Postoperative wound complications in extensile lateral approach versus sinus tarsi approach for calcaneal fractures: Are we improving? Updated meta-analysis of recent literature.

INTRODUCTION: To analyze recent literature comparing clinical outcomes of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACF) treated with open reduction and internal fixation using the extensile lateral approach (ELA) vs the minimally invasive sinus tarsi approach (STA), with a focus on wound complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted utilizing PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies published between 2013 and 2022, level of evidence (LOE) I-III, head-to-head comparative studies reporting on clinical outcomes after DIACFs treated with ORIF using ELA versus STA, and literature with full-text written in English were included. Data collection included: publication year, study design, number of surgeons, number of participants, demographic data (mean age at time of surgery, percent male, body mass index, medical co-morbidities), preoperative data (mechanism of injury, Sanders classification, time from injury to surgical fixation), intraoperative data, and postoperative clinical and radiographic outcomes (Böhler angle, angle of Gissane, calcaneal height/length/width). RESULTS: A total of 21 articles (4 randomized control trials, 17 cohort studies) comprising of 2086 patients with calcaneal fractures, treated with either ELA (n = 1129) or STA (n = 957) met inclusion criteria. The risk of postoperative wound-related complications (RR 2.82, 95 % CI: 2.00-3.98, I2=27 %) and the risk of reoperation (RR 1.85, 95 % CI: 0.69-5.00, I2=67 %) was higher in ELA patients comparted to STA patients. However, the increased risk of postoperative wound-related complications with an ELA vs. STA was shown to be trending downward in recent publications. The ELA group also experienced longer time to surgery, extended operative times, and prolonged hospital stays when compared to the STA group. Radiographic measurements at final follow-up, including Böhler angle, angle of Gissane, as well as calcaneal height, length, and width, showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment of calcaneal fractures utilizing the ELA continues to have an increased rate of complications and reoperation when compared to the less invasive STA, yet recent trends in the literature show that this rate is decreasing. Operative treatment of calcaneal fractures via either an ELA or STA can both achieve comparable postoperative radiographic outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III.

Outcomes of Antibiotic-Impregnated Calcium Sulfate, Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator, and Locked Intramedullary Static Spacer in the Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in the Multiply Revised and Infected Knee: A Single-Center Case Series.

Background: Periprosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty is commonly treated via 2-stage revision utilizing either articulating or static antibiotic cement spacers. While recent literature exhibits a slight functional advantage in favor of articulating spacers, those patients with a history of recurrent infection/multiple revision procedures are frequently excluded from these studies. The purpose of this study was to report infection eradication rates and efficacy of utilizing antibiotic-loaded locked intramedullary nail for infection for the multiply revised, infected total knee arthroplasty. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of all consecutive patients receiving static spacers between 2017 and 2020 at an academic medical center. Surgical techniques for all patients included irrigation and debridement using a reamer-irrigator-aspirator, injection of antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate into the intramedullary canal, and nail placement. Antibiotic-loaded cement is then used to create a spacer block in the joint space. A Cox proportional hazard regression was run to identify risk factors for reinfection. Results: Forty-two knees in 39 patients were identified meeting inclusion criteria. Overall, there was an 68.8% infection eradication rate at an average of 46.9 months following spacer placement. The only risk factors identified on cox regression were increasing number of previous spacers, a surrogate for previous infections (hazards ratio = 14.818, P value = .021), and increasing operative time during spacer placement (hazards ratio = 1.014, P value = .039). Conclusions: Use of static spacers, in conjunction with reamer-irrigator-aspirator and antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate, can be effective in treating chronic, complex periprosthetic joint infections in the setting of bone loss and or soft-tissue compromise and produced similar results to more simple infection scenarios.

Bilateral Atypical Femoral Fracture in a Bisphosphonate-Naïve Patient with Prior Long-Term Denosumab Therapy: A Case Report of the Management Strategy and a Literature Review.

