RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sagittal fractures of equine cheek teeth are commonly observed during oral examination. There are few reports on the apical and endodontic pathology associated with such fractures seen during computed tomographic (CT) examination. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to document the prevalence of CT changes indicative of apical disease in equine cheek teeth, which have suffered a sagittal fracture involving the clinical ± reserve crown. STUDY DESIGN: This study is a retrospective case series. METHODS: CT examinations of equine heads with sagittal fractures of cheek teeth present were reviewed: 81 teeth from 49 horses were identified to have a sagittal cheek tooth fracture. The images were evaluated for apical pathology including gas (in the endodontic system and periapically), widened periodontal space, periapical sclerosis, apical clubbing, cementoma/hypercementosis, lamina dura loss, associated sinusitis and sinus mucosal swelling. An apical infection grading system was created to give each tooth a score. Hounsfield units were used to measure the density of the endodontic, apical and periapical regions. The fracture length ratio was recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using a generalised estimating equation to evaluate predictors of apical infection and associations between clinical signs and CT abnormalities. RESULTS: Eighty-seven sagittal fractures (56 buccal, 17 palatal/lingual and 14 midline) from 81 teeth were recorded (74 maxillary and 7 mandibular). Apical infection was diagnosed in 73% (37/51, P = .05) of buccal, 55% (6/11, P = .07) of palatal/lingual, 100% (13/13) of midline, 100% (6/6) of multiple fractures and 96% (23/24, P = .008) of fractures involving infundibula. There was no significant relationship between apical infection and the presence of clinical signs associated with dental pathology (P = .4). There was no significant association between fracture length ratio and apical infection (P = 1.0). Midline sagittal fractures were significantly associated with sinusitis when compared with all other maxillary fractures (odds ratio [OR] 5.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.67-20.83, P = .006). Loss of the lamina dura was not significantly associated with apical infection (P = .5). MAIN LIMITATIONS: There is a maxillary cheek tooth bias in the data set and the subjective grading system. CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of fractured cheek teeth have evidence of apical infection on CT examination and therefore warrant treatment.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas , Enfermedades de los Caballos , Diente , Animales , Mejilla/patología , Fracturas Óseas/patología , Fracturas Óseas/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Caballos/patología , Caballos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/veterinaria , Diente/patologíaRESUMEN
There are risks from disease in undertaking wild animal reintroduction programmes. Methods of disease risk analysis have been advocated to assess and mitigate these risks, and post-release health and disease surveillance can be used to assess the effectiveness of the disease risk analysis, but results for a reintroduction programme have not to date been recorded. We carried out a disease risk analysis for the reintroduction of pool frogs (Pelophylax lessonae) to England, using information gained from the literature and from diagnostic testing of Swedish pool frogs and native amphibians. Ranavirus and Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis were considered high-risk disease threats for pool frogs at the destination site. Quarantine was used to manage risks from disease due to these two agents at the reintroduction site: the quarantine barrier surrounded the reintroduced pool frogs. Post-release health surveillance was carried out through regular health examinations of amphibians in the field at the reintroduction site and collection and examination of dead amphibians. No significant health or disease problems were detected, but the detection rate of dead amphibians was very low. Methods to detect a higher proportion of dead reintroduced animals and closely related species are required to better assess the effects of reintroduction on health and disease.