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42019140841). We searched for available articles in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library through Jun 62 021. Random-effects meta-analyses, including subgroup analyses, were conducted to estimate the pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for specific doses of NOACs. RESULTS: We retrieved 1683 studies, of which 20 were eligible for inclusion. We found that apixaban was associated with a lower incidence of total wound complications compared with LMWH (RR = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.65-1.00), while dabigatran and rivaroxaban did not increase the risk of total wound complications. In addition, apixaban was associated with a reduction in the risk of major/clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events compared to LMWH (RR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.65-0.99), while rivaroxaban increased the risk for major/clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events (RR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.02-1.50). Moreover, all 4 NOACs were associated with lower incidences of major venous thromboembolism compared with LMWH. CONCLUSION: A lower risk of wound complications was detected for apixaban, while dabigatran and rivaroxaban did not increase the risk when compared with LMWH. The efficacy of 4 NOACs was broadly similar.