The benefits of denosumab as an antiresorptive therapy and in reducing fragility fractures are well documented. However, its association with atypical femur fractures (AFFs), especially in the absence of prior bisphosphonate use, remains poorly understood and warrants further investigation. This case report presents a rare instance of bilateral AFFs in a 78-year-old bisphosphonate-naïve patient with a history of long-term denosumab therapy for previous metastatic breast cancer. Management involved intramedullary nail fixation after initial presentation with a unilateral AFF and a recommendation to cease denosumab therapy. However, the patient subsequently experienced a contralateral periprosthetic AFF below a total hip implant 5 months thereafter and was treated with open reduction internal fixation. This case report highlights the critical need for orthopedic surgeons to maintain a high level of suspicion and vigilance in screening for impending AFFs, especially in patients with a prolonged history of denosumab therapy without prior bisphosphonate use. Furthermore, the growing report of such cases emphasizes the urgent need for comprehensive research aimed at refining treatment protocols that balance the therapeutic benefits of denosumab and its associated risks of AFFs.

Maximizing Adherence and Minimizing Time to Antibiotics: A Multidisciplinary Institutional Trauma Bay Protocol for Single Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Open Fractures.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if a multidisciplinary institutional protocol can optimize the time to antibiotic (Abx) administration for open fractures (openFx) and improve compliance with the administration of Abx prophylaxis during trauma activation. DESIGN: Retrospective pre-post study design. SETTING: Single Level II Trauma Center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: All patients who triggered a trauma activation with suspected openFx and were treated according to the institutional single antibiotic regimen were eligible for inclusion. Patients were excluded if fractures did not involve the appendicular skeleton. Patients treated before implementation of a standardized institutional protocol where premixed IV bags of antibiotics were stocked in automated dispensing systems within ED trauma bays (January 2021-October 2022) were defined as the "pre" group and those treated following implementation the "post" group. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: The primary outcome was time from trauma bay arrival to antibiotic aministration, measured in minutes, with comparisons made between preprotocol and postprotocol implementation. Secondary outcomes for comparison included rates (%) of time to Abx <60 minutes, allergic reactions, acute kidney injury, ototoxicity, surgical site infection, multi-drug-resistant organisms identified in blood or biopsy cultures in cases requiring reoperation, and Clostridium difficile infection in the gastrointestinal system, confirmed by stool test results, within 30 days. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients (mean age 39.5 ± 16.3 years) met the criteria after protocol implementation compared with 72 patients (mean age 34.3 ± 14.8 years) before implementation. Implementation of the institutional protocol resulted in a significant reduction in the time to Abx administration for openFx from 87.9 ± 104.6 minutes to 22.2 ± 12.8 minutes in the postprotocol group ( P < 0.001). In addition, only 53% in the preprotocol group received Abx within 60 minutes compared with 96% in postprotocol group ( P < 0.001). Post hoc power analysis revealed that the study was powered at 92% (effect size = 0.72) to detect a significant difference between the preprotocol and postprotocol groups. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that a multidisciplinary institutional protocol for the administration of Abx prophylaxis can be an effective strategy for optimizing the time to Abx administration in cases of suspected openFx. This protocol may be implemented in other trauma centers to optimize time to Abx administration for openFx. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comparative outcomes after treatment of peri-implant, periprosthetic, and interprosthetic femur fractures: which factors increase mortality risk?

Objectives: To compare mortality rates between patients treated surgically for periprosthetic fractures (PPF) after total hip arthroplasty (THA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA), peri-implant (PI), and interprosthetic (IP) fractures while identifying risk factors associated with mortality following PPF. Design: Retrospective. Setting: Single, Level II Trauma Center. Patients/Participants: A retrospective review was conducted of 129 consecutive patients treated surgically for fractures around a pre-existing prosthesis or implant from 2013 to 2020. Patients were separated into 4 comparison groups: THA, TKA, PI, and IP fractures. Intervention: Revision implant or arthroplasty, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), intramedullary nailing (IMN), percutaneous screws, or a combination of techniques. Main Outcome Measurements: Primary outcome measures include mortality rates of different types of PPF, PI, and IP fractures at 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year postoperative. We analyzed risk factors associated with mortality aimed to determine whether treatment type affects mortality. Results: One hundred twenty-nine patients were included for final analysis. Average follow-up was similar between all groups. The overall 1-year mortality rate was 1 month (5%), 3 months (12%), 6 months (13%), 1 year (15%), and 2 years (22%). There were no differences in mortality rates between each group at 30 days, 90 days, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years (P-value = 0.86). A Kaplan-Meier survival curve demonstrated no difference in survivorship up to 2 years. Older than 65 years, history of hypothyroidism and dementia, and discharge to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) led to increased mortality. There was no survival benefit in treating patients with PPFs with either revision, ORIF, IMN, or a combination of techniques. Conclusion: The overall mortality rates observed were 1 month (5%), 3 months (12%), 6 months (13%), 1 year (15%), and 2 years (22%), and no differences were found between each group at all follow-up time points. Patients aged 65 and older with a history of hypothyroidism and/or dementia discharged to an SNF are at increased risk for mortality. From a mortality perspective, surgeons should not hesitate to choose the surgical treatment they feel most comfortable performing. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Does Perioperative Radiation Affect Implant Survivorship of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Setting of Metastatic Bone Disease?

Background: Metastatic bone disease (MBD) commonly affects the hip and surgical intervention including total hip arthroplasty (THA) is often indicated to treat the joint and improve function. Patients with metastatic cancer often receive radiotherapy, and orthopaedic oncologists must consider surgical risks with operating on irradiated bone and soft tissue. We evaluated surgical outcomes and implant survival (IS) of titanium acetabular components and femoral components in patients treated for MBD in the setting of perioperative radiation. Methods: This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent THA for MBD at 3 institutions between 2017 and 2021. Outcomes included rates of reoperation, complications, IS, and overall survival. Results: Forty-six patients who received primary THA for MBD were included in the study. Twenty patients (43.5%) received perioperative radiation for MBD. Six postoperative complications including one superficial wound infection, 2 dislocations, 2 pathologic fractures, and one aseptic acetabular component loosening led to 5 reoperations. There were no significant differences in postoperative outcomes, reoperation after THA, and IS based on radiotherapy status. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first paper evaluating primary THA outcomes and IS between patients who receive perioperative radiation for MBD to the hip and those who do not. As surgical management is a crucial part of the treatment in alleviating pain and disability in patients with MBD, we continue to recommend THA for patients who received radiation at the operative site.

No Difference in Acute Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Fix and Replace Versus Fixation Alone in the Treatment of Geriatric Acetabular Fractures.

OBJECTIVES: To compare acute outcomes between patients undergoing fix and replace (FaR) versus open-reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) alone in the treatment of geriatric acetabular fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort Study. SETTING: Single Level 2 Trauma Center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Consecutive acetabular fracture patients ≥ 55 years of age treated by two orthopaedic trauma surgeons at one tertiary care center from January 2017 to April 2022 with FaR versus ORIF were identified. Included were those with complete datasets within the 180-day global period. Excluded were patients with previous ORIF of the acetabulum or femur, or revision total hip arthroplasty. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: The primary outcomes were length of hospital stay (LOS), postoperative weight-bearing status, postoperative disposition, time to postoperative mobilization, and 90-day readmission rates. Secondary outcomes compared included demographic information, injury mechanism, surgical time, complications, revisions, and preoperative and postoperative Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS Jr.) scores. These were compared between FaR and ORIF groups. RESULTS: Seventeen FaR patients (average age 74.5 ± 9.0 years) and 11 ORIF patients (average age 69.4 ± 9.6 years) met inclusion criteria. Mean follow-up was 26.4 months (range: 6-75.6 months). More FaR group patients were ordered immediate weight-bearing as tolerated or partial weight-bearing compared with ORIF alone (70% vs. 9.0%, P = 0.03). More patients in the FaR group had pre-existing hip osteoarthritis compared with ORIF alone (71% vs. 27%, P = 0.05). Fracture classification ( P = 0.03) and Charlson Comorbidity Index ( P = 0.02) differed between the 2 groups. There were no other differences in demographics, LOS ( P = 0.99), postoperative disposition ( P = 0.54), time to postoperative mobilization ( P = 0.38), 90-day readmission rates ( P = 0.51), operative time ( P = 0.06), radiographic union ( P = 0.35), time to union ( P = 0.63), pre- ( P = 0.32) or postoperative HOOS Jr. scores ( P = 0.80), delta HOOS Jr. scores ( P = 0.28), or reoperation rates between groups ( P = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: FaR and ORIF seem to be sound treatment options in the management of geriatric acetabular fractures. Patients in the FaR group achieved immediate or partial weight-bearing earlier than the ORIF group; however, time to postoperative mobilization did not differ between the two groups. The remainder of acute postoperative outcomes (LOS, postoperative disposition, and 90-day readmission rates) did not differ between the two groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Early versus Standard Weight Bearing Following Operative Treatment of Tibial Plateau Fractures: Do We Really Have to Wait So Long?

