Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 89(8): 2423-2429, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36908021

RESUMEN

AIMS: There is no consensus on the haemorrhagic risk associated with potential interactions between commonly used CYP3A4 inhibitors and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). METHODS: Macrolide antibiotics and azole antimycotics were investigated in this study. Data from Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System were retrieved from July 2010 to September 2021. Haemorrhagic signals were expressed by reporting odds ratios (RORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) based on the interaction/noninteraction methodology as (a/c) / (b/d) and considered significant when the lower limit of 95% CI was >1 and the case number of interaction group was ≥3. Subgroup analyses and logistic regression were conducted by adjusting associated factors in haemorrhagic events. RESULTS: From the third quarter of 2010 to the first quarter of 2021, we retrieved 382 853 distinct cases of adverse events associated with DOACs, in which 1128 cases of bleeding were associated with coadministration of CYP3A4 inhibitors and DOACs. The haemorrhagic signal was significant for apixaban when coadministered with clarithromycin (ROR 1.60, 95% CI 1.16-2.20) and posaconazole (ROR 2.69, 95% CI 1.37-5.28). For dabigatran, coadministration with azithromycin (ROR 4.06, 95% CI 2.77-5.95), fluconazole (ROR 2.26, 95% CI 1.52-3.37), itraconazole (ROR 7.52, 95% CI 1.51-37.46) and ketoconazole (ROR 2.06, 95% CI 1.25-3.41) was associated with significantly higher risks of haemorrhages. At the same time, addition of itraconazole to rivaroxaban also indicated significant haemorrhagic signal (ROR 3.58, 95% CI 1.30-9.85). CONCLUSIONS: Macrolide antibiotics and azole antimycotics have potential but different effects on the bleeding risk of DOACs. Close attention is needed when using these drugs together. Such precautions have already been included in some drug labels.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores del Citocromo P-450 CYP3A , Itraconazol , Humanos , Inhibidores del Citocromo P-450 CYP3A/efectos adversos , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Claritromicina , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Citocromo P-450 CYP3A
2.
Cancer Med ; 12(8): 9167-9174, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36734333

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hepatic failure induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been reported in only a few case series and case reports. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore the association between ICIs and hepatic failure and characterize the clinical features of ICI-associated hepatic failure in the pharmacovigilance database. METHODS: Data from the first quarter (Q1) of 2015 to the fourth quarter (Q4) of 2021 in the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database were retrieved for disproportionality and Bayesian analysis. Reporting odds ratios (ROR) and information component (IC) were used to evaluate correlations between ICIs and hepatic failure. RESULTS: Hepatic failure occurred in 0.19% (18,454/9,647,655) of all cases in the FAERS database, of which 654 cases were associated with ICIs. The overall median time from ICIs initiation to hepatic failure onset was 38 days, 72.3% of the adverse events occurred within the first 3 months, and 68.65% of the cases died after developing hepatic failure. In general, a strong signal was shown between ICIs and hepatic failure (ROR025  = 2.70, IC025  = 1.39). For the three categories of ICIs, programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 inhibitors (ROR025  = 3.09, IC025  = 1.57) had a higher risk signal than programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitors and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 inhibitors. For monotherapy, atezolizumab showed the strongest risk signal (ROR025  = 4.07, IC025  = 1.90). The combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab showed stronger signals of hepatic failure compared with nivolumab or ipilimumab alone (nivolumab + ipilimumab vs. ipilimumab: ROR025  = 1.40, IC025  = 0.16; nivolumab + ipilimumab vs. nivolumab: ROR025  = 1.24, IC025  = 0.34). Considering the concomitant agents used with ICIs, the majority of these regimens showed stronger signals than ICI monotherapy, such as acetaminophen (ICIs + acetaminophen vs. ICIs: ROR025  = 1.06, IC025  = 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: ICIs had possible strong signals associated with hepatic failure, and most cases of hepatic failure occurred within the first 3 months and had poor outcomes, which should attract clinical attention.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos , Fallo Hepático , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Humanos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Nivolumab/efectos adversos , Ipilimumab/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , United States Food and Drug Administration , Teorema de Bayes , Acetaminofén , Farmacovigilancia
3.
Expert Opin Drug Saf ; 22(6): 469-476, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36794347