Postoperative management of tibial plateau fractures classically involves a prolonged period between 10 and 12 weeks of nonweight bearing or partial weight bearing. In recent years, there has been some support for earlier weight-bearing protocols although this remains controversial. The goal of this study was to investigate the difference in outcomes between early weight-bearing (EWB) and traditional weight-bearing (TWB) protocols. This investigation is a retrospective review of 92 patients treated with open reduction and internal fixation of tibial plateau fractures at a single institution, from August 2018 to September 2020. Subjects were divided into EWB (< 10 weeks) and traditional nonweight bearing groups (≥ 10 weeks). Key outcome measures collected include injury classification, mechanism of injury, surgical fixation method, bone grafting, time to full weight bearing, radiographic time to union, range-of-motion, all-cause complications, and subsidence at an average follow-up time of 1 year. The EWB group had an earlier average time to weight bearing versus the TWB group (6.5 ± 1.4 vs. 11.8 ± 2.3 weeks, p < 0.0001). There was no difference in the classification of fractures treated between the two groups, with Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association B3 fractures the most common in the EWB group, and C3 fractures the most common in the TWB group. Radiographic time to union was no different between the two groups (93.5 ± 53.7 days for EWB vs. 103.7 ± 77.6 days for TWB, p = 0.49). There was no significant difference in complication rates or subsidence. Following operative treatment of tibial plateau fractures, patients who underwent a weight-bearing protocol earlier than 10 weeks were able to recover faster with similar outcomes and complications compared with patients who started weight bearing after 10 weeks or more. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Comparison of Outcomes After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients With Proximal Humerus Fractures Versus Rotator Cuff Arthropathy.

INTRODUCTION: Indications for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has expanded to encompass complex proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) in recent years. The purpose of this study was to report and assess whether PHF patients treated with rTSA could achieve similar functional outcomes and short-term survivorship to patients who underwent rTSA for rotator cuff arthropathy (RTCA). METHODS: All consecutive patients with a preoperative diagnosis of PHF or RTCA, 18 years or older, treated with rTSA at a single academic institution between 2018 and 2020 with a minimum 2-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Primary outcomes were survivorship defined as revision surgery or implant failure analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve, and functional outcomes, which included Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, and range of motion (ROM) were compared at multiple follow-up time points up to 2 years. Secondary outcomes were patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical data, length of hospital stay, and discharge disposition. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients were included: 21 patients (44%) were diagnosed with PHF and 27 patients (56%) had RTCA. The Kaplan-Meier survival rate estimates at 3 years were 90.5% in the PHF group and 85.2% in the RTCA group. No differences in revision surgery rates between the two groups (P = 0.68) or survivorship (P = 0.63) were found. ROM was significantly lower at subsequent follow-up time points in multiple planes (P < 0.05). A greater proportion of patients in the PHF group received cement for humeral implant fixation compared with the RTCA group (48% versus 7%, P = 0.002). The mean length of hospital stay was longer in PHF patients compared with RTCA patients (2.9 ± 3.8 days versus 1.6 ± 1.8 days, P = 0.13), and a significantly lower proportion of PHF patients were discharged home (67% versus 96%, P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: The rTSA implant survivorship at 3 years for both PHF and RTCA patients show comparable results. At the 2-year follow-up, RTCA patients treated with rTSA were found to have better ROM compared with PHF patients.

Assessing the Necessity of Extra Reduction Aides in Intramedullary Nailing of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures.

Purpose: This study aims to determine which intertrochanteric (IT) hip fracture and patient characteristics predict the necessity for adjunct reduction aides prior to prep and drape aiming for a more efficient surgery. Materials and Methods: Institutional fracture registries from two academic medical centers from 2017-2022 were analyzed. Data on patient demographics, comorbidities, fracture patterns identified on radiographs including displacement of the lesser trochanter (LT), thin lateral wall (LW), reverse obliquity (RO), subtrochanteric extension (STE), and number of fracture parts were collected, and the need for additional aides following traction on fracture table were collected. Fractures were classified using the AO/OTA classification. Regression analyses identified significant risk factors for needing extra reduction aides. Results: Of the 166 patients included, the average age was 80.84±12.7 years and BMI was 24.37±5.3 kg/m2. Univariate regression revealed increased irreducibility risk associated with RO (odds ratio [OR] 27.917, P≤0.001), LW (OR 24.882, P<0.001), and STE (OR 5.255, P=0.005). Multivariate analysis significantly correlated RO (OR 120.74, P<0.001) and thin LW (OR 131.14, P<0.001) with increased risk. However, STE (P=0.36) and LT displacement (P=0.77) weren't significant. Fracture types 2.2, 3.2, and 3.3 displayed elevated risk (P<0.001), while no other factors increased risk. Conclusion: Elderly patients with IT fractures with RO and/or thin LW are at higher risk of irreducibility, necessitating adjunct reduction aides. Other parameters showed no significant association, suggesting most fracture patterns can be achieved with traction manipulation alone.

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Younger Patients: A Comparable Analysis of Patients Older and Younger Than 65 Years.

INTRODUCTION: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has become a popular option for the surgical management of rotator cuff arthropathy and complex fractures of the proximal humerus. However, there is a paucity of studies evaluating outcomes, especially between patients of different age groups. The purpose of this study was to compare functional outcomes and survivorship between patients older than 65 years (o65) and those 65 years and younger (y65). METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted at a single academic medical center identifying a consecutive cohort of patients undergoing rTSA between 2018 and 2020. The minimum follow-up time was 2 years. Patients were stratified into two groups for comparative analyses (y65 and o65). Patient demographics, perioperative and postoperative data, and functional outcomes were collected. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was conducted to determine survivorship, defined as revision surgery or implant failure. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were included for final analysis. Nineteen patients comprised the y65 group while 29 patients comprised the o65 group. No difference was observed in Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores at baseline nor at the latest follow-up between the two groups. Patients in the y65 group had significantly greater internal and external rotation (IR/ER) from 3 months to 2 years compared with patients in the o65 group (P ≤ 0.05). Finally, there were no differences in revision surgery rates between the y65 group and the o65 group (11% vs. 14%, P = 1.0). A KM survival analysis revealed no difference in implant failure, necessitating revision surgery between the two groups at the latest follow-up (P = 0.69). DISCUSSION: Despite a notable difference in the number of baseline comorbidities, there were no notable differences in functional outcomes, survivorship, and revision surgery rates between each cohort. Although both groups had a similar function initially, by 3 months postoperatively, the y65 group had markedly greater range of motion in IR and ER. Longer term survivorship is needed; however, rTSA may offer a reliable option for shoulder reconstruction even in the y65 patient group.

Risk Factors for Revision Surgery Following Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Using a Hinged Knee Prosthesis for Septic and Aseptic Indications.

INTRODUCTION: The use of hinged knee replacements (HKRs) for limb salvage is a popular option for revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA). Although recent literature focuses on the outcomes of HKR for septic and aseptic RTKAs, little is reported on the risk factors of returning to the operating room. The purpose of this study was to evaluate risk factors of revision surgery and revision after receiving HKR for septic versus aseptic etiology. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective review was conducted on consecutive patients who received HKR from January 2010 to February 2020 with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Patients were separated into two groups: septic and aseptic RTKAs. Demographic, comorbidity, perioperative, postoperative, and survivorship data were collected and compared between groups. Cox hazard regression was used to identify risk factors associated with revision surgery and revision. RESULTS: One-hundred fifty patients were included. Eighty-five patients received HKR because of prior infection, and 65 received HKR for aseptic revision. A larger proportion of septic RTKA returned to the OR versus aseptic RTKA (46% vs 25%, P = 0.01). Survival curves revealed superior revision surgery-free survival favoring the aseptic group ( P = 0.002). Regression analysis revealed that HKR with concomitant flap reconstruction was associated with a three-fold increased risk of revision surgery ( P < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: HKR implantation for aseptic revision is more reliable with a lower revision surgery rate. Concomitant flap reconstruction increased the risk of revision surgery, regardless of indication for RTKA using HKR. Although surgeons must educate patients about these risk factors, HKR remains a successful treatment option for RTKA when indicated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: prognostic, level III evidence.

Are complications related to the perineal post on orthopaedic traction tables for surgical fracture fixation more common than we think? A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Traction tables have long been utilized in the management of fractures by orthopaedic surgeons. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature to determine the complications inherent to the use of a perineal post when treating femur fractures using a traction table. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. The search phrase used was "fracture" AND "perineal" AND "post" AND ("femur" OR "femoral" OR "intertrochanteric" OR "subtrochanteric"). Inclusion criteria for this review were: level of evidence (LOE) of I - IV, studies reporting on patients surgically treated for femur fractures, studies reporting on patients treated on a fracture table with a perineal post, and studies that reported the presence or absence of perineal post-related complications. The rate and duration of pudendal nerve palsy were analyzed. RESULTS: Ten studies (2 prospective and 8 retrospective studies; 2 LOE III and 8 LOE IV) were included consisting of 351 patients of which 293 (83.5%) were femoral shaft fractures and 58 (16.5%) were hip fractures. Complications associated with pudendal nerve palsies were reported in 8 studies and the mean duration of symptoms ranged between 10 and 639 days. Three studies reported a total of 11 patients (3.0%) with perineal soft tissue injury including 8 patients with scrotal necrosis and 3 patients with vulvar necrosis. All patients that developed perineal skin necrosis healed through secondary intention. No permanent complications relating to pudendal neurapraxia or soft tissue injuries were reported at final follow-up timepoints. CONCLUSION: The use of a perineal post when treating femur fractures on a fracture table poses risks for pudendal neurapraxia and perineal soft tissue injury. Post padding is mandatory and supplemental padding may also be required. Appropriate perineal skin examination prior to use is also important. Occurring at a higher rate than previously thought, appropriate post-operative examination for any genitoperineal soft tissue complications and sensory disturbances should not be ignored.

Extensor Mechanism Reconstruction After Total Knee Arthroplasty with Allograft Versus Synthetic Mesh: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Patellar and quadriceps tendon ruptures after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have historically poor outcomes. To date, there is no consensus for optimal treatment. The purpose of this study is to directly compare clinical outcomes and survivorship between allograft versus synthetic mesh for reconstruction of native extensor mechanism (EM) rupture after TKA. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective review identifying consecutive TKA patients operated between December 2009 to November 2019 was conducted. Patients aged ≥ 45 years old with native EM disruption treated with either allograft or synthetic mesh with minimum 2 year follow-up were included. Demographic information, injury mechanism, range of motion, surgical time, revision surgeries, and postoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS Jr.) were collected. Student t-tests and Fisher exact tests were used to compare the demographic data between groups. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve method was used to determine the survivorship as treatment failure was defined as postoperative EM lag >30° or revision surgery. Survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. Univariate Cox proportional hazard regression identified risk factors associated with treatment failure. RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent EM reconstruction using allograft versus 35 with synthetic mesh. Both groups had similar demographics and an average follow-up time of 3.5 years (P = 0.98). Patients treated with allograft had significantly greater postoperative flexion than patients treated with mesh (99.4 ± 9.5 allograft versus 92.6 ± 13.6 synthetic mesh, P = 0.04). Otherwise, there was no difference in postoperative outcomes between the two groups in average KOOS Jr. (P = 0.29), extensor lag (P = 0.15), graft failure (P = 0.71), revision surgery rates (P = 0.81), surgical time (P = 0.42), or ambulatory status (P = 0.34) at the most recent follow-up. Survival curve comparison also yielded no difference at up to 5-year follow-up (P = 0.48). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that reconstruction with allograft or synthetic mesh leads to similar clinical outcomes with good survivorship. Future studies, including larger randomized control trials, are required to determine the superior reconstruction method for this injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Adjunct neutralization plating in patella fracture fixation: a technical trick.

Patella fracture outcomes are positive overall; however, in some cases, traditional fixation methods result in complications, including loss of fixation and irritable hardware requiring removal. We present a technique of plate fixation that we believe has the potential to improve stability and is less offensive in more comminuted fracture patterns. Improved stability should allow unfettered advancement of rehabilitation without concern for loss of fixation. Lower profile fixation offers a potential for diminishing the presence of irritating hardware requiring removal. We present our technique for using plate fixation to augment more complex patella fracture patterns.

Direct versus indirect posterior malleolar fixation in the treatment of trimalleolar ankle fractures: Is there a difference in outcomes?

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in functional outcomes between direct and indirect surgical fixation methods of the posterior malleolus in the setting of trimalleolar fractures and identify any variables affecting patient outcomes. Methods: Primary outcomes were evaluated by PROMIS scores for short-term outcomes regarding total pain (TP) and total function (TF) comparing 40 patients with direct fixation with 77 with indirect fixation. Continuous variables were analyzed using t tests for parametric variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for nonparametric variables. Categorical variables were analyzed using a χ2 test. Univariate and multivariate linear regression models were performed to analyze factors that affect outcomes of TP and TF. Results: There was no difference in TP or TF between groups (P = 0.65 vs. P = 0.19). On univariate linear regression for TP, BMI, incidence of complication, tobacco use, and open injury showed significance in increasing pain levels with open injuries providing the greatest effect (coef = 11.8). On multivariate analysis, BMI, incidence of complication, open injury, and tourniquet time all significantly increased pain. For TF, univariate analysis showed age, BMI, incidence of complication, and diabetes to decrease function, and use of external fixator and tourniquet time increased function. In the multivariate model, increased BMI, open injuries, and increasing tourniquet time all decreased TF while use of an external fixator increased TF. Conclusion: This study showed no difference in TP and TF using the PROMIS outcome scores when comparing direct fixation versus indirect fixation under univariate and multivariate models. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic III.

Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis and Sacrum: Current Trends in Literature.

Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) and fragility fractures of the sacrum (FFS), which are emerging in the geriatric population, exhibit characteristics that differ from those of pelvic ring disruptions occurring in the younger population. Treatment of FFP/FFS by a multidisciplinary team can be helpful in reducing morbidity and mortality with the goal of reducing pain, regaining early mobility, and restoring independence for activities of daily living. Conservative treatment, including bed rest, pain therapy, and mobilization as tolerated, is indicated for treatment of FFP type I and type II as loss of stability is limited with these fractures. Operative treatment is indicated for FFP type II when conservative treatment has failed and for FFP type III and type IV, which are displaced fractures associated with intense pain and increased instability. Minimally invasive stabilization techniques, such as percutaneous fixation, are favored over open reduction internal fixation. There is little evidence regarding outcomes of patients with FFP/FFS and more literature is needed for determination of optimal management. The aim of this article is to provide a concise review of the current literature and a discussion of the latest recommendations for orthopedic treatment and management of FFP/FFS.

Deltoid ligament repair versus trans-syndesmotic fixation for bimalleolar equivalent ankle fractures.

INTRODUCTION: The role of deltoid ligament repair is controversial in the treatment of bimalleolar equivalent ankle injuries. Our purpose was to compare midterm functional outcomes and reoperation rates of unstable distal fibula fractures treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of the fibula and either deltoid ligament repair, trans-syndesmotic fixation, or combined fixation. METHODS: Skeletally mature subjects were retrospectively identified after fixation of isolated unstable distal fibula fractures treated at a single academic level 1 hospital from January 2005 to May 2019. The AAOS Foot and Ankle Module outcomes questionnaire (AAOS-FAM) was obtained at a mean time from surgery of 4.6 +/- 3.1 years. Subjects underwent one of three methods of fixation including distal fibula ORIF and one of the following: trans-syndesmotic fixation (N = 66), deltoid ligament repair (N = 16), or combined trans-syndesmotic fixation and deltoid ligament repair (N = 26). Outcomes scores and Charlson Comorbidity Index scores were compared between groups by Kruskal-Wallis testing for non-normally distributed data. Rates of reoperation were compared by Fisher's exact test. Statistical significance was set to P < 0.05 for all comparisons. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in AAOS-FAM scores between the three groups (P = 0.18). No subjects in the deltoid ligament repair group underwent reoperation compared to 17 (26%) in the trans-syndesmotic fixation group and six (23%) in the combined fixation group. The most common reason for reoperation was removal of hardware, which was performed in 12 (18%) subjects in the trans-syndesmotic fixation group and three (12%) subjects in the combined fixation group. CONCLUSIONS: Direct deltoid ligament repair yields similar functional scores and fewer reoperations compared to trans-syndesmotic fixation at midterm follow up. Deltoid ligament repair may be a favorable treatment strategy when considering trans-syndesmotic fixation in the surgical treatment of unstable distal fibula fractures.

The Effect of Obstructive Sleep Apnea on Venous Thromboembolism Risk in Patients Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a known risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE), defined as pulmonary embolism (PE) or deep vein thrombosis (DVT); however, little is known about its effect on VTE rates after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). This study sought to determine whether patients with OSA who undergo TJA are at greater risk for developing VTE versus those without OSA. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 12,963 consecutive primary TJA patients at a single institution from 2016 to 2019. Patient demographic data were collected through query of the electronic medical record, and patients with a previous history of OSA and VTE within a 90-day postoperative period were captured using the International Classification of Disease, 10th revision diagnosis and procedure codes. RESULTS: Nine hundred thirty-five patients with OSA were identified. PE (0.6% versus 0.24%, P = 0.023) and DVT (0.1% versus 0.04%, P = 0.37) rates were greater for patients with OSA. A multivariate logistic regression revealed that patients with OSA had a higher odds of PE (odds ratio [OR] 3.821, P = 0.023), but not DVT (OR 1.971, P = 0.563) when accounting for significant demographic differences. Female sex and total knee arthroplasty were also associated with a higher odds of PE (OR 3.453 for sex, P = 0.05; OR 3.243 for surgery type, P = 0.041), but not DVT (OR 2.042 for sex, P = 0.534; OR 1.941 for surgery type, P = 0.565). CONCLUSION: Female patients with OSA may be at greater risk for VTE, specifically PE, after total knee arthroplasty. More attention toward screening procedures, perioperative monitoring protocols, and VTE prophylaxis may be warranted in populations at risk.

Techniques for extensor mechanism reconstruction after total knee arthroplasty: Is there a clear winner?

Extensor mechanism (EM) disruption after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is rare, but can result in devastating outcomes for patients including inability to ambulate. Disruption can occur at the quadriceps tendon, patella, or patellar tendon. This complication can be traumatic, but is often atraumatic from an iatrogenic or degenerative etiology. Primary repair for treatment of EM disruption has led to poor results with high failure rates and has mostly been abandoned. Most commonly accepted techniques center around Achilles tendon allograft reconstruction, synthetic mesh reconstruction, or other smaller options. However, to date, there is still no consensus for the optimal EM reconstructive technique due to the heterogeneity and small sample sizes of published studies. The need to identify a consistent and effective surgical technique is paramount to restore quality of life to patients who suffer from EM disruption after TKA. The purpose of this review is to describe the osteology, vasculature, and EM of the knee, identify risk factors associated with EM disruption after TKA, outline the considerations for surgical management, as well as compare and analyze the latest contributions to the literature, in particular allograft versus synthetic mesh, in the reconstruction of the EM after TKA.