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recently, there have been clinical reports of hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) related with Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. However, there were no studies to investigate the association between HBVr and different JAK inhibitors. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This study was a retrospective review utilizing the FAERS pharmacovigilance database and a systematic literature search for all cases of HBVr reported with JAK inhibitors. Disproportionality analysis and Bayesian analysis were used in data detection to screen the suspected HBVr after the administration of different JAK inhibitors, based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) pharmacovigilance database from Q4 2011 to Q1 2022. RESULTS: There were a total number of 2097 (0.02%) reports of HBVr in FAERS, of which 41 (1.96%) were associated with JAK inhibitors. Baricitinib appeared to have the strongest signal among four JAK inhibitors, based on the highest reporting odds ratio (ROR = 4.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.67-11.89). Ruxolitinib also showed signals, whereas no signals were detected among Tofacitinib and Upadacitinib. CONCLUSION: While there may be an association between JAK inhibitors and HBVr, it appears to be a numerically uncommon occurrence. Further studies are needed to optimize the safety profiles of JAK inhibitors.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus , Farmacovigilancia , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Virus de la Hepatitis B , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/efectos adversos , Teorema de Bayes , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , United States Food and Drug Administration
4.
Cancer Med ; 12(5): 5181-5194, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36504294

RESUMEN

AIM: This study aimed to systematically characterize transplant rejection after immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) initiation in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs). METHODS: Data were extracted from the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database and case reports in the literature. Disproportionality analysis including information component and reported odds ratio (ROR) was performed to access potential risk signals. RESULTS: A total of 168 patients with transplant rejection after ICIs usage were identified in the FAERS database, and 89 cases were identified in the literature review. ICIs were significantly associated with transplant rejection (ROR025 : 2.2). A strong risk signal was found for combination therapy with pembrolizumab and ipilimumab compared to monotherapy. CONCLUSION: Immune checkpoint inhibitors were significantly associated with transplant rejection in SOTRs.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Trasplante de Órganos , Humanos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Farmacovigilancia , Ipilimumab/efectos adversos , Aloinjertos , Trasplante de Órganos/efectos adversos
5.
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol ; 36: 3946320221145520, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36565299

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The haematopoietic cytopenia (HC) of the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitors was evaluated using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). METHOD: Data from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2021 has been retrieved from the FAERS database. Disproportionality analysis and Bayesian analysis were utilized in the data mining. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for HC was calculated for each CDK 4/6 inhibitor agent. Clinical features of the patients were collected and compared between death outcome and non-death outcome groups. Time to onset (TTO), proportion of deaths, life-threatening and hospitalizations of CDK 4/6 inhibitors-associated HC were also studied. RESULTS: A total of 17,235 cases of HC associated with CDK 4/6 inhibitors were identified with a median age of 65 years (interquartile range [IQR] 57-73). Palbociclib appeared the strongest signal, with the highest (ROR 9.64, 95% CI 9.46-9.83), followed by ribociclib (ROR 6.38, 95% CI 6.04-6.73) and then abemaciclib (ROR 2.72, 95% CI 2.49-2.97). Patients aged 18-64 had a higher proportion of deaths than those aged 65-84 (12.21% vs. 9.91%, p = 0.001). In Africa and Asia, the proportions of deaths were higher (31.65% and 26.13%, respectively). The median TTO was 26 days (IQR 14-65) for abemaciclib, 33 days (IQR 15-134) for palbociclib and 23 days (IQR 14-69) for ribociclib, respectively. The highest proportion of deaths, life-threatening and hospitalizations all occurred in abemaciclib (13.00%, 5.42% and 44.04%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Greater proportions of deaths occurred in Africa and Asia. HC may occur early in any CDK 4/6 inhibitor regimen. Abemaciclib had the highest proportion of deaths, life-threatening and hospitalizations. Health care workers should be more concerned about CDK 4/6 inhibitors. The higher proportions of serious events, including deaths, from Africa and Asia, as well as for abemaciclib, deserve further investigations through additional pharmacoepidemiological approaches.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Quinasa 4 Dependiente de la Ciclina , Quinasa 6 Dependiente de la Ciclina , Enfermedades Hematológicas , Hematopoyesis , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas , Anciano , Humanos , Teorema de Bayes , Quinasa 4 Dependiente de la Ciclina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , United States Food and Drug Administration , Enfermedades Hematológicas/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Hematológicas/epidemiología , Enfermedades Hematológicas/mortalidad , Quinasa 6 Dependiente de la Ciclina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Hematopoyesis/efectos de los fármacos , África/epidemiología , Asia/